Book contents
- Heidegger on Logic
- Heidegger on Logic
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Method of Citation
- Introduction
- Part I Normativity, the Phenomenology of Assertions, and Productive Logic
- Part II Language, Logic, and Nonsense
- Part III Paradox, the Prospects for Ontology, and Beyond
- Part IV Logical Principles and the Question of Being
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2022
Book contents
- Heidegger on Logic
- Heidegger on Logic
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Method of Citation
- Introduction
- Part I Normativity, the Phenomenology of Assertions, and Productive Logic
- Part II Language, Logic, and Nonsense
- Part III Paradox, the Prospects for Ontology, and Beyond
- Part IV Logical Principles and the Question of Being
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Heidegger on Logic , pp. 259 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Primary Sources
Heidegger, Martin. Gesamtausgabe. 102 vols. Edited by Hermann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von, Trawny, Peter et al. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1975– (as of 2022, only volumes 72, 92, and 93 have not been published).Google Scholar
Sein und Zeit. Translated as Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Frühe Schriften.Google Scholar
Sein und Zeit. For translation, see SZ above.Google Scholar
Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Translated as Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Translated by Richard Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Holzwege. Translated as Off the Beaten Track. Translated and edited by Young, Julian and Haynes, Kenneth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Vorträge und Aufsätze.Google Scholar
Was heisst Denken? Translated as What Is Called “Thinking”? Translated by Fred D. Wieck and J. Glenn Gray. New York: Harper & Row, 1976.Google Scholar
Wegmarken. Translated as Pathmarks. Edited by McNeil, William. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Der Satz vom Grund. Translated as The Principle of Reason. Translated by Reginald Lilly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Identität und Differenz. Edited by Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2006.Google Scholar
Unterwegs zur Sprache. Translated as On the Way to Language. Translated by Peter D. Hertz. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1982.Google Scholar
Aus der Erfahrung des Denkens.Google Scholar
Zur Sache des Denkens. Translated as On Time and Being. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1972.Google Scholar
Seminare. Translated as Seminars. Translated by Andrew J. Mitchell and François Raffoul. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Reden und andere Zeugnisse eines Lebensweges.Google Scholar
Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Translated as Introduction to Phenomenological Research. Translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie. Translated as Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy. Translated by Robert D. Metcalf and Mark B. Tanzer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Platon: Sophistes. Translated as Plato’s Sophist. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Translated as History of the Concept of Time. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit. Translated as Logic: The Question of Truth. Translated by Thomas Sheehan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Grundbegriffe der antiken Philosophie. Translated as Basic Concepts of Ancient Philosophy. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Geschichte der Philosophie von Thomas v. Aquin bis Kant.Google Scholar
Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Translated as Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Phänomenologische Interpretation von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Translated as Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Translated as The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Translated by Michael Heim. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Einleitung in die Philosophie.Google Scholar
Der Deutsche Idealismus (Fichte, Hegel, Schelling) und die philosophische Problemlage der Gegenwart.Google Scholar
Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit. Translated as The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Translated by William McNeill and N. Walker. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Vom Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie. Translated as The Essence of Human Freedom. Translated by Ted Sadler. London: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar
Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Translated as Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Aristoteles: Metaphysik IX. Translated as Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta 1–3: On the Essence and Actuality of Force. Translated by Walter Brogan and Peter Warnek. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Vom Wesen der Wahrheit. Zu Platons Höhlengleichnis und Theätet. Translated as The Essence of Truth: On Plato’s Cave Allegory and Theaetetus. Translated by Ted Sadler. New York: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar
Sein und Wahrheit. Translated as Being and Truth. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Logik als die Frage nach dem Wesen der Sprache. Translated as Logic as the Question Concerning the Essence of Language. Translated by Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Unna. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hölderlins Hymnen “Germanien” und “Der Rhein.” Translated as Hölderlin’s Hymns “Germania” and “The Rhine.” Translated by William McNeill and Julia Ireland. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Einführung in die Metaphysik. Translated as Introduction to Metaphysics. Translated by Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Die Frage nach dem Ding. Translated as The Question Concerning the Thing. Translated by Benjamin Crowe and James Reid. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.Google Scholar
