Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Chapter 11 Trade and Health
- Chapter 12 Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Health
- Chapter 13 The International Arms Trade and Global Health
- Chapter 14 Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine
- Chapter 15 Development Assistance for Health
- Chapter 16 Geopolitics, Disease, and Inequalities in Emerging Economies
- Chapter 17 Neoliberalism, Power Relations, Ethics, and Global Health
- Chapter 18 Morbid Symptoms, Organic Crises, and Enclosures of the Commons
- Chapter 19 Challenging the Global Extractive Order
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 11 - Trade and Health
The Ethics of Global Rights, Regulation, and Redistribution
from Section 3 - Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2021
Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Chapter 11 Trade and Health
- Chapter 12 Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Health
- Chapter 13 The International Arms Trade and Global Health
- Chapter 14 Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine
- Chapter 15 Development Assistance for Health
- Chapter 16 Geopolitics, Disease, and Inequalities in Emerging Economies
- Chapter 17 Neoliberalism, Power Relations, Ethics, and Global Health
- Chapter 18 Morbid Symptoms, Organic Crises, and Enclosures of the Commons
- Chapter 19 Challenging the Global Extractive Order
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Summary
Concerns about health are not new aspects of trade policies and have long been part of trade negotiations. It is also known that failures in public health policies can substantially and adversely affect trade. The economic costs of global epidemics have been increasing, but more important is that prevention of epidemics requires both functional public health measures at national borders and functional health systems. Whereas health policies and trade policies have mutually compatible and strengthening aspects, they are marred by important conflicts of interests. In this chapter, I outline ethical issues and questions that relate to these conflicts and the importance of considering trade policies not merely as transnational policies but also as a component of global legal development and governance in relation to rights, redistribution, and regulatory measures. These have consequences not only across countries and among international organizations and actors but also for the balance between public policies and interests and those of national and increasingly global corporate actors and interest groups.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global HealthEthical Challenges, pp. 158 - 169Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Achmea v. Slovakia (2012). Final Award, December 7, 2012. Available at www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3206.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., & Martin, W. (2005). Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Bettcher, D. W., Yach, D., & Guindon, G. E. (2000). Global trade and health: key linkages and future challenges. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78, 521–531.Google Scholar
Bialious, S. A., & Yach, D. (2001). Whose standard is it anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tobacco Control 10, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, N. (2006). The World Is Not Flat: Inequality and Injustice in Our Global Economy. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. S., & Waibel, M. (2017). The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, A., Dominguez-Gil, B., Matesanz, R., & Prior, C. (2009). Trafficking of Organs, Tissues and Cells and Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of the Removal of Organs (Joint Council of Europe/United Nations Study). Strasbourg: Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Caudron, J.-M., Ford, N., Henkens, M., et al. (2008). Substandard medicines in resource-poor settings: a problem that can no longer be ignored. Journal of Tropical and International Health 13, 1062–1072.Google ScholarPubMed
Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) (2017). Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/ceta-chapter-by-chapter/.Google Scholar
Epps, T. (2008). International Trade and Health Protection: A Critical Assessment of the WTO’s SPS Agreement. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar International Economic Law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EU–CARIFORUM (2008). Economic partnerships agreement between the CARIFORUM states, of the one part, and the European Union, on the other part. Official Journal of the European Union 30.10.2008, L 289/I/3.Google Scholar
EU–Mexico FTA (2001). European Union–Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Available at www.worldtradelaw.net/fta/agreements/eftamexfta.pdf.Google Scholar
EU–Mexico FTA (2018). Agreement in Principle. Available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1833.Google Scholar
Fidler, D. (1997). Trade and health: the global spread of disease and international trade. German Yearbook of International Law 40, 300–305.Google Scholar
Fidler, D., Correa, C., & Oginam, A. (2003). Legal Review of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) from a Health Policy Perspective (Globalisation, Trade and Health Working Paper Series). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Fink, C., & Reichenmiller, P. (2005). Tightening TRIPS: The Intellectual Property Provisions of Recent US Free Trade Agreements (Trade Note No. 20). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Fitter, R., & Kaplinsky, R. (2001). Who Gains from Product Rents as Coffee Market Becomes More Differentiated. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2003). Trade Reforms and Food Security: Conceptualising the Linkages. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2009). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O., Friedman, E. A., Ooms, G., et al. (2011) The Joint Action and Learning Initiative: towards a global agreement on national and global responsibilities for health. PLoS Medicine 8(5), e1001031. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001031.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2017) Designing multilateral investment court: issues and options. Yearbook of European Law 2017, 1–28.Google Scholar
Hunt, P. (2006). The human right to the highest attainable standard of health: new opportunities and challenges. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 100, 603–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eli-Lilly v. Canada (2017). Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada. Nations Commission on International Trade Law, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2. Available at www.italaw.com/cases/1625.Google Scholar
