Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:30:14.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

By
Natalia Knoblock
Edited by
Natalia Knoblock
Natalia Knoblock
Affiliation:
Saginaw Valley State University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

This collection presents a new outlook on an old problem. Studies of impoliteness, verbal aggression, hate speech, and similar phenomena have been conducted for a significant time now. They can be considered developed research areas with well-established methods, models, and their own bodies of literature. Numerous studies are in print and in progress, diverse aspects are being investigated, and the body of research on language aggression is growing.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Grammar of Hate
Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse
 , pp. 1 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, K. (2015). When is a slur not a slur? The use of nigger in Pulp Fiction. Language Sciences 52: 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, L., and Lepore, E. (2013). Slurring words. Noûs 47(1): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baider, F., and Constantinou, M. (2014). How to make people feel good when wishing hell: Golden Dawn and National Front discourse, emotions and argumentation. In Romero-Trillo, J. (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: New Domains and Methodologies, 179–210. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Baider, F., and Constantinou, M. (2017). At night we’ll come and find you, traitors: Cyber-communication in the Greek- Cypriot Ultra-nationalist Space. In Hatzidaki, O. and Goutsos, D. (Eds.), Greece in Crisis: Combining Critical Discourse and Corpus Linguistics Perspectives, 413–454. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2010). Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999–2005. Journal of Language and Politics 9(2): 310–338. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.07bakCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., and McEnery, T (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics 4(2): 197–226.Google Scholar
Bischof, K., and Stoegner, K. (2009). Towards a comprehensive view on prejudice. In Pelinka, A., Bischof, K., and Stoegner, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Prejudice, 443–462. Amherst: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2013). Slurring perspectives. Analytic Philosophy, 54(3): 330–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. (2018). A dual act analysis of slurs. In Sosa, D. (Ed.), Bad Words: Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs (pp. 29–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capone, A. (2016). Slurring in indirect-reporting. International Journal of Language Studies, 10(4): 19–36.Google Scholar
Cepollaro, B., Sulpizio, S., and Bianchi, C. (2019). How bad is it to report a slur? An empirical investigation. Journal of Pragmatics 146: 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, S., Pater, J. A., Clear, T., Gilbert, E., and de Choudhury, M. (2016). # thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-eating disorder communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1201–1213. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819963Google Scholar
Cisneros, J. D. (2008). Contaminated communities: The metaphor of ‘immigrant as pollutant’ in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 11(4): 569–601. https://doi.org/10.1353/rap.0.0068Google Scholar
Costello, M., and Hawdon, J. (2018). Who are the online extremists among us? Sociodemographic characteristics, social networking, and online experiences of those who produce online hate materials. Violence and Gender 5(1): 55–60.Google Scholar
Croom, A. M. (2013). How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words. Language and Communication 33(3): 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, P. W. (1996). Threats of corporal punishment as verbal aggression: A naturalistic study. Child Abuse and Neglect 20(4): 289–304.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (1994). Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., and Merlini Barbaresi, L. (2017). Pragmatics and morphology: Morphopragmatics. In Huang, Y. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, 493–510. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (2001). Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L. (2009). Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language: 405–442.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. (1985). Pragmatics in diachronic syntax. Studies in Language 9(3): 363–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. (1989). Pragmatics and syntactic change. In Breivik, Leiv E. and Jahr, Ernst Håkon (Eds.), Language Change: Contributions to the Study of its Causes, 71–98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, C., and Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics 36(1): 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., and van Orden, G. (2012). Pragmatic choice in conversation. Topics in Cognitive Science 4(1): 7–20.Google Scholar
Hawdon, J., Oksanen, A., and Räsänen, P. (2017). Exposure to online hate in four nations: A cross-national consideration. Deviant Behavior 38(3): 254–266.Google Scholar
Hedger, J. A. (2013). Meaning and racial slurs: Derogatory epithets and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Language and Communication 33(3): 205–213.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. (2019). Taboo terms and their grammar. In Allan, K. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Taboo Words and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ilie, C. (2018). ‘Behave yourself, woman!’ Patterns of gender discrimination and sexist stereotyping in parliamentary interaction. Journal of Language and Politics 17(5): 594–616.Google Scholar
Jaworska, S., and Krishnamurthy, R. (2012). On the F word: A corpus-based analysis of the media representation of feminism in British and German press discourse, 1990–2009. Discourse and Society 23(4): 401–431.Google Scholar
Joint open letter on concerns about the global increase in hate speech (2019). United Nations Human Rights: Office of the High Commissioner. Retrieved from www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25036&LangID=E.Google Scholar
Juffermans, K. (2008). The discourse of lending aid on small-scale development project websites: Dutch depreciatory diminutives. Language Matters 39(1): 126–145.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2008). Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40(3): 385–406.Google Scholar
Keipi, T., Näsi, M., Oksanen, A., and Räsänen, P. (2016). Online Hate and Harmful Content: Cross-National Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: a critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 9: 1–28.Google Scholar
Kiaer, J. (2014). Pragmatic Syntax. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, M., Woźniak, J., and Grabowski, Ł (2017). From ‘patriotism’ to hate: Axiological urgency in online comments related to refugees. In Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Baider, Fabienne H., and Millar, Sharon (Eds.), Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective, 42–51. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, , M., and R. Wodak, (2008). Multiple identities, migration and belonging: ‘Voices of migrants’. In Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Iedema, R (Eds.), Identity Trouble. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593329_6Google Scholar
Leezenberg, M. (2017). Discursive violence and responsibility: Notes on the pragmatics of Dutch populism. In Kopytowska, Monika (Ed.), Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, 243–270. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Liu, C. (2021). The derogatory force and the offensiveness of slurs. Organon F, 28(3): 626–649.Google Scholar
MacAvaney, S., Yao, H., Yang, E., Russell, K., Goharian, N., and Frieder, O. (2019). Hate speech detection: Challenges and solutions. PloS One 14(8).Google Scholar
Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (2003). Greek diminutive use problematized: Gender, culture, and common sense. Discourse and Society 14(6): 699–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, S., Ajanovic, E., and Sauer, B. (2014). Intersections and inconsistencies: Framing gender in right-wing populist discourses in Austria. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22(4): 250–266.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J. (2016). Slurring as insulting. In R. Finkbeiner, J. Meibauer, and H. Wiese (Eds.), Pejoration, (pp. 145–167), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miró-Llinares, F., Moneva, A., and Esteve, M. (2018). Hate is in the air! But where? Introducing an algorithm to detect hate speech in digital microenvironments. Crime Science 7(1): 15.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2015). Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 41–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ jlac.3.1.02musCrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAACP (2007). The ‘N’ word is laid to rest by the NAACP [Press release, July 9]. Retrieved from www.naacp.org/latest/the-n-word-is-laid-to-rest-by-the-naacp/.Google Scholar
Nevala, M. (2004). Accessing politeness axes: Forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 36(12): 2125–2160.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. (2017). The social life of slurs. In Fogal, D., Harris, D., and Moss, M. (Eds.), New Work on Speech Acts, 237–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Hawdon, J., Holkeri, E., Näsi, M., and Räsänen, P. (2014). Exposure to online hate among young social media users. In Warehime, M. N. (Ed.), Soul of Society: A Focus on the Lives of Children and Youth, 253–273. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. (2016). Homophobic grammar: The role of transitivity and phoricity in homophobic formation. Journal of Language and Sexuality 5(1): 61–93.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A. (1994). Do language reforms change our way of thinking? Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M., and Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. M. (2010). Parent–child aggression: Association with child abuse potential and parenting styles. Violence and Victims 25(6): 728–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santa Ana, O. (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse and Society 10(2): 191–224.Google Scholar
Sarrasin, O., Gabriel, U., and Gygax, P. (2012). Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language: The case of English, French, and German. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71(3): 113.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J. A., and Leonard, K. E. (2005). Husbands’ and wives’ marital adjustment, verbal aggression, and physical aggression as longitudinal predictors of physical aggression in early marriage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73(1): 28–37.Google Scholar
Siegel, A. A. (2020). Online hate speech. In Persily, N. and Tucker, J. A. (Eds.), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform, 56–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sonnad, N. (2016). Alt-right trolls are using these code words for racial slurs online. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/798305/alt-right-trolls-are-using-googlesyahoos-skittles-andskypes-ascode-words-for-racial-slurs-on-twitter/Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2015). How Propaganda Works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stets, J. E. (1990). Verbal and physical aggression in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52(2): 501–514.Google Scholar
Stögner, K., and Bischof, K. (2018). International high finance against the nation? Antisemitism and nationalism in Austrian print media debates on the economic crisis. Journal of Language and Politics 17(3): 428–446.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E., and Edwards, D. (2007). ‘Black this, black that’: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse and Society 18(3): 337–372.Google Scholar
Strani, K., and Szczepaniak-Kozak, A. (2018). Strategies of othering through discursive practices: Examples from the UK and Poland. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14(1): 163–179.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. A. (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, 45–74. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the Press. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11(1): 11–52.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. J. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2019). Hatred behind the screens: A report on the rise of online hate speech. Report by HateLab, Cardiff University and Mishcon de Reya. Retrieved from http://orca.cf.ac.uk/127085/1/Hate%20Behind%20the%20Screens.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z., Robinson, D., and Tepper, J. (2018). Detecting hate speech on Twitter using a convolution-LSTM based deep neural network. In Gangemi, A., Navigli, R., Vidal, M. E., Hitzler, P., Troncy, R., Hollink, L., Tordai, A., and Alam, M. (Eds.), ESWC 2018: The Semantic Web: 03-07 Jun 2018, Heraklion, Greece. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10843, 745–760. Cham: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×