Grundfragen der Philosophie. Ausgewählte “Probleme” der “Logik.” Translated as The Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected “Problems” of “Logic.” Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zur Auslegung von Nietzsches II. Unzeitgemässe Betrachtung. Translated as Interpretation of Nietzsche’s Second Untimely Meditation. Translated by Ullrich Haase and Mark Sinclair. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hölderlins Hymne “Andenken.” Translated as Hölderlin’s Hymn “Remembrance.” Translated by William McNeill and Julia Ireland. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Parmenides. Translated as Parmenides. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Heraklit Der Anfang des abendländischen Denkens (Heraklit) 2. Logik. Heraklits Lehre vom Logos. Translated as Heraclitus: The Inception of Occidental Thinking and Logic: Heraclitus’ Doctrine of the Logos. Translated by Julia Goesser Assaiante and Montgomery Ewegen. London: Bloomsbury, 2018.Google Scholar
Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Translated as Towards the Definition of Philosophy. Translated by Ted Sadler. London: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar
Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Translated as The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Scott M. Campbell. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
Phänomenologie der Anschauung und des Ausdrucks. Theorie der philosophischen Begriffsbildung. Translated as Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression. Translated by Tracy Colony. London: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. Translated as Phenomenology of Religious Life. Translated by Matthias Fritsch and Jennifer Anna Gosetti-Ferencei. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles: Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung. Translated as Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Phänomenologische Interpretationen ausgewählter Abhandlungen des Aristoteles zur Ontologie und Logik.Google Scholar
Ontologie: Hermeneutik der Faktizität. Translated as Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity. Translated by John van Buren. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis). Translated as Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event). Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Besinnung. Translated as Mindfulness. Translated by Parvis Emad and Thomas Kalary. London: Athlone, 2016.Google Scholar
Metaphysik und Nihilismus.Google Scholar
Hegel. Translated as Hegel. Translated by Joseph Arel and Niels Feuerhahn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Geschichte des Seyns. Translated as The History of Beyng. Translated by William McNeill and Jeffrey Powell. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Das Ereignis Translated as The Event. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Zum Ereignis-Denken.Google Scholar
Leitgedanken zur Entstehung der Metaphysik, der neuzeitlichen Wissenschaft und der modernen Technik.Google Scholar
Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Translated as Bremen and Freiburg Lectures: Insight Into That Which Is and Basic Principle of Thinking. Translated by Andrew J. Mitchell. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Seminare: Hegel – Schelling.Google Scholar
Seminare: Nietzsche: Seminare 1937 und 1944.Google Scholar
Überlegungen II–VI (Schwarze Hefte 1931–1938). Translated as Ponderings II–VI. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Überlegungen VII–XI (Schwarze Hefte 1938–1939). Translated as Ponderings VII–XI. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Vigiliae I, II/Notturno, (1952/53 bis 1957).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1963. “Letter to William J. Richardson, April 1962.” Translated by William J. Richardson. In Richardson, William J., Through Phenomenology to Thought. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Pages viii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. Translated by John Anderson and Hans Freund. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1976. “The Theological Discussion of ‘The Problem of a Non-Objectifying Thinking and Speaking in Today’s Theology’ – Some Pointers to Its Major Aspects.” In The Piety of Thinking. Translated by J. G. Hart and J. C. Maraldo. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Pages 22–31Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2002. Supplements: From the Earliest Essays to Being and Time and Beyond. Edited by van Buren, John. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2008. Basic Writings. Edited by Krell, David. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2010. “Wilhelm Dilthey’s Research and the Current Struggle for a Historical Worldview.” In Becoming Heidegger: On the Trail of His Early Occasional Writings, 1910–1927. Edited by Kisiel, Theodore and Sheehan, Thomas. 2nd ed. Seattle: Noesis Press. Pages 238–274.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 2013. Nature, History, State: 1933–1934. Translated and edited by Fried, Gregory and Polt, Richard. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine. 1998. The City of God against the Pagans. Translated and edited by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bahoh, James. 2020. Heidegger’s Ontology of Events. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2018. “Symmetric Dependence.” In Reality and Its Structure. Edited by Bliss, Ricki Leigh and Priest, Graham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 50–70.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra L. 2010. “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Art.” In Heidegger the Man and the Thinker. Edited by Sheehan, Thomas. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Pages 257–275.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 1995. “Decontextualization, Standardization and Deweyan Science.” Man and World, 28(4): 321–339.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blattner, William. 2007. “Ontology, the A Priori and the Primacy of Practice.” In Transcendental Heidegger. Edited by Crowell, Steven and Malpas, Jeff. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, Ricki. 2013. “Viciousness and the Structure of Reality.” Philosophical Studies, 166 (2): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, Ricki. 2014. “Viciousness and Circles of Ground.” Metaphilosophy, 45 (2): 245–256.Google Scholar
Bliss, Ricki, and Priest, Graham. 2017. “Metaphysical Dependence, East and West.” In Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach. Edited by Emmanuel, S. M.. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. Pages 63–87.Google Scholar
