Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:51:46.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2024

Pamela Ban ,
Ju Yeon Park  and
Hye Young You
Pamela Ban
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Ju Yeon Park
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Hye Young You
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Hearings on the Hill
The Politics of Informing Congress
 , pp. 175 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D. 1990. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Kyle. 2013. “An Analysis of Labor Union Participation in U.S. Congressional Hearings.” Sociological Forum 28 (3): 574–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Simon Calmar, and Moynihan, Donald. 2016. “Bureaucratic Investments in Expertise: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Field Trial.” Journal of Politics 78 (4): 1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1990a. “Credible Debate Equilibria.” Social Choice and Welfare 7: 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1990b. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1993. “Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Riker, William H.. 1987. “Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation.” American Political Science Review 81 (3): 897–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Riker, William H.. 1990. “Asymmetric Information and the Coherence of Legislation: A Correction.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, Emiel. 2020. “Persuasive Lobbying with Allied Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 64 (4): 938–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, Emiel, and Minaudier, Clement. 2024. “Friendly Lobbying under Time Pressure.” American Journal of Political Science 68 (2): 529–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, Andrew O., and Curry, James M.. 2021. “Minority Party Capacity in Congress.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1388–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, Pamela, Moskowitz, Daniel, and Snyder, James M.. 2021. “Leadership Power in Congress, 1890–2014: Evidence from PAC Contributions and Newspaper Coverage.” Working Paper, April 14, 2016 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2765092).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Jeffrey S., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1992. “The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Leech, Beth. 1998. Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Leech, Beth, and Kimball, David. 2002. “Organized Interests and Issue Definition in Policy Debates.” In Interest Group Politics, 6th ed., ed. Cigler, Allan and Loomis, Burdett. Press, CQ.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David, and Leech, Beth. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellodi, Luca. 2023. “A Dynamic Measure of Bureaucratic Reputation: New Data for New Theory.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (4): 880–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, John, Glazer, Ami, and Hammond, Thomas. 2001. “Theories of Delegation.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 235–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Taylor, Serge, and van Gaalen, Roland. 1985. “Bureaucratic Expertise versus Legislative Authority: A Model of Deception and Monitoring in Budgeting.” American Political Science Review 79 (4): 1041–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Taylor, Serge, and Van Gaalen, Roland. 1987. “Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Asymmetric Information.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 796–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony, and Lewis, David. 2013. “Policy Influence, Agency-Specific Expertise, and Exit in the Federal Service.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (2): 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, William. 1997. “Reliable Source or Usual Suspects? Cue-taking, Information Transmission, and Legislative Committees.” Journal of Politics 59 (3): 913–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1991. “Information as a Factor in Congressional Politics.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4): 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2015. “The Dysfunctional Congress.” American Review of Political Science 18 (1): 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Peter. 2013. Congress’s Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–1995). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Alexander, and Thrower, Sharece. 2021. Checks in the Balance: Legislative Capacity and the Dynamics of Executive Power. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2016. “Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public Version 2.0.” Stanford University Libraries (https://data.stanford.edu/dime).Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Christenson, Dino, and Craig, Allison. 2019. “Cue-Taking in Congress: Interest Group Signals from Dear Colleague Letters.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Ryan, Josh, and Edward Sokhey, Anand. 2015. “Examining Legislative Cue-Taking in the US Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (1): 13–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. 1980. “Motivations in Legislative Information Use.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (3): 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasher, Holly. 2006. “Listening to Hearings.” American Politics Research 34 (5): 583–604.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownstein, Ronald. 2022. “The House GOP’s Investigation Conundrum.” The Atlantic, November 24 (www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/11/republican-house-majority-biden-investigations/672259/).Google Scholar
