Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T14:11:20.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 57 - Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes (Content last reviewed: 20th February 2020)

from Section 6 - Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

By
Christine Willekes
Edited by
David James ,
Philip Steer ,
Carl Weiner ,
Bernard Gonik  and
Stephen Robson
David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

Term prelabor rupture of the membranes (PROM) is defined as spontaneous rupture of the membranes at 37 weeks of gestation before the onset of contractions. Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM) is defined as spontaneous rupture of the membranes at less than 37 weeks of gestation, at least 1 hour before the onset of contractions.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
 , pp. 1654 - 1673
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

World Health Organization. WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977; 56: 247–53.Google Scholar
Cox, SM, Williams, ML, Leveno, KJ. The natural history of preterm ruptured membranes: what to expect of expectant management. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 558–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, RS, Blanco, JD. Premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 671–9.Google Scholar
Mercer, BM, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes through clinical findings and ancillary testing. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 738–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steer, P The epidemiology of preterm labour. BJOG 2005; 112 (Suppl 1): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furman, B, Shoham-Vardi, I, Bashiri, A, Erez, O, Mazor, M. Clinical significance and outcome of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 92: 209–16.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, RL, Nelson, KG, Davis, RO, Koski, J. Delay in delivery: influence of gestational age and the duration of delay on perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 480–4.Google Scholar
Mercer, BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 178–93.Google Scholar
NVOGNet. Breken van de vliezen voor het begin van de baring 2002. http://nvog-documenten.nl/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/pagina.php&fSelectTG_62=75&fSelectedSub=62&fSelectedParent=75 (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Romero, R, Espinoza, J, Kusanovic, JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006; 113 (Suppl 3): 17–42.Google Scholar
Tita, AT, Andrews, WW. Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol 2010; 37: 339–54.Google Scholar
Waters, TP, Mercer, BM. The management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes near the limit of fetal viability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 230–40.Google Scholar
Romero, R, Kusanovic, JP, Chaiworapongsa, T, Hassan, SS. Placental bed disorders in preterm labor, preterm PROM, spontaneous abortion and abruptio placentae. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 25: 313–27.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denzler, A, Burkhardt, T, Natalucci, G, Zimmermann, R. Latency after preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes: increased risk for periventricular leukomalacia. J Pregnancy 2014; 2014: 874984.Google Scholar
Manuck, TA, Maclean, CC, Silver, RM, Varner, MW. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: does the duration of latency influence perinatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 414.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melamed, N, Ben-Haroush, A, Pardo, J, et al. Expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes: is it all about gestational age? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 48.e1–8.Google Scholar
Lee, T, Silver, H. Etiology and epidemiology of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Clin Perinatol 2001; 28: 721–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Naeye, RL. Factors that predispose to premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 93–8.Google Scholar
Iams, JD, Romero, R, Culhane, JF, Goldenberg, RL. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 164–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumley, J, Chamberlain, C, Dowswell, T, et al. Interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3): CD001055.Google Scholar
Lockwood, CJ, Kuczynski, E. Risk stratification and pathological mechanisms in preterm delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15 (Suppl 2): 78–89.Google Scholar
Manuck, TA, Esplin, MS, Biggio, J, et al. The phenotype of spontaneous preterm birth: application of a clinical phenotyping tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 487.e1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaisbuch, E, Hassan, SS, Mazaki-Tovi, S, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 433.e1–8.Google Scholar
Berghella, V. Novel developments on cervical length screening and progesterone for preventing preterm birth. BJOG 2009; 116: 182–7.Google Scholar
Meis, PJ, Klebanoff, M, Thom, E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, DF, Major, CA, Towers, CV, et al. Effects of digital vaginal examinations on latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 630–4.Google Scholar
Alexander, JM, Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, et al. The impact of digital cervical examination on expectantly managed preterm rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1003–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, ML, McElin, TW. Diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes. Clinical study and review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 104: 544–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Ham, DP, van Teeffelen, AS, Mol, BW. Prelabour rupture of membranes: overview of diagnostic methods. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 24: 408–12.Google Scholar
Abdelazim, IA, Makhlouf, HH. Placental alpha microglobulin-1 (AmniSure test) versus insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (Actim PROM test) for detection of premature rupture of fetal membranes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 1129–36.Google Scholar
Sosa, CG, Herrera, E, Restrepo, JC, Strauss, A, Alonso, J. Comparison of placental alpha microglobulin-1 in vaginal fluid with intra-amniotic injection of indigo carmine for the diagnosis of rupture of membranes. J Perinat Med 2014; 42: 611–16.Google Scholar
