Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:02:11.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Article 102 TFEU

from Part II - The role of environmental protection in EU competition law and policy in practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Suzanne Kingston
Suzanne Kingston
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Greening EU Competition Law and Policy , pp. 294 - 327
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Vickers, J.‘Abuse of Market Power’ 2005 115 Economic Journal244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, M.‘The European Commission's Guidance Communication on Article 82’ 2009 30 European Competition Law Review593Google Scholar
O'Donoghue, R.Padilla, J.The Law and Economics of Article 82 ECOxfordHart Publishing 2006Google Scholar
Ridyard, D.‘Article 82 Price Abuses – Towards a More Economic Approach’Ehlermann, C.-D.Atanasiu, I.European Competition Law Annual – What Is an Abuse of a Dominant Position?OxfordHart Publishing 2006Google Scholar
Waelbroeck, D.‘Michelin : A Per Se Rule against Rebates by Dominant Companies?’ 2005 1 Journal of Competition Law and Economics149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faull, J.Nikpay, A.The EC Law of CompetitionOxfordOxford University Press 2007
Witt, A.‘The Commission's Guidance Paper on Abusive Exclusionary Conduct – More Radical Than It Appears?’ 2010 35 European Law Review214Google Scholar
Lovdahl Gormsen, L.‘Why the European Commission's Enforcement Priorities on Article 82 EC Should Be Withdrawn’ 2010 31 European Competition Law Review45Google Scholar
Chiriţă, A.‘The EC Commission's Guidance Paper on the Application of Article 82 EC: An Efficient means of Compliance for Germany?’ 2009 5 European Competition Journal677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridyard, D.‘The Commission's Article 82 Guidelines: Some Reflections on the Economic Issues’ 2009 30 European Competition Law Review230Google Scholar
Kellerbauer, M.‘The Commission's New Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 EC to Dominant Companies’ 2010 31 European Competition Law Review175Google Scholar
Bishop, S.Walker, M.The Economics of EC Competition Law: Concepts, Application and MeasurementLondonSweet & Maxwell 2010Google Scholar
Kato, M.‘Transitoriness of Market Power and Antitrust Activity’ 2010 6 Journal of Competition Law and Economics393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glader, M.Innovation Markets and Competition Analysis: EU Competition Law and US Competition LawCheltenhamEdward Elgar 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lianos, I.‘Categorical Thinking in Competition Law and the Effects-Based Approach in Article 82 EC’Ezrachi, A.Article 82 EC: Reflections on Its Recent EvolutionOxfordHart Publishing 2009Google Scholar
Rousseva, E.Rethinking Exclusionary Abuses in EU Competition LawOxfordHart Publishing 2010Google Scholar
Polo, M.‘Anticompetitive Versus Competitive Explanations of Unilateral Practices: The Identification Problem’ 2010 6 Journal of Competition Law and Economics457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R.Antitrust LawChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press 1976Google Scholar
Rousseva, E.‘Objective Justification and Article 82 EC in the Era of Modernisation’Amato, G.Ehlermann, C.-D.EC Competition Law: A Critical AssessmentOxfordHart Publishing 2007Google Scholar
Vogelaar, F.‘Comments on Prof. Jacques Steenbergen's Contribution on “Proportionality in Competition Law and Policy”’ 2008 35 Legal Issues of Economic Integration269Google Scholar
Albors-Llorens, A.‘The Role of Objective Justification and Efficiencies in Article 82 EC’ 2007 44 Common Market Law Review1727Google Scholar
Loewenthal, P.‘The Defence of “Objective Justification” in the Application of Article 82 EC’ 2005 28 World Competition455Google Scholar
Steenbergen, J.‘Proportionality in Competition Law and Policy’ 2008 35 Legal Issues of Economic Integration259Google Scholar
Canada, P. Glossop 2009 30 European Competition Law Review
Vedder, H.Competition Law and Environmental Protection in Europe: Towards Sustainability?GroningenEuropa Law Publishing 2003Google Scholar
Kjølbye, L.‘Rebates under Article 82 EC: Navigating Uncertain Waters’ 2010 European Competition Law Review 66Google Scholar
Baccaro, V.‘Collecte et recyclage des batteries usagées en Italie: droits exclusives, exigences environnementales et droit de la concurrence’ 2001 1 Competition Policy Newsletter39Google Scholar
Vickers, J.‘Competition Policy and Property Rights’ 2010 120 Economic Journal375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission Report on Competition PolicyLuxembourgOffice of Official Publications of the European Communities 1994Google Scholar
Eilmansberger, T.‘How to Distinguish Good from Bad Competition under Article 82 EC: In Search of Clearer and More Coherent Standards for Anti-Competitive Abuses’ 2005 42 Common Market Law Review129Google Scholar
Stone, J.‘Restraints on Competition through the Alteration of the Environment at the Genetic Level’ 2000 8 NYU Environmental Law Journal704Google Scholar
Weishaar, S.‘The European Emissions Trading System and Competition – Anti-Competitive Measures beyond Reach? An Assessment of the Grandfathering Allocation Method and the Performance Standard Rate System’ 2006 European Competition Law Review 371Google Scholar
Faull, J.Nikpay, A.The EC Law of CompetitionOxfordOxford University Press 2007
Vedder, H.‘An Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage under EC Competition Law’ 2008 European Competition Law Review 586Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Article 102 TFEU
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Article 102 TFEU
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Article 102 TFEU
  • Suzanne Kingston, University College Dublin
  • Book: Greening EU Competition Law and Policy
  • Online publication: 05 November 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511758522.014
Available formats
×