6 - Contested Identities
The History of Economics since 1945
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014
Summary
In 2007, when the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) proposed a new classification in which “history of economic thought” was moved from “economics” to “history, archeology, religion and philosophy,” some in the field were up in arms, protesting that this amounted to its destruction (see Kates and Millmow 2008a, b). As most Australian historians of economics are affiliated to economics departments, this change threatened to render their research worthless within their institutions. However, their reaction also reflected a belief that what they were doing fell under the jurisdiction of economics and that it could not therefore be considered a form of the history and philosophy of science.
This episode and others like it point to an identity problem: Most historians of economics are trained as economists and think of themselves as such, but the remainder of the economics profession cannot see the significance of the history of economics for what they are doing. Some historians of economics, such as those who challenged the ABS reclassification, are committed to trying to change this situation while others contend that what they do is a form of history and accordingly feel less concerned about economists’ lack of interest.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Historiography of the Modern Social Sciences , pp. 183 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
. 2008. Soldiers of Reason: The Rand Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1996. “Vision and Progress in Economic Thought: Schumpeter after Kuhn.” In Joseph A. Schumpeter: Historian of Economics, ed. . London: Routledge, 21–32.Google Scholar
2007. “Lives in Synopsis: The Production and Use of Short Biographies by Historians of Economics.” In Life Writing and the History of Economics, ed. and . Annual Supplement to Volume 39 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2008. “John Maynard Keynes: Recent Developments.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. and . London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
and , eds. 2010a. The Unsocial Social Science? Economics and Neighboring Disciplines since 1945. Annual Supplement to Volume 42 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
and , 2010b. The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1985. New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists and American Economic Policy, 1921–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996. Designs within Disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Economists, and the Shaping of American Economic Policy, 1933–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002. “Sitting on a Log with Adam Smith: The Future of the History of Economic Thought at the Liberal Arts Colleges.” In The Future of the History of Economics, ed. . Annual Supplement to Volume 34 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1990. “On the Historiography of Economics,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12.1:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001. “No History of Ideas, Please, We’re Economists,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15.1:145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1953. “Graduate Education in Economics,” American Economic Review 43.4 (Part 2): ii–xv and 1–223.Google Scholar
. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1983. That Noble Science of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Hobson and Imperialism: Radicalism, New Liberalism, and Finance 1887–1938. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Introduction: Doctrines, Disciplines, Discourses, Departments,” Critical Inquiry 35.4:729–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969a. “Is There a ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ in Economics?” Kyklos 22.2:289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969b. “Research Priorities in the History of Economics,” History of Political Economy 1.1:9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1996. The Post-1945 Internationalization of Economics. Annual Supplement to volume 28 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
et al. 1945. General Education in a Free Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1975. “Should Economists Abandon HOPE?” History of Political Economy 7.2:252–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. Wealth and Welfare: An Economic and Social History of Britain, 1851–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1998. “Introduction.” In New Economics and Its History, ed. . Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 1–9.Google Scholar
, ed. 1993. Non-Natural Social Science: Reflecting on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light. Annual Supplement to Volume 25 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
, and , eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
, and . 2014. Finding Equilibrium: Arrow, Debreu and McKenzie and the Problem of Scientific Credit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Entrenching Disciplinary Competence: The Role of General Education and Graduate Study in Chicago Economics.” In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, ed. and . Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2009. Know Your Enemy: The Rise and Fall of America’s Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “HES Presidential Address: What’s Wrong with Economics?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34.1:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. London Macmillan. Trans. from Naissance de la biopolitique: Cours au Collège de France. 1978–1979. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1956. “The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement.” In Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, ed. . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
General Education in a Free Society. 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
, and . 1909. Histoire des doctrines économiques depuis les Physiocrates jusqu’à nos jours. Paris: Larose and Tenin.Google Scholar
, , and 2008. “History of Economic Thought.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, ed. and , 2nd ed., Vol. 4. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 48–57.Google Scholar
1965. “The Role of the History of Economic Thought in the Understanding of Modern Economic Theory,” American Economic Review 55.1/2:119–127.Google Scholar
2012. “Agonies of the Real: Anti-Realism from Kuhn to Foucault,” Modern Intellectual History 9.1:127–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1954. The Behavioral Sciences at Harvard: Report by a Faculty Committee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1976 (1993). “The History of Thought in the Development of the Chicago Paradigm.” In The Chicago School of Political Economy, ed. . New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar
and . 2010. “‘Introduction’ to Focus: New Perspectives on Science and the Cold War,” Isis 101.2:362–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and , eds. 1983. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1974. “Historians and Economists: Perspectives on the Development of American Economic Thought,” History of Political Economy 6.4:454–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1987. La Mano Invisibile: L’equilibrio economico nella storia della scienza. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
, and 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science, trans. . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1996. Out of the Blue Yonder: The RAND Corporation’s Diversification into Social Welfare Research, 1946–1968. PhD Dissertation, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
1971. The Keynesian Revolution and the Monetarist Counter-revolution,” American Economic Review 61.2:1–14.Google Scholar
, and . 2008a. “The History Wars of Economics: The Classification Struggle in the History of Economic Thought,” History of Economics Review 47 (Winter):110–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2008b. “A Canary in the Coalmine: The Near Death Experience of the History of Economics in Australia,” History of Economic Ideas 16.3:79–94. (This article is followed by five comments and a reply.)Google Scholar
. 2006. “Whither the History of Economic Thought? Going Nowhere Rather Slowly?” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13.4:463–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. “Hawtrey, Harvard, and the Origins of the Chicago Tradition,” Journal of Political Economy 101.6:1068–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1976. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. “Reading Cournot, Reading Nash: the Creation and Stabilisation of the Nash Equilibrium,” Economic Journal 104.424:492–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995. “From Parlor Games to Social Science: von Neumann, Morgenstern and the Creation of Game Theory, 1928–1944,” Journal of Economic Literature 33.2:730–761.Google Scholar
2010. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory: From Chess to Social Science, 1900–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “Are There Limits to the Past in the History of Economic Thought,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13.2:134–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2002. “Economics as History of Economics: The Italian Case in Retrospect.” In The Future of the History of Economics, ed. . Annual Supplement to Volume 34 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction. Cambridge, MA, and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1998. Charlatans or Saviours? The British Economics Profession from Marshall to Meade. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
. 1989 (1991). More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. What Were von Neumann and Morgenstern Trying to Accomplish?” In Toward a History of Game Theory, ed. . Annual Supplement to Volume 24 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and , eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual Supplement to Volume 30 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Two Cultures Controversy: Science, Literature and Cultural Politics in Postwar Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. “The Chicago Tradition, the Quantity Theory, and Friedman,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1.1:46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976. Keynes’s Monetary Thought: A Study of Its Development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 1902. Review of Theories of Value before Adam Smith, by A. R. Sewall. Economic Journal 12.47:374–375.
. 2008. The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1974. “The History of Economic Thought as Intellectual History,” History of Political Economy 6.3:305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy,” Journal of Economic Literature 16.4:1415–34.Google Scholar
1987. “Out of the Closet: A Program for the Whig History of Economic Science,” History of Economics Society Bulletin 9.1:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science,” History of Political Economy 24.1:187–203.CrossRef
" 2002. “Coming Together: History of Economics as History of Science.” In The Future of the History of Economics., ed. . Annual Supplement to Volume 34 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
1992. John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 2: Economist as Saviours, 1920–1937. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
1976. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and , eds. 2012. Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. Economists’ Papers, 1750–1950: A Guide to Archive and Other Manuscript Sources for the History of British and Irish Economic Thought. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008. Free Trade Nation: Commerce, Consumption and Civil Society in Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1944. Petite Histoire des grandes doctrines économiques, rev. ed. Paris: Génin, 1985.Google Scholar
2002. “The ‘Sussex School’ and the History of Economic Thought: British Intellectual History, 1750–1950,” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 9.3:452–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. “Introduction.” In Toward a History of Game Theory. ed. E. Roy Weintraub. Annual Supplement to Volume 24 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
1999. “How Should we Write the History of Twentieth-century Economics?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15.4: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002a. The Future of the History of Economic Thought. (Annual Supplement to Volume 34 of History of Political Economy). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
2002b. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007. “Economic Science Wars,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29.3: 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 1998. “Archiving the History of Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 36.3: 1496–1501.Google Scholar
1964. “What Price the History of Economic Thought?” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 11.3:193–204.Google Scholar
2000. “Does Progress Matter?” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7.4:465–84.
2009. Intellectual History and the History of Economic Thought: A Personal View, Working paper, Sussex Center for Intellectual History.
1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10
- Cited by