Adelaar, K. A. 1997. An exploration of directional systems in West Indonesia and Madagaskar. In Senft, G. (ed.), Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages (pp. 53–81). Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 15. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Adzomada, J. K. 1979. L'Ewe Standard. Lomé: Institut National de Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar

Agbodeka, F. K. 1997. A handbook of Eweland, Vol. 1: The Ewe of southeastern Ghana. Accra: Woeli Publishers.Google Scholar

Agesthialingom, S. 1979. A grammar of Old Tamil (1st edn). Annamalainagar, South India: Annamalai University.Google Scholar

Aissen, J. L. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aklif, G. 1999. Ardiyooloon Bardi ngaanka: One arm point Bardi dictionary. Halls Creek: Kimberley Language Resource Centre.Google Scholar

Alpher, B. 1991. Yir-Yoront Lexicon. Sketch and dictionary of an Australian language. Trends in Linguistics, Documentation 6. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1987. A comparative analysis of linguistic routines in two languages: English and Ewe. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 229–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1988. The grammatical coding of the terminal viewpoint of situations in Ewe. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8(2): 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10(2): 139–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1991. Ewe: its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

Ameka, F. K. 1992. Focus constructions in Ewe and Akan: A comparative perspective. In Collins, C. and Manfredi, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop MIT 1992 (pp. 1–25). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17. Cambridge MA: MIT Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1994. When verbs defy description: Explorations in the semantics of some Ewe verbs. The function and structure of the verb in African languages. 2nd Nordic Seminar on African Linguistics, 11–12 November, 1994. University of Trondheim, Norway.

Ameka, F. K. 1995. The linguistic construction of space in Ewe. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3): 139–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1996. Body parts in Ewe grammar. In Chappell, H. and McGregor, W. (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation (pp. 783–840). Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1998. Les particules énonciatives en Ewe. In Platiel, S. and Kabore, R. (eds.), Les langues d'Afrique Subsaharienne (pp. 179–204). Faits de Langues 11–12. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 1999. Spatial information packaging in Ewe and Likpe: A comparative perspective. In Neumann, S. (ed.), Comparing African spaces (pp. 7–34). Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter 11. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 2003a. ‘Today is far’: Situational anaphors in overlapping constructions in Ewe. In Kropp, M. E. Dakubu and Osam, K. (eds.), Studies in the languages of the Volta Basin 1 (pp. 9–22). Legon: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Ghana.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. 2003b. Prepositions and postpositions in Ewe (Gbe): Empirical and theoretical considerations. In P. Sauzet and A. Zibri-Hertz (eds.), Typologie des langues afriques et universaux de la grammaire, Vol. II: Benue-Kwa, Wolof (pp. 41–67). Paris: L'Harmattan.

Ameka, F. K., de Witte, C. and Wilkins, D. P. 1999. A picture series for positional verbs: Eliciting the verbal component in locative descriptions. In Wilkins, D. P. (ed.), A manual for the 1999 field season, Version 1.0 (pp. 48–56). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. K. and Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Adverbialiser or predicate(ion) marker? Ewe -i and its relatives in a typological perspective. Third World Congress of African Linguistics. Université du Benin, Lomé, Togo, 2000.

Ameka, F. K. and Essegbey, J. 2001. Serialising languages: Verb-framed, satellite-framed or neither? Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on African linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, 2001. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar

Ameka, F. and Levinson, S. (in preparation). Introduction to positionals: The state of the art. Special issue of Linguistics.

Andrade, M. J. 1955. A grammar of Modern Yucatec. Chicago: University of Chicago Library. Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts on Middle American Cultural Anthropology, 41.Google Scholar

Ansre, G. 1966a. The verbid: A caveat to serial verbal constructions. Journal of West African Languages 3(1): 29–32.Google Scholar

Ansre, G. 1966b. The grammatical units of Ewe. PhD dissertation, University of London.

Ansre, G. 1971. Language standardisation in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. VII: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 680–98). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ansre, G. 2000. The Ewe language. In Gavua, K. (ed.), A handbook of Eweland, Vol. II: The Noehen Ewes in Ghana (pp. 22–47). Accra: Woeli Publishers.Google Scholar

Armstrong, W. E. 1928. Rossel Island: An ethnological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arden, A. H. 1942. A progressive grammar of the Tamil language. Madras: Christian Literature Society.Google Scholar

Arden, A. H. 1954. A progressive grammar of common Tamil. Madras: Christian Literature Society.Google Scholar

Aske, J. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In Hall, K., Meacham, M. and Shapiro, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. General Session and parasession on theoretical issues in language reconstruction (pp. 1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Austin, P. 1989. Verb compounding in Central Australian languages. La Trobe University Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. II.Google Scholar

Ayres, G. and Pfeiler, B. 1997. Los verbos mayas. La conjugación en el maya yucateco moderno [The Mayan verbs. Conjugation in modern Yukatek Maya]. Mérida, Yucatán: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (Tratados; 4).Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. 1945. Usituma! A song of heaven. Oceania 15: 201–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, B. 1950. Kadaguwai songs of the Trobriand Isles. Oceania 20: 263–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbiers, S. 1998. English and Dutch as SOV-languages and the distribution of CP-complements. In Bezooijen, R. and Kager, R. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 13–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Barrera-Vásquez, A. 1946. La Lengua Maya de Yucatán [The Mayan language of Yucatan]. Enciclopedia Yucatenense, Vol. VI (pp. 205–92). México, DF: Gobierno de Yucatán.Google Scholar

Barrera-Vásquez, A. et al. 1980. Diccionario Maya Cordemex. Mérida, Yucatán: Ediciones Cordemex.Google Scholar

Becquelin, A. 1997. Parlons Tzeltal: Une langue Maya du Mexique. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar

Beliën, M. 2002. Force dynamics in static propositions: Dutch aan, op and tegen. In Cuyckens, H. and Radden, G. (eds.), Perspectives on prepositions (pp. 195–209). Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beltrán de Santa, Rosa P. 1746. Arte de el idioma Maya reducido a succintas reglas [Art of the Maya idiom, reduced to succinct rule]. Box 46, Folder 1, William E. Gates Collection, Harold B. Lee Library. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Berlin, B. 1968. Tzeltal numeral classifiers: A study in ethnographic semantics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, B., Kaufman, T. and Maffi, L. 1990. Un diccionario básico del Tzeltal de Tenejapa, Chiapas, México. Procomith Project, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Berman, R. and Slobin, D. I. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bickel, B. 1997. Spatial operations in deixis, cognition, and culture: Where to orient oneself in Belhare. In Nuyts, J. and Pederson, E. (eds.), Language and conceptualization (pp. 46–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, R. W. 1964. Yucatec Maya noun and verb morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

Blair, R. W. and Vermont-Salas, R. 1965–7. Spoken (Yucatec) Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago, Dept. of Anthropology. Ms. on Microfilm.

