Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- 5 Laparotomy
- 6 Diagnostic Laparoscopy
- 7 Operative Laparoscopy
- 8 Hysteroscopy
- 9 Permanent Female Sterilization
- 10 Vaginal Hysterectomy
- 11 Abdominal Hysterectomy
- 12 Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- 13 Robotic Surgery
- 14 Complications of Gynecologic Surgery
- 15 Postoperative Care
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- Index
- References
9 - Permanent Female Sterilization
from Section 2 - Gynecologic Surgery
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 February 2018
Book contents
- Gynecologic Care
- Gynecologic Care
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Section 1 Basic Gynecologic Care Issues
- Section 2 Gynecologic Surgery
- 5 Laparotomy
- 6 Diagnostic Laparoscopy
- 7 Operative Laparoscopy
- 8 Hysteroscopy
- 9 Permanent Female Sterilization
- 10 Vaginal Hysterectomy
- 11 Abdominal Hysterectomy
- 12 Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
- 13 Robotic Surgery
- 14 Complications of Gynecologic Surgery
- 15 Postoperative Care
- Section 3 Infertility
- Section 4 Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
- Section 5 Gynecologic Oncology
- Section 6 General Considerations
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gynecologic Care , pp. 79 - 88Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Patil, E, Jensen, JT. Update on permanent contraception options for women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:465–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finer, LB, Henshaw, SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90–6.Google Scholar
Mosher, WD, Jones, J, Abma, JC. Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;55:1–27. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr055.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar
Daniels, K, Daugherty, J, Jones, J, Mosher, W. Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women age 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;86:1–14. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr086.pdf. Retrieved January 18, 2016.Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 133. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Benefits and risks of sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, MS, Murphy, MA, Vitonis, AF et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England case-control study. Inter Cancer 2013;133:2415–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madsen, C, Baandrup, L, Dehlendorff, C, Kjaer, SK. Tubal ligation and salpingectomy and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: a nationwide case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94:86–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creinin, MD, Zite, N. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:596–9.Google Scholar
Narod, SA, Sun, P, Ghadirian, P et al. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations: a case control study. Lancet 2001;357:1467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 620. Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:279–81.Google Scholar
Kwon, KS, McAlpine, JN, Hanley, GE, et al. Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125;338–45.Google Scholar
Levgur, M, Duvivier, R. Pelvic inflammatory disease after tubal sterilization: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55:41–50.Google Scholar
Bartz, D, Greenberg, JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:23–32.Google Scholar
Curtis, KM, Mohllajee, AP, Peterson, HB. Regret following female sterilization at a young age: a systematic review. Contraception 2006;73:205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, EO, Diedrich, JT, Eisenberg, DL. Surgical procedures for tubal sterilization. Glob. libr. Women’s Med. 2014. DOI 10.3843/GLOWM.10400Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, Wilcox, LS, Taylor, LR, Trussell, J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollapragada, SS, Bandyopadhyay, S, Serle, E, Baird, C. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 2005;83:767–8.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, MI, Edelman, AB, Kapp, N. Postpartum sterilization with the titanium clip: a systemic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:143–7.Google Scholar
Penfield, AJ. The Filshie clip for female sterilization: a review of world experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:485–9.Google Scholar
Dominik, R, Gates, D, Sokal, D et al. Two randomized controlled trials comparing the hulka and filshie clips for tubal sterilization. Contraception 2000;62(4):169–76.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM et al. The risk for ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:762–7.Google Scholar
Malacova, E, Kemp, A, Hart, R, Jama-Alol, K, Preen, DB. Long-term risk of ectopic pregnancy varies by method of tubal sterilization: a whole–population study. Fertil Steril 2014;101:728–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adelman, MR, Dassel, MW, Sharp, HT. Management of complications encountered with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: a systematic review. J Minn Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:733–43.Google Scholar
Moss, C, Isley, M. Sterilization: a review and update. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2015;42:713–24.Google Scholar
Essure instructions for use, www.essuremd.com/App_Themes/BaseTheme/PDFs/Link%20Essure%20IFU.pdf. Retrieved June 3, 2014.Google Scholar
Basinski, CM. A review of clinical data for currently approved hysteroscopic sterilization procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3:101–10.Google Scholar
Povedano, B, Arjona, JE, Velasco, E, Monserrat, JA, Lorente, J, Castelo-Branco, C. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure(®)sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:795–9.Google Scholar
Jamieson, DJ, Hillis, SD, Duerr, A, Marchbanks, PA, Costello, C, Peterson, HB. Complications of Interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:997–1002.Google Scholar
Rios-Castillo, Velasco E, Arjona-Berral, JE, Povedano-Canizares, B, Castelo-Branco, C. Efficacy of Essure hysteroscopy sterilization – 5 years follow up of 1200 women. Gynecol Endolcrinol 2013;29(6):580–582.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Wilcox, LS et al. US collaborative review of sterilization working group. Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with silicone rubber band and spring clip application. Obstet Gynecol 2001;94:205–10.Google Scholar
Pölcher, M, Hauptmann, S, Fotopoulou, C et al. Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:231–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B, Levie, MD, Childers, ME. A summary of reported pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:271–4.Google Scholar
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 615. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:250-Google Scholar
FDA Essure risks and benefits, www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/EssurePermanentBirthControl/ucm452254.html. Retrieved March 8, 2016.Google Scholar