Bliss, Ricki, and Trogdon, Kelly. 2016. “Metaphysical Grounding.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grounding/Google Scholar
Bolzano, Bernard. 2014. Theory of Science. 4 vols. Translated by Paul Rusnock and Rolf George. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1992. “Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time.” In Heidegger: A Critical Reader. Edited by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Hall, Harrison. London: Blackwell. Pages 45–64.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representation, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1960. Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristotles. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1995. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bronzo, Silver. 2015. “Words, Sentences, and Speech Acts: An Interpretation and Defense of the Context Principle.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bryant, Amanda. 2017. “Resolving Quine’s Conflict: A Neo-Quinean View of the Rational Revisability of Logic.” Australasian Journal of Logic, 14 (1): 30–45.Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2004. “The Generality Constraint and Categorial Restrictions.” Philosophical Quarterly, 54 (214): 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caputo, John. 1975. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Study of Heideggerian Self-Criticism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 13 (4): 419–426.Google Scholar
Caputo, John. 1986. The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Caputo, John. 1990. The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, Taylor. 2013. “The Question of Being.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. Edited by Warthall, Mark. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 84–100.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1959. “Overcoming of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language.” In Logical Positivism. Edited by Ayer, A. J.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Translation of “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache.” Erkenntnis, 2 (1932): 219–224.Google Scholar
Casati, Filippo. 2018. “Heidegger’s Grund: (Para-)Foundationalism.” In Reality and its Structure. Edited by Bliss, Ricki Leigh and Priest, Graham. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 291–313.Google Scholar
Casati, Filippo. 2019. “Heidegger and the Contradiction of Being: A Dialetheic Interpretation of the Late Heidegger.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 27 (5): 1002–1024.Google Scholar
Casati, Filippo. 2020. “The Recent Engagement between Analytic Philosophy and Heideggerian Thought: Logic and Language.” Philosophy Compass, 15 (2): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casati, Filippo, and Priest, Graham. 2018. “Heidegger and Dogen on the Ineffable.” In The Significance of Indeterminacy: Perspectives from Asian and Continental Philosophy. Edited by Scott, Robert H. and Moss, Gregory S.. New York: Routledge. Pages 279–309.Google Scholar
Casati, Filippo, and Wheeler, Michael. 2016. “The Recent Engagement between Analytic Philosophy and Heideggerian Thought: Metaphysics and Mind.” Philosophy Compass, 11 (9): 486–498.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1976. “The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy.” In Must We Mean What We Say? New York: Cambridge University Press. Pages 44–72.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerbone, David. 2000. “How to Do Things with Wood.” In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge. Pages 293–314.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2000. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Wittgenstein.” In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge. Pages 179–218.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2002. “The Method of the Tractatus.” In From Frege to Wittgenstein. Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Edited by Reck, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 374–463.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2001. Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2013. Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, Steven. 2017. “Competence over Being as Existing: The Indispensability of Haugeland’s Heidegger.” In Giving a Damn: Essays in Dialogue with John Haugeland. Edited by Adams, Zed and Browning, Jacob. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pages 73–103.Google Scholar
Cussins, Adrian. 2003. “Content, Conceptual Content, and Nonconceptual Content.” In Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Edited by Gunther, York H.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pages 133–165.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 1994a. “Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts and Formal Indications.” Review of Metaphysics, 47 (4): 775–795.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 1994b. “Heidegger’s Critique of Husserl.” In The Early Heidegger: New Texts, New Perspectives. Edited by Kisiel, Ted and van Buren, John. Albany: State University of New York Press. Pages 231–244.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2005. “Heidegger’s Transcendentalism.” Research in Phenomenology, 35: 29–54.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2010. “Hermeneutic Ontology.” In Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives. Edited by Poli, Roberto and Seibt, Johanna. Dordrecht: Springer. Pages 395–415.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel. 2011. “Being and Being Grounded.” In The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Edited by Wippel, John F. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press. Pages 125–145.Google Scholar
Dastur, François. 1987. “Logic and Ontology: Heidegger’s ‘Destruction’ of Logic.” Research in Phenomenology, 17: 55–74.Google Scholar
Dastur, François. 2003. “Heidegger et les ‘Recherches logiques.’” In Husserl: La représentation vide, suivi de “Les Recherches logiques, une œuvre de percée.” Edited by Benoist, Jocelyn and Courtine, Jean-François. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Pages 265–281.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. “What Metaphors Mean.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 245–264.Google Scholar