Blake, B. 1987. Australian Aboriginal Grammar. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. 1997. Yucatec Mayan lexicalization patterns in time and space. In Biemans, M. and Weijer, J. v.d. (eds.), Proceedings of the CLS opening academic year 1997–1998 (pp. 73–106). Tilburg: Center for Language Studies.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. 2002. The grammar of time reference in Yukatek Maya. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. 2004. Split intransitivity, linking and lexical representation: The case of Yukatek Maya. Linguistics 42(1): 67–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. (in press). The pitfalls of getting from here to there: bootstrapping the syntax and semantics of motion event expressions in Yucatec Maya. In Bowerman, M. and Brown, P. (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. n.d. Two ways to skin a cat: Alternative approaches to the analysis of spatial demonstratives. Ms. Submitted to M. Dunn and S. Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. University at Buffalo – SUNY.

Bohnemeyer, J. and Brown P. (in press). Standing divided: Dispositional verbs and locative predications in two Mayan languages. To appear in F. Ameka and S. C. Levinson (eds.), Special issue of Linguistics. University of Buffalo – SUNY.

Bolt, J. E., Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M. 1971a. An elementary grammar of the Ngaliwuru language of the Northern Territory. Unpublished manuscript, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.

Bolt, J. E., Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M. 1971b. An elementary grammar of the Nungali language of the Northern Territory. Unpublished manuscript, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.

Boogaart, R. J. U. 1999. Aspect and temporal ordering. A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Free University Amsterdam.

Bowden, J. 1992. Behind the preposition. Grammaticalisation of locatives in Oceanic languages. Pacific Linguistics Series B-107. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Bowerman, M. 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. (eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Breen, G. and Pensalfini, R. 1999. Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bricker, V. R. 1981. Grammatical introduction. In Po'ot, E. Yah (ed.), Yucatec Maya verbs (Hocaba dialect) (pp. ⅵ–ⅹⅼⅶ). [With a grammatical introduction by Victoria R. Bricker. Trans. James Ward.] Tulane: Center for Latin American Studies, Tulane University (Latin American Studies Curriculum Aids).Google Scholar

Bricker, V. R. 1986. A grammar of Mayan hieroglyphs. Middle American Research Institute Publication 56. New Orleans: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University.Google Scholar

Bricker, V. R., Po'ot, Yah E. and Dzul de Po'ot, O. 1998. A Dictionary of the Maya language as spoken in Hocabá, Yucatán. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Britto, F. 1986. Diglossia: A study of the theory with application to Tamil. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Broekhuis, H. 2002. Adpositions and adposition phrases. MGD Occasional Papers 3. University of Tilburg.

Brown, P. 1991. Spatial conceptualization in Tzeltal. Working Paper No. 6, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

Brown, P. 1993. The role of shape in the acquisition of Tzeltal (Mayan) locatives. In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Child Language Research Forum (pp. 211–20). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 1994. The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics 32: 743–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. 2000. ‘He descended legs upwards’: Motion and stasis in Tzeltal child and adult narratives. In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Child Language Research Forum (pp. 67–75). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 2001. Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language-specific bias for verb learning? In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. 2002. Language as a model for culture: Lessons from the cognitive sciences. In King, B. and Fox, R. (eds.), Anthropology beyond culture (pp. 169–92). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 2003. Position and motion in Tzeltal frog stories: The acquisition of narrative style. In Strömqvist, S. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 37–57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 1992. ‘Left’ and ‘right’ in Tenejapa: Investigating a linguistic and conceptual gap. In León, L. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Space in Amerindian languages. Special issue of Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(6): 590–611.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 1993a. ‘Uphill’ and ‘downhill’ in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3(1): 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 1993b. Linguistic and nonlinguistic coding of spatial arrays: Explorations in Mayan cognition. Working Paper No. 24, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 1993c. Shaping the world: Semantic distinctions of shape and orientation in Tzeltal roots. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association meetings, Washington, DC.

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. 2000. Frames of spatial reference and their acquisition in Tenejapan Tzeltal. In Nucci, L., Saxe, G. and Turiel, E. (eds.), Culture, thought and development (pp. 167–97). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (in prep.). Tilted worlds: The language and cognition of space in a Mayan community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar

Burrow, T. and Emeneau, M. B. 1984. A Dravidian etymological dictionary (2nd edn). Oxford:Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. and Kaufman, T. 1990. Lingüística Mayance: ¿dónde nos encontramos ahora? [Mayan linguistics: where are we now?] In England, N. C. and Elliot, S. R. (eds.), Lecturas sobre la lingüística Maya [Lectures on Mayan linguistics] (pp. 51–8). La Antigua, Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar

Capell, A. 1940. The classification of languages in north and north-west Australia. Oceania 10: 241–72, 404–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capell, A. 1969. A survey of New Guinea languages. Sydney University Press.

Capell, A. 1976. General picture of Austronesian languages, New Guinea area. In Wurm, S. A. (ed.), Austronesian languages – New Guinea area languages and language study, Vol. II (pp. 5–52). Pacific Linguistics Series C-39. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Capo, H. B. C. 1979. Notes on language differentiation: Lessons from a Gbe dialect survey. Anthropological Linguistics 21: 419–42.Google Scholar

Capo, H. B. C. 1991. A comparative phonology of Gbe. Berlin and Garome: de Gruyter (Foris) and LABOGBE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlin, E. B. 1997. Nominal possession in Trio. In Coerts, J. and Hoop, H. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 25–36). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carlin, E. B. 1998. Speech community formation: A sociolinguistic profile of the Trio of Suriname. New West Indian Guide/Nieuwe West-Indische Gids 72(1/2): 4–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlin, E. B. 1999. WYSIWYG in Amazonia: The grammatical expression of truth and knowledge. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 30: 233–45.

Carlin, E. B. 2003. The experiencer role in the expression of mental states and activities in Trio. Amérindia 28: 161–82.

Carlin, E. B. 2004. A grammar of Trio: A Cariban language of Suriname. Duisburger Arbeiten zur Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft, Vol. 55. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang (Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften).

Carlin, E. B. 2006. The verbalizers in Trio (Cariban): A semantic description. In J. Grazyna Rowicka and E. B. Carlin (eds.), What's in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, LOT Occasional Series. Utrecht, the Netherlands: LOT.

Carroll, M. and Stutterheim, C. 1993. The representation of spatial configurations in English and German and the grammatical structure of locative and anaphoric expressions. Linguistics 31: 1011–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadwick, N. 1984. The relationship of Jingulu and Jaminjungan. Unpublished manuscript, School of Australian Linguistics, Batchelor.

Chadwick, N. 1997. The Barkly and Jaminjungan languages: A non-contiguous genetic grouping. In Tryon, D. T. and Walsh, M. (eds.), Boundary rider: Studies in the lexicology and comparative linguistics of Australian languages (pp. 95–106). Pacific Linguistics Series C-136. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Choi, S. and Bowerman, M. 1991. Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41: 83–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, E. 1978. Locationals: Existential, locative, and possessive constructions. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. IV: Syntax (pp. 85–126). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Claudi, U. and Heine, B. 1986. On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in Language 10: 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, G. N. 1972. The verbal syntax of Ewe. PhD dissertation, University of London.

Clements, G. N. 1979. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10(2): 141–77.Google Scholar

Cleverly, J. R. 1968. A preliminary study of the phonology and grammar of Djamindjung. Unpublished manuscript, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.

Collins, C. 1993. Topics in Ewe syntax. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Amherst.

Collins, C. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28(3): 461–97.Google Scholar

Coronel, J. 1620. Arte, en lengua Maya [Art of the Mayan language]. Box 46, Folder 2, William E. Gates Collection, Harold B. Lee Library. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Creissels, D. 2000. Typology. In Heine, B. and Nurse, D. (eds.), African languages: An introduction (pp. 231–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crowley, T. 1987. Serial verbs in Paamese. Studies in Language 11: 35–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cunningham, W. 1990. Buki Tapwaroro. Hong Kong: Caritas Printing Training Center.Google Scholar

Cuyckens, H. 1991. The semantics of spatial prepositions in Dutch: A cognitive-linguistic exercise. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.

Danziger, E. 1998. Getting here from there: The acquisition of ‘Point of View’ in Mopan Maya. In Danziger, E. (ed.), Language, space, and culture. Special issue of Ethos 26(1): 48–72.Google Scholar

Dayley, J. P. 1981. Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 3–82.Google Scholar

Dayley, J. P. 1990. Voz y ergadividad en idiomas Mayas [Voice and ergativity in Mayan languages]. In England, N. C. and Elliott, S. R. (eds.), Lecturas sobre la lingüística Maya [Lectures on Mayan linguistics] (pp. 335–98). La Antigua, Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar

De Goeje, C. H. 1909. Grammaire et vocabulaire de la langue Trio. In De, C. H. Goeje (ed.), Études linguistiques caraïbes (pp. 181–244). Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.Google Scholar

Dench, A. C. 1995. Martuthunira. A language of the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Pacific Linguistics Series C-125. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, D. C. 1979. Hixkaryana. Lingua Descriptive Studies, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, D. C. 1999. Carib. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages (pp. 23–64). Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dhamotharan, A. 1972. A Grammar of Tirukkural, Vol. V. Delhi: South Asia Institute, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donaldson, B. C. 1997. Dutch: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. 1977. Maps in minds. Reflections on cognitive mapping. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Dryer, M. S. 1997. Postpositional clitics vs. case suffixes. Paper presented to ALT II Conference, Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Durie, M. 1997. Grammatical structures in verb serialization. In Alsina, A., Bresnan, J. and Sells, P. (eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 289–354). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Dürr, M. 1991. Reference to space in colonial Quiche. In P. Gómez López et al. (eds.), Estudios sobre lenguas amerindias (pp. 47–78). Universidad de Guadalajara. Guadalajara: Centro de Investigación de Lenguas Indígenas, [Función Num. 8 (1988)].

Duthie, A. S. 1996. Introducing Ewe linguistic patterns. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar

Edmonson, M. S. 1986. Heaven born Merida and its destiny. The book of Chilam Balam of Chumayel. The Texas Pan American Series. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

England, N. C. 1978. Space as a Mam grammatical theme. In England, N. C. (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics (pp. 225–38). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Essegbey, J. 1994. Anaphoric phenomena in Ewe. MPhil thesis, University of Trondheim.

Essegbey, J. 1999. Inherent complement verbs revisited: Towards an understanding of argument structure in Ewe. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.

Essegbey, J. 2002. The syntax of inherent complement verbs in Ewe. In Ameka, F. K. and Osam, E. K. (eds.), New directions in Ghanaian linguistics (pp. 55–84). Accra: Black Mask.Google Scholar

Essegbey, J. Essegbey, J. (in press). The potential in Ewe: A reexamination of the so-called -a future marker. In F. K. Ameka and M. K. Dakubu (eds.), Aspect and modality in Kwa languages of Ghana.

Evans, N. 1995. A Grammar of Kayardild. Mouton Grammar Library 15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, N. and Wilkins, D. 2000. The knowing ear: An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition. Language 76(3): 546–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fellows, S. B. 1901. Grammar of the Kiriwina dialect (together with a vocabulary). Annual report on Brtitish New Guinea 1900–1901. Brisbane: G. A. Vaughan, Government Printer. Appendix N 2. 171–77. Appendix O 2. 177–96.Google Scholar

Foley, W. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Freeze, R. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68(3): 553–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frikel, P. 1961. Fases culturais e aculturação intertribal no Tumucumaque. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, nova série, no. 16 (série Antropologia).Google Scholar

Gavua, K. 2000. A handbook of Eweland, Vol II: The northern Ewes in Ghana. Accra: Woeli Publishers.Google Scholar

Geerts, G., Haeseryn, W., Rooij, J. and Toorn, M. C. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar

Geerts, G. and Heestermans, H. 1995. Van Dale groot woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar

Geoghegan, R. 1971. Manifolds of piecewise linear maps and a related normed linear space. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 77: 629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gildea, S. 1995. A comparative description of syllable reduction in the cariban language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 61: 62–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gildea, S. 1998. On reconstructing grammar: Comparative Cariban morphosyntax. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1990. Verb serialization in Tok Pisin and Kalam: A comparative study of temporal packaging. Melanesian Pidgin and Tok Pisin. In Verhaar, J. W. M. (ed.), Proceedings of the first international conference of Pidgins and Creoles in Melanesia (pp. 19–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goddard, C. 1985. A grammar of Yankunytjatjara. Alice Springs: Institute for Aboriginal Development.Google Scholar

Goldap, C. 1991. Lokale Relationen im Yukatekischen [Spatial Relations in Yukatek]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Goldap, C. 1992. Morphology and semantics of Yucatec space relators. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(6): 612–25.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gossen, G. 1974. Chamulas in the world of the sun: Time and space in a Maya oral tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gossen, G. (ed.) 1986. Symbol and meaning beyond the closed community: Essays in Mesoamerican ideas. Albany, NY: Institute for Mesoamerican Studies.Google Scholar

Green, I. 1995. The death of ‘prefixing’: Contact-induced typological change in northern Australia. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 21: 414–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, K. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Swartz, S. (ed.), Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst (pp. 217–315). Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A, Volume 6.Google Scholar

Hale, K. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamano, S. 1998. The sound symbolic system of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI and Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar

Hanks, W. F. 1990. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harkins, J. and Wilkins, D. P. 1994. Mparntwe Arrernte and the search for lexical universals. In Goddard, C. and Wierzbicka, A. (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings (pp. 285–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasegawa, Y. 1996. A study of Japanese clause linkage: The connective TE in Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI and Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1979. Guugu Yimidhirr. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, B. (eds.), Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. I (pp. 27–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1981. Sk'op Sotz'leb: El Tzotzil de San Lorenzo Zinacantán. Mexico, DF: UNAM.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1988. It's my own invention: A comparative grammatical sketch of colonial Tzotzil. In Laughlin, R. L. (ed.), The great Tzotzil dictionary of Santo Domingo Zinacantán, Vol. I (pp. 79–121). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1991. The grammaticalization of motion (and time) in Tzotzil. Working Paper No. 2, Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