Koivusalo, M. (1999). WTO and Trade-Creep in Health and Social Policies (GASPP Occasional Papers No. 4). Helsinki: National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.Google Scholar
Koivusalo, M., Labonté, R., & Schrecker, T. (2009). Globalization and policy space for health and social determinants of health, in Labonté, R., Schrecker, T., Packer, C., & Runnels, V. (eds.), Globalization and Health: Pathways, Evidence, and Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koivusalo, M. (2014). Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements. Health Promotion International 29(Suppl. 1), i29–i47. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau033.Google Scholar
Koivusalo, M., & Pereduhoff, K. (2018). What future for global health governance and right to health in the era of new generation trade and investment agreements? Global Health Governance XII(1), 116–125.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2017). It’s not the cases, it’s the system. Journal of World Investment and Trade 18, 343–352.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. (2003). Public services and trade liberalisation: mapping the legal framework. International Journal of Economic Law 6, 341–367.Google Scholar
Kuptsch, C. (ed.) (2006). Merchants of Labour. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Lang, T. (2004). Food Industrialisation and Food Power: Implications for Food Governance (IIED Gatekeeper Series No. 114). London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Luff, F. (2003). Regulation of health services and international trade law, in Mattoo, A., & Sauve, P. (eds.), Domestic Regulation and Service Trade Liberalisation. New York: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A., & Rathindran, R. (2006). How health insurance inhibits trade in health care. Health Affairs 25, 358–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ofodile, U. (2009). Import (toy) safety, consumer protection and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade: prospects, progress and problems. International Journal of Private Law 2, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2003). Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) (2017). Philip Morris Asia Limited (Hong Kong) v. The Commonwealth of Australia. Available at www.pcacases.com/web/view/5.Google Scholar
Pelc, K. (2017) What explains the low success rate of investor–state disputes? International Organization 71(3), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip Morris v. Uruguay (2016). Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay (formerly FTR Holding SA, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay). ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, July 8. Available at www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7417.pdf.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (2018). What do trade agreements really do? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 23 (2), 73-90. Available at https://j.mp/2EsEOPkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roffe, P., & Spennemann, C. (2006). The impact of FTAs on public health policies and TRIPS flexibilities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management 1, 75–93.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N. (2000). The global traffic in human organs. Current Anthropology 41, 191–208.Google Scholar
Sell, S. (2008). The global IP upward ratchet, anti-counterfeiting and piracy enforcement efforts: the state of play. Available at www.twnside.org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/development.research/SusanSellfinalversion.pdf.Google Scholar
Swinburn, B., Kraak, V., & Allenden, S. (2019) The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet 393, 791–846Google Scholar
United Nations (2009). Access to Medicine in the Context of the Right of Everyone to the Enjoyment of the Highest Attainable Standard of Physical and Mental Health, resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council. A/ HRC/RES/12/24. Available at https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/alldocs.aspx?doc_id=16180.Google Scholar
United Nations (2009b). Report of the Commission of Experts of the President of the United Nations General Assembly on Reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations (2016). Report of the Independent Expert A de Zayas on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order. A/HRC/33/40. Available at https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G16/151/19/PDF/G1615119.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
US Trade Representative (USTR) (2018). National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers. Washington, DC: Office of USTR.Google Scholar
Veggeland, F., & Borgen, S. O. (2005). Negotiating international food standards: the World Trade Organization’s impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 18, 675–708.Google Scholar
Wibulpolprasert, S., Pachanee, C., Pitayarangsarit, S., & Hempisut, P. (2004). International service trade and its implications for human resources for health: a case study of Thailand. Human Resources for Health 2, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478–4491–2–10.Google Scholar
Willetts, A., & Martinea, T. (2004). Ethical International Recruitment of Health Professionals: Will Codes of Practice Protect Developing Country Health Systems? Version 1.1, January. Available at www.liv.ac.uk/lstm/research/documents/codesofpracticereport.pdf.Google Scholar
World Health Assembly (WHA) (2008). Global Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (Resolution 61.21, Annex). Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010). WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel (WHA 63), May 16. Geneva: WHO. Available at www.who.int/hrh/migration/code/code_en.pdf?ua=1.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) Access to medicines, vaccines and pharmaceuticals. pricing of cancer medicines and its impacts. Technical report. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (1998). EC measures concerning meat and meat products (hormones). Appellate body report, WT/DS26AB/R, January 16. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2005). United States: measures affecting the cross-border supply of gambling and betting services. WT/DS285/ AB/R, April 7. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2006). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. Notification, G/TBT/N/ THA/215, October 10, 2006. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2008). Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. Minutes of the meeting of 9 November, G/TBT/M/43, January 21. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar