Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T23:30:38.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Global Health and Responsibility

from Part 2 - Who is Responsible for Remedying Global Health Inequality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Gillian Brock
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Patti Tamara Lenard
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Christine Straehle
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A striking feature concerning the state of global health is that it is characterised by some radical disparities, including those in life expectancy, maternal mortality and malaria-related deaths. Do we have any responsibilities with respect to improving global health? I begin my answer to this question by surveying a number of international practices that contribute to poor global health. We can then appreciate the wide range of different kinds of international practices and policies that facilitate poor global health. Which, if any, are we obligated to reform in our decidedly non-ideal world? How should we allocate responsibilities fairly in bringing about some necessary reforms? I argue that there is an important class of remedial responsibilities that falls on many citizens of affluent, developed states, and their primary agents of change, governments. In order to appreciate why this conclusion follows, I analyse the notion of remedial responsibilities and the grounds on which it may fairly be allocated.

GLOBAL HEALTH: SOME PROBLEMS AND PATTERNS

One of the most striking features about the state of global health is that it is characterised by radical inequalities. Here is just a sample of the more widely noticed kinds. Life expectancy at birth varies enormously: life expectancy in Sierra Leone or Afghanistan is about forty years, whereas those lucky enough to be born in Japan or Australia enjoy a life expectancy of twice that at approximately eighty (Benatar and Upshur 2011: 14–15).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×