Haviland, J. 1992. Seated and settled: Tzotzil verbs of the body. In León, L. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Space in Amerindian languages. Special issue of Zeitschrift fur Phonetik Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(6): 543–61.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1993b. The syntax of Tzotzil auxiliaries and directionals: The grammaticalization of ‘motion’. Proceedings of the 19th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 35–49). Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Haviland, J. 1994. ‘Te xa setel xulem’ (The buzzards were circling): Categories of verbal roots in (Zinacantec) Tzotzil. In Haviland, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages. Special issue of Linguistics 32(4/5): 691–742.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heestermans, H. 1979. ‘Naar’, ‘naast’, ‘langs’, en ‘in’: Een onomasiologisch-semasiologische studie over enige voorzetsels met een locaal betekenismerk in de Nederlandse dialecten en in het Fries. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Heine, B. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, B. and Reh, M. 1984. Grammaticalisation and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar

Heine, B., Claudi, U. and Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heine, B., Güldemann, T., Kilian-Hatz, Ch ., Lessau, D. A., Roberg, H., Schladt, M. and Stolz, Th . 1993. Conceptual shift: A lexicon of grammaticalization processes in African languages. Cologne: Institut für Afrikanistik.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (ed.) 1986. Arrernte Ayeye: Arrernte Stories. Alice Springs: IAD and Yipirinya.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. 1995. Phonology and grammar of Yele: Papua New Guinea. Pacific Linguistics Series B-112, pp. 1–110.

Henderson, J. 1998. Topics in Eastern and Central Arrernte grammar. PhD thesis, University of Western Australia.

Henderson, J. 2002. The word in Eastern/Central Arrernte. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology (pp. 100–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. and Dobson, V. 1994. Eastern and Central Arrernte to English Dictionary. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. and Henderson, A. (compilers). 1999 [1987]. Nt:u k'opu dyuu u puku dmi (Rossel-English dictionary) (rev. edn 1999).

Hengeveld, K. 1982. Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Functional Grammar Series 15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Herring, S. C. 1988. Aspect as a discourse category in Tamil. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the 14th Berkeley Linguistics Society (280–94). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Herskovits, A. 1986. Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Studies in natural language processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, C. 1982. Up/down, front/back, left/right: A contrastive study of Hausa and English. In Weissenborn, J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Here and there: Cross-linguistic studies on deixis and demonstration (pp. 11–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M. 1976a. Ergative, locative and instrumental case inflections: Djamindjungan. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 397–401). Linguistic Series 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M. 1976b. The bivalent suffix -ku: Djamindjungan. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 437–41). Linguistic Series 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Hoddinott, W. G. and Kofod, F. M. 1976c. Simple and compound verbs: Conjugation by auxiliaries in Australian verbal systems: Djamindjungan. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 698–704). Linguistic Series 22. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hosokawa, K. 1991. The Yawuru language of West Kimberley: A meaning-based description. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

Humboldt, W. von 1963 [1822]. Über das Entstehen der grammatischen Formen und ihren Einfluß auf die Ideenentwicklung. In Flitner, A. and Giel, K. (eds.), Wilhelm von Humboldt. Werke in fünf Bänden, Vol. III: Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie (pp. 31–63). Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta'sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. 1980. Culture and inference. A Trobriand case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikegami, Y. 1981. ‘Suru’ to ‘naru’ no gengogaku [Linguistics of ‘do’ and ‘become’]. Tokyo: Taishuukan.Google Scholar

Ikegami, Y. 1991. ‘DO-language’ and ‘BECOME-language’: Two contrasting types of linguistic representation. In Ikegami, Y. (ed.), The empire of sings – semiotic essays on Japanese culture (pp. 285–326). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Current Studies in Linguistics Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, W. S. 1972. A Wayana grammar. In Grimes, J. E. (ed.), Languages of the Guianas (pp. 47–77). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, J. R. and Slobin, D. I. 1979. The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. Journal of Child Language 6: 529–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, C. 1994. Draft Sketch Grammar of Ngarinyman. Unpublished manuscript. Katherine: Diwurruwurru-Jaru Aboriginal Corporation.

Kant, E. 1768. Von dem ersten Grunde des Unterschiedes der Gegenden im Raume [Trans. as: ‘On the first ground of the distinction of regions in space’]. In Cleve, J. and Frederick, R. E. (eds.) 1991, The philosophy of right and left: Incongruent counterparts and the nature of space (pp. 27–34). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kasaipwalova, J. 1978. Yaulabuta, Kolupa deli Lekolekwa. Pilatolu Kilivila Wosimwaya. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.Google Scholar

Kasaipwalova, J. and Beier, U. 1978a. Lekolekwa – An historical song from the Trobriand Islands. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.Google Scholar

Kasaipwalova, J. and Beier, U. 1978b. Yaulabuta – The passion of Chief Kailaga. An historical poem from the Trobriand Islands. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.Google Scholar

Kato, Y. 1991. Negative polarity in Japanese and the levels of representation. Tsuda Review 36: 151–79.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1971. Tzeltal phonology and morphology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1990. Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas Mayances [Some structural traits of the Mayan languages]. In England, N. C. and Elliot, S. R. (eds.), Lecturas sobre la lingüística Maya [Lectures on Mayan linguistics] (pp. 59–114). La Antigua, Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1994. The native languages of South America. In Moseley, C. and Asher, R. E. (eds.), Atlas of the world's languages (pp. 46–76). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kita, S. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S. 1999. Japanese enter/exit verbs without motion semantics. Studies in Language 23: 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S. 2001. Semantic schism and interpretive integration in Japanese sentences with a mimetic: A reply to Tsujimura. Linguistics 39(2): 419–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S. (in press). Linking under-specification and multi-tiered semantic representation. In M. Bowerman and P. Brown (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on argument structure.

Kita, S. and Walsh, Dickey L. (eds.) 1998. Annual report. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar

Kita, S. and Essegbey, J. 2001. Pointing left in Ghana: How a taboo on the use of the left hand influences gestural practice. Gesture 1: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klimov, G. A. 1974. On the character of languages of active typology. Linguistics 131: 11–25 (reprinted from Voprosy Jazykoznanija 4 (1972): 3–13).Google Scholar

Koch, H. 1984. The category of ‘associated motion’ in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia 1: 23–34.Google Scholar

Kofod, F. M. 1996. Kija Learner's Grammar. Unpublished manuscript. Halls Creek: Kimberley Language Resource Centre.

