Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2024
ABSTRACT
The idea that unions are bureaucratic organizations is an old one. However, there is no consensus on what bureaucracy is, why unions are so often bureaucratic, what the interests of full-time officials are and whether the union officialdom is inevitably a conservative influence within unions. This chapter provides an overview of efforts to answer these questions and attempts to advance thinking about the union officialdom. It considers the ideas of both academic writers and political thinkers committed to working-class movements. It begins by considering why workers create, maintain and join formal organizations and what generates bureaucracy in them. It then examines efforts to explain what bureaucracy is and why workers’ organizations are so often bureaucratic, before turning to the much-debated question of whether the interests of full-time union officials are different from those of the workers they represent and whether the officialdom is always a conservative force within unions.
Keywords: Union organization; union democracy; union bureaucracy; challenges for unions
INTRODUCTION
Union activists and academic analysts of unions have long thought about unions as bureaucratic organizations. However, there is no consensus on what exactly bureaucracy is, why unions are so often bureaucratic, what the interests of full-time union officials – as the personnel of the bureaucracy – are and whether the union officialdom is inevitably a conservative influence within unions. This chapter provides an overview of efforts to answer these questions and seeks to advance thinking about the union officialdom. It considers answers proposed by both a range of academic writers and by political thinkers committed to working-class movements. It begins by considering why workers create, maintain and join formal organizations and where bureaucracy arises from in these circumstances. It then examines efforts to explain what bureaucracy is and why workers’ organizations are so often bureaucratic before turning to the much-debated question of whether the interests of full-time union officials are different from those of the workers they represent and whether the officialdom is always a conservative force within unions.
FORMALITY AND ORGANIZATION
Bureaucracy is a feature of formal organizations (Beetham 1987). While workers have long created and sustained unions and other formal organizations of one kind or another, it is worth pausing to examine why this is the case before considering the phenomenon of bureaucracy itself. Clarity about why workers create, maintain and join formal organizations is helpful for the study of bureaucracy.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.