Lee, SM, Romero, R, Park, JW, et al. The clinical significance of a positive Amnisure test in women with preterm labor and intact membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 1690–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Palacio, M, Kühnert, M, Berger, R, Larios, CL, Marcellin, L. Meta-analysis of studies on biochemical marker tests for the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: comparison of performance indexes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, PS, Lieman, JM, Brumfield, CG, Carlo, W. Chorioamnionitis increases neonatal morbidity in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1162–6.Google Scholar
van de Laar, R, van der Ham, DP, Oei, SG, et al. Accuracy of C-reactive protein determination in predicting chorioamnionitis and neonatal infection in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 147: 124–9.Google Scholar
Trochez-Martinez, RD, Smith, P, Lamont, RF. Use of C-reactive protein as a predictor of chorioamnionitis in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: a systematic review. BJOG 2007; 114: 796–801.Google Scholar
Genc, MR, Ford, CE. The clinical use of inflammatory markers during pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 22: 116–21.Google Scholar
Mercer, BM, Crouse, DT, Goldenberg, RL, Miodovnik, M, Mapp, DC, Meis, PJ, et al. The antibiotic treatment of PPROM study: systemic maternal and fetal markers and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 145.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenyon, S, Boulvain, M, Neilson, J. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (12): CD001058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, JE, Pang, J, Knight, DB, Liggins, GC. Do antenatal corticosteroids help in the setting of preterm rupture of membranes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 131–9.Google Scholar
Roberts, D, Dalziel, S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3): CD004454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onland, W, de Laat, MW, Mol, BW, Offringa, M. Effects of antenatal corticosteroids given prior to 26 weeks’ gestation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 33–44.Google Scholar
Wapner, R, Jobe, AH. Controversy: antenatal steroids. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 529–45.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, McKinlay, CJ, Middleton, P, Harding, JE. Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (6): CD003935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garite, TJ, Kurtzman, J, Maurel, K, Clark, R. Impact of a “rescue course” of antenatal corticosteroids: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 248.e1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MJ, Davies, J, Guinn, D, et al. Single versus weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 274–81.Google Scholar
Brookfield, KF, El-Sayed, YY, Chao, L, et al. Antenatal corticosteroids for preterm premature rupture of membranes: single or repeat course? Am J Perinatol 2015; 32: 537–44.Google Scholar
Brownfoot, FC, Gagliardi, DI, Bain, E, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA. Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (8): CD006764.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin No. 139: Premature rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 918–30.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, Aghajafari, F, Askie, LM, et al. Repeat prenatal corticosteroid prior to preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis for the PRECISE study group (prenatal repeat corticosteroid international IPD study group: assessing the effects using the best level of evidence) – study protocol. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 12. doi: 10.1186/2046–4053-1–12.Google Scholar
Kenyon, SL, Taylor, DJ, Tarnow-Mordi, W. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for preterm, prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: the ORACLE I randomised trial. ORACLE Collaborative Group. Lancet 2001; 357: 979–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Mercer, BM, Miodovnik, M, Thurnau, GR, et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. JAMA 1997; 278: 989–95.Google Scholar
Hannah, M Antibiotics for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and preterm labour? Lancet 2001; 357: 973–4.Google Scholar
Kenyon, S, Pike, K, Jones, DR, et al. Childhood outcomes after prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with preterm rupture of the membranes: 7-year follow-up of the ORACLE I trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 1310–18.Google Scholar
Tan, S, Holliman, R, Russell, AR. Hazards of widespread use of erythromycin for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Lancet 2003; 361: 437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, AR, Steer, PJ. Antibiotics in preterm labour: the ORACLE speaks. Lancet 2008; 372: 1276–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackeen, AD, Seibel-Seamon, J, Muhammad, J, Baxter, JK, Berghella, V. Tocolytics for preterm premature rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (2): CD007062.Google Scholar
Garite, TJ, Keegan, KA, Freeman, RK, Nageotte, MP. A randomized trial of ritodrine tocolysis versus expectant management in patients with premature rupture of membranes at 25 to 30 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 388–93.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Renk, K, Klugman, M. The therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aggressive tocolysis for premature labor associated with premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 216–22.Google Scholar
Crowther, CA, Hiller, JE, Doyle, LW, Haslam, RR. Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 2669–76.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Hirtz, DG, Thom, E, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S, Rouse, D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD004661.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Gibbins, KJ. Magnesium sulfate for cerebral palsy prevention. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37: 414–16.Google Scholar
Vergani, P, Locatelli, A, Strobelt, N, et al. Amnioinfusion for prevention of pulmonary hypoplasia in second-trimester rupture of membranes. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 325–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Teeffelen, S, Pajkrt, E, Willekes, C, Van Kuijk, SM, Mol, BW. Transabdominal amnioinfusion for improving fetal outcomes after oligohydramnios secondary to preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before 26 weeks. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (8): CD009952.Google Scholar
Roberts, D, Vause, S, Martin, W, et al. Amnioinfusion in very early preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (AMIPROM): pregnancy, neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomized controlled pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 490–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Teeffelen, AS, van der Ham, DP, Willekes, C, et al. Midtrimester preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM): expectant management or amnioinfusion for improving perinatal outcomes (PPROMEXIL-III trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014; 14: 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kempen, LEM, van Teeffelen, AS, de Ruigh, AA, et al. Amnioinfusion compared with no intervention in women with second-trimester rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: 129–36. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003003.Google Scholar
van der Heyden, JL, van der Ham, DP, van Kuijk, S, et al. Outcome of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes before 27 weeks’ gestation: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 125–30.Google Scholar
Laudy, JA, Wladimiroff, JW. The fetal lung. 2: Pulmonary hypoplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 482–94.Google Scholar
Laudy, JA, Wladimiroff, JW. The fetal lung. 1: Developmental aspects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 284–90.Google Scholar
van Teeffelen, AS, van der Ham, DP, Oei, SG, et al. The accuracy of clinical parameters in the prediction of perinatal pulmonary hypoplasia secondary to midtrimester prelabour rupture of fetal membranes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 148: 3–12.Google Scholar
van Teeffelen, AS, Van Der Heijden, J, Oei, SG, et al. Accuracy of imaging parameters in the prediction of lethal pulmonary hypoplasia secondary to mid-trimester prelabor rupture of fetal membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39: 495–9.Google Scholar
Lewis, DF, Robichaux, AG, Jaekle, RK, et al. Expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes and nonvertex presentation: what are the risks? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 566.e1–5.Google Scholar
Al-Mandeel, H, Alhindi, MY, Sauve, R. Effects of intentional delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 28 and 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 83–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, SL, Crowther, CA, Levett, KM, Middleton, P, Morris, J. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks’ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (3): CD004735.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes. Green-top Guideline No. 44. London: RCOG, 2006 (minor amendment October 2010). https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_44.pdf (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
van der Ham, DP, Nijhuis, JG, Mol, BW, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks (the PPROMEXIL-trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007; 7: 11.Google Scholar
van der Ham, DP, van der Heyden, JL, Opmeer, BC, et al. Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL-2 trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 276.e1–10.Google Scholar
Tajik, P, van der Ham, DP, Zafarmand, MH, et al. Using vaginal Group B Streptococcus colonisation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes to guide the decision for immediate delivery: a secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials. BJOG 2014; 121: 1263–72.Google Scholar
Morris, JM, Roberts, CL, Bowen, JR, et al.; PPROMT Collaboration. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016: 387: 444–52.Google Scholar
Quist-Nelson, J, de Ruigh, AA, Seidler, AL, et al. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management in late preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131: 269–79. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002447.Google Scholar
van der Heyden, JL, Willekes, C, van Baar, AL, et al. Behavioural and neurodevelopmental outcome of 2-year-old children after preterm premature rupture of membranes: follow-up of a randomised clinical trial comparing induction of labour and expectant management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 94: 17–23.Google Scholar
Teune, MJ, Bakhuizen, S, Gyamfi Bannerman, C, et al. A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 374.e1–9.Google Scholar
Hannah, ME, Ohlsson, A, Farine, D, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1005–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodnett, ED, Hannah, ME, Weston, JA, et al. Women’s evaluations of induction of labor versus expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TermPROM Study Group. Birth 1997; 24: 214–20.Google Scholar
Ottervanger, HP, Keirse, MJ, Smit, W, Holm, JP. Controlled comparison of induction versus expectant care for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. J Perinat Med 1996; 24: 237–42.Google Scholar
Gafni, A, Goeree, R, Myhr, TL, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM Study Group. Term Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes. CMAJ 1997; 157: 1519–25.Google Scholar
Dare, MR, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA, Flenady, VJ, Varatharaju, B. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (1): CD005302.Google Scholar
Wojcieszek, AM, Stock, OM, Flenady, V. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10): CD001807.Google Scholar
Fox, NS, Chervenak, FA. Cervical cerclage: a review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008; 63: 58–65.Google Scholar
Treadwell, MC, Bronsteen, RA, Bottoms, SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 555–8.Google Scholar
Galyean, A, Garite, TJ, Maurel, K, et al. Removal versus retention of cerclage in preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 399.e1–7.Google Scholar
Walsh, J, Allen, VM, Colford, D, Allen, AC. Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes with cervical cerclage: a review of perinatal outcomes with cerclage retention. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 448–52.Google Scholar
Giraldo-Isaza, MA, Berghella, V. Cervical cerclage and preterm PROM. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54: 313–20.Google Scholar
Pergialiotis, V, Gkioka, E, Bakoyiannis, I, et al. Retention of cervical cerclage after preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a critical appraisal. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 291: 745–53.Google Scholar
Wong, LF, Holmgren, CM, Silver, RM, Varner, MW, Manuck, TA. Outcomes of expectantly managed pregnancies with multiple gestations and preterm premature rupture of membranes prior to 26 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 215.e1–9.Google Scholar
Manuck, TA, Eller, AG, Esplin, MS, et al. Outcomes of expectantly managed preterm premature rupture of membranes occurring before 24 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 29–37.Google Scholar
Ehsanipoor, RM, Arora, N, Lagrew, DC, Wing, DA, Chung, JH. Twin versus singleton pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 658–61.Google Scholar
Chapman, E, Reveiz, L, Illanes, E, Bonfill, CospX. Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (12): CD010976.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×