Davis, Brett. 2007. Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1986. Nomadology: The War Machine. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Denker, Alfred, Gander, Hans-Helmuth, and Zaborowski, Holger (eds.). 2004. Heidegger-Jahrbuch I: Heidegger und die Anfänge seines Denkens. Freiburg/Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. “‘Il faut bien manger’ ou le calcul du sujet.” In Points de Suspension: Entretiens. Edited by Weber, Elisabeth. Paris: Galilée. Pages 269–303.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Maureen. 2011. “Using Mereological Principles to Support Metaphysics.” Philosophical Quarterly, 61 (243): 225–246.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2005a. “Heidegger’s Ontology of Art.” In A Companion to Heidegger. Edited by Dreyfus, Hubert and Wrathall, Mark. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pages 407–420.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert. 2005b. “Overcoming the Myth of the Mental.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79: 47–65.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1994. The Origins of Analytic Philiosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scotus, Duns 1997. Opera Philosophica. Volume III: Quaestiones super Libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis, Libri I–V. Edited by Andrews, R., Etzkorn, G., Noone, T. et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, C. 2015. “A Dialogical, Multi-Agent Account of the Normativity of Logic.” Dialectica, 69 (4): 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Thomas. 1974. “Heidegger on Logic: a Genetic Study of His Thought on Logic.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 12 (1): 77–94.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 1995. “Ontological Dependence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95: 269–290.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. 2012. “Guide to Ground.” Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Edited by Correia, Fabrice and Schnieder, Benjamin. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 37–81.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1980. Foundations of Arithmetic. Translated by J. L. Austin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1997. “On Concept and Object.” Translated by Peter Geach. In The Frege Reader. Edited by Beaney, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell. Pages 181–194.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. A Parting a Way: Carmap, Cassirer, Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1994. Heidegger’s Ways. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1997. “Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit.” Journal of Philosophical Research, 22: 57–73.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 2011. “Das Überwinden: Anti-Metaphysical Readings of the Tractatus.” In Beyond the Tractatus Wars. Edited by Read, Rupert and Lavery, Matthew A.. New York: Routledge. Pages 6–22.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2013. “Heidegger on Assertion, Method, and Metaphysics.” European Journal of Philosophy, 23 (4): 878–908.Google Scholar
Golob, Sacha. 2014. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob, and Grimm, Wilhelm. 2021. Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm. Digitalized version by Trier Center for Digital Humanities, Version 01/21. www.woerterbuchnetz.de/DWBGoogle Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1929. Phänomenologie der Thematik und des reinen Ich. Studien über Beziehungen zwischen Gestalttheorie und Phänomenologie. In Psychologische Forschung. Volume 12. Pages 279–381. Translated as “Phenomenology of Thematics and of the Pure Ego: Studies of the Relation between Gestalt Theory and Phenomenology.” In Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology. Translated by Richard M. Zaner. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966. Pages 175–287.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Aron. 1931. Die mitmenschlichen Begegnungen in der Milieuwelt. Edited by Métraux, Alexandre. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification.” In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pages 43–116.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 2000. “Was He Trying to Whistle It?” In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge. Pages 352–389.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. 1974. “The Logic of Deficient and Eminent Modes in Heidegger.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 5 (2): 118–134.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. 1981. “No Logic of Modes in Heidegger?” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 12 (1): 74–75.Google Scholar
Hatab, Lawrence. 2016. “The Point of Language in Heidegger’s Thinking: A Call for the Revival of Formal Indication.” Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 6: 1–22.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 1998. “Truth and Rule-Following.” In Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pages 305–363.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John. 2013. Dasein Disclosed. Edited by Rouse, Joseph. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holton, Richard. 2010. “The Exception Proves the Rule.” Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (4), 369–388.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1913. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. In Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. Logical Investigations. 2 Vols. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and Judgment. Translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2005a. Logical Investigations, vol. I. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2005b. Logical Investigations, vol. II. Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 2014 (translation of Husserl 1913). Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2001. “On Heidegger on Logic.” Continental Philosophy Review, 34 (4): 455–476.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2005a. “The Nothing and the Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s ‘What is Metaphysics?’” Inquiry, 48 (6): 482–506.Google Scholar
