Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editorial preface
- List of contributors
- Introduction: Cracks in the neoclassical mirror: on the break-up of a vision
- Part I Class relations in circulation and production
- Part II The Cambridge criticisms
- Part III Microeconomics
- Part IV Macroeconomics
- 8 Keynes's paradigm: a theoretical framework for monetary analysis
- 9 A post-Keynesian development model of the “Keynesian” model
- 10 A simple framework for the analysis of taxation, distribution, and effective demand
- 11 A classical model of business cycles
- Part V International trade
- Part VI Property and welfare
- Part VII Marxism and modern economics
- Epilogue: The hieroglyph of production
10 - A simple framework for the analysis of taxation, distribution, and effective demand
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Editorial preface
- List of contributors
- Introduction: Cracks in the neoclassical mirror: on the break-up of a vision
- Part I Class relations in circulation and production
- Part II The Cambridge criticisms
- Part III Microeconomics
- Part IV Macroeconomics
- 8 Keynes's paradigm: a theoretical framework for monetary analysis
- 9 A post-Keynesian development model of the “Keynesian” model
- 10 A simple framework for the analysis of taxation, distribution, and effective demand
- 11 A classical model of business cycles
- Part V International trade
- Part VI Property and welfare
- Part VII Marxism and modern economics
- Epilogue: The hieroglyph of production
Summary
Development of the theory of fiscal policy has been inhibited by the lack of a satisfactory theory of real fiscal incidence. By default, fiscal policies are proposed, analyzed and implemented using the naive assumption that the real incidence of fiscal measures is the same as their legal incidence.
The problem of the real incidence of the fiscal activity of the state has two dimensions:
The relationship between nominal tax rates (legal incidence) and the real distribution of income for any given level and composition of total output; and
The relationship between the mix of tax rates, the overall scale of fiscal activity, and the level and composition of effective demand.
The formidable complexity of the problem derives from the necessity of tackling both dimensions at the same time, and at the general (as opposed to the partial) level. This requires the integration of a theory of value and distribution with the theory of effective demand.
The objective here is to present a framework of analysis which is suited to this task. This framework is used to identify the crucial elements which must be incorporated into a full theory of fiscal incidence; it provides a setting within which such elements may be combined and manipulated, and represents, in itself, a check on the conditions which any theory of incidence must satisfy. The formal framework is constructed on a basis of strong simplifying assumptions, but is capable of extensive generalization. The incorporation of more complex relationships between the variables, or the extension of the framework to include functional specification of what are here expressed as constants, would make the analysis more complicated, but would not invalidate the general approach.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Growth, Profits and PropertyEssays in the Revival of Political Economy, pp. 165 - 172Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1980
- 2
- Cited by