Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:10:21.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On some questions concerning subnormally monomial groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2010

C. M. Campbell
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
E. F. Robertson
Affiliation:
University College, Galway
T. C. Hurley
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
S. J. Tobin
Affiliation:
University College, Galway
E Horváth
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology, 1521 Budapest, Hungary
Get access

Summary

In his papers [4], [5] and [6] Guan-Aun How described some properties of SM (subnormally monomial) groups. He proved that the class of SM groups is the intersection of the class of CSF (chiefly sub-Frobenius) and the class X of those solvable groups G, for which for all primes p and for all subgroups A, Op(A) has no central p-factor. Among other things, he proved that the class of SM-groups is closed under taking direct products, factor groups and subgroups. First we consider the relation between SM groups, subgroup-closed M-groups and supersolvable groups, showing that these classes are all distinct. For the class of Frobenius groups the first two classes coincide, and they properly contain the class of supersolvable Frobenius groups. For Frobenius complements the three classes are equal. The class SM is not closed under extensions. We show that even the split extension of an abelian group with an SM-group can be non-SM. On the basis of the notion of relative M-groups, we introduce the notion of relative SM-groups. We investigate whether some results which are known to be true for relative M-groups, remain true for relative SM-groups or not. Some of them remain true: we show that every SM-group is relative SM with respect to every abelian normal subgroup. According to [7], if G/N is supersolvable, then G is relative M-group with respect to N. The analogous statement is not true for SM: it may happen that G/N is supersolvable, but G is not relative SM with respect to N. However, if G/N is nilpotent, then G is relative SM with respect to N.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×