Kooij, J. G. 1990 [1987]. Dutch. In Comrie, B. (ed.), The major languages of Western Europe (pp. 129–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Krämer, M. and Wunderlich, D. 1999. Transitivity alternations in Yucatec, and the correlation between aspect and argument roles. Linguistics 37(3): 431–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kummer, W. 1982. Spracheinstellung einer bilingualen indianischen Minorität in einer Diglossie-Situation: Spanisch-Yucatec Maya [Linguistic attitudes of a bilingual indigenous minority in a diglossic situation: Spanish-Yukatek Maya]. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 21: 1–43.Google Scholar

Kunihiro, T., Shibata, T., Nagashima, Y. and Asano, Y. 1982. Kotoba no imi 3 [Meaning of words 3]. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, J. 1965. The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51: 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, P. and Maddieson, I. 1996. Recording the phonetic structure of endangered languages. Fieldwork studies of targeted languages IV. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 93: 1–7.Google Scholar

Landau, B. and Jackendoff, R. 1993. ‘What’ and ‘where’ in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laughlin, R. M. 1975. The great Tzotzil dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Laughlin, R. M. 1977. Cabbages and kings. Tales from Zinacantán. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 23. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Laughlin, R. M. 1980. Of shoes and ships and sealing wax: Sundries from Zinacantán. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Laughlin, R. M. 1988. Mayan tales from Zinacantán: Dreams and stories from the people of the Bat. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Laughren, M. 1978. Directional terminology in Warlpiri. Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 8: 1–16. Launceston: Tasmanian College of Advanced Education.Google Scholar

Lawton, R. 1979. Bulogala Bwaina. Port Moresby: Bible Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar

Lawton, R. 1984. Bulogala Bwaina Kabutuvau. Port Moresby: Bible Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar

Lawton, R. 1993. Topics in the description of Kiriwina. In Ross, M. and Ezard, J. (eds.), Pacific Linguistics D-84. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Lawton, R. 1995. Kilivila. In Tryon, D. T. (ed.), Comparative Austronesian dictionary. An introduction to Austronesian studies. Part 1: Fascile 2 (pp. 747–56). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lawton, R. 1997. Buki Pilabumaboma. Kabutubogwa deli Kabutuvau. The Shorter Old Testament and The New Testament in the Language of Kiriwina, Trobriand Islands. Port Moresby: Bible Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar

Leach, J. W. 1981. A Kula folktale from Kiriwina. Bikmaus 2: 50–92.Google Scholar

Leach, J. W. and Leach, E. R. (eds.) 1983. The Kula: new perspectives on Massim exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. 1992. Yukatekische lokale Relatoren in typologischer Perspektive [Yukatek spatial relators in typological perspective]. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45: 626–41.Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. 1993. Predicate classes in Yucatec Maya. Función 13–14: 195–272.Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalisation. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. 1996. Ein Schriftsystem für das Yukatekische [A writing system for Yukatek Maya]. Paper presented at the conference ‘Konvergenz und Individualität – die Mayasprachen zwischen Hispanisierung und Indigenismus’. Bremen, 5–7 July, 1996.

Lehmann, C. 1998. Possession in Yucatec Maya: Structures – functions – typology. Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics; 4. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Th. 1989. A Grammar of modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.Google Scholar

Lemmens, M. 2002. The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In Newman, J. (ed.), The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (pp. 103–39). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de León, L. 1992. Body parts and location in Tzotzil: Ongoing grammaticalization. In León, L. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Spatial description in Mesoamerican languages. Special issue of Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 45(6): 570–89.Google Scholar

de León, L. 1993. Shape, geometry, and location: The case of Tzotzil body part terms. In Beals, K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the parasession on conceptual representations (pp. 77–90). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

León, L. 1994. Exploration in the acquisition of geocentric location by Tzotzil children. In Haviland, J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages. Special issue of Linguistics 32(4/5): 857–84.Google Scholar

de León, L. 1997. Vertical path in Tzotzil (Mayan) acquisition: Cognitive vs. linguistic determinants. In Clark, E. V. (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Child Language Research Forum (pp. 183–97). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

de León, L. 2001. Finding the richest path: Language and cognition in the acquisition of verticality in Tzotzil (Mayan). In Bowerman, M. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 544–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. 1999. Multiple perspectives on word production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, B. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion. In Roca, I. (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar (pp. 247–69). Berlin: Foris/Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, B. and Hovav, Rappaport M. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1994. Vision, shape and linguistic description. Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. In Haviland, J. B. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Spatial conceptualization in Mayan languages. Special issue of Linguistics, 32(4), 791–855.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1996a. Relativity in spatial conception and description. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 177–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1996b. Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 353–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 1997a. Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1): 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 2000a. H. P. Grice on location on Rossel Island. Proceedings of the 25th Berkeley Linguistics Society (210–24). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 2000b. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (in press) Syntactic ergativity in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island and its implications for typology. Linguistic Typology.

Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. and Rasch, B. H. 2002. Re-turning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84: 158–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M. and Rasch, B. H. 2003. Spatial language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. and Brown, P. 1990. Re-centering in Mayan spatial cognition, with special reference to Tzeltal. Working Paper, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.

Levinson, S. C. and Brown, P. 1994. Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as empirical philosophy. Ethos 22(1): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. and Meira, S. (2003). ‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial typological domain – Adpositional meanings in cross-linguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79(3): 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, P. and Gleitman, L. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83: 265–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lichtenberk, F. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67(3): 475–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liep, J. 1981. The workshop of the Kula. Folk 23: 297–309.Google Scholar

Liep, J. 1983. Ranked exchange in Yela (Rossel Island). In Leach, J. and Leach, E. (eds.), The Kula (pp. 503–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liep, J. 1989a. The day of reckoning on Rossel island. In Damon, F. and Wagner, R. (eds.), Death rituals and life in the societies of the Kula Ring (pp. 230–53). DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Liep, J. 1989b. Performance in petticoats: Reversal and reciprocity in a Rossel Island dance feast. Folk 29: 219–37.Google Scholar

Lithgow, D. 1976. Austronesian languages: Milne Bay Province and adjacent islands (Milne Bay Province). In Wurm, S. A. (ed.), Austronesian languages – New Guinea area languages and language study, Vol. II (pp. 441–523). Pacific Linguistics Series C-40. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Lord, C. 1993. Historical change in serial verb constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, J. 1994. The role of semantic value in lexical comparison: Motion and position in Yucatec Maya. In Haviland, J. B. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Spatial conceptualization in Mayan Languages. Special issue of Linguistics 32(4): 623–56.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1967. A note on possessive, existential and locative sentences. Foundations of Language 3: 390–6.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. 1995. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1920. Classificatory particles in the language of Kiriwina. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies. London Institution, Vol. 1. Part IV, pp. 33–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1935. Coral Gardens and their magic, Vol. II: The language of magic and gardening. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. 1936. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (eds.), The meaning of meaning. Supplement I (pp. 296–336). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.Google Scholar

Martin, L. 1977. Positional roots in Kanjobal (Mayan). PhD dissertation, University of Florida.

Martin, L. 1979. Direction/location and the semantics of Kanjobal positional roots. In Martin, L. (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics. Columbia, MO: Lucas Brothers Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Martin, L. 1975. A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Martínez Hernández, J. (ed.) 1929. Diccionario de Motul [Motul dictionary]. Mérida, Yucatán: Tipografía Yucateca.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1996a. Complex predicates in Japanese: A syntactic and semantic study of the notion ‘word’. Stanford, CA: CSLI and Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1996b. Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. 1997. Kuukan idoo no gengohyoogen to sono kakuchoo [Linguistic expressions of motion in space, and their extensions]. In Tanaka, S. and Matsumoto, Y. (eds.), Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expressions of space and motion] (pp. 125–230). Tokyo: Kenkyuusha.Google Scholar

Matthews, P. 1991. Morphology (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar

McGhee, J. and Dwyer, J. 1949. History of the Old Testament done in Boyowan. Trobriand Islands: Catholic Mission.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1988. Handbook of Kimberley languages, Vol. I: General information. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1990a. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGregor, W. 1990b. An impersonal construction in Gooniyandi, Western Australia. Word 41: 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGregor, W. 1994. Warrwa. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1996. Nyulnyul. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1997a. Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1997b. Functions of noun phrase discontinuity in Gooniyandi. Functions of Language 4: 83–114.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1998a. Applicative constructions in Warrwa. In Siewierska, A. and Song, J. J. (eds.), Case, typology, and grammar: In honour of Barry J. Blake (pp. 171–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1998b. Semantic constraints on dependency. In Caron, B. (ed.), Proceedings of the sixteenth International Congress of Linguists. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Paper No. 0500.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1999a. Kukatja ethno-physiology and medicine. Review of Anthony Rex Peile. 1997. In Bindon, P. (ed.), Body and soul: An Aboriginal view. Aboriginal Studies Series, No. 10. Perth: Hesperian Press and The Pallottines in Australia. Anthropos 94: 224–8.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 1999b. External possession constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In Payne, D. L. and Barshi, I. (eds.), External possession (pp. 429–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. 2000. Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages. In Frajzyngier, Z. and Curl, T. S. (eds.), Reciprocals: Form and function (pp. 85–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. (2002a). Ergative and accusative patterning in Warrwa. In Davidse, K. and Lamiroy, B. (eds.), Case and grammatical relations across languages, Vol. IV: The nominative/accusative (pp. 285–317). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

McGregor, W. (2002b). Verb classification in Australian languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGregor, W. (in preparation). A grammar of Nyulnyul, Dampier Land, Western Australia.

McKenzie, R. 1997. Downstream to here: Geographically determined spatial deictics in Aralle-Tabulahan (Sulawesi). In Senft, G. (ed.), Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages (pp. 221–49). Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 15. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

McQuown, N. A. 1967. Classical Yucatec (Maya). In Wauchope, R. (ed.), Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. V: Linguistics (pp. 201–47). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Meillet, A. 1948 [1912]. L'évolution des formes grammaticales. Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale (pp. 130–48). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Meira, S. 1997. [f], [ñ] e [h]: fonogênese em Tiriyó (Karíb). Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, sérieAntropologia 13(3): 167–78.Google Scholar

Meira, S. 1998. Rhythmic stress in Tiriyó (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics 64(4): 352–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meira, S. 1999a. A grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University, Houston.

Meira, S. 1999b. Syllable reduction and ghost syllables in Tiriyó. In Hwang, S. J. J. and Lommel, A. R. (eds.), XXV LACUS Forum (pp. 125–31). Fullerton, CA: Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States (LACUS).Google Scholar

Meira, S. 2000a. A reconstruction of Proto-Taranoan: Phonology and morphology. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Meira, S. 2000b. The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. In Gildea, S. (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization (pp. 201–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meira, S. 2000c. Reduplication in Tiriyó (Cariban). Languages of the World Series, no. 17. Munich: LINCOM Europa.

Meira, S. 2001. Linguistic theory and linguistic description: The case of Tiriyó [h]. International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 119–35.

Meira, S. 2003a. ‘Addressee effects’ in demonstrative systems: The cases of Tiriyó and Brazilian Portuguese. In Friedrich Lenz (ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time, and person (pp. 3–12). Pragmatics & Beytond new series, Vol. 112. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Meira, S. 2003b. Les démonstratifs proximaux non-animés de la langue tiriyo (caribe): une étude de corpus. Amérindia (langues caribes) 28: 183–200.

Meira, S. 2004a. Morfologia vs. semântica, ou intransitividade cindida em Tiriyó (Karíb). In Atas do II Encontro Nacional do Grupo de Estudos da Linguagem do Centro-Oeste, Denize Elena Garcia da Silva (org.), Vol. 1 (pp. 261–70).

Meira, S. 2004b. Mental state postpositions in Tiriyó and other Cariban languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 213–41.

Meira, S. 2006. A Grammar of Tiriyo. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Méndez Guzmán, Diego. 1998. Kajkanantik: Joh'ultatiketik te leke sok te chopole. (El kajkanantik: Los dioses del bien y mal). Letras Mayas Contemporáneas, Vol. V. Instituto Nacional Indigenista.

Merlan, F. C. 1994. A Grammar of Wardaman: A language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Mouton Grammar Library 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morita, Y. 1977. Kiso nihongo [Basic Japanese]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar

Morita, Y. 1988. Nihongo no ruiihyougen [Japanese expressions with similar meanings]. Tokyo: Sotakusha.Google Scholar

Mosel, U. and Hovdhaugen, E. 1992. Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar

Muraki, M. 1978. The Shika Nai construction and predicate raising. In Hinds, J. and Howard, I. (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics (pp. 155–77). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Mushin, I. 1995. Epistememes in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 15: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, F. 1986. Pintupi country, Pintupi self. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Nash, D. 1986. Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York/London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1982. Ingush transitivization and detransitivization. Proceedings of the 8th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (445–462). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, W. 1973. Positional and transitive roots in Kanjobal. American Anthropological Association paper.

Nüse, R. 1996. Über die Realitätsadäquatheit der phänomenalen Welt oder Things look as they do because they are what they are. Gestalttheorie 18: 52–67 and 86–114.Google Scholar

Nyaku, Frank Kofi. 1997. Yiyi Nuti gli a ewo [Some folktales about the spider]. Accra: Sedco.

Osam, E. K. 1996. The object relation in Akan. Afrika und Übersee 79: 57–83.Google Scholar

Osam, E. K. 1997. Serial verbs and grammatical relations in Akan. In Givón, T. (ed.), Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (pp. 253–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Owen, M. G. 1968. The semantic structure of Yucatec verbs. PhD dissertation, Yale University.

Özyürek, A. and Kita, S. (in prep.). Attention manipulation and situational use of Japanese and Turkish demonstratives.

Pawley, A. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: Different logics for reporting experience. In Tomlin, R. S. (ed.), Typological studies in language, Vol. I: Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 329–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Pawley, A. 1993. A language which defies description by ordinary means. In Foley, W. A. (ed.), The role of theory in language description (pp. 87–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pederson, E. 1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Frank, A. U. and Campari, I. (eds.), Spatial information theory (pp. 294–311). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Pederson, E. 1998. Spatial language, reasoning, and variation across Tamil communities. In Zima, P. and Tax, V. (eds.), Language and location in space and time, Vol. VII (pp. 111–19). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D. P., Levinson, S. C., Kita, S. and Senft, G. 1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74: 557–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peile, A. R. (n.d.). Body and soul: An Aboriginal view. Manuscript.

Persson, J. 1999. Sagali and the Kula. A regional system analysis of the Massim. Lund Monographs in Social Anthropology 7. Lund: Dept. of Sociology, Lund University.Google Scholar

Pfeiler, B. 1985. Yucatán: Das Volk und seine Sprache. Zwei Fallstudien zur Bilingualismus-situation [Yucatán: the people and their language. Two studies of the situation of bilingualism]. PhD dissertation, Vienna University.

Pfeiler, B. 1988. Yucatán: El uso de dos lenguas en contacto [The use of two languages in contact]. Estudios de Cultura Maya, Vol. XVII (pp. 423–44). México, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas.Google Scholar

Pfeiler, B. 1995. Variación fonológica en el maya yucateco [Phonological variation in Yukatek Maya]. In Arzápalo, R. and Lastra, Y. (eds.), Vitalidad e influencia de las lenguas indígenas en Latinoamérica (pp. 488–97). México, DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. 1956 [1948]. The child's conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pío Pérez, J. 1866–1877. Diccionario de la lengua maya [Dictionary of the Mayan language]. Mérida, Yucatán: J. F. Molina Solis.Google Scholar

Polian, G. 2004. Eléments de grammaire du Tseltal. PhD dissertation, Université Paris III-Sorbonne Nouvelle.

Powell, H. A. 1957. An analysis of present day social structure in the Trobriand Islands. PhD dissertation, University of London.

Radetzky, P. 2001. Some diachronic aspects of topic marking. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Rajam, V. S. 1992. A reference grammar of classical Tamil poetry: 150 BC-pre-fifth/sixth century AD. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Ray, S. H. 1926. A comparative study of the Melanesian Island languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Richter, J. V. 1997. Posture verbs in Akan and Ga. MPhil. thesis, University of Ghana.

Rivière, P. 1969. Marriage among the Trio: A principle of social organization. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Castillo, Romero M. 1964. Tres cuentos mayas [Three Mayan stories]. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia 17/45: 303–20Google Scholar

Ross, M. D. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia. Pacific Linguistic Series C-98. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Rumsey, A. 2000. Bunuba. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, B. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. V (pp. 35–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Saah, K. K. 1992. Null object constructions in Akan. In Collins, C. and Manfredi, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the Kwa comparative syntax workshop (pp. 219–44). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar

San, Bonaventura G. 1684. Arte de la lengua Maya [Art of the Mayan language]. Summarized by William E. Gates. Box 46, Folder 11, William E. Gates Collection, Harold B. Lee Library. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. 1917. Review of C. C. Uhlenbeck: Het passieve karakter van het verbum transitivum of van het verbum actionis in talen van Noord-Amerika. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 82–6. (Reprinted in W. Bright (ed.), The collected works of Edward Sapir, Vol. V: American Indian languages 1 (pp. 69–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)Google Scholar

Schaefer, R. P. 1986. Lexicalising directional and nondirectional motion in Emai. Studies in African Linguistics 17(2): 177–98.Google Scholar

Schaefer, R. P. and Gaines, R. 1997. Toward a typology of directional motion for African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 26(2): 193–220.Google Scholar

Schiffman, H. 1979. A grammar of spoken Tamil. Madras: Christian Literature Society.Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, E. 1998. Zur Interaktion von semasiologischer und onomasiologischer Grammatik: Der Verbkomplex im Jaminjung. In Zaefferer, D. (ed.), Deskriptive Grammatik und allgemeiner Sprachvergleich (pp. 149–76). Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, E. 2000. Simple and complex verbs in Jaminjung: A study of event categorisation in an Australian language. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 14. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.

Schultze-Berndt, E. 2001. Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Erhard, F. K. Voeltz and Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.), Ideophones (pp. 355–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Schultze-Berndt, E. 2002. Grammaticalized restrictive clitics on adverbials and secondary predicates: evidence from Australian Languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22(2): 231–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scoditti, G. M. G. 1990. Kitawa – A linguistic and aesthetic analysis of visual art in Melanesia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Scoditti, G. M. G. 1996. Kitawa oral poetry: An example from Melanesia. Pacific Linguistics Series D-87. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1986. Kilivila – The language of the Trobriand Islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senft, G. 1993a. Review of Giancarlo M. G. Scoditti, Kitawa – A linguistic and aesthetic analysis of visual art in Melanesia. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senft, G. 1993b. A grammaticalization hypothesis on the origin of Kilivila classificatory particles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 100–12.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1994a. These ‘Procrustean’ feelings … - Some of my problems in describing Kilivila. Semaian 11: 86–105.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1994b. Spatial reference in Kilivila. The Tinkertoy matching games – A case study. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 25: 55–93.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1994c. Grammaticalisation of body parts in Kilivila. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 25: 98–9.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1994d. Ein Vorschlag, wie man standardisiert Daten zum Thema ‘Sprache, Kognition und Konzepte des Raumes’ in verschiedenen Kulturen erheben kann. Linguistische Berichte 154: 413–29.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1995. ‘Crime and custom …’ auf den Trobriand Inseln: Der Fall Tokurasi. Anthropos 90: 17–25.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1996a. Classificatory particles in Kilivila. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1996b. Review article of Darrell T. Tryon, ed. 1995. Comparative Austronesian dictionary. An introduction to Austronesian studies. 4 parts, 5 vols. Linguistics 34: 1255–70.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1996c. Review of Ralph Lawton, Topics in the description of Kiriwina. In Ross, M. and Ezard, J. (eds.), Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 27: 189–96.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1997. Introduction. In Senft, G. (ed.), Referring to space: Studies in Austronesian and Papuan languages (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1998a. Body and mind in the Trobriand Islands. Ethos 26: 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senft, G. 1998b. Frames of spatial reference in Kilivila – Studies in language, cognition and the conceptualization of space. Essen: LAUD Working Paper Series A, No. 424.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1999a. Bronislaw Kasper Malinowski. In Verschueren, J., Östman, J.-O. and Blommaert, J. (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Supplement 1998. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 1999b. ENTER and EXIT in Kilivila. Studies in Language 23: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senft, G. 2000a. What do we really know about nominal classification systems? In Senft, G. (ed.), Systems of nominal classification (pp. 11–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Senft, G. 2000b. COME and GO in Kilivila. In Palmer, W. and Geraghty, P. (eds.), SICOL Proceedings of the second international conference on Oceanic linguistics, Vol. II: Historical and descriptive studies (pp. 105–36). Pacific Linguistics Series. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Shibatani, M. 1990. The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages (pp. 112–71). Canberra: AIATSIS.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 1994. Passives and alternatives in children's narratives in English, Spanish, German, and Turkish. In Fox, B. and Hopper, P. J. (eds.), Voice (pp. 341–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 1996. Two ways to travel. In Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S. (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–220). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In Bybee, J., Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (eds.), Essays on language function and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 437–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 1998. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. Essen: LAUD Working Paper Series A, No. 449.Google Scholar

Slobin, D. I. 2000. Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slobin, D. I. and Hoiting, N. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the 20th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (487–505). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Smailus, O. 1975. Textos mayas de Belice y Quintana Roo [Mayan texts from Belize and Quintana Roo]. Berlin: Gebr. Mann (Indiana Beiheft; 3).Google Scholar

Smailus, O. 1989. Gramática del Maya Yucateco Colonial [Grammar of Colonial Yukatek Maya]. Hamburg: Wayasbah.Google Scholar

Stewart, J. M. 1989. Kwa. In Samuel, J. B. (ed.), The Niger-Congo languages (pp. 217–46). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Stokes, B. 1982. A description of Nyigina: A language of the West Kimberley, Western Australia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

Stokes, B., Johnson, G. and Marshall, L. 1980. Nyigina to English: A first lexicon. Unpublished manuscript.

Straight, S. H. 1976. Decompositional structure in Yucatec verbs. In McClaran, M. (ed.), Mayan linguistics, Vol. I (pp. 189–98). Los Angeles: UCLA American Indian Studies Center.Google Scholar

Stross, B. 1976. Tzeltal anatomical terms: Semantic processes. In McClaren, M. (ed.), Mayan linguistics, Vol. I (pp. 243–67). Los Angeles: UCLAAmerican Indian Studies Center.Google Scholar

Stross, B. 1977. Love in the armpit: Tzeltal tales of love, murder, and cannibalism. Museum Brief, no. 23. University of Missouri.Google Scholar

Stross, B. 1978. Demons and monsters: Tzeltal tales. Museum Brief, no. 24 University of Missouri.Google Scholar

Stross, B. 1979. Tzeltal texts. In Furbee, L. (ed.), Mayan Texts II (pp. 106–21). IJAL-NATS Monograph No. 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Suárez, J. A. 1983. The Mesoamerican Indian languages. Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Subrahmanyasastri, P. S. 1979. Tolka:ppiyam collatika:ram. Anamalainagar, South India: Annamalai University.Google Scholar

Svorou, S. 1994. The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagashira, Y. and Hoff, J. 1986. Handbook of Japanese compound verbs. Tokyo: Hokuseido Press.Google Scholar

Takahashi, T. 1976 [1969]. Sugata to mokuromi [Situation and intention]. In Kindaichi, H. (ed.), Nihongo dooshi no asupekuto [Aspect of Japanese verbs] (pp. 117–54). Tokyo: Mugi Shoboo.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1972. Semantic structures in English and Atsugewi. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.

Talmy, L. 1975. Semantics and syntax of motion. In Kimball, J. (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. IV (pp. 181–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1978. Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. IV: Syntax (pp. 625–49). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Pick, H. and Acredolo, L. (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225–320). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talmy, L. 1991. Path to realization – via aspect and result: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. (eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tanaka, S. 1997. Kukanhyoogen no imi to kinoo [Meaning and function of spatial expressions]. In Tanaka, S. and Matsumoto, Y. (eds.), Kuukan to idoo no hyoogen [Expressions for space and motion] (pp. 4–123). Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar

Tanz, C. 1982. An experimental investigation of children's comprehension of the locutionary verb ask. In Johnson, C. E. and Thew, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the second international congress for the study of child language, Vol. I (pp. 357–71). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Tedlock, B. 1982. Time and the highland Maya. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Teramura, H. 1982. Nihongo no shintakusu to imi dai-1-kkan [Syntax and semantics of Japanese], Vol. I. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar

Tindale, N. 1974. Aboriginal tribes of Australia, their terrain, environmental controls, distribution, limits, and proper names. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press and Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar

Tozzer, A. 1921. A Maya grammar with bibliography and appraisement of the works noted. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archeology and Ethnology, Harward University, 9. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Traugott, E. C. and Heine, B. (eds.) 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tsujimura, N. 1996. An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tsunoda, T. 1981. The Djaru language of Kimberley, WA. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series B-78.Google Scholar

Tunbridge, D. 1988. Affixes of motion and direction in Adnyamathanha. In Austin, P. (ed.), Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages (pp. 267–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner-Neale, M. M. 1996. Bush foods: Nhenhe-areye anwerne-arle Arlkweme. Alice Springs: IAD Press.Google Scholar

Van Oosten, J. 1984. Sitting, standing and lying in Dutch: A cognitive approach to the distribution of the verbs Zitten, Staan, and Liggen. In Oosten, J. and Snapper, J. (eds.), Dutch Linguistics at Berkeley (pp. 137–60). Berkeley, CA: Dutch Studies Program, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Villa Rojas, A. 1973. The concepts of space and time among the contemporary Maya. In León-Portilla, M. (ed.), Time and reality in the thought of the Maya (pp. 121–67). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Rojas, Villa A. 1987. Los elegidos de dios: Etnografía de los mayas de Quintana Roo. Seria de antropología social. Collección Sepini; 56. México, DF: Instituto Nacional Indigenista.Google Scholar

Vogt, E. 1976. Tortillas for the gods: A symbolic analysis of Zinacantán ritual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Weijnen, A. 1964. Structuren van Nederlandse voorzetsels. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal – en Letterkunde 80: 116–32.Google Scholar

Weiner, A. B. 1976. Women of value, men of renown. New perspectives in Trobriand exchange. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Weiner, A. B. 1988. The Trobrianders of Papua New Guinea. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Westermann, D. H. 1928. Ewefiala: Ewe-English dictionary. Nendeln: Kraus Thompson.Google Scholar

Westermann, D. H. 1930. A study of the Ewe language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Whitehead, O. 1990. Which way is up? Unpublished Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.

Wilkins, D. P. 1986. Particle/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda). Journal of Pragmatics 10: 575–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1988. Switch-reference in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Form, function, and problems of identity. In Austin, P. (ed.), Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages (pp. 141–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1989. Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda): Studies in the structure and semantics of grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.

Wilkins, D. P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘Associated Motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics: 207–57.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1993a. Linguistic evidence in support of a holistic approach to traditional ecological knowledge. In Williams, N. and Bains, G. (eds.), Traditional ecological knowledge: Wisdom for sustainable development (pp. 71–93). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1993b. Preliminary ‘COME’ and ‘GO’ questionnaire. Cognition and Space Kit, Version 1.0, July 1993. Nijmegen: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1995. More than just wishful thinking: the survival of Arrernte worldview is historical fact, not romantic fiction. Oceania Newsletter 15: 8–12.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1996. Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In Durie, M. and Ross, M. (eds.), The comparative method reviewed. Regularity and irregularity in language change (pp. 264–305). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1997a. The verbalization of motion events in Arrernte (Central Australia). In Clark, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th annual child language research forum (pp. 295–308). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1997b. Alternative representations of space: Arrernte narratives in sand and sign. In Biemans, M. and Weijer, J.v.d. (eds.), Proceedings of the CLS opening academic year '97–'98 (pp. 133–62). Nijmegen: Center for Language Studies.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. P. 1998. The semantic extension of basic locative constructions cross-linguistically. In Kita, S. and Walsh, L. Dickey (eds.), Annual report 1998 (pp. 55–61). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. and Senft, G. 1994. A man, a tree, and forget about the pigs: Space games, spatial reference and cross-linguistic comparison. Plenary paper presented by G. Senft at the 19th international LAUD-symposium ‘Language and Space’, Duisburg. Nijmegen: Mimeo.

Wilkins, D. P. and Hill, D. 1995. When GO means COME: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3): 209–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, K. and Blench, R. 2000. Niger-Congo. In Heine, B. and Nurse, D. (eds.), African languages: An introduction (pp. 11–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, S. 1999. Coverbs and complex predicates in Wagiman. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar

Woodworth, N. L. 1991. Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences 29(2): 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wurm, S. 1982. Papuan languages of Oceania. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Zavala, R. 1993. Clause integration with verbs of motion in Mayan languages. MA thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene.