from Special Section on Goethe and the Postclassical: Literature, Science, Art, and Philosophy, 1805–1815
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2018
In memory of my sister, Jane Rima Mehl So klar beweglich bleibt das Bild der Lieben Mit Flammenschrift ins treue Herz geschrieben.
JEAN-LUC NANCY's DISCUSSION of the Kantian schema in The Ground of the Image characterizes the European “transformation of thought” between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuries as an epochal shift “from painting to the projection screen,” or “from sight (vue) to vision,” by which he means “from representation to presentation …, from the idea to the image, or, more precisely, from the fantasy or fantasm to the imagination.” Nancy's time-span, of course, precisely encompasses the historical arc of Faust. Consequently, his list of the transformative changes that were witnessed between Luther and Goethe could easily serve as an historical and theoretical frame for analyzing the problem of figuration in Faust, which similarly features the work of the imagination and thereby shifts the attention of its protagonist and spectator—in the spirit of Nancy's formulation—from “being to appearing” or from “ontology to phenomenology” (Nancy 80).
Even the casual reader of Faust will notice how the complex of figurative structures at work throughout Goethe's play move with compelling immediacy across the impassioned, personal investments of part one, only to re-emerge as the characteristically rarefied abstractions of part two, with its challenging allegorical and symbolic exhibitions. However, rather than valorize the poetic figure (Bild), in line with Emrich, within an ontological-genetic framework as a referential form that reveals origins in history, or expose it, along with Flax, as a site of deconstructive semiosis, I will take my cue from Nancy in the following remarks and reframe the discussion about figuration (Bildlichkeit) in Faust by exploring the transcendental quality of the play's figurative processes. To initiate this kind of post-Kantian re-evaluation of the Faust-stage, especially in part two, as a site where the poetic figure is analyzed in terms of the inherent (a priori) capacity of the Goethean imagination to animate and sustain thought—despite, or perhaps, because of Faust's cognitive and moral shortfalls—I will consider (more modestly here) just a few familiar passages, largely from the first part of the work—with the exception of Faust's journey to the Mothers.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.