Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Special Section on Goethe's Lyric Poetry
- Introduction: New Approaches to Goethe's Lyric Poetry
- Intimacy, Morality, and the Inner Problematic of the Lyric
- Beyond the Poem: Strategies of Metapoetic Reflection in Goethe's Erster Weimarer Gedichtsammlung
- Meistersänger als Beruf: The Maieutics of Poetic Vocation in “Erklärung eines alten Holzschnittes …”
- Song or Narration?: Goethe's Mignon
- The Sucking Subject: Structural Ambiguities of Goethe's “Auf dem See” in Literary and Linguistic Perspective
- “Höhere Begattung,” “höhere Schönheit”: Goethe's Homoerotic Poem “Selige Sehnsucht”
- Poetry after Faust
- Forms of Knowledge/Knowledge of Forms: The Epistemology of Goethe's West-östlicher Divan and Cavellian Skepticism
- Im flüßgen Element bin und wieder schweifen: Development and Return in Goethe's Poetry and Hegel's Philosophy
- Goethe's Historical Particularism and the “Right Hand” of History: Early Modern State Building, Nobility, and the Feud in Götz von Berlichingen
- Where Are the Mountains?: Johann Jacob Bodmer and the “Pre-Kantian Sublime”
- The Politics of Aesthetic Humanism: Schiller's German Idea of Freedom
- Romanticism's Old German as Stepping-Stone to Goethe's World Literature
- Book Reviews
Im flüßgen Element bin und wieder schweifen: Development and Return in Goethe's Poetry and Hegel's Philosophy
from Special Section on Goethe's Lyric Poetry
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Special Section on Goethe's Lyric Poetry
- Introduction: New Approaches to Goethe's Lyric Poetry
- Intimacy, Morality, and the Inner Problematic of the Lyric
- Beyond the Poem: Strategies of Metapoetic Reflection in Goethe's Erster Weimarer Gedichtsammlung
- Meistersänger als Beruf: The Maieutics of Poetic Vocation in “Erklärung eines alten Holzschnittes …”
- Song or Narration?: Goethe's Mignon
- The Sucking Subject: Structural Ambiguities of Goethe's “Auf dem See” in Literary and Linguistic Perspective
- “Höhere Begattung,” “höhere Schönheit”: Goethe's Homoerotic Poem “Selige Sehnsucht”
- Poetry after Faust
- Forms of Knowledge/Knowledge of Forms: The Epistemology of Goethe's West-östlicher Divan and Cavellian Skepticism
- Im flüßgen Element bin und wieder schweifen: Development and Return in Goethe's Poetry and Hegel's Philosophy
- Goethe's Historical Particularism and the “Right Hand” of History: Early Modern State Building, Nobility, and the Feud in Götz von Berlichingen
- Where Are the Mountains?: Johann Jacob Bodmer and the “Pre-Kantian Sublime”
- The Politics of Aesthetic Humanism: Schiller's German Idea of Freedom
- Romanticism's Old German as Stepping-Stone to Goethe's World Literature
- Book Reviews
Summary
After an exchange of letters early in 1821, Goethe was so pleased by the sensitivity of Hegel's reflections on a concept central to his own thought that he sent Hegel a gift of an opaque wine glass, with the dedication:
Dem Absoluten
empfiehlt sich
schönstens
zu freundlicher Aufnahme
Urphänomen.
This vignette, tongue-in-cheek though it is, points to an enduring meeting of minds between the two thinkers, which can be detected in the most surprising places. The parallels between Goethe's West-östlicher Divan (1819) and the fundamentals of Hegel's thought have never been remarked upon, even though they are remarkable. My purpose here is to draw out those similarities, to listen beyond the apparent differences in the voices of these two thinkers to the internal resonance between their ideas.
Goethe and Hegel corresponded intermittently for some two decades, and there was significant mutual respect, even admiration, between them. Hegel was outspoken in his defense of Goethe's Farbenlehre, which had been harshly received, and he was deeply influenced by Goethe's theory of morphology. Goethe, for his part, valued Hegel's unique mind, and commented on more than one occasion on Hegel's sensitivity to his own ideas. Of course, they remained profoundly different thinkers. It goes without saying that Goethe did not share Hegel's conception of Geist, and that he did not seek, as Hegel did, to develop an all-encompassing philosophical system.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Goethe Yearbook 20 , pp. 167 - 178Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2013