Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 The N-body problem
- 2 Predictor–corrector methods
- 3 Neighbour treatments
- 4 Two-body regularization
- 5 Multiple regularization
- 6 Tree codes
- 7 Program organization
- 8 Initial setup
- 9 Decision-making
- 10 Neighbour schemes
- 11 Two-body algorithms
- 12 Chain procedures
- 13 Accuracy and performance
- 14 Practical aspects
- 15 Star clusters
- 16 Galaxies
- 17 Planetary systems
- 18 Small-N experiments
- Appendix A Global regularization algorithms
- Appendix B Chain algorithms
- Appendix C Higher-order systems
- Appendix D Practical algorithms
- Appendix E KS procedures with GRAPE
- Appendix F Alternative simulation method
- Appendix G Table of symbols
- Appendix H Hermite integration method
- References
- Index
4 - Two-body regularization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 The N-body problem
- 2 Predictor–corrector methods
- 3 Neighbour treatments
- 4 Two-body regularization
- 5 Multiple regularization
- 6 Tree codes
- 7 Program organization
- 8 Initial setup
- 9 Decision-making
- 10 Neighbour schemes
- 11 Two-body algorithms
- 12 Chain procedures
- 13 Accuracy and performance
- 14 Practical aspects
- 15 Star clusters
- 16 Galaxies
- 17 Planetary systems
- 18 Small-N experiments
- Appendix A Global regularization algorithms
- Appendix B Chain algorithms
- Appendix C Higher-order systems
- Appendix D Practical algorithms
- Appendix E KS procedures with GRAPE
- Appendix F Alternative simulation method
- Appendix G Table of symbols
- Appendix H Hermite integration method
- References
- Index
Summary
Introduction
Sooner or later during the integration of an N-body system close encounters create configurations that lead to difficulties or at best become very time-consuming if studied by direct methods. On further investigation one usually finds a binary of short period slowing down the calculation and introducing unacceptable systematic errors. Moreover, the eccentricity may attain a large value that necessitates small time-steps in the pericentre region unless special features are introduced. It can be seen that a relative criterion of the type (ηR/|F|)½ for a binary yields an approximate time-step Δt ∝ R3/2, where R is the two-body separation. From this it follows that eccentric orbits require more steps for the same period. Even a relatively isolated binary may therefore become quite expensive to integrate as well as cause a significant drift in the total system energy. It is convenient to characterize the systematic error of a binary integration by the relative change per Kepler orbit, α = Δa/a. For example, using the basic Hermite method we find α = –1.3×10–6 with 270 steps per orbit and an eccentricity e = 0.9. At this rate of inward spiralling, the binary energy would be significantly affected after 104 – 105 periods. Although better behaved, less eccentric systems are also time-consuming, giving α = –4×10–8 for e = 0.2 and 135 steps per orbit.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Gravitational N-Body SimulationsTools and Algorithms, pp. 51 - 65Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 3
- Cited by