The Paranoid Style in the Study of American Politics

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511657504.009

8 - The Paranoid Style in the Study of American Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2010

David A. Moss and

Mary Oey

Edited by

Edward J. Balleisen and

David A. Moss

Show author details

Edward J. Balleisen: Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
David A. Moss: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

What drives policymaking in a democracy? Is it our lawmakers' desire to serve the public interest or their desire to serve themselves through the accumulation of money, power, and votes? Most social scientists have long since concluded it is the latter – or, to put it another way, that the old public interest theory is dead. The central behavioral assumption of modern economic analysis, that individuals act in their own self-interest, has become the reigning behavioral assumption of modern political analysis as well.

Partly as a result, a large subset of social scientists – perhaps the vast majority in some fields – has come to assume that special interest groups dominate, or capture, the policymaking process by satisfying the policymakers' need for money and other forms of political support. “The preferences of the ‘majority,’” writes Jonathan Macey, “are virtually irrelevant in determining legislative outcomes. Instead, law is made by legislators whose primary goal is to aggregate the political support they receive from competing special interest coalitions. Legal rules are generated by a process that conforms to standard microeconomic models of rationally self-interested behaviour.”

What makes this economic theory of regulation at once so powerful and so peculiar is its portrayal of representative democracy as profoundly unrepresentative – a tool of organized minority interests rather than of the majority interest. To arrive at this result, it is not enough to assume that lawmakers behave as rationally self-interested actors.

Type: Chapter
Information: Government and Markets
Toward a New Theory of Regulation
, pp. 256 - 298

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657504.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Macey, Jonathan R., “Public Choice and the Law,” in Newman, Peter, ed., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law (New York: Stockton Press, 1998), vol. 3, 177Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957)Google Scholar

Stigler, George, “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, no. 1 (Spring 1971), 3–21CrossRef Google Scholar

Black, Duncan, “On the Rationale of Group Decision Making,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 56, no. 1. (Feb. 1948), 23–34CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J., “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 58, no. 4 (August 1950), 328–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1957)Google Scholar

Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962)CrossRef Google Scholar

Tullock, Gordon, “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft,” Western Economic Journal [now: Economic Inquiry], vol. 5, no. 3 (June 1967), 224–32Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 19, no. 2 (August 1976), 211–40CrossRef Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S., “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 98, no. 3 (August 1983), 371–400CrossRef Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan, “Protection for Sale,” American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 4 (September 1994), 833–50Google Scholar

Bó, Ernesto Dal and Tella, Rafael Di, “Capture by Threat,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 111, no. 5 (2003), 1123–54Google Scholar

Bó, Ernesto Dal, “Regulatory Capture: A Review,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 22, no. 2 (2006), 203–25Google Scholar

Leight, Jessica, “Public Choice: A Critical Reassessment,” in Balleisen, Edward and Moss, David, eds., Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

James, P. D., The Black Tower (New York: Scribner, 1975), 196Google Scholar

Wittman, Donald, The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Hofstadter, Richard, The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays (New York: Knopf, 1965)Google Scholar

Garrow, David J., Protest at Selma: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1978), 171–74Google Scholar

Dallek, Robert, Flawed Giant: Lyndon Johnson and His Times, 1961–1973 (New York: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1998), 120Google Scholar

Moyers, Bill in Hardesty, Robert L., ed., The Johnson Years: The Difference He Made (Austin: University of Texas at Austin Edie and Lew Wasserman Public Affairs Library, 1993), 32Google Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Huckfeldt, Robert, “Party Politics in the Wake of the Voting Rights Act,” in Controversies in Minority Voing: The Voting Rights Act in Perspective, Grofman, Bernard and Davidson, Chandler, eds. (Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1992), 129Google Scholar

Fairclough, Adam, To Redeem the Soul of America: The Southern Christian Leadership Conference and Martin Luther King, Jr. (Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1987), 208Google Scholar

Alt, James E., “The Impact of the Voting Rights Act on Black and White Voter Registration in the South,” in Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965–1990, Davidson, Chandler and Grofman, Bernard, eds. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 374Google Scholar

Morris, John D., “Johnson Pledges Alabama Action,” New York Times, February 5, 1965, 17Google Scholar

Ball, Howard, Krane, Dale, and Lauth, Thomas P., Compromised Compliance: Implementation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1982), 44–45Google Scholar

Daniel, Leon, “Tear Gas, Clubs Halt 600 in Selma March: State Troopers Beat and Injure Many Negroes,” Washington Post, March 8, 1965, A1Google Scholar

Reed, Roy, “Alabama Police Use Gas and Clubs to Rout Negroes,” New York Times, March 8, 1965, 1Google Scholar

Robinson, Pearl T., “Whither the Future of Blacks in the Republican Party?” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 97, no. 2 (Summer 1982), 211CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, Neil A., “Louis E. Martin, 84, Aide to 3 Democratic Presidents,” New York Times, January 30, 1997, D21Google Scholar

