Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:41:25.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Majoritarianism, Majoritarian Tension, and the Reed Revolution

from Part III - Partisanship and Governmental Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2016

By
Keith Krehbiel
Edited by
Alan S. Gerber  and
Eric Schickler
Alan S. Gerber
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Eric Schickler
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Governing in a Polarized Age
Elections, Parties, and Political Representation in America
 , pp. 328 - 368
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John and Rohde, David. 1998. Measuring Conditional Party Government. Manuscript: Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Alexander, DeAlva Stanwood. 1915 [1970]. History and Procedure of the House of Representatives. Franklin Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1996. “The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990.” American Political Science Review (1996): 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle?: Filibustering in the United States Senate. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, Shi-Chang. 1928 [1968]. The Speaker of the House of Representatives Since 1896. AMS Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review (1981): 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2007. Replication Data for: Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Harvard Institute for Quantitative Political Science.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 2001. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressman in Committees. Little-Brown.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W. and Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. “Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 287–335.Google Scholar
Giuriato, Luisa. 2007. Combining Autocracy and Majority Voting: The Canonical Succession Rules of the Latin Church. Manuscript: University of Rome La Sapienza.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinberg, John Gilbert. 1926. “History of the Majority Principle.” American Political Science Review 20(1): 52–68.Google Scholar
Hinds, Asher C. 1899. Parliamentary Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Alex and Shotts, Kenneth. 2012. “Policy-Specific Information and Informal Agenda Power.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 67–83.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas and Washington, Henry Augustine. 1854. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 8.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Stewart, Charles III. 2013. Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Alan. N.d. “Roberts Rules: Getting Comfortable with Parliamentary Procedure.” www.dummies.com/how-to/content/roberts-rules-getting-comfortable-with-parliamenta.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 30(3): 617–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1985. “Obstruction and Representativeness in Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 643–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 212–27.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003a. “Asymmetry of Party Influence: Reply.” Political Analysis 11: 108–09.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003b. “The Coefficient of Party Influence.” Political Analysis 11: 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2007. “Partisan Roll Rates in a Nonpartisan Legislature.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith and Meirowitz, Adam. 2002. “Minority Rights and Majority Power: Theoretical Consequences of the Motion to Recommit.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(2): 191–217.Google Scholar
Malamut, Michael E. 2008. “Musings on General or Common Parliamentary Law.” Parliamentary Journal XLIX(3) July.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1977. “The Rules Committee: New Arm of Leadership in a Decentralized House.” In Congress Reconsidered, vol. 1. Praeger Publishers, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, Bruce. 1994. “The House Traffic Cop: The Rules Committee.” In Silbey, Joel (ed.), Encyclopedia of the American Legislative System. Scribners, pp. 1049–66.Google Scholar
Park, Hong Min. 2013. Logit, Ordered Logit, and Multinomial Logit: A Case of Studying Rules Changes in the U.S. House. Manuscript: University of Alabama.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the US House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 144–68.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt A., Ober, Josiah, and Wallace, Robert. 2007. Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Jason and Smith, Steven. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1974. “Committee Reform in the House of Representatives and the Subcommittee Bill of Rights.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 411(1): 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas and Rosenthal, Howard. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33: 27–43.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2000. “Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 269–288.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2014. Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of Supermajority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81(1): 85–104.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J. and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the US Senate. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” The Journal of Political Economy 96(1): 132–163.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×