Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:23:09.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Divided by Discipline?

Contrasting Motivations, Perceptions and Background Characteristics of Beginning Australian English and Mathematics Teachers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

By
Helen M. G. Watt ,
Paul W. Richardson  and
Zoe A. Morris
Edited by
Helen M. G. Watt ,
Paul W. Richardson  and
Kari Smith
Helen M. G. Watt
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Paul W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Kari Smith
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The motivational profiles, perceptions about teaching, and background demographic characteristics of beginning English and Mathematics teachers were compared within an Australian sample, from the start of their teacher education studies (NT1 = 325; 213 English) until early career teaching (NT2 = 132; 89 English). Beginning Mathematics teachers tended to be older, to study through graduate-entry mode, were less likely to have chosen teaching as their first career, and more likely to have parents who worked in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) fields. Relative to beginning English teachers, there was a higher proportion from non-English speaking and less advantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. Preservice English teachers tended to have parents who worked in education, were more highly motivated to enhance social equity, less motivated to teach as a “fallback” career, and regarded teaching as more demanding. From initial teacher education until early career teaching, the only significant change was that perceptions of teaching demand increased for beginning English and Mathematics teachers; overall, there were more similarities than differences between the motivations and perceptions of beginning English and Mathematics teachers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Perspectives on Teacher Motivation , pp. 322 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, J., Kos, J. & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in Science, Mathematics and Technology in Australian Education (ACER Research Monographs). Melbourne: ACER. Available at http://research.acer.edu.au/acer_monographs/4.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. & Hatch, G. (2002). Initial motivations of serving teachers of secondary mathematics. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(4), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002). Australian Social Trends. Available at http://.abs.gov.au (accessed May 2003).Google Scholar
Australian Industry Group (2013). Lifting our Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) Skills. Available at www.aigroup.com.au/portal/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/LIVE_CONTENT/Publications/Reports/2013/Ai_Group_Skills_Survey_2012-STEM_FINAL_PRINTED (accessed 2 October 2014).Google Scholar
Australian Industry Group (2015). Progressing STEM skills in Australia. Available at www.aigroup.com.au/portal/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/LIVE_CONTENT/Publications/Reports/2015/14571_STEM%20Skills%20Report%20Final%20-.pdf (accessed 8 October 2015).Google Scholar
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2013). Initial Teacher Education Data Report. Melbourne: AITSL. Available at www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/aitsl-research/insights/re00057_initial_teacher_education_data_report_2013_aitsl_may_2013.pdf?sfvrsn=4 (accessed 13 March 2016).Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, B. & Wendler, C. (1991). Gender differences in predictors of college mathematics performance and in college mathematics course grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 275–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookhart, S. M. & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37–60 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543062001037).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzler, S. & Wolter, S. C. (2009). Sorting into teacher education: how the institutional setting matters. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(4), 423–41.Google Scholar
Department of Education and Training Victoria (2013). English as an Additional Language in Victorian Government Schools 2013. Canberra: Victorian State Government. Available at www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/diversity/eal/2013%20English%20as%20a%20Second%20Language%20report.pdf (accessed 13 March 2016).Google Scholar
Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dow, K. L. (2003). Australia’s Teachers: Australia’s Future. Advancing Innovation, Science, Technology and Mathematics. Main Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Eccles (Parsons), J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M. et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D. & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self-talk and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–47.Google Scholar
Ellis, V. (2003). The love that dare not speak its name? The constitution of the English subject and beginning teachers’ motivations to teach it. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 2(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
Fantilli, R. D. & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6), 814–25. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.021Google Scholar
Fredricks, J. A. & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: growth trajectories in two male-sex-types domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–33.Google Scholar
Guarino, C. M., Santibañez, L. & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: a review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (2002). Why teach? A case study investigating the decision to train to teach ICT. Journal of Education for Teaching, 28(2), 135–48.Google Scholar
Harris, K.-L., Jensz, F. & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s Teaching Science? Meeting the Demand for Qualified Science Teachers in Australian Secondary Schools. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
Heller, K. A. & Parsons, J. E. (1981). Sex differences in teachers’ evaluative feedback and students’ expectancies for success in mathematics. Child Development, 52, 1015–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: a situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–36.Google Scholar
Kılınç, A., Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2012). Factors influencing teaching choice in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M. et al. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge the role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106.Google Scholar
Leder, G. & Forgasz, H. (1992). Gender: a critical variable in mathematics education. In Atweh, B. & Watson, J. (eds.), Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 1988–1991 (pp. 67–95). University of Technology, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender- and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students’ academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40(1), 62–81.Google Scholar
Ma, X. & Johnson, W. (2008). Mathematics as the critical filter: curricular effects on gendered career choices. In Watt, H. M. G. & Eccles, J. S. (eds.), Explaining Gendered Occupational Outcomes: Examining Individual and Social Explanations through School and Beyond (pp. 55–83). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Manuel, J. & Brindley, S. (2005). The call to teach: identifying pre-service teachers’ motivations, expectations and key experiences during initial teacher education in Australia and the United Kingdom. English in Australia, 144(Summer), 38–49.Google Scholar
McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P. & Murphy, M. (2011). Staff in Australia’s Schools 2010: Main Report. Canberra: DEEWR.Google Scholar
Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Committee for the Mathematical Sciences of the Australian Academy of Science (2006). Mathematics and Statistics: Critical Skills for Australia’s Future. The National Strategic Review of Mathematical Sciences Research in Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Education at a Glance 2008. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011). Education at a Glance 2011. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pigge, F. L. & Marso, R. N. (1992). A longitudinal comparison of the academic, affective, and personal characteristics of persisters and nonpersisters in teacher preparation. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 19–26.Google Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2014). Why people choose teaching as a career: an expectancy-value approach to understanding teacher motivation. In Richardson, P. W., Karabenick, S. A. & Watt, H. M. G. (eds.), Teacher Motivation: Theory and Practice (pp. 3–19). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, P. W. & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, N. & Allard, A. (2005). (Re)examining identities: working with diversity in the pre-service teaching experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 863–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264xxxxxx-en.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. & Perrin, R. (1989). A comparison of physics undergraduates’ and PGCE students’ attitudes to a career in teaching, Physics Education, 24(5), 252 –3.Google Scholar
Sturman, A. (1985). Immigrants, education and the transition to work. Paper prepared for the National Advisory and Coordinating Committee on Multicultural Education, Canberra.Google Scholar
Suryani, A. (2014). Indonesian teacher education students’ motivations for choosing a teaching career and a career plan. PhD thesis, Monash University.Google Scholar
US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration (1998). O*NET: The Occupational Information Network. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Van Driel, J. H. & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to math. In Watt, H. M. G. & Eccles, J. S. (eds.), Understanding Women’s Choice of Mathematics and Science Related Careers: Longitudinal Studies from Four Countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305–322.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. (2008). What motivates females and males to pursue sex-stereotyped careers? In Watt, H. M. G. & Eccles, J. S. (eds.), Gender and Occupational Outcomes: Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–28.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G. & Richardson, P. W. (2010). ‘When the rubber hits the road’: changing motivations for teacher subtypes in the first five years of teaching. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, Denver, 30 April–4 May.Google Scholar
Watt, H. M. G., Richardson, P. W. & Devos, C. (2013). (How) Does gender matter in the choice of a STEM teaching career and later teaching behaviours? International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 187–206.Google Scholar
Weldon, P. R. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: supply, demand and data issues. Policy Insights, 2. Available at http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=policyinsights (accessed 13 March 2016).Google Scholar
Weldon, P., McMillan, J., Rowley, G. & McKenzie, P. (2014). Profiles of Teachers in Selected Curriculum Areas: Further Analyses of the Staff in Australia’s Schools 2013 Survey. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education. Available at https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/sias_2013_supplementary_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×