Moss, David, Socializing Security: Progressive-Era Economists and the Origins of American Social Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996), 136–57Google Scholar

Corning, Peter A., The Evolution of Medicare…from idea to law, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Research Report No. 29 (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969), 54Google Scholar

Marmor, Theodore R., The Politics of Medicare (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1973), 13Google Scholar

Harris, Richard, “Medicare [part] II – More Than A Lot of Statistics,” New Yorker, July 9, 1966, 62Google Scholar

The Gallup Poll Public Opinion, 1935–1971 (New York: Random House, 1972)

Harris, Richard, “Medicare [part] III – We Do Not Compromise,” New Yorker, July 16, 1966, 74–76Google Scholar

Patashnik, Eric and Zelizer, Julian, “Paying for Medicare: Benefits, Budgets, and Wilbur Mills's Policy Legacy,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, vol. 26, no. 1 (February 2001), 17–18CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wehrwein, Austin C., “A.M.A. Opens Bid to Kill Medicare,” New York Times, January 27, 1965, 14Google Scholar

Meyers, Harold B., “Mr. Mills's Elder-medi-bettercare,” Fortune, June 1965, 166Google Scholar

“A.M.A. Head Predicts Medicare Boycott,” New York Times, August 18, 1965, 35

“A.M.A. Plans Special Session on Problems of Medicine,” New York Times, September 11, 1965, 28

Harris, Richard, “Medicare [part] I – All Very Hegelian,” New Yorker, July 2, 1966, 29Google Scholar

Rayack, Elton, Professional Power and American Medicine: The Economics of the American Medical Association (Cleveland: The World Publishing Company, 1967), 145Google Scholar

Campion, Frank D., The AMA and U.S. Health Policy Since 1940 (Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 1984), 210Google Scholar

Wehrwein, Austin C., “Lobby Expenses of A.M.A. at Peak,” New York Times, June 23, 1965, 63Google Scholar

Morris, John D., “President Signs Medicare Bill; Praises Truman,” New York Times, July 31, 1965, 1, 8Google Scholar

Pratt, Henry J., The Gray Lobby (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), 63Google Scholar

Wallace, Stephen P. and Williamson, John B., The Senior Movement: References and Resources (New York: G.K. Hall & Co., 1992Google Scholar

Starr, Paul, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982), 382Google Scholar

Cohen, Wilbur, “From Medicare to National Health Insurance,” in Warner, David C., ed., Toward New Human Rights: The Social Policies of the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations (Austin: University of Texas at Austin, 1977), 146–47Google Scholar

Chase, E. T., “The Doctors' Bonanza,” The New Republic (1967), 15–16Google Scholar

Matusow, Allen J., The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberalism in the 1960s (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1984), 228Google Scholar

Marmor, Theodore R., “Why Medicare Helped Raise Doctors' Fees,” Trans-Action (September 1968), 17Google Scholar

Wehrwein, Austin C., “Doctors Pressed to Defy Medicare,” New York Times, June 19, 1965, 30Google Scholar

Wehrwein, Austin C., “A.M.A. Split on Proposals for a Boycott of Medicare,” New York Times, June 22, 1965, 1Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970)Google Scholar

Mahon, John F. and Post, James E., “The Evolution of Political Strategies During the 1980 Superfund Debate” in Marcus, Alfred A., Kaufman, Allen M., and Beam, David R., ed., Business Strategy and Public Policy: Perspectives from Industry and Academia (New York: Quorum Books, 1987), 66Google Scholar

Menell, Peter S., “The Limitations of Legal Institutions for Addressing Environmental Risks,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5 (Summer 1991), 96CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, Walter A., Environmental Politics and Policy (Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 1985), 200Google Scholar

“Oil Spills and Cleanup Bills: Federal Recovery of Oil Spill Cleanup Costs,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 93 (June 1980), 1763

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “Upstate Waste Site May Endanger Lives,” New York Times, August 2, 1978, A1Google Scholar

“Love Canal Warnings,” Wall Street Journal, June 19, 1980, 22

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “Health Chief Calls Waste Site A ‘Peril,’” New York Times, August 3, 1978, A1Google Scholar

“Residents Told of Landfill's Chemical Peril,” Chicago Tribune, August 3, 1978, 5

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “Upstate Waste Site: Carey Seeks U.S. Aid,” New York Times, August 4, 1978, B14Google Scholar

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “Toxic Waste Fund Sought In Congress,” New York Times, June 10, 1979, 51Google Scholar

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “First Families Leaving Upstate Contamination Site,” New York Times, August 5, 1978, 20Google Scholar

“Long-Buried Poisons Ooze Out of the Ground,” Washington Post, August 5, 1978, A1

“Rains Let Up in Texas; Victims Sought,” Los Angeles Times, August 6, 1978, OC2

Francis, Mark, “Reporters flock to canal crisis,” Niagara Gazette, August 20, 1978Google Scholar

McNeil, Jr. Donald G., “Reporter's Notebook: Niagara Olfactory Impact,” New York Times, August 9, 1978, D19Google Scholar

Bukro, Casey, “Is environment mortally ill?” Chicago Tribune, April 20, 1980, A1Google Scholar

“Kentucky Hunts Cleanup Funds for Valley of Drums,” Washington Post, February 4, 1979, A1

Richards, Bill, “U.S. to Seek Hazard Fund In Industry,” Washington Post, April 30, 1979, A1Google Scholar

Estep, George, “EPA proposes industry fund for waste spills,” Chicago Tribune, May 11, 1979, A6Google Scholar

Richards, Bill, “Oozing Earth,” Washington Post, September 4, 1978, A3Google Scholar

Bird, Maryann, “Battle of Toxic Dumps: Who Pays for Cleanup?” New York Times, July 11, 1980, B4Google Scholar

Shabecoff, Philip, “Waste Cleanup Bill Approved By House,” New York Times, September 24, 1980, A16Google Scholar

Walsh, Edward, “Carter Asks $1.6 Billion to Clean Up Chemical, Oil Hazards,” Washington Post, June 14, 1979, A2Google Scholar

Libby, Ronald T., Eco-Wars: Political Campaigns and Social Movements (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), 22Google Scholar

Magnuson, Ed, “The Poisoning of America,” Time, September 22, 1980Google Scholar

“Carter Proposes $1.6 Billion Fund To Fight Chemical Waste Hazards,” New York Times, June 14, 1979, A1

Roland, Robert A., “Toxic Scapegoats,” Washington Post, April 21, 1979, A15Google Scholar

“Chemical Industry Attacks Carter Cleanup Proposal,” Washington Post, July 13, 1979, A3

Nelson, Bryce, “Getting Rid of Toxic Wastes: Cost Is High,” Los Angeles Times, September 30, 1979, 14Google Scholar

Cushman, Jr. John H., “After ‘Silent Spring,’ Industry Put Spin on All It Brewed,” New York Times, March 26, 2001, A14Google Scholar

“18 Finance Panel Members Got $300,000 From Chemical Industry,” Washington Post, November 17, 1980, A1

Lazarus, Richard J., The Making of Environmental Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 95–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Omang, Joanne, “Warfare Brewing on Hill Over Chemical Clean-Up ‘Superfund,’” Washington Post, January 3, 1980, A5Google Scholar

Omang, Joanne, “U.S. Lawyers Argue Both Sides of a Deadly Issue,” Washington Post, May 3, 1980, B8Google Scholar

Sinclair, Ward, “Subtle Spray From Chemical Firms May Stifle Hill Cleanup,” Washington Post, August 30, 1980, A5Google Scholar

Roland, Robert A., “Hazardous Wastes and the Law,” Washington Post, September 23, 1980, A14Google Scholar

Shabecoff, Philip, “Congress Set to Debate ‘Superfund’ to Clean Up Hazardous Wastes,” New York Times, September 18, 1980, A24Google Scholar

Stall, Bill, “Congress Treads Legal Minefield With Chemical Cleanup ‘Superfund,’” Los Angeles Times, May 18, 1980, G4Google Scholar

Molotsky, Irvin, “Senate Panel Nears Approval of Waste Cleanup Bill,” New York Times, September 14, 1980, 54Google Scholar

“A ‘Superfund’ For Toxic Waste,” New York Times, July 8, 1978, NJ1

Grad, Frank P., “A Legislative History of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability (“Superfund”) Act of 1980,” Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 8 (1982), 1Google Scholar

“Dump Cleanup Funds Are Voted By a House Panel,” Wall Street Journal, May 14, 1980, 7

“Congress Clears ‘Superfund’ Legislation,” Congressional Quarterly Almanac, vol. 50 (1980), 587–88

Omang, Joanne, “Senate Committee Sends ‘Superfund’ Bill to Floor,” Washington Post, November 19, 1980, A5Google Scholar

“Superfund Superrush,” Wall Street Journal, November 20, 1980, 26

Dalton, Brett, Riggs, David, and Yandle, Bruce, “The political production of Superfund: Some financial market results,” Eastern Economic Journal, vol. 22 (Winter 1996), 77Google Scholar

Carter, Jimmy, “Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. Remarks on Signing H.R. 7020 Into Law. December 11, 1980,” Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, vol. 16, no. 50 (Monday, December 15, 1980), 2798Google Scholar

Bry, Barbara, “Industry Fueled by Environmental Regulations: Hazardous Waste Collectors Piling Up,” Los Angeles Times, July 9, 1979, G1Google Scholar

Carney, Leo H., “For Environmentalists, The Battle Goes On,” New York Times, JANUARY 4, 1981, 22Google Scholar

Mitchell, George J., “Not a Super Fund,” New York Times, December 8, 1980, A27Google Scholar

Doyle, Arthur Conan, “A Study in Scarlet” in The Complete Sherlock Holmes (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1988), 27Google Scholar