Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:46:46.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Periphery toward Center and Back

Scholarship on the History of Sociology, 1945–2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

By
Charles Camic
Edited by
Roger E. Backhouse  and
Philippe Fontaine
Charles Camic
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Roger E. Backhouse
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Philippe Fontaine
Affiliation:
Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Get access

Summary

Inescapably, birth order casts a long shadow over a child’s later development and interests, as social scientists who study family dynamics have often observed. Among other effects, siblings born late into large families exhibit a strong ambivalence about the history of their family: disdaining, in their resolve to chart their own path forward, dusty stories about the group’s past and yet curious, occasionally at least, about their own place in the saga of their tribe.

As latecomers to the family of the social sciences, entering a household already full of the brothers and sisters discussed in other chapters of this volume – historians, political theorists, economists, psychologists, and even anthropologists – sociologists have long shown a similar ambivalence. Typically, they have been impatient spending hours around the family hearth listening to tales about their forebears, even as their collective ancestry now and then piques their interest – especially when it appears to hold treasures that might help them on their forward journey.

Keywords

post-World War II erahistory of sociologyhistoriographic scholarshiphistorical period 1945 to 1969historical period 1970 to 1999historical period 2000 to 2012
Type
Chapter
Information
A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences , pp. 99 - 143
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew 2008. “The Traditional Future: A Computational Theory of Library Research.” College and Research Libraries 69:524–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abend, Gabriel. 2008. “The Meaning of ‘Theory’.” Sociological Theory 26:173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, Philip. 1968. The Origins of British Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Julia, Clemens, Elizabeth, and Orloff, Ann, eds. 2005. Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1982–83. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, 4 Vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., ed. 2001. Mainstream and Critical Social Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary, 8 Vols. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1965–67. Main Currents in Sociological Thought, 2 Vols. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Baehr, Peter. 2002. Founders, Classics, Canons: Modern Disputes over the Origins and Appraisal of Sociology’s Heritage. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. 1975. Condorcet: From Natural Philosophy to Social Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L., eds. 1989. Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. 1979. Social Darwinism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. 1987. Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, Robert C. 1992. “Principle, Politics, and Profession.” In Sociology Responds to Fascism, ed. Turner, Stephen P. and Kasler, Dirk. London: Routledge, 172–213.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 1985. A History of Modern Economic Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnes, Harry Elmer, ed. 1948. An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Besnard, Philippe, ed. 1983. The Sociological Domain the Durkheimians and the Founding of French Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1960. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bernard, Luther, and Bernard, Jessie. 1943. The Origins of American Sociology: The Social Science Movement in the United States. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Bierstedt, Robert. 1981. American Sociology Theory: A Critical History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blasi, Anthony, ed. 2005. Diverse Histories of American Sociology. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Bogardus, Emory S. 1922. A History of Social Thought. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomore, Tom, and Nisbet, Robert, eds. A History of Sociology Analysis. New York: Basic Books.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Trans. by Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity, trans. Nice, Richard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loic. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin. 1984. The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, Diversity, and the Rise of Sociological Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish, eds. 1991. The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W. 1966. Evolution and Society: A Study of Victorian Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1995. Critical Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig, ed. 2007. Sociology in America: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles. 1979. “The Utilitarians Revisited.” American Journal of Sociology 85:515–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles 2008–9. “The History of Sociology as a Bifocal Project.” Timelines (Newsletter of the History of Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association) 12:1–3; 14:1, 9.
Camic, Charles 2010. “How Merton Sociologizes the History of Ideas.” In Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science, ed. Calhoun, Craig. New York: Columbia University Press, 273–296.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles, and Gross, Neil. 1998. “Contemporary Developments in Sociological Theory: Current Projects and Conditions of Possibility.”Annual Review of Sociology 24:413–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont, eds. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles, and Xie, Yu. 1994. “The Statistical Turn in American Social Science: Columbia University, 1890–1915.” American Sociological Review 59:773–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capshew, James J. 1999. Psychologists on the March: Science, Practice and Professional Identity in America, 1929–1969. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Paul D. 1988. Schools as Sorters: Lewis M. Terman, Applied Psychology and the Intelligence Testing Movement, 1890–1930. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Terry N. 1973. Prophets and Patrons: The French University and the Emergence of the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collini, Stefan. 1979. Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England, 1880–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald, and Burrow, J. W.. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall 1985. Three Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Jean M. 1987. Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence, 1890 1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. (1971) 1977. Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideal in Historical and Social Context. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.Google Scholar
Cravens, Hamilton. 1978. The Triumph of Evolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, Charles. 2007. “The Changing Profile of Core Publication in the Discipline of Sociology.” Unpublished Paper.
Curti, Merle. 1980. Human Nature in American Thought. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Danziger, Kurt. 1990. Constructing the Subject: Historical Origins of Psychological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1979. “Sociology at Nebraska: 1884–1929.” Journal of the History of Sociology 1:40–41.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1983. “Sociology at Wellesley College: 1900–1919.” Journal of the History of Sociology 5:91.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1960. Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of Sociology, trans. Manheim, Ralf. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., with Curelaru, M.. 1976. The Form of Sociology: Paradigms and Crises. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1995. A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan, and Severance, Janet S.. 1985. “Great Men and Hard Times: Sociology at the University of Minnesota.” Sociological Quarterly 26:117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrichs, Robert W. 1970. A Sociology of Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Furner, Mary O. 1975. Advocacy and Objectivity: A Crisis in the Professionalization of American Social Science, 1865–1905. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Galliher, John F. 1995. Marginality and Dissent in Twentieth-Century American Sociology: The Case of Elizabeth Briant Lee and Alfred McClung Lee. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1971. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Betty, John, and Kruger, Lorenz. 1989. The Empire of Change: How Probability Changes Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Grimmer-Solem, Erik. 2003. The Rise of Historical Economics and Social Reform in Germany, 1864–1894. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984–1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 Vols., trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1995. Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Science of Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. 1977. The Emergence of Professional Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1976. Enlightenment and Despair: A History of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Michael R. 2005. Centennial Bibliography on the History of American Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Roscoe C. 1980. Founding Theory of American Sociology, 1881–1915. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Roscoe C. 1994. Developments in American Sociology Theory, 1915–1950. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Hinkle, Roscoe C., and Hinkle, Gisela J.. 1954. The Development of Modern Sociology, Its Nature and Growth in the United States. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Floyd Nelson. 1936. The Development of Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. Stuart. 1958. Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought, 1890–1930. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Igo, Sarah E. 2007. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1973. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1985. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans 2003. War and Modernity.Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Joas, Hans, and Knobl, Wolfgang. 2009. Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Guy Benton, and Johnson, Guron Griffs. 1980. Research in Service to Society: The First Fifty Years of the Institute for Research in Social Science at the University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Barry V. 1995. Pitirim A. Sorokin: An Intellectual Biography. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Robert Alun. 1977. “On Understanding a Sociological Classic.” American Journal of Sociology 83:279–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Robert Alun 1983. “The New History of Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:447–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, David Patrick, and Galliher, John F.. 2000. Confronting the Drug Control Establishment: Alfred Lindesmith as a Public Intellectual. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kivisto, Peter, ed. 1988. Illuminating Social Life: Classical and Contemporary Theory Revisited. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Kivisto, Peter 1997. Social Theory: Roots and Branches. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James T. 1986. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Henrika. 1991. The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 1973. Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School, 1922–1972. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam 1988. The Invention of Primitive Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laslett, Barbara. 1990. “Unfeeling Knowledge: Emotion and Objectivity in the History of Sociology.” Sociological Forum 5:413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemert, Charles, ed. 1993. Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classical Readings. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Lengermann, Patricia Madoo. 1979. “The Founding of the American Sociological Review: The Anatomy of a Rebellion.” American Sociology Review 44:185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf. 1988. Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N. 1995. Visions of the Sociology Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. David, and Smith, Richard L.. 1980. American Sociology and Pragmatism: Mead, Chicago Sociology, and Symbolic Interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Stephen. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1971. History, Man, and Reason. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, Don. 1960. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Martindale, Don 1980. “The Golden Age of Minnesota Sociology, 1921–1930.” Journal of the History of Sociology 2:35–60.Google Scholar
Matthews, Fred H. 1977. Quest for an American Sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago School. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Terrence J., ed. 1996. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGonigal, Kathryn, and Galliher, John F.. 2005. Mabel Agnes Elliott: Pioneering Feminist, Pacifist Sociologist. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McGuire, Patrick, and Dawes, Denneth. 1983. “Sociology as Social Contribution: University of North Dakota as a Case Study of the Contradiction of American Sociology.” Sociology Quarterly 24:589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1949/1957) 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure, enlarged ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1990. The History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Delbert C.One Hundred Years: The History of Sociology at Indiana University, 1885–1995. Bloomington: Department of Sociology, Indiana University.
Nichols, Lawrence T. 1992. “The Establishment of Sociology at Harvard.” In Science at Harvard University, ed. Elliott, Clark A. and Rossiter, Margaret W.. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 191–222.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert A. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Novick, Peter. 1988. That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Professions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony, ed. 1972. The Establishment of Empirical Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, John M. 1985. The Origins of Behaviorism: American Psychology, 1870–1920. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Odum, Howard W., ed. 1927. American Masters of Social Science. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E., and Burgess, Ernest. (1921) 1969. An Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pels, Richard H. 1973. Radical Visions and American Dreams. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Alton, and VanAntwerpen, Jonathan. 2007. “Histories of American Sociology: Readings and Resources.” In Sociology in America: A History, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 733–738.Google Scholar
Pickering, Mary. 1993. Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Jennifer. 1996. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920–1960. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer 1998. History of ISA, 1948–1997. International Sociological Association.
Platt, Jennifer 2003. The British Sociological Association: A Sociological History. Durham, UK: Sociologypress.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer 2009. “Work on the History of Subfields.” Timelines (Newsletter of the History of Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association) 16:7–9.Google Scholar
Platt, Jennifer 2010. “Sociology.” In The History of the Social Sciences since 1945, ed. Backhouse, Roger E. and Fontaine, Philippe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore, and Ross, Dorothy, eds. 2003. The Modern Social Sciences. Vol. 7 of The Cambridge History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rhoades, Lawrence J. 1981. A History of the American Sociology Association, 1905–1980. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
Ricci, David M. 1984. The Tragedy of Policy Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George. 1983. Sociological Theory. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George, ed. 2003. The Blackwell Companion to Major Classical Social Theorists. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1998. Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1972. G. Stanley Hall: The Psychologist as Prophet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, Axel R. 2000. American Progressives and German Social Reform, 1875–1920. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond. 1985. Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884–1984. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven. 1983. Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, Edwin R. A., ed. 1930–35. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1970. “Tradition, Ecology, and Institution in the History of Sociology.” Daedalus 99:760–825.Google Scholar
Sica, Alan. 1983. “Sociology at the University of Kansas, 1889–1993.” Sociological Quarterly 24:605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sica, Alan 2007. “Defining Disciplinary Identity: The Historiography of U.S. Sociology.” In Sociology in America: A History, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sica, Alan, and Turner, Stephen, eds. 2005. A Disobedient Generation: Social Theorists in the Sixties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sills, David, ed. 1968. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 17 Vols. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sills, David 1979. Biographical Supplement. Vol. 18 of the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sills, David, and Merton, Robert K., eds. 1990. Social Science Quotations: Who Said What, When, and Where. Vol. 19 of the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sklansky, Jeffrey P. 2002. The Soul’s Economy: Market Society and Selfhood in American Thought, 1820–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Small, Albion. 1905. General Sociology: An Exposition of the Main Development in Sociological Theory from Spencer to Ratzenhofer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Small, Albion 1924. Origins of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J., and Baltes, Paul B.. 2001. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 26 Vols. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Smith, Laurence. 1986. Behaviorism and Logical Positivism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark C. 1994. Social Science in the Crucible: The American Debate over Objectivity and Purpose, 1918–1941. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitirim. 1928. Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, George. 2005. “Scientific Authority and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Plausibility of Positivism in U.S. Sociology since 1945.” In The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences, ed. Steinmetz, George. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 275–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, George 2007. “American Sociology before and after World War II: The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field.” In Sociology in America: A History, ed. Calhoun, Craig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 314–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, Stephen. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. 1987. Victorian Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. 1995. After Tylor. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 1991. Schumpeter: A Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. 1974. The Structure of Sociological Theory. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P. 1991. “The World of Academic Quantifiers: The Columbia University Family and its Connections.” In The Social Survey in Historical Perspective, 1880–1940, ed. Bulmer, Martin, Bales, Kevin, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 291–315.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen P., and Turner, Jonathan H.. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vidich, Authur J., and Lyman, Stanford M.. 1985. American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religions and Their Directions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter. 2001. A History and Theory of the Social Sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and Society, trans. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. New York: Bedminister Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yonay, Yuval P. 1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economics in America between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Harriet. 2010. “On Sociological Semantics as an Evolving Research Program,” In Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science, ed. Calhoun, Craig. New York: Columbia University Press, 253–275.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×