Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Chapter 11 Trade and Health
- Chapter 12 Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Health
- Chapter 13 The International Arms Trade and Global Health
- Chapter 14 Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine
- Chapter 15 Development Assistance for Health
- Chapter 16 Geopolitics, Disease, and Inequalities in Emerging Economies
- Chapter 17 Neoliberalism, Power Relations, Ethics, and Global Health
- Chapter 18 Morbid Symptoms, Organic Crises, and Enclosures of the Commons
- Chapter 19 Challenging the Global Extractive Order
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Chapter 17 - Neoliberalism, Power Relations, Ethics, and Global Health
from Section 3 - Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2021
Book contents
- Global Health
- Global Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Global Health: Definitions and Descriptions
- Section 2 Global Health Ethics, Responsibilities, and Justice: Some Central Issues
- Section 3 Analyzing Some Reasons for Poor Health and Responsibilities to Address Them
- Chapter 11 Trade and Health
- Chapter 12 Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Health
- Chapter 13 The International Arms Trade and Global Health
- Chapter 14 Allocating Resources in Humanitarian Medicine
- Chapter 15 Development Assistance for Health
- Chapter 16 Geopolitics, Disease, and Inequalities in Emerging Economies
- Chapter 17 Neoliberalism, Power Relations, Ethics, and Global Health
- Chapter 18 Morbid Symptoms, Organic Crises, and Enclosures of the Commons
- Chapter 19 Challenging the Global Extractive Order
- Section 4 Environmental/Ecological Considerations and Planetary Health
- Section 5 The Importance of Including Cross-Cultural Perspectives and the Need for Dialogue
- Section 6 Shaping the Future
- Index
- References
Summary
Spectacular progress, both intellectual and material, has been achieved through the Enlightenment notion of the centrality of the individual and the supremacy of science and technology in advancing health and healthcare practices. The modern Western belief system and its frames for global thinking that have now become powerful worldwide are succinctly characterized by an individualistic, self-determining, and rights-bearing concept of being; an epistemological framework that centers on abstract thinking, objectivity in observation, logical reasoning processes, verifiable knowledge, and a positivist version of the scientific method; and moral and political values of autonomy supportive of individual rights. Scientific and technological progress and diverse socioeconomic systems contributed to fostering great “accelerations” in the scale of production, consumption, communication, and transportation that in particular since 1945 have improved the duration and quality of life for many people.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global HealthEthical Challenges, pp. 230 - 241Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Albrecht, G. (2016). Exiting the Anthropocene and entering the Symbiocene. Minding Nature 9(2), 12–16. Available at www.humansandnature.org/filebin/pdf/minding_nature/may_2016/Albrecht_May2016.Google Scholar
Alexander, T. (1996). Unravelling Global Apartheid: An Overview of World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (2015). Liberty, equality, and private government (Tanner Lectures in Human Values). Available at https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/Anderson%20manuscript.pdf.Google Scholar
Astroulakis, N. (2014). An ethical analysis of neoliberal capitalism: alternative perspective from development ethics. Éthique et économique/Ethics and Economics 11(2), 94–108. Available at https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/10931 (accessed December 4, 2019).Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baudet, J. (ed.) (2000). Building a Global Community: Globalization and the Common Good. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Ministry for Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Barnosky, A. D., et al. (2012). Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486: 52–58.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2001). The coming catastrophe in international health: an analogy with lung cancer. International Journal 56(4), 611–631.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2005). Moral imagination: the missing component in global health. Public Library of Science Medicine 2(12), e400.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2011). Global leadership, ethics and global health: the search for new paradigms, in Gill, S. (ed.), The Global Crisis and the Crisis of Global Leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, S. R. (2016). Politics, power, poverty and global health: systems and frames. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 5(10), 599–604.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R., & Upshur, R. (2013). Virtue in medicine reconsidered: individual health and global health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 56(1), 126–147.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Global health ethics: a rationale for mutual caring. International Affairs 79, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benatar, S R., Daibes, I., & Tomsons, S. (2016). Inter-philosophies dialogue: creating a paradigm for global health ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26(3), 323–346. doi:10.1353/ken.2016.0027.Google Scholar
Benatar, S. R., Gill, S., & Bakker, I. C. (2011). Global health and the global economic crisis. American Journal of Public Health 101(4), 646–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benatar, S., Upshur, R., & Gill, S. (2018). Understanding the relationship between ethics, neoliberalism and power as a step towards improving the health of people and our planet. Anthropocene Review 2018, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bensimon, C. A., & Benatar, S. R. (2006). Developing sustainability: a new metaphor for progress. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27:(1), 59–79.Google Scholar
Birn, A.-E., Pillay, Y., & Holtz, T. (2018). Globalisation, trade, work and health, in Textbook of Global Health, 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 377–424.Google Scholar
Brock, G. (2009). Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chatwood, S., Paulette, F., Baker, R., et al. (2015). Approaching etuaptmumk: introducing a consensus based mixed method for health services research. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 4(1), 27438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M. (2015). The Bank Bailout. Available at www.forbes.com/sites/mikecollins/2015/07/14/thebig-bank-bailout/#13595fd72d83.Google Scholar
Cooper, V., & Whyte, D. (eds.) (2017). The Violence of Austerity. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraw, D. (2010a). The economic elite have engineered an extraordinary coup, threatening the very existence of the middle class. Available at www.alternet.org/story/145667 (accessed September 20, 2012).Google Scholar
DeGraw, D. (2010b). The richest 1% have captured America’s wealth: what’s it going to take to get it back? Available at www.alternet.org/story/145705.Google Scholar
Drayton, R., & Motadel, D. (2018) Discussion: the futures of global history. Journal of Global History 13(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Emmott, B. (2017). The Fate of the West: The Battle to Save the World’s Most Successful Political Idea. New York: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, L. (1994). The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Garrido, M. (2003). The free trade charade. Asia Times, June 11. Available at www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/EF11Dj01.html.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructivist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40, 266–275.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, market civilisation and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23(3), 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S. (2008). Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (ed.) (2011). Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, S. (2015). At the historical crossroads: radical imaginaries and the crisis of global governance, in Gill, S. (ed.), Critical Perspectives on the Crisis of Global Governance: Reimagining the Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
Gill, S., & Benatar, S. R. (2016). Global health governance and global power: a critical commentary on The Lancet–University of Oslo Commission Report. International Journal of Health Services 46(2), 346–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S., & Benatar, S. R. (2019). Reflections on the political economy of planetary health. Review of International Political Economy 27(1), 167–190.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M., de Leeuw, S., & Lindsay, N. M. (2018). Determinants of Indigenous Peoples’ Health Beyond the Social, 2nd ed. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Grantham, J. (2018). The race of our lives revisited. GMO White Paper. Available at www.gmo.com/docs/default-source/research-and-commentary/strategies/asset-allocation/the-race-of-our-lives-revisited.pdf.Google Scholar
Grice, F. (2016). Towards non-Western histories in international relations textbooks. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. Available at www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/ethics_online/0105 (accessed January 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Hanlon, R. J., & Christie, K. (2016). Freedom from Fear, Freedom from Want: An Introduction to Human Security. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2005). A Short History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jamison, D., Summers, L. H., Alleyne, G., et al. (2013). Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation. Lancet 382(9908), 1898–1955.Google Scholar
Johnstone, D. J. (2017). Missing the Tide: Global Governments in Retreat. Montreal: McGill-Queens’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kaebnick, G. E. (2013). Humans in Nature: The World as We Find It and the World as We Create It. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. (2009). The Return of History and the End of Dreams. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Katz, J. D. (2011). Who benefited from the bailout? Minnesota Law Review 95, 1568. Available at www.minnesotalawreview.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/05/Katz_PDF.pdf.Google Scholar
Klein, N. (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kolbert, E. (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
Kopp, R. E., Shwom, R., Wagner, J., et al. (2016). Tipping elements and climate economic shocks: pathways toward integrated assessment. Earth’s Future 4, 346–372.Google Scholar
Manuel, A., & Derrikson, R. (2017) The Reconciliation Manifesto: Recovering the Land, Rebuilding the Economy. Toronto. James Lorimer and Company.Google Scholar
McMichael, A. J. (2013). Globalization, climate change, and human health. New England Journal of Medicine 368, 1335–1343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monbiot, G. (2004). The Age of Consent: A Manifesto for a New World Order. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Nettelford, R. (1995). Inward Stretch, Outward Reach: A Voice from the Caribbean. London: Caribbean Diaspora Press.Google Scholar
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2013). The collapse of Western civilization: a view from the future. Daedalus 142(1), 40–58.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2017). Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, E., & Barry, J. (2016). Planning for Coexistence: Recognizing Indigenous Rights Through Land-Use Planning in Canada and Australia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pradella, L., & Marois, T. (eds.) (2015). Polarizing Development: Alternatives to Neoliberalism and the Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rockstrom, J., & Foley, S. W. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475.Google Scholar
Rowden, R. (2009). The Deadly Ideas of Neoliberalism: How the IMF Has Undermined Public Health and the Fight Against AIDS. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Schlossberg, T. (2017). Era of “biological annihilation” is underway, scientists warn. New York Times, July 11. Available at www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/climate/mass-extinction-animal-species.html.Google Scholar
Shiffman, J. (2014). Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. International Journal of Health Policy Management 2014(3), 297–299.Google Scholar
Singer, P. A., Benatar, S. R., Bernstein, P., et al. (2003). Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto. British Medical Journal 327, 1342–1344.Google Scholar
Standing, G. (2014). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Talaga, T. (2018). All Our Relations: Finding the Way Forward. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
Tarnas, R. (2006). Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Tomsons, S., & Meyer, L. (eds.) (20034). Philosophy and Aboriginal Rights: Critical Dialogues. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooze, A. (2017). Tempestuous Seasons (Review of In the Long Run We Are All Dead, by Geoff Mann). London Review of Books, September 13, pp. 19–21.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. (1992). America and the world: today, yesterday and tomorrow. Theory Society 21, 1–28.Google Scholar
Waters, C., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., et al. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science 35(2689), 137. Available at http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6269/aad2622.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. (2016). The Return of History: Conflict, Migration and Geopolitics in the 21st Century (2016 Massey Lectures). Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 40(7), 762–780.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by