Bibliography

doi:10.1017/9781108592000.017

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 August 2021

Edited by

Sebastian Stein and

Joshua Wretzel

Show author details

Sebastian Stein: Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Joshua Wretzel: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Hegel's Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences
A Critical Guide
, pp. 293 - 308

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108592000.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (2002). Aesthetic Theory. Trans. R. Hullot-Kentor. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Alznauer, M. (2015). Hegel’s Theory of Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ameriks, K. (1990). “Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 72(1), pp. 63–85.Google Scholar

Ameriks, K. (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy: Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, T. (2006). The Treatise on the Divine Nature: Summa Theologiae I, 1–13. Trans. B. J. Shanley. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. Edited by Barnes, J.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beiser, F. C. (2008). “Introduction: The Puzzling Hegel Renaissance,” in Beiser, F. C., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bernasconi, R. (1998). “Hegel at the Court of the Ashanti,” in Barnett, S., ed. Hegel after Derrida. New York: Routledge, pp. 41–63.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, R. (2000). “With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel’s Eurocentrism,” Nineteenth-Century Contexts, 22(2), pp. 171–201.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berry, C. (1980). “Property and Possession: Two Replies to Locke – Hume and Hegel,” in Pennock, J. R. and Chapman, J. W., eds. Property. New York: New York University Press, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar

Berthold-Bond, D. (1995). Hegel’s Theory of Madness. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Biard, J., et al. (1987). Introduction à la lecture de la Science de la Logique de Hegel, vol. 3: La doctrine du Concept. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar

Bonsiepen, W. (1997). Die Begründung einer Naturphilosophie bei Kant, Schelling, Fries und Hegel: Mathematische versus spekulative Naturphilosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. (1990). “Filling in Space,” Analysis, 50(2), pp. 62–5.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowman, B. (2013). Hegel and the Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, K. (2011). Idealism without Limits: Hegel on the Problem of Objectivity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Brinkmann, K. (2016). “Hegel on Translating Representations: Rethinking the Task of Philosophy,” in Fonnesu, L. and Ziglioli, L., eds. System und Logik bei Hegel. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. 43–61.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2004). “Taking the System Seriously: Themes in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2007). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. ed. (2012a). “Hegel and the Unified Theory of Punishment,” in Brooks, T., ed. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 103–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brooks, T., ed. (2012b). Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2012c). Punishment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2013). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2016). “In Defence of Punishment and the United Theory of Punishment: A Reply,” Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10, pp. 629–38.Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2017a). “Hegel on Crime and Punishment,” in Brooks, T. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brooks, T. (2017b). “Hegel’s Philosophy of Law,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 453–74.Google Scholar

Brooks, T., and Nussbaum, M. C., eds. (2015). Rawls’s Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Brooks, T., and Stein, S., eds. (2017). Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brumbaugh, R. S. 1954. Plato’s Mathematical Imagination: The Mathematical Passages in the Dialogues and Their Interpretation. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Buchwalter, A. (2009). “Is Hegel’s Philosophy of History Eurocentric?,” in Dudley, W, ed. Hegel and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 87–110.Google Scholar

Burbidge, J. W. (2006). The Logic of Hegel’s Logic: An Introduction. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, L. (2009). The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, L., and Kittay, E. F., eds. (2010). Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ciavatta, D. (2005). “Hegel on Owning One’s Body,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 43, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Clare, E. (2017). Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. E. (1971). “Hegel’s Theory of Punishment,” in Pelczynski, Z. A., ed. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–67.Google Scholar

Corti, L. (2016). “Conceptualism, Non-conceptualism, and the Method of Hegel’s Psychology,” in S. Herrmann-Sinai and L. Ziglioli, eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 228–50.Google Scholar

Cramer, K. (1999). “Peripetien der Ontologie – Wolff, Kant, Hegel,” in Bubner, R., ed. Die Weltgeschichte – das Weltgericht? Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, pp. 176–207.Google Scholar

De Laurentiis, A. (2014). “Race in Hegel: Text and Context,” in Egger, M, ed. Philosophie nach Kant: Neue Wege zum Verständnis von Kants Transzendental- und Moralphilosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 591–624.Google Scholar

DellaRocca, M. (2008). Spinoza. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (1986). Art and the Absolute: A Study of Hegel’s Aesthetics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (1992). Beyond Hegel and Dialectic: Speculation, Cult, and Comedy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Desmond, W. (2017). Hegel’s God: A Counterfeit Double? Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

DeVries, W. (1988). Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

DeVries, W. (2016). “Hegel’s Account of the Presence of Space and Time in Sensation, Intuition, and the World: A Sellarsian View,” in Herrmann-Sinai, S. and Ziglioli, L., eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 214–27.Google Scholar

Dryden, J. (2013). “Hegel, Feminist Philosophy, and Disability: Rereading Our History,” Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4), http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3868/3407 (accessed 9 February 2021).CrossRef Google Scholar

Dryden, J. (2016). “Digestion, Habit, and Being at Home: Hegel and the Gut as Ambiguous Other,” PhaenEx, 11(2), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Düsing, K. (2016). Das Problem der Subjektivität in Hegels Logik. Hamburg: Meiner. (First published Bonn: Bouvier, 1976.)Google Scholar

Fackenheim, E. L. (1970). The Religious Dimension in Hegel’s Thought. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Falk, H. P. (1983). Das Wissen in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar

Ferrarin, A. (2019). Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feuerbach, L. (1959). Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft, in Sämtliche Werke, Vol. 2. Edited by Bolin, W. and Jodl, F.. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstadt: Frommann.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1971a). Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 10. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1971b). Einige Vorlesungen über die Bestimmung des Gelehrten, 1794, in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 6. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1971c). System der Sittenlehre nach den Principien der Wissenschaftslehre, 1798, in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 4. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1971d). Zweite Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre (1797), in Fichtes Werke, Vol. 1. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1988). Early Philosophical Writings. Trans. and edited by Breazeale, D.. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (2005a). The Science of Knowing: J. G. Fichte’s 1804 Lectures on the Wissenschaftslehre. Trans. W. E. Wright. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (2005b). The System of Ethics. Trans. and edited by Breazeale, D. and Zöller, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ficara, E. (2019). “Empowering Forms: Hegel’s Conception of ‘Form’ and ‘Formal.’” in Bubbio, P. D., De Cesaris, A., Pagano, M., and Weslati, H., eds. Hegel, Logic and Speculation. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar

Findlay, J. N. (1962). Hegel: A Re-examination. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Fisher, Q. A. “Being-Together: An Essay on the First-Person Plural,” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Foley, R. (2008). “Plato’s Undividable Line: Contradiction and Method in Republic VI,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 46, pp. 1–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Förster, E. (2012). The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fossa, J. A., and Erickson, G. W. (2005). “The Divided Line and the Golden Mean,” Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática, 5(9), pp. 59–77.Google Scholar

Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Trans. H. Kaal. Edited by McGuinness, B.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Fulda, H. F. (1999). “Die Ontologie und ihr Schicksal in der Philosophie Hegels. Kantkritik in Fortsetzung kantischer Gedanken,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 210, pp. 465–84.Google Scholar

Fulda, H. F. (2003). Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar

Fulda, H. F., Horstmann, R. P., and Theunisen, M. (1980). Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik: Eine Diskussion über Hegels Logik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Furlotte, W. (2018). The Problem of Nature in Hegel’s Final System. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Gaiger, J. (2006). “Catching Up with History: Hegel and Abstract Painting,” in Deligiorgi, K, ed. Hegel: New Directions. Chesham: Acumen, pp. 159–76.Google Scholar

Gerhard, M. (2015). Hegel und die logische Frage. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1991). “Ästhetik oder Philosophie der Kunst: Die Nachschriften und Zeugnisse zu Hegels Berliner Vorlesungen,” Hegel-Studien, 26, pp. 92–110.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1992). “Das ‘moderne’ Gesamtkunstwerk: Die Oper,” in Gethmann-Siefert, A, ed. Phänomen versus System: Zum Verhältnis von philosophischer Systematik und Kunsturteil in Hegels Berliner Vorlesungen über Ästhetik oder Philosophie der Kunst. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 165–230.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, A. (2000). “Die Kunst (§§556–563): Hegels systematische Begründung der Geschichtlichkeit der Kunst,” in Drüe, H et al., eds. Hegels “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften” (1830): Ein Kommentar zum Systemgrundriß. Franfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 317–74.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, A. (2005). “Die systematische Bestimmung der Kunst und die Geschichtlichkeit der Künste: Hegels Vorlesung über ‘Aestheticen sive philosophiam artis’ von 1826,” in Hegel, G., Philosophie der Kunst: Vorlesung von 1826. Edited by Gethmann-Siefert, A, Kwon, J.-I, and Berr, K. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 9–44.Google Scholar