Käufer, Stephan. 2005b. “Logic.” In A Companion to Heidegger. Edited by Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Wrathall, Mark. Oxford: Blackwell. Pages 141–156.Google Scholar
Kinkaid, James. 2020. “What Would a Phenomenology of Logic Look Like?” Mind, 129 (516): 1009–1031.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kisiel, Theodore. 2006. “Die formale Anzeige als Schlüssel zu Heideggers Logik der philosophischen Begriffsbildung.” In Heidegger und die Logik. Edited by Denker, Alfred and Zaborowski, Holger. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Pages 49–65.Google Scholar
Kistner, Ulrike. 2011. “The Exception and the Rule: Fictive, Real, Critical.” Telos, 157: 43–59.Google Scholar
Koslicki, Kathrin. 2015. “The Coarse-Grainedness of Grounding.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, 9: 306–344.Google Scholar
Kukkonen, Taneli. 2000. “Plenitude, Possibility, and the Limits of Reason: A Medieval Arabic Debate on the Metaphysics of Nature.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 61 (4): 539–560.Google Scholar
Lachenman, Daniel. 1981. “Philosophic Truth and the Existentiell: The Lack of Logic in Sein und Zeit.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 12 (1): 55–73.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Sandra. 2011. Bolzano’s Theoretical Philosophy: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989. Philosophical Papers and Letters. 2nd ed. Edited and translated by Loemker, Leroy E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W., and Clarke, Samuel. 2000. Correspondence. Edited by Ariew, Roger. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Lewis, Charlton, and Short, Charles. 1879. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986. “Against Structural Universals.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64 (1): 25–46.Google Scholar
Liddell, Henry, and Scott, Robert. 1940. A Greek–English Lexicon. Revised by Sir Henry Stuart Jones. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lotze, Hermann. 1884. Lotze’s System of Philosophy. Part I: Logic. Translated by Bernard Bosanquet. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lillien J. 1914–15. “Ueber die Abhängigkeit visueller Vorstellungsbilder vom Denken.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie, vol. 70, 3/4: 212–275.Google Scholar
Martin, Wayne. 2006. Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris. 2009. “Ways of Being.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Edited by Chalmers, David, Manley, David, and Wasserman, Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pages 290–320.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris. 2013. “Heidegger’s Metaphysics of Material Beings.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86 (1): 332–357.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris. 2014. “Metaphysics, History, Phenomenology.” Res Philosophica, 91 (3): 339–365.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Kris. 2016. “Heidegger and the ‘There Is’ of Being.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 93 (2): 306–320.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2006. The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2012. Heidegger and the Measure of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2013a. “Ontological Pluralism and the Being and Time Project.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 51 (4): 651–673.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2013b. “The Provocation to Look and See: Appropriation, Recollection and Formal Indication.” In Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Edited by Egan, David, Reynolds, Stephen, and Wendland, Aaron. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2014. “Austerity, Psychology, and the Intelligibility of Nonsense.” Philosophical Topics, 42 (2): 161–199.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2015a. “On Being as a Whole and Being-a-Whole.” In Division III of Being and Time: Heidegger’s Unanswered Question of Being. Edited by Braver, Lee. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pages 175–197.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2015b. “Wittgenstein, Moore and the Lure of Transcendental Idealism.” Philosophical Topics, 43 (1/2): 125–148.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2017. “Beholdenness to Entities and the Concept of ‘Dasein’: Phenomenology, Ontology and Idealism in the Early Heidegger.” European Journal of Philosophy, 25 (2): 512–534.Google Scholar
McManus, Denis. 2020. “Review of The Fragmentation of Being by Kris McDaniel.” European Journal of Philosophy, 28 (3): 833–837.Google Scholar
Meinong, Alexius. 1960. “On the Theory of Objects.” In Realism and the Background of Phenomenology. Edited by Chisholm, Roderick. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Pages 76–112.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak, and Lin, Martin. 2020. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/sufficient-reasonGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Jitendra N. 1988. “Heidegger on Logic.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26 (1): 107–135.Google Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2003. “Ineffability and Nonsense.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 77: 169–193.Google Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2015a. “Being, Univocity and Logical Syntax.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 115 (1): 4–25.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2006. “Die formale Anzeige der Faktizität als Frage der Logik.” In Heidegger und die Logik. Edited by Denker, Alfred and Zaborowski, Holger. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Pages 31–49.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2002. Beyond Good and Evil. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2005. The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1986. Logic, Science and Dialectic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parapuf, Andreea. 2005. “Die defizienten Modi in Sein und Zeit und ihre Rolle für die Fundamentalontologie Heideggers.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Philosophia, 2: 29–57.Google Scholar
Philipse, Herman. 1998. Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being: A Critical Interpretation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Poli, Robert. 1993. “Husserl’s Conception of Formal Ontology.” History and Philosophy of Logic, 14 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Polt, Richard. 2006. The Emergency of Being: On Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Polt, Richard. 2019. Time and Trauma: Thinking through Heidegger in the Thirties. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 1979. “The Logic of Paradox.” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 219–241.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 1998. “What Is So Bad about Contradictions?” Journal of Philosophy, 95: 410–426.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2001. Beyond the Limits of Thought. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2014b. “Revising Logic.” In The Metaphysics of Logic. Edited by Rush, P.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pages 211–223.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2016. “The Answer to the Question of Being.” Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. Edited by Bell, Jeffrey A., Cutrofello, Andrew, and Livingston, Paul M.. London: Routledge. Pages 249–261.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham, Berto, Francesco, and Weber, Zach. 2018. “Dialetheism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dialetheismGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review, 60 (1): 20–43.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Radloff, Bernhard. 2007. Heidegger and the Question of National Socialism: Disclosure and Gestalt. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Reinach, Adolf. 1982. “On the Theory of Negative Judgment.” In Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Edited by Smith, Barry. Munich: Philosophia Verlag. Pages 309–376.Google Scholar
Richardson, Kara. 2014. “Avicenna and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” Review of Metaphysics, 67 (4): 743–768.Google Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich. 1913. Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen Begriffsbildung. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 2010. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Edited by Hale, Bob and Hoffmann, Aviv. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 109–137.Google Scholar
Rubin, Edgar. 1921. Visuell Wahrgenommene Figuren. Studien in Psychologischer Analyse. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1937. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2009. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Edited by Chalmers, David, Manley, David, and Wasserman, Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pages 347–384.Google Scholar
Schear, Joseph. 2007. “Judgment and Ontology in Heidegger’s Phenomenology.” In The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 7. Edited by Crowell, Steven and Hopkins, Burt. New York: Routledge. Pages 127–158.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2012. “On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In Arthur Schopenhauer: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason and Other Writings. Translated and edited by Cartwright, David E., Erdmann, Edward E., and Janaway, Christopher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2000. “The Limits of Phenomenology.” In Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Edited by Wrathall, Mark and Malpas, Jeff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pages 71–93.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Thomas. 2015. Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Shirley, Gref. 2010. Heidegger and Logic: The Place of Lógos in Being and Time. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Simons, Peter. 2012. “To Be and/or Not to Be: the Objects of Meinong and Husserl.” In Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Edited by Haaparanta, Leila and Koskinen, Heikki J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pages 241–257.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. 1965. The Phenomenological Movement, vol. 1. 2nd ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Florian. 2017. “The Normative Status of Logic” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/logic-normativeGoogle Scholar
Tolley, Clinton. 2006. “Kant and the Nature of Logical Laws.” Philosophical Topics, 34 (1/2): 371–407.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. 2009. “Being, Existence, and Ontological Commitment.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Edited by Chalmers, David, Manley, David, and Wasserman, Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pages 472–507.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. 2014. “Modes of Being and Quantification.” Disputatio, 6 (38): 1–24.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jessica. 2014. “No Work for a Theory of Grounding.” Inquiry, 57 (5–6): 535–579.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Edward. 2000. “Conceptions of Nonsense in Carnap and Wittgenstein.” In The New Wittgenstein. Edited by Crary, Alice and Read, Rupert. London: Routledge. Pages 315–351.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Edward. 2002. “Logic and the Inexpressible in Frege and Heidegger.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40 (1): 89–113.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, Edward. 2003. “Much Ado about the Nothing: Carnap and Heidegger on Logic and Metaphysics.” In A House Divided: Comparing Continental and Analytic Philosophers. Edited by Prado, C. G.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books. Pages 291–322.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. 2022. Heidegger on Being Self-Concealing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. Forthcoming a. “Heidegger on Human Being: The Living Thing Having Logos.” In Human: A History. Edited by Hübner, Karolina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Withy, Katherine. Forthcoming b. “The Trouble with the Ontological Difference.” In The Cambridge Critical Guide to Being and Time. Edited by Wendland, Aaron. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Edited by Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, Joachim. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. 1999. “Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, (1): 69–88.Google Scholar
Wrathall, Mark. 2011. Heidegger and Unconcealment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar