Allison, Henry. Kant's Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Poetics. Trans. Janko, R.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Rhetoric. Trans. Rhys Roberts, W.. New York: Modern Library, 1958.Google Scholar

Auden, W.H.Selected Poems. New York: Vintage International, 1989.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, Charles. The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. Trans. Mayne, J.. London: Phaidon, 1995.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst.Frühromantik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Karol. A Theory of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J.M. “Confession and Forgiveness: Hegel's Poetics of Action.” In Eldridge, R.T., ed., Beyond Representation: Philosophy and Poetic Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 34–65.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno (State College, PA: Penn State University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Boyle, Nicholas.Goethe: The Poet and the Age, vol. i. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Goethe: The Poet and the Age, vol. ii. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Brogan, T.V.F., ed. New Princeton Handbook of Poetic Terms. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.

Brown, Frederick.Flaubert. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2006.Google Scholar

Brown, Jane K. “In the Beginning Was Poetry.” In Parsons, James, ed., The Cambridge Companion to the Lied. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 12–32.Google Scholar

Bubner, Rüdiger.Innovations of Idealism. Trans. Walker, N. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bungay, Stephen.Beauty and Truth: A Study of Hegel's Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Carroll, Nöel.Beyond Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cascardi, Anthony J.Consequences of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavell, Stanley.Must We Mean What We Say? rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.This New Yet Unapproachable America. Albuquerque, NM: Living Batch Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted.Thinking of Others: On the Talent for Metaphor. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R.G.The Principles of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958 [1938].Google Scholar

Damrosch, David.What Is World Literature?Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.The Abuse of Beauty. Chicago: Open Court, 2003.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.After the End of Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.“The End of Art: A Philosophical Defense.”History and Theory, 37, 4 (1998), 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danto, Arthur.The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald.Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Man, Paul.Aesthetic Ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Desmond, William.Art and the Absolute. Albany: SUNY Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dewey, John.Art As Experience. New York: Perigree, 1980 [1934].Google Scholar

Dickinson, Emily.The Poems of Emily Dickinson. Ed. Franklin, R.W.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Donougho, Martin.“Remarks on ‘Humanus Heiβt der Heilige.’”Hegel-Studien, 17 (1982), 214–25.Google Scholar

Eldridge, R.T. “Hegel on Music.” In Houlgate, S., ed. Hegel and the Arts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007, 119–45.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Eldridge, R.T., ed.Stanley Cavell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emerson, R.W.The Portable Emerson. Ed. Bode, C.. New York: Viking, 1981.Google Scholar

Etter, Brian K. “Hegel's Aesthetic and the Possibility of Art Criticism.” In Maker, William, ed., Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY Press, 2000, 31–44.Google Scholar

Flaubert, G.The Letters of Gustave Flaubert: 1830–1857. Ed. Steegmuller, F.. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Forster, E.M.Aspects of the Novel. New York: Harcourt, 1927.Google Scholar

Fried, Michael.Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido.The Founding Act of Modern Ethical Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Geiger, Ido.“Is Art A Thing of the Past? The Political Work of Art between Hegel and Schiller.”Idealistic Studies, 35, 2–3 (2005), 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. “Einleitung.” In Gethmann-Siefert, A. and Collenberg-Plotnikov, B., eds., Philosophie der Kunst oder Ästhetik: nach Hegel, im Sommer 1826. Munich: Fink, 2004.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. “Einleitung: Gestalt und Wirkung von Hegels Ästhetik.” In Gethmann-Siefert, , ed. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Kunst: Berlin 1823. Hamburg: Meiner, 1998, xv–ccxv.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie.“Hegel über Kunst und Alltäglichkeit. Zur Rehabilitierung der schönen Künste und des ästhetischen Genusses.”Hegel-Studien, 28 (1993), 215–65.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. “Phänomen versus System.” In Gethmann-Siefert, , ed., Phänomen versus System: Zum Verhaltnis von philosophischer Systematik und Kunsturteil in Hegels Berliner Vorlesungen über Ästhetik oder Philosophie der Kunst. Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 34. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar

Gethmann-Siefert, Annemarie. “Schöne Kunst und Prosa des Lebens. Hegels Rehabilitierung des ästhetischen Genusses.” In Jamme, C., ed., Kunst und Geschichte im Zeitalter Hegels. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 1996, 115–50.Google Scholar

Goethe, J.W.Goethe: Selected Verse. New York: Penguin, 1964.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Goethe's Literary Essays. Ed. Spingarn, J.E.. New York: Felix Ungar, 1964.Google Scholar

Goethe, J.W.Goethes Werke. Hamburg: Christian Wegner, 1967.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson.Languages of Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul.“Kant's Conception of Fine Art.”Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 52, 3 (1994), 275–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, B. and Wright, C., eds. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.CrossRef

Hammermeister, Kai.The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harries, Karsten.“Hegel on the Future of Art.”Review of Metaphysics, 27 (1974), 677–96.Google Scholar

Harris, Errol.“Some Difficulties with Hegel's Aesthetics.”Idealistic Studies, 28, 33 (1998), 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, H.S.“The Resurrection of Art.”Owl of Minerva, 16 (1984), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Charles, Wood, Paul, and Gaiger, Jason, eds. Art in Theory, 1685–1815. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.

Henrich, Dieter. “Art and Philosophy of Art Today: Reflections with Reference to Hegel.” In Amacher, Richard E. and Lange, Victor, eds., New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism: A Collection of Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979, 107–33. (A translation of “Kunst und Kunst Philosophie der Gegenwart.” In H.R. Jauss, ed., Poetik und Hermeneutik 1. Munich: Eidos Verlag, 1964.)Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. “The Contemporary Relevance of Hegel's Aesthetics.” In Inwood, M., ed., Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985, 199–207.Google Scholar

Herder, J.G.Selected Early Works: 1764–1767. Trans. Menze, Ernest A.. State College, PA: Penn State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hogarth, William.The Analysis of Beauty. London: W. Hogarth, 1810.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, Friedrich.Friedrich Hölderlin: Essays and Letters on Theory. Ed. and trans. Pfau, ThomasAlbany: SUNY Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen.“The ‘End’ of Art.”Owl of Minerva, 29 (1997), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danto, Arthur. “Hegel and the Art of Painting.” In Maker, William, ed. Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY Press, 2000, 61–82.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel on the Beauty of Sculpture.” In Houlgate, , ed. Hegel and the Arts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007, 56–89.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. “Hegel's Theory of Tragedy.” In Houlgate, , ed. Hegel and the Arts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007, 146–78.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel.Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Ed. and trans. Louden, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, W.S.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel.Political Writings. Ed. Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Trans. Barnard, P. and Lester, C. . Albany: SUNY Press, 1988 [1978].Google Scholar

Lamport, F.J.German Classical Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Law, Stephen C. “Hegel and the Spirit of Comedy.” In Maker, William, ed. Hegel and Aesthetics. Albany: SUNY Press, 2000, 113–30.Google Scholar

Lessing, G.E.Sämtliche Schriften, 3rd edn., 23 vols., ed. Lachmann, Karl and Muncher, Franz. Stuttgart: G.J. Göschen, 1886–1924.Google Scholar

Lewes, G.H.Life of Goethe. London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1875.Google Scholar

Magnus, Katherine Dow.Hegel and the Symbolic Mediation of Spirit. Albany: SUNY Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.“Spirit's Symbolic Self-Presentation in Art: A Reading of Hegel's Aesthetics.”Owl of Minerva, 30, 2 (1998), 155–207.Google Scholar

Mark, Thomas Carlson.“On Works of Virtuosity.”Journal of Philosophy, 77, 1 (1980), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, , Friedrich W. The Birth of Tragedy. Trans. Speirs, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.The Use and Abuse of History. Trans. Collins, Adrian. New York: Macmillan, 1957).Google Scholar

Norton, Glyn P., ed.Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. iii, The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Oelmueller, Willi.Die unbefriedigte Aufklaerung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969.Google Scholar

Pillow, Kirk.Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry.Hegel: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. “Symbolic, Classical and Romantic Art.” In Houlgate, S., ed., Hegel and the Arts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007, 3–28.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry.“Virtues, Morality, and Sittlichkeit: From Maxims to Practices.”European Journal of Philosophy, 7, 2 (1999), 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippin, Robert. “The Absence of Aesthetics in Hegel's Aesthetics.” In Beiser, F.C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 394–418.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.“Authenticity in Painting: Remarks on Michael Fried's Art History.”Critical Inquiry, 31, 3 (2005), 575–98.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. “The Paradoxes of Power in the Early Novels of J.M. Coetzee.” In Leist, Anton and Singer, Peter, eds., J.M. Coetzee and Ethics: Philosophical Perspectives on Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert.“What Was Abstract Art? (From the Point of View of Hegel).”Critical Inquiry, 29, 1 (2002), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Redfield, James.Nature and Culture in the Iliad. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994 [1975].Google Scholar

Richards, I.A.The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965 [1936].Google Scholar

Richter, Jean Paul.Horn of Oberon: Jean Paul Richter's School for Aesthetics. Trans. Hale, M.R.. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Vorschule der Ästhetik. Hamburg: Meiner, 1990.Google Scholar

Roche, M.W.Tragedy and Comedy: A Systematic Study and a Critique of Hegel. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.Letter to d'Alembert, and Writings for the Theater. Hanover, NH: University of New England Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Saul, Nicholas. “Goethe the Writer and Literary History.” In Sharpe, Lesley, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 23–41.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, J-M.Art of the Modern Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Schelling, F.W.J.Philosophy of Art. Trans. Stott, D.W.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.System of Transcendental Idealism [1800]. Trans. Heath, Peter. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia, 1997.Google Scholar

Schiller, Friedrich.Essays. Ed. Hinderer, W. and Dahlstrom, D.O.. New York: Continuum, 1993.Google Scholar

Schlegel, A.W.Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature. Trans. Black, John. London: George Bell, 1904.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Vorlesungen über schöne Literatur und Kunst, vols. I–III. Stuttgart: Göschen, 1884.Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. “Letter on the Novel.” In Bernstein, J.M., ed., Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 287–96.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur. “On Goethe's Meister.” In Bernstein, J.M., ed., Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 269–86.Google Scholar

Schlegel, F.Philosophical Fragments. Trans. Firchow, P.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Searle, John. “Metaphor.” In Martinich, A.P., ed., Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990, 408–29.Google Scholar

Segal, Erich.The Death of Comedy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Shelley, Percy Bysshe.Shelley's Poetry and Prose. Ed. Reiman, Donald H. and Fraistat, Neil. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor.Theory of Prose. Trans. Sher, Benjamin. Elmwood Park, IL: Dalkey Archive Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen.Hegel, Literature, and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staiger, Emil.Basic Concepts of Poetics. State College, PA: Penn State University Press, 1991 [1946].Google Scholar

Stecker, Robert.Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturm-Maddox, Sara.Petrarch's Laurels. State College, PA: Penn State Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Swales, Martin. “Goethe's Prose Fiction.” In Sharpe, Lesley, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 129–46.Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel.Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Unseld, S.Goethe and His Publishers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vendler, Helen.Poems, Poets, Poetry. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Hammer-Purgstall, Joseph. “Einleitung.” In Hafis, , Der Diwan. Stuttgart and Tübingen: Cotta, 1812.Google Scholar

Wellbery, David.The Specular Moment. Stanford, CA: Stanford U.P., 1996.Google Scholar

Wellbery, David, ed. in chief. A New History of German Literature. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Wellek, , René, . Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. iii. New York: Scribner, 1974.Google Scholar

Wicks, Robert. “Hegel's Aesthetics: An Overview.” In Beiser, F.C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, 349–77.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Hegel's Theory of Aesthetic Judgment. New York: Peter Lang, 1994.Google Scholar

Williams, John R. “Goethe the Poet.” In Sharpe, Lesley, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, 42–65.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard.Art and its Objects, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Painting as an Art. London: Thames and Hudson, 1987.Google Scholar

Wood, Allen.“Does Hegel Have an Ethics?”, Monist, 74, 3 (1991), 358–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danto, Arthur.Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Wood, James.The Broken Estate. New York: Random House, 1999.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur.How Fiction Works. New York: FSG, 2008.Google Scholar

Wood, James.The Irresponsible Self. New York: FSG, 2004.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William, and Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Lyrical Ballads. Ware: Wordsworth Editions, 2003.Google Scholar

Zammito, John.Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar