Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:02:24.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Legitimising global economic governance through transnational parliamentarisation: how far have we come? How much further must we go?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Markus Krajewski
Affiliation:
University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Manfred Elsig
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The debate about the legitimacy deficit of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and of other international economic institutions forms a core element of the legal and political discourse about global economic governance (Esty 2002: 7; Nye 2003). Parliamentary and civil society interest in and engagement with issues of global economic governance continue to flourish. Questions about legitimacy and democratisation will also remain a prominent element of the debate about the institutional structure and the reform of the decision-making processes of global economic institutions.

This chapter aims to contribute to this debate by analysing the potential role of transnational parliamentary institutions and framing this analysis in the wider debate about democratic legitimacy at the international level. The chapter is organised in five main sections. The first section identifies different usages of the key notions of legitimacy and democracy and relates them to each other. Based on this, a framework for the analysis of the potential of transnational parliamentarisation as a means of reducing the democratic deficit of global economic governance is developed. Transnational parliamentarisation is explained in the next section, as the growing trend of parliamentary activities beyond the nation state. This involves the proliferation of parliamentary assemblies in various regional settings and the emergence of less formal parliamentary dimensions of global economic governance. The third and fourth sections of the chapter discuss the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO (PCWTO) and the Parliamentary Network on the World Bank (PNoWB), as two recent examples of transnational parliamentarisation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Governing the World Trade Organization
Past, Present and Beyond Doha
, pp. 82 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacchus, James 2004. ‘A few thoughts on legitimacy, democracy, and the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law 7(3): 667–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviglia Zampetti, Americo 2003. ‘Democratic legitimacy in the World Trade Organization: the justice dimension’, Journal of World Trade 37(1): 105–26.Google Scholar
Bodansky, Daniel 1999. ‘The legitimacy of international governance’, American Journal of International Law 93(3): 596–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Allen and Keohane, Robert 2008. ‘The legitimacy of global governance institutions’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law. Berlin: Springer, pp. 25–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Matthias, Pfahl, Stefanie and Verheyen, Rhoda 1999. ‘Parliaments and international trade decision-making: observations in Europe before Seattle’, in ,The Heinrich Böll Foundation (eds.), On the Road to the WTO Ministerial Meeting in Seattle. Washington, DC: Heinrich Böll Foundation, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis 2007. ‘The inconveniences of transnational democracy’, Ethics & International Affairs 21(2): 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve 2002. ‘Trans-parliamentary associations in global functional agencies, transnational associations’, available at http://papers.ssrn.com, accessed on 14 April 2010.
Chimni, Bhupinder 2006. ‘The World Trade Organization, democracy and development: a view from the South’, Journal of World Trade 40(1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas 1998. ‘The WTO and environmental law: three points for discussion’, in Fijalkowski, Agata and Cameron, James (eds.), Trade and the Environment: Bridging the Gap. London: Cameron May, pp. 56–64.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas 2009. ‘The legitimacy of WTO law’, in Yueh, Linda (ed.), The Law and Economics of Globalisation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 11–48.Google Scholar
Elsig, Manfred 2007. ‘The World Trade Organization's legitimacy crisis: what does the beast look like?’, Journal of World Trade 41(1): 75–98.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel 2002. ‘The World Trade Organization's legitimacy crisis’, World Trade Review 1(1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,European Parliament 1998. Resolution on transatlantic trade and economic relations, 15 January 1998, A4–0403/97, OJC 1998 34/139.
,European Parliament 2008. Resolution on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organization’, 24 April 2008, P6_TA(2008)0180, OJC 2009 259E/77.
Franck, Thomas 1990. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Georgiev, Dencho 1993. ‘Politics or rule of law: deconstruction and legitimacy in international law’, European Journal of International Law 4(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerster, Richard 1998. ‘Ein Parlament für die WTO?’ Informationsbrief Weltwirtschaft und Entwicklung, 07–08.
Held, David 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Herwig, Alexia and Hüller, Thorsten 2008. ‘Towards normative legitimacy of the world trade order’, in Joerges, Christian and Kjaer, Poul (eds.), Transnational Standards of Social Protection – Contrasting European and International Governance. University of Oslo, pp. 223–53.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert 2003. ‘How to begin to think about the “democratic deficit” at the WTO’, in Griller, Stephan (ed.), International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns. Vienna: Springer, pp. 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert and Nicolaïdis, Kalypso 2003. ‘Enhancing WTO legitimacy’, Governance 16(1): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John and Sykes, Alan (eds.) 1997. Implementing the Uruguay Round. Oxford: Clarendon.
Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph 2001. ‘The club model of multilateral cooperation and problems of democratic legitimacy’, in Porter, Roger B., Sauvé, Pierre, Subramanian, Arvind and Zampetti, Americo Beviglia (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium. Washington, DC: Brookings, pp. 264–94.Google Scholar
Mann, Erika 2004. ‘A parliamentary dimension to the WTO – more than just a vision?!’, Journal of International Economic Law 7(3): 659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Susan 2001. ‘Democracy and international governance’, in Coicaud, Jean-Marc and Heiskanen, Veijo (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
Mendoza, Ronald 2003. ‘The multilateral trade regime: A global public good for all?’, in Kaul, Inge, Conceicao, Pedro, Goulven, Katell and Mendoza, Ronald U. (eds.), Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalisation. Oxford University Press, pp. 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanz, Patrizia 2006. ‘Democratic legitimacy and constitutionalisation of transnational trade governance: a view from political theory’, in Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford: Hart, pp. 59–84Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph 2003. The ‘Democracy Deficit’ in the Global Economy: Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Global Institutions. London: Trilateral Commission.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich 1996/1997. ‘Constitutionalism and international organizations’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 17(2–3): 398–469.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz 2003. ‘Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU’, Max Planck Institut für Gemeinschaftsgüter (MPIfG) Working Paper No. 3.
Shaffer, Gregory 2004. ‘Parliamentary oversight of WTO-rule making’, Journal of International Economic Law 7(3): 629–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steger, Debra P. 2009. ‘The future of the WTO: institutional reform’, Journal of International Economic Law 12(4): 808–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, Peter, Bhagwati, Jagdish, Botchwey, Kwesi, Fitzgerald, Niall, Hamada, Koichi and Jackson, John H. 2004. The Future of the WTO – Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Verweij, Marco and Josling, Timothy 2003. ‘Special issue: deliberately democratizing multilateral organization’, Governance 16(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdandy, Armin 2004. ‘Globalization and Europe: how to square democracy, globalization, and international law’, European Journal of International Law 15(5): 885–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Warwick Commission 2007. The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward?Report of the First Warwick Commission, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Watt, Fergus 2001. ‘Parliamentarians have a role to play in Doha’, Bridges 5(8): 1–24, available at ictsd.net/downloads/bridges/bridges5–8.pdf, accessed on 15 April 2010.Google Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger 2008. ‘Legitimacy of international law from a legal perspective’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Röben, Volker (eds.), Legitimacy in International Law. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweifel, Thomas 2006. International Organizations and Democracy – Accountability, Politics, and Power. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×