Gibson, A. B. (1955). “Plato’s Mathematical Imagination,” Review of Metaphysics, 9, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H. (1997). “Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness,” in Reath, A., Herman, B., and Korsgaard, C. M., eds. Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329–60.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H. (2001). “Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Watkins, E., ed. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–78.Google Scholar

Greene, M. (1972). Hegel on the Soul: A Speculative Anthropology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Haase, M. (2016). “Three Forms of the First Person Plural,” in Abel, G and Conant, J, eds. Rethinking Epistemology, Vol. 1. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 229–56.Google Scholar

Hackenesch, C. (2000). “Die Wissenschaft der Logik (§§ 19–244),” in Drüe, H et al., eds. Hegels “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften” (1830): Ein Kommentar zum Systemgrundriß. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–138.Google Scholar

Halbig, C. (2002). Objektives Denken: Erkenntnistheorie und Philosophy of Mind in Hegels System. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Halfwassen, J. (2005). Hegel und der spätantike Neuplatonismus: Untersuchungen zur Metaphysik des Einen und des Nous in Hegels spekulativer und geschichtlicher Deutung. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Halfwassen, J. (2006). Der Aufstieg zum Einen: Untersuchungen zu Platon und Plotin. Munich: Saur.Google Scholar

Harris, E. E. (1983). An Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Hartmann, K. (1972). “Hegel: A Non-metaphysical View,” in MacIntyre, A., ed. Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 101–24.Google Scholar

Hartmann, K. (1999). Hegel’s Logic. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Heath, T. (1921). A History of Greek Mathematics. Volume 1, From Thales to Euclid. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heath, T. (1949). Mathematics in Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1894). Philosophy of Mind (Volume 3 of Hegel’s Encyclopedia). Trans. W. Wallace. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1956). The Philosophy of History. Trans. J. Sibree. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). Philosophy of Nature (Volume 2 of Hegel’s Encyclopedia). Volume 1. Trans. M. J. Petry. London: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1968–). Gesammelte Werke. Edited by the Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of Logic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Amherst: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature, Part Two of the Encyclopædia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1970–1). Werke. Edited by Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind: Part Three of the Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830). Trans. W. Wallace, together with the Zusätze in Boumann’s text (1845), trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, 2 vols. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1984). Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1986). The Philosophical Propadeutic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Edited by M. George and A. Vincent. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1988a). Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Trans. L. Rauch. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1988b). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: One Volume Edition, The Lectures of 1827. Trans. R. F. Brown, P. C. Hodgson, and J. M. Stewart, with the assistance of H. S. Harris. Edited by P. C. Hodgson. Berkeley: The University of California Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1990a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline and Critical Writings. Edited by Behler, E.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1990b). Lectures on the History of Philosophy: The Lectures of 1825–1826: Volume III Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Trans. R. F. Brown, J. M. Stewart, and H. S. Harris. Edited by Brown, R. F.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991a). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991b). The Encyclopedia Logic. Trans. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991c). Science of Logic. Trans. A. V. Miller. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1992). Vorlesungen über Logik und Metaphysik. Heidelberg 1817. Co-written by Good, F. A.. (Vorlesungen. Ausgwählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 11). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1994). Hegels Vorlesungen über die Philosophie des Geistes 1827/28. Edited by Hespe, F. and Tuschling, B., with an introduction by Tuschling, B.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1995a). Lectures on Natural Right and Political Science: The First Philosophy of Right. Trans. J. M. Stewart and P. C. Hodgson. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1995b). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 3 volumes, volume 3 Medieval and Modern Philosophy. Trans. E. S. Haldane and F. H. Simson, with introduction by Beiser, F. C.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Vorlesungen über die Logik. Berlin 1831. Nachgeschrieben von Karl Hegel, in Vorlesungen: Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 10. Edited by Rameil, U. in collaboration with Lucas, H.-C.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2002a). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Natur. Berlin 1819/20. Co-written by Ringier, Johann Rudolf. (Vorlesungen. Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 16). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2002b). Vorlesung über Naturphilosophie. Berlin 1821/22. Postscript von Uexküll, Boris. Edited by Marmasse, G. and Posch, T.. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2003). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: 1823. Edited by Gethmann-Siefert, A. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Philosophie der Kunst oder Ästhetik: Nach Hegel, im Sommer 1826; Mitschrift Friedrich Carl Hermann Victor von Kehler. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2006). Lectures on the History of Philosophy 1825–6. Volume II: Greek Philosophy. Trans. R. F. Brown and J. M. Stewart with the assistance of H. S. Harris. Edited by Brown, R. F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2007a). Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: Volume I: Introduction and the Concept of Religion. Trans. R. F. Brown, P. C. Hodgson, and J. M. Stewart. Edited by Hodgson, P. C. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2007b). Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit 1827–8. Translated by R. R. Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2007c). Philosophy of Mind (Part III of the Encyclopædia of the Philosophical Sciences). Trans. W. Wallace and A. V. Miller, revised by Inwood, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2007d). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Natur. Berlin 1825/26. Co-written by Dove, Heinrich Wilhelm. (Vorlesungen. Ausgewählte Nachschriften und Manuskripte, Vol. 17). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2008a). Lectures on Logic. Berlin, 1831. Transcribed by Karl Hegel. Trans. C. Butler. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2008b). Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. T. M. Knox. Edited and introduction by Houlgate, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2010a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline. Part One: The Science of Logic. Trans. and edited by Brinkmann, K. and Dahlstrom, D. O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2010b). The Science of Logic. Trans. G. di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2015). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. 1st ed. Trans. Petry, M. J.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2017). Vorlesungen zur Ästhetik: Vorlesungsmitschrift Adolf Heimann (1828/1829). Edited by Olivier, A. P. and Gethmann-Siefert., A. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, Brill Deutschland.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2018a). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. T. Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (2018b). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. with introduction and commentary by M. Inwood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., and Glockner, H. (1927). Sämtliche Werke. Jubiläumsausgabe. Auf Grund des von Ludwig Boumann [et al.] besorgten Originaldruckes im Faksimileverfahren. Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., and Schneider, H. (1995). Vorlesung über Ästhetik: Berlin 1820/21: Eine Nachschrift. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Lang.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F., Hotho, H. G., and Gethmann-Siefert, A. (1998). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: Berlin 1823. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1985). Schelling’s Treatise: On the Essence of Human Freedom. Trans. J. Stambaugh. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Heidemann, D. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Wesen. Zweyter Abschnitt. Die Erscheinung,” in Quante, M and Mooren, N, eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 325–86.Google Scholar

Heidemann, D. (2019). “Hegel: Ein Rationalist?,” in Emundts, D and Sedgwick, S, eds. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism 14. Berlin: DeGruyter, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar

Henrich, D. (1971). “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Henrich, D., Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Henrich, D., ed. (1986). Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik: Formation und Rekonstruktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1986.Google Scholar

Heraclitus (2001). Fragments: The Collected Wisdom of Heraclitus. Trans. B. Haxton. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Herrmann-Sinai, S. (2016). “Subjective Action,” in Herrmann-Sinai, S. and Ziglioli, L., eds. Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 127–52.Google Scholar

Herrmann-Sinai, S., and Ziglioli, L. (2016). Hegel’s Philosophical Psychology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hermanni, F. (2013). “Kritischer Inklusivismus: Hegels Begriff der Religion und seine Theorie der Religionen,” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosphie, 55(2), pp. 136–60.Google Scholar

Herz-Fischler, R. (1998). A Mathematical History of the Golden Number. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan, with Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Edited by Curley, E.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Hodgson, P. C. (2007). Hegel and Christian Theology: A Reading of the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2005). An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2006). The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2009). “Hegel’s Logic,” in Beiser, F. C., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111–34.Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2011), “Essence, Reflexion, and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds. A Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 139–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2015). “Glaube, Liebe, Verzeihung: Hegel und die Religion,” in Hermanni, F, Nonnenmacher, B, and Schick, F, eds. Religion und Religionen im deutschen Idealismus: Schleiermacher – Hegel – Schelling. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 253–74.Google Scholar

Houlgate, S. (2018). “Thought and Being in Hegel’s Logic: Reflections on Hegel, Kant and Pippin,” in Illetterati, L and Menegoni, F, eds. Geist und Geschichte. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, pp. 101–18.Google Scholar

Hutchings, K., and Pulkinnen, T., eds. (2010). Beyond Antigone: Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Iber, C. (1990). Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität: Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Iber, C. (2002). “Hegels Konzeption des Begriffs,” in Koch, A. F. and Schick, F., eds. G. W. F. Hegel: Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, H. (2017). “Hegel’s Psychology,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 424–49.Google Scholar

Illetterati, L., and Menengoni, F., eds. (2018). Wirklichkeit: Beiträge zu einem Schlüsselbegriff der Hegelschen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Inwood, M. (2010). A Commentary on Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, W. (1999). “Einleitung,” in Hegel, G. W. F, Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objektive Logik. Zweites Buch: Die Lehre vom Wesen (1813). Edited by Gawoll, H.-J.. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. ix–xxxv.Google Scholar

James, D. (2009). Art, Myth and Society in Hegel’s Aesthetics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Jarrett, C. (2009). “Spinoza on Necessity,” in Koistinen, O., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–39.Google Scholar

Kang, S.-J. (1999). Reflexion und Widerspruch: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche und systematische Untersuchung des Hegelschen Begriffs des Widerspruchs. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1968). Kants Werke. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1969). Kritik der reinen Vernunft, in Kant, I., Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the der Wissenschaften, Preußische Akademie. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1989). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1991). The Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. P. Guyer and E. Matthews. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, R. M., and Yeomans, C. (2017). “Math by Pure Thinking: R First and the Divergence of Measures in Hegel’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), pp. 985–1020.Google Scholar

Kittay, E. (1999). Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Knappik, F. (2016). “Hegel’s Essentialism: Natural Kinds and the Metaphysics of Explanation in Hegel’s Theory of ‘the Concept,’” European Journal of Philosophy, 24(4), pp. 760–87.Google Scholar

Koch, A. F. (2003). Der Begriff als die Wahrheit: Zum Anspruch der Hegelschen “subjektiven Logik.” Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Koch, A. F. (2014a). “Subjektivität und Objektivität: Die Unterscheidung des Begriffs,” in Koch, A. F., Schick, F., Vieweg, K., and Wirsing, C., eds. Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie: Hegel – 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 209–21.Google Scholar

Koch, A. F. (2014b). Die Evolution des logischen Raumes: Aufsätze zu Hegels Nichtstandard-Metaphysik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Koch, A. F., and Schick, F., eds. (2002). G. W. F. Hegel: Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar

Koch, A. F., Schick, F., Vieweg, K., and Wirsing, C., eds. (2014). Deutsches Jahrbuch Philosophie: Hegel – 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Kolb, D. (2010). “The Necessities of Hegel’s Logics,” in Nuzzo, A., ed. Hegel and the Analytic Tradition. London: Continuum, pp. 40–60.Google Scholar

Kosman, A. (2013). The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kreines, J. (2007). “Between the Bounds of Experience and Divine Intuitions: Kant’s Epistemic Limits and Hegel’s Ambitions,” Inquiry, 50, pp. 306–34.Google Scholar

Kreines, J. (2008). “The Logic of Life: Hegel’s Philosophical Defense of Natural Teleology,” in Beiser, F. C, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 344–77.Google Scholar

Kreines, J. (2015). Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lakebrink, B. (1979). Kommentar zu Hegels “Logik” in seiner “Enzyklopädie” von 1830. Band I: Sein und Wesen. Freiburg and Munich: Alber.Google Scholar

Lasserre, F. (1964). The Birth of Mathematics in the Age of Plato. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Lewis, T. A. (2011). Religion, Modernity, and Politics in Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, B. (2007). Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Trans. N. J. Simek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Luckner, A., and Ostritsch, S., eds. (2019) Philosophie der Existenz: Aktuelle Beiträge von der Ontologie bis zur Ethik. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Lumsden, S. (2013). “Between Nature and Spirit: Hegel’s Account of Habit,” in Stern, D., ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 121–37.Google Scholar

Mabille, B. (1999). Hegel: L’épreuve de la contingence. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar

Macherey, P. (2011). Hegel or Spinoza. Trans. S. M. Ruddick. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Martin, C. “Our Three Attitudes towards Nature” (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2012). Ontologie der Selbstbestimmung: Eine operationale Rekonstruktion von Hegels »Wissenschaft der Logik«. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2014). “Die Idee als Einheit von Begriff und Objektivität,” in Koch, A., ed. 200 Jahre Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 223–42.Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2017a). “Das Logische und der Raum,” in Noller, J., ed. Wozu Metaphysik? Historisch-systematische Perspektiven. Freiburg: Alber, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2017b). “Hegel on Truth and Absolute Spirit,” Idealistic Studies, 47, 191–217.Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2019). “G. W. F. Hegel: Die Verwandlung von Metaphysik in Logik,” in Urbich, J., ed. Metzler Handbuch Ontologie. Darmstadt: Metzler.Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2020). Die Einheit des Sinns: Untersuchungen zur Form des Denkens und Sprechens. Münster: Mentis.Google Scholar

McCarney, J. (2009). Hegel on History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McCumber, J. (1990). “Hegel on Habit,” The Owl of Minerva, 21(2), pp. 155–65.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (2017). “Why Does It Matter to Hegel That Geist Has a History?,” in Zuckert, R. and Kreines, J., eds. Hegel on Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

McWhorter, L. (1999). Bodies and Pleasures: Foucault and the Politics of Sexual Normalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Y. Y. (2010). “Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(1), pp. 77–92.Google Scholar

Melamed, Y. (2012). “‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’: Determination, Negation, and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel,” in Förster, M and Melamed, Y, eds. Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar

Melamed, Y. Y. (2017). The Causes of Our Belief in Free Will: Spinoza on Necessary, “Innate,” yet False Cognition in Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–41.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. D. A. Landes. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Michalko, R. (1999). The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, P. J., ed. (1996). Feminist Interpretations of Hegel. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Moland, L. (2003). “Inheriting, Earning, and Owning: The Source of Practical Identity in Hegel’s ‘Anthropology,’” Owl of Minerva, 34(2), pp. 139–70.Google Scholar

Molas, A. (2019). “The Compatibility of Hegelian Recognition and Morality with the Ethics of Care,” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 50(4), pp. 285–304.Google Scholar

Mowad, N. (2019). Meaning and Embodiment: Human Corporeity in Hegel’s Anthropology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Moyar, D. (2007). “Urteil, Schluss und Handlung: Hegels logische Übergänge im Argument zur Sittlichkeit,” Hegel-Studien, 42, 51–80.Google Scholar

Moyar, D. (2012). “Thought and Metaphysics: Hegel’s Critical Reception of Spinoza,” in Förster, M and Melamed, Y, eds. Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–213.Google Scholar

Moyar, D. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Begriff. Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Objektivität,” in Quante, M. and Mooren, N., eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 559–650.Google Scholar

Mure, G. (1940). An Introduction to Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, S. (2018). “The Intellectual Love of God,” in DellaRocca, M., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 295–313.Google Scholar

Ng, K. (2016). “Life and Mind in Hegel’s Logic and Subjective Spirit,” Hegel Bulletin, 39(1), pp. 23–44.Google Scholar

Ng, K. (2019). “Life and the Space of Reasons: On Hegel’s Subjective Logic,” Hegel Bulletin, 40(1), pp. 121–42.Google Scholar

Novakovic, A. (2017). “Hegel’s Anthropology,” in Moyar, D., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407–23.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, A. (2013). “Anthropology, Geist, and the Soul–Body Relation: The Systematic Beginning of Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit,” in Stern, D, ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, A. (2018). Approaching Hegel’s Logic Obliquely. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Okochi, T. (2008). Ontologie und Reflexionsbestimmungen: Zur Genealogie der Wesenslogik Hegels. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Olshewsky, T. M. (1968). “Aristotle’s Use of Analogia,” Apeiron, 2(2), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Parekh, S. (2009). “Hegel’s New World: History, Freedom, and Race,” in Dudley, W., ed. Hegel and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar

Pelczynski, Z. A. (1964). “An Introductory Essay,” in Hegel, G. W. F, Hegel’s Political Writings. Trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–137.Google Scholar

Peperzak, A. (1987). Selbsterkenntnis des Absoluten. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Peters, J. (2015). Hegel on Beauty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Petry, M. (1970). Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Pillow, K. (2002). “Hegel and Homosexuality,” Philosophy Today, 46 (5, SPEP Supplement), pp. 75–91.Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (1996). Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (2001). Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (2011). “Freedom and Necessity. And Music,” in Honneth, A and Hendrichs, G, eds. Freiheit: Stuttgarter Hegelkongress. Frankfurt: Klostermann, pp. 313–29.Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. (2013). Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. B. (1989). Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. (2008). Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. B. (2014). After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. B. (2019). Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in The Science of Logic. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Plato (1997). Complete Works. Edited by Cooper, J. M.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Plevrakis, H. (2018). “Übergang von der Logik in die Natur aus ‚absoluter Freiheit‘? Eine argumentanalytische Rekonstruktion des letzten Satzes der enzyklopädischen Logik Hegels,” Hegel-Studien, 52, pp. 103–38.Google Scholar

Ploucquet, G. (2006). Logik. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Franz, M.. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality: Being the John Locke Lectures for 1955–6 Delivered in the University of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Quante, M., and Mooren, N., eds. (2018). Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Rademaker, H. (1979). Hegels “Wissenschaft der Logik”: Eine darstellende und erläuternde Einführung. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Rand, S. (2007). “The Importance and Relevance of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of Nature,’” The Review of Metaphysics, 61(2), pp. 379–400.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2000). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Edited by Herman, B.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Edited by Kelly, E.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Redding, P. (2017). “Findlay’s Hegel: Idealism as Modal Actualism,” Critical Horizons, 18(4), pp. 359–77.Google Scholar

Redding, P. (2018). “Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,” in E. N. Zalta, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/hegel (accessed 10 February 2021).Google Scholar

Redding, P. (2019). “Time and Modality in Hegel’s Account of Judgment,” in Ball, B. and Schuringa, C., eds. The Act and Object of Judgment: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar

Rohs, P. (1982). Form und Grund: Interpretation eines Kapitels der Hegelschen Wissenschaft der Logik, 3rd ed. Bonn: Bouvier.Google Scholar

Rosen, S. (2014). The Idea of Hegel’s Science of Logic. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1906). “Review of Symbolic Logic and Its Applications by Hugh MacColl,” Mind, New Series, 15(58), pp. 255–60.Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1945). A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Rutter, B. (2011). Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. (1975). Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie: Münchener Vorlesungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. (1982). Philosophische Briefe über Dogmatismus und Kritizismus, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/3. Edited by Buchner, H, Jacobs, W. G, and Pieper., A Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. (1985). Ausgewählte Schriften. Edited by Frank, M, 6 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. (2005). System des transcendentalen Idealismus, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/9-1. Edited by Korten, H and Ziche, P. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. (2009). Darstellung meines Systems der Philosophie, in Historisch-kritische Ausgabe F. W. J. Schelling, Vol. I/10. Edited by Durner, M. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar

Schick, F. (1994). Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik: Metaphysische Letztbegründung oder Theorie logischer Formen? Freiburg and Munich: Alber.Google Scholar

Schick, F. (2012). “Logik, Wirklichkeit und ihre Verwechslung. Schellings Hegel-Kritik,” in Hermanni, F., ed. “Der Anfang und das Ende aller Philosophie ist – Freiheit!”: Schellings Philosophie in der Sicht neuerer Forschung. Tübingen: Attempto, pp. 383–401.Google Scholar

Schick, F. (2018). “Die Lehre vom Begriff. Erster Abschnitt. Die Subjectivität,” in Quante, M. and Mooren, N., eds. Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 457–558.Google Scholar

Schmidt, K. J. (1997). G. W. F. Hegel: “Wissenschaft der Logik – Die Lehre vom Wesen.” Ein einführender Kommentar. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. (2010). “What Does It Mean to ‘Make Oneself into an Object’? In Defense of a Key Notion of Hegel’s Theory of Action,” in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C., eds. Hegel on Action. London: Palgrave, pp. 189–211.Google Scholar

Siebers, T. (2019). “Returning the Social to the Social Model,” in Mitchell, D. T., Antebi, S., and Snyder, S. L., eds. The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 39–47.Google Scholar

Sheppard, A. (2014). Embodied Virtuosity: Dances from Disability Culture. Emory University YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-qfZA1V7Yo (accessed 14 November 2019).Google Scholar

Speight, A. (2015). “Hegel’s Philosophy of Art,” in Baur, M, ed. Hegel: Key Concepts. London: Routledge, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar

Speight, A. (2019). “Art as a Mode of Absolute Spirit: The Development and Significance of Hegel’s Encyclopaedia Account of the Philosophy of Art,” in Bykova, M. F, ed. Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–42.Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. de (1994). Ethics, in A Spinoza Reader. Trans. and edited by E. Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Stekeler-Weithofer, P. (1992). Hegels analytische Philosophie: Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar

Stern, R. (2009). Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart, J. (2018). Hegel’s Interpretation of the Religions of the World: The Logic of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stone, A. (2018a). “Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism and the Difference between Women and Men,” in Stone, A., Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism. London: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 191–205.Google Scholar

Stone, A. (2018b). Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Stone, A. (2020). “Hegel and Colonialism,” Hegel Bulletin, 41(2), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Testa, I. (2013). “Hegel’s Naturalism or Soul and Body in the Encyclopedia,” in Stern, D, ed. Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar

Theunissen, M. (1980). Sein und Schein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Stuttgart: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Trisokkas, I. (2009). “The Speculative Logical Theory of Universality,” The Owl of Minerva, 40, pp. 141–74.Google Scholar

Trisokkas, I. (2012). Pyrrhonian Scepticism and Hegel’s Theory of Judgement. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Trisokkas, I. (2017). “The Two-Sense Reading of Spinoza’s Definition of Attribute,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 25(6), pp. 1093–115.Google Scholar

Vinco, R. (2015). “Philosophie ist Gottesdienst: Zum liturgischen Charakter des hegelschen Philosophieren,” in Hermanni, F, Nonnenmacher, B, and Schick, F, eds. Religion und Religionen im deutschen Idealismus: Schleiermacher – Hegel – Schelling. Tübingen:Mohr Siebeck, pp. 233–51.Google Scholar

Wandschneider, D. (2004). “Zur Dialektik des Übergangs von der absoluten Idee zur Natur. Eine Skizze,” in Schneider, H., ed. Sich in Freiheit entlassen: Natur und Idee bei Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 107–24.Google Scholar

Wandschneider, D. (2016). “Die Entäußerung der Idee zur Natur bei Hegel und ihre ontologische Bedeutung,” in Neuser, W., ed. Natur zwischen Logik und Geschichte: Beiträge zu Hegels Naturphilosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar

Watson, G. (2004). Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wendte, M. (2012). “To Develop Relational Autonomy: On Hegel’s View of People with Disabilities,” in Brock, B., ed. Disability in the Christian Tradition: A Reader. Grand Rapids and Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans, pp. 251–85.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1997). Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wicks, R. (1993). “Hegel’s Aesthetics: An Overview,” in Beiser, F. C, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 348–77.Google Scholar

Williams, R. R. (2007). “Translator’s Introduction,” in Hegel, G. W. F., Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit 1827–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar

Williams, R. R. (2017). Hegel on the Proofs and Personhood of God: Studies in Hegel’s Logic and Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wong, S. (2002). “At Home with Down Syndrome and Gender,” Hypatia, 17(3), pp. 89–117.Google Scholar

Wolff, M. (2013). “The Science of Logic,” in De Laurentiis, A. and Edwards, J., eds. The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Wood, A. W. (1990). Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wood, A. W. (2017). “Method and System in Hegel’s Philosophy of Right,” in Brooks, T. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: On the Normative Significance of Method and System. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 82–102.Google Scholar

Wretzel, J. (2018). “Organic Imagination as Intuitive Intellect: Self-Knowledge and Self-Constitution in Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant,” European Journal of Philosophy, 26(3), pp. 958–73.Google Scholar

Wretzel, J. I. (2020). “Constraint and the Ethical Agent: Hegel between Constructivism and Realism,” in Gledhill, J. and Stein, S., eds. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 88–106.Google Scholar

Yeomans, C. (2012). Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yeomans, C. (2019). “Perspective and Logical Pluralism in Hegel,” Hegel Bulletin, 40(1), pp. 29–50.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive