Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:29:33.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Phonological abilities of Korean–English bilinguals

from Part I - Language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Chungmin Lee
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Greg B. Simpson
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Youngjin Kim
Affiliation:
Ajou University, Republic of Korea
Ping Li
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The information reviewed in this paper is about Korean-English bilinguals; specifically it is about native Koreans who emigrated to the US at different ages. The findings to be reported are colored by the fact that at the time of testing for the main study the participants were long-term residents of the US living in communities in and around the Washington, DC area. The participants lived with their families and spoke Korean at home and Korean was their only language during their preschool years; however, the language environment outside their homes was predominantly English. In studying bilingualism and evaluating the achievement of bilingual individuals it is important to recognize the linguistic make-up of the country of residence. Studies carried out in other linguistic environments may very well produce different results from those reported here.

Theories of first (L1) and second (L2) language acquisition invariably get embroiled in the issue of the Critical or Sensitive Period Hypothesis (CPH). Advocates of the CPH use age of learning as the primary index of the individuals' neural maturational state and do not worry much about the effects of experiential factors that co-vary with age. The majority of studies of L2 pronunciation carried out in the US with immigrant populations show an age of learning effect that favors early L2 learners (Asher & Garcia, 1969; Fathman, 1975; Oyama, 1976; Tahta, Wood & Lowenthal, 1981b; Patkowski, 1990, 1994; Flege, Munro & MacKay, 1995; Flege, Yeni-Komshian & Liu, 1999; Yeni-Komshian, Flege & Liu, 2000; see also research reviewed by Scovel, 1988; Long, 1990; Harley & Wang, 1997, and Birdsong, 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×