Burgat, Casey, and Hunt, Charles. 2020. “How Committee Staffers Clear the Runway for Legislative Action in Congress.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform, ed. LaPira, Timothy, Drutman, Lee, and Kosar, Kevin. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1999. Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul, and Hirsh, Elizabeth. 2007. “Interest Organizations, Information, and Policy Innovation in the U.S. Congress.” Sociological Forum 22 (2): 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, and Peter Rosendorff, B.. 1993. “A Signaling Theory of Congressional Oversight.” Games and Economic Behaviors 5 (1): 44–70.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Gray, Cody, Kastellec, Jonathan, and Park, Jee-Kwang. 2020. “From Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism.” Journal of Law and Courts 8 (2): 301–332.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, and Park, Jee-Kwang. 2007. “A Primer of the President’s Program.” In Presidential Leadership: The Vortex of Power, ed. Rockman, Bert and Waterman, Richard. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, David, and Montgomery, Jacob M.. 2017. “A Pairwise Comparison Framework for Fast, Flexible, and Reliable Human Coding of Political Texts.” American Political Science Review 111 (4): 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M.. 1998. “The Strength of Weak Ties in Lobbying Networks: Evidence from Health-Care Politics in the United States.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (4): 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Caitlin, Gode, Jackson, Turner Lee, Nicole, and Reynolds, Molly. 2021. “With New House Rules, More Diversity in Technology Legislation and Hearings Is Possible.” Brookings (www.brookings.edu/articles/with-new-house-rules-more-diversity-in-technology-legislation-and-hearings-is-possible/).Google Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O’Brien, Diana, and Piscopo, Jennifer. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Anthony Bertelli, Christian Grose, Lewis, David, and Nixon, David. 2012. “Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey. 1995. “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosson, Jesse, Furnas, Alexander, Lapira, Timothy, and Burgat, Casey. 2021. “Partisan Competition and the Decline in Legislative Capacity among Congressional Offices.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46 (3): 745–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRS. 2006. “Hearings in the House of Representatives: A Guide for Preparation and Procedure.” Updated June 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Curry, James. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James. 2019. “Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 203–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James, and Rosenstiel, Leah. 2023. “Unorthodox Lawmaking and the Value of Committee Assignments.” Working Paper (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tj5lLfZoRgqyuCm5ONFp60NsnvB2JBX-/view).Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H., and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1985. Congress and Its Members. CQ Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christopher. 2015. “House Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses.” Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher, and Smith, Steven. 1997. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed. CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGregorio, Christine. 1994. “Professional Committee Staff as Policymaking Partners in the U.S. Congress.” Congress and the Presidency 21 (1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delevoye, Angele. 2020. “Ideology and Polarization in Congressional Hearings.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Dellis, Arnaud. 2023. “Legislative Informational Lobbying.” Journal of Economic Theory 208: 105595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy. 2000. “Information and Congressional Hearings.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Schott, Richard L.. 1979. Congress and the Administrative State. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Patrick, and Mullin, Megan. 2017. “Climate Change: US Public Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science 20 (2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Groll, Thomas. 2020. “Strategic Legislative Subsidies: Informational Lobbying and the Cost of Policy.” American Political Science Review 114 (1): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transactional Costs Politics Approach to Politics under the Separation of Power. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin. 2004. The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency. The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, Kevin. 2007. “Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Diana. 1996. “Before the Roll Call: Interest Group Lobbying and Public Policy Outcomes in House Committees.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (2): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Martha. 1989. Order without Design: Information Production and Policymaking. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Flemming, Roy, MacLeod, Michael, and Talbert, Jeffrey. 1998. “Witnesses at the Confirmations? The Appearance of Organized Interests at Senate Hearings of Federal Judicial Appointments, 1945–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (3): 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flock, Elizabeth. 2012. “Birth Control Hearing on Capitol Hill Had Mostly Male Panel of Witnesses (photo).” The Washington Post, February 16 (www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/birth-control-hearing-on-capitol-hill-had-all-male-panel-of-witnesses/2012/02/16/gIQA6BM5HR_blog.html).Google Scholar
Fong, Christian. 2020. “Expertise, Networks, and Interpersonal Influence in Congress.” Journal of Politics 82 (1): 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman, Christopher. 1988. Signals from the Hill: Congressional Oversight and the Challenge of Social Regulations. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fouirnaies, Alexander, and Hall, Andrew. 2018. “How Do Interest Groups Seek Access to Committees?” American Journal of Political Science 62 (1): 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnas, Alexander C., and LaPira, Timothy M.. 2020. “Long-Term Trends in Congress’s Brain Drain.” www.newamerica.org/political-reform/reports/congressional-brain-drain/long-term-trends-in-congresss-brain-drain/. Accessed 2023-11-18.Google Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John. 2012a. “Formal Models of Bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John. 2012b. Learning While Governing: Information, Accountability, and Executive Branch Institutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within US House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Jeremy, Wilkenfeld, Gilad, and Scott Adler, E.. 2015. “The Opportunistic President: How US Presidents Determine Their Legislative Programs.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 363–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 531–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 100–119.Google Scholar
Gormley, William. 1998. “Witnesses for the Revolution.” American Politics Quarterly 26 (2): 1740195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2000. “Where Do Policy Ideas Come From? A Study of Minnesota Legislators and Staffers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (3): 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Matthew, and Crouch, Jeffrey. 2022. Newt Gingrich: The Rise and Fall of a Party Entrepreneur. University Press of Kansas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenzke, Janet. 1989. “PAC and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency Is Complex.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin, and Munger, Michael. 1986. “The Impact of Legislator Attitudes on Interest-Group Campaign Contributions.” Journal of Labor Research 7: 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin, and Munger, Michael. 1993. “Comparing Interest Group PAC Contributions to House and Senate Incumbents, 1980–1986.” Journal of Politics 55 (3): 615–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach, Jacob, Sahn, Alexander, and Staszak, Sarah. 2022. “Gender, Race, and Intersectionality in Campaign Finance.” Political Behavior 44 (2): 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1987. “Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committee.” American Political Science Review 84 (4): 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heitshusen, Valerie. 2017. “Senate Committee Hearings: Arranging Witnesses.” Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Hertel-Fernandez, Alexander, Mildenberger, Matto, and Stokes, Leah. 2019. “Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David. 1998. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David. 1999. “The Who and How of Organizations’ Lobbying Strategies in Committee.” Journal of Politics 61: 999–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, Shipan, Charles, and Pfahler, Madelaine. 2001. “Legislative and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and McCarty, Nolan. 2004. “Bureaucratic Capacity, Delegation, and Political Reform.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huitt, Ralph K. 1954. “The Congressional Committee: A Case Study.” American Political Science Review 48 (2): 340–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Eddie Bernice. 2019. “Experts Needed: Options for Improved Science and Technology Advice for Congress.” U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, & Technology.Google Scholar
Kim, In Song. 2018. “LobbyView: Firm-Level Lobbying & Congressional Bills Database.” MIT Working Paper (http://web.mit.edu/insong/www/pdf/lobbyview.pdf).Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1981. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1997. “Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 519–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberg, Maya. 2023. Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Disfunction in the Legislative Process. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosar, Kevin. 2020. “Legislative Branch Support Agencies: What They Are, What They Do, and Their Uneasy Position in Our System of Government.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform, ed. Drutman, Lee, LaPira, Timothy, and Kosar, Kevin. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krause, George, and Joseph O’Connell, Anne. 2016. “Experiential Learning and Presidential Management of the U.S. Federal Bureaucracy: Logic and Evidence from Agency Leadership Appointment.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 914–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schickler, Eric. 2016. Investigating the President. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Schwartz, Liam. 2008. “Divided Government and Congressional Investigations.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33 (2): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona, and O’Brien, Diana. 2012. “All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 840–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, and Thomas, Herschel F.. 2016. “Congressional Analytical Capacity, Party Polarization, and the Political Economy of Revolving Door Lobbying.” Working Paper (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827615).Google Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, and Thomas, Herschel F.. 2017. Revolving Door Lobbying: Public Service, Private Influence, and the Unequal Representation of Interests. University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, Marchetti, Kathleen, and Thomas, Herschel F.. 2020. “Gender Politics in the Lobbying Profession.” Politics & Gender 16 (3): 816–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPira, Timothy, Drutman, Lee, and Kosar, Kevin R.. 2020. “Overwhelmed: An Introduction to Congress’s Capacity Problem.” In Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2000. “Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2015. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 18: 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances, and Oppenheimer, Bruce. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 2003. President and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946–1997. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leyden, Kevin M. 1995. “Interest Group Resources and Testimony at Congressional Hearings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (3): 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1995. “Information, Access, and Contributions.” Public Choice 85 (3/4): 267–284.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2020. “Prioritized Interests: Diverse Lobbying Coalitions and Congressional Committee Agenda Setting.” Journal of Politics 82 (1): 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth. 2018. “Who Polices the Administrative State?” American Political Science Review 112 (4): 874–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth, Ritchie, Melinda, and Lauterbach, Erinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (3): 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malbin, Michael J. 1980. Unelected Representatives: Congressional Staff and the Future of Representative Government. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1973. U.S. Senators and Their World. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yes and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2017. “The Regulation and Self-Regulation of a Complex Industry.” Journal of Politics 79 (4): 1220–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2019a. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2019b. “Team Policy Production.” Working Paper (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3505655).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., Noll, Roger G., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2): 243–277.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Page, Talbot. 1987. “A Theory of Congressional Delegation.” In Congress: Structure and Policy, ed. McCubbins, Mathew and Sullivan, Terry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, James. 2020. “2019 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report.” Think Tank and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
McGrath, Robert J. 2013. “Congressional Oversight Hearings and Policy Control.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher, and Goedert, Nicholas. 2014. “Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Gary. 2005. “The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Gary J., and Moe, Terry M.. 1983. “Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government.” American Political Science Review 77 (2): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 1989. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. CQ Press.Google Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 2021. “Congressional Reform: A Perspective.” Congressional Research Service R46933.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Ovide, Shira. 2020. “Congress Doesn’t Get Big Tech: By Design.” The New York Times, July 29 (www.nytimes.com/2020/07/29/technology/congress-big-tech.html).Google Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2017. “A Lab Experiment on Committee Hearings: Preferences, Power, and a Quest for Information.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2019. “Committee Chair’s Majority Partisan Status and Its Effect on Information Transmission via Hearings.” Journal of Legislative Studies 25 (4): 614–624.Google Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2021. “When Do Politicians Grandstand? Measuring Message Politics in Committee Hearings.” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Ju Yeon. 2023. “Electoral Rewards for Political Grandstanding.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (17): e2214697120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrott, Michael. 2019. “What Role Do Interest Groups Play in House Committees? A View from Behind the Curtain.” PS: Political Science and Politics 52 (2): 404–409.Google Scholar
Patty, John, and Turner, Ian. 2021. “Ex Post Review and Expert Policymaking: When Does Oversight Reduce Accountability?” Journal of Politics 83 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinney, Robin. 2017. Strange Bedfellows: Interest Group Coalitions, Diverse Partners, and Influence in American Social Policy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Eleanor, and Grimmer, Justin. 2016. “Money in Exile: Campaign Contributions and Committee Access.” Journal of Politics 78 (4): 974–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeremy. 2020. “Gender Imbalance in Expert Testimony at U.S. Senate Hearings.” The Forum 18 (2): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Paul J. 2005. “Deliberation and Decision Making.” In The Legislative Branch, ed. Paul, J. Quirk and Sarah, A. Binder. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J., and Bendix, William. 2011. “Deliberation in Congress.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, ed. George Edwards, III, Frances, E. Lee, and Schickler, Eric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J., Bendix, William, and Bachtiger, Andre. 2018. “Institutional Deliberation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. Bachtiger, Andre, Dryzek, John, Mansbridge, Jane, and Warren, Mark. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Amisa, Neikrie, Jamie, and Beckel, Michael. 2022. “Fair Pay: Why Congress Needs to Invest in Junior Staff.” Accessed November 18, 2023.Google Scholar
Richardson, Mark. 2019. “Politicization and Expertise: Exit, Effort, and Investment.” Journal of Politics 81 (3): 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Mark, Clinton, Joshua, and Lewis, David. 2018. “Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill.” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Melinda. 2018. “Back-Channel Representation: A Study of the Strategic Communication of Senators with the U.S. Department of Labor.” Journal of Politics 80 (1): 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Melinda. 2023. Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Melinda, and Young You, Hye. 2019. “Legislators as Lobbyists.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 65–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, Melinda, and Young You, Hye. 2021. “Women’s Advancement in Politics: Evidence from Congressional Staff.” Journal of Politics 83 (2): 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Snyder, James M.. 1994. “An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 745–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romzek, Barbara, and Utter, Jennifer. 1997. “Congressional Legislative Staff: Political Professionals or Clerks?” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1251–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2002. Managing the President’s Program: Presidential Leadership and Legislative Policy Formulation. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, John. 2020. “The Office of Technology Assessment: History, Authorities, Issues, and Options.” Congressional Research Service R46327.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel. 2015. When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in American History. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Philip Jones, Hye Young You, Burch, Tracy, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry. 2015. “Organizations and the Democratic Representation of Interests: What Does It Mean When Those Organizations Have No Members?” Perspectives on Politics 13 (4): 1017–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith. 2017. “Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Michael, and Young You, Hye. 2020. “Exit Strategy: Career Concerns and Revolving Doors in Congress.” American Political Science Review 114 (1): 270–284.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1986. “The Role of Committees in Agenda Setting in the US Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11 (1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles III, and Woon, Jonathan. 2017. “Congressional Committee Assignments, 103rd to 114th Congresses, 1993–2017.”Google Scholar
Talbert, Jeffrey C., Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 1995. “Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Dorceta. 2016. The Rise of the American Conservation Movement: Power, Privilege, and Environmental Protection. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. The Governmental Process. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.Google Scholar
Tudor, Grant, and Warner, Justin. 2019. “Congress Should Revive the Office of Technology Assessment: Here’s How to Do It.” Brookings Institute, December 18 (www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2019/12/18/congress-should-revive-the-office-of-technology-assessment-heres-how-to-do-it/).Google Scholar
Van Der Slik, Jack, and Stenger, Thomas. 1977. “Citizen Witnesses before Congressional Committees.” Political Science Quarterly 92 (3): 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Justin, and Tudor, Grant. 2019. “The Congressional Futures Office.” Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center Paper (www.belfercenter.org/publication/congressional-futures-office).Google Scholar
Weiner, Eric. 2007. “American Conscience Waking Up to Climate Change.” NPR, July 7 (www.npr.org/2007/07/07/11787222/american-conscience-waking-up-to-climate-change).Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1984. “The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal Agent Perspective (with Applications to the SEC).” Public Choice 44: 147–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., and Moran, Mark. 1983. “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control? Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission.” Journal of Political Economy 91 (5): 765–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfenberger, Donald. 2001. Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, John R. 1985. “PACs, Contributions, and Roll Calls: An Organizational Perspective.” American Political Science Review 79 (2): 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Yackee, Jason Webb, and Webb Yackee, Susan. 2006. “A Bias toward Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Adam. 2019. “Is Position-Taking Contagious? Evidence of Cue-Taking from Two Field Experiments in a State Legislature.” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 340–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×