Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of language abbreviations
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Germanic lexicon
- 3 The sound systems of Germanic: inventories, alternations and structures
- 4 The Germanic nominal system: paradigmatic and syntagmatic variation
- 5 The verbal systems of Germanic: paradigmatic and syntagmatic comparison
- 6 The syntax of the clause
- References
- Index
- References
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of language abbreviations
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Germanic lexicon
- 3 The sound systems of Germanic: inventories, alternations and structures
- 4 The Germanic nominal system: paradigmatic and syntagmatic variation
- 5 The verbal systems of Germanic: paradigmatic and syntagmatic comparison
- 6 The syntax of the clause
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Germanic Languages , pp. 482 - 504Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
Abraham, Werner. 1989. Futur-Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 345–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.1995. Adjektivrektion. In , ed., Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 241–280.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner.1997. The Interdependence of Case, Aspect and Referentiality in the History of German: The Case of the Verbal Genitive. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Uninversity Press. 29–61.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2000. Modal Particles in German: Word Classification and Legacy beyond Grammaticalization. In and , eds., Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2001a. Peculiarities of Verbal Classes in German, Particularly in Relation to English and Dutch. In et al., eds., Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2001b. How Far Does Semantic Bleaching Go? In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 15–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 1989. Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner and Anko Wiegel. 1993. Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 12–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Swedish Modal Particles in a Contrastive Perspective. Language Sciences 18: 393–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Dummy Subjects and the Verb-Second “Target” in Old English. English Studies 6: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Jens. 1982. The Complex NP Constraint in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 15–32.Google Scholar
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn. 2000. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Andersson, Eric. 1994. Swedish. In and . The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 271–312.Google Scholar
Andersson, Erik.2000. How Many Gender Categories Are there in Swedish? In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S.-G. 1989. Zur Interaktion von Temporalität, Modalität, Aspektualität, und Aktionsart bei nichtfuturischen Tempora im Deutschen, Englischen und Swedischen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. 1990. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 165–186. [first published 1976]Google Scholar
1992. A Pragmatic Analysis of Norwegian Modal Particles. Arlington: SIL and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
. 1964. Zum Umlaut im Deutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 86: 177–196.Google Scholar
. 1969. Zur Umlautfeindlichkeit des Oberdeutschen. Zeitschrift fïr Dialektologie und Linguistik 36: 201–207.Google Scholar
. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1981. On the Syntax of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Michigan German Studies 7: 50–61.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan. 1982. Basic Swedish. In and , eds., Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 47–76.Google Scholar
. 1970. Nonrandom Assignment of Loanwords: German Noun Gender. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association 26: 244–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Perfect Auxiliary Selection in the Old Saxon Heliand. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 23–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askedal, John Ole. 1994. Norwegian. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 219–270.Google Scholar
Ballweg, Joachim. 1989. Preterite, (Present-) Perfect and Future. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, Isabella. 1996. On the Syntax of Dutch er. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Passive in Icelandic—Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–146.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., with Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge 190–218.Google Scholar
. 2003. Prosody, Productivity and Word Stress: The stød Pattern of Modern Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984a. Toward an Explanation of Certain That-t Phenomena: The COMP-Node in Bavarian. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 23–32.Google Scholar
. 1923–1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1965. Heliand und Genesis. 8th edn., revised by Walther Mitzka. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Arthur. 2004. Bipartite Negation and the Fine Structure of the Negative Phrase. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Bennis, Hans and Liliane Haegeman. 1984. On the Status of Agreement and Relative Clauses in West Flemish. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 33–54.Google Scholar
et al., eds. 1972. Duden Zweifelsfälle der deutschen Sprache. (Der Grosse Duden vol. 9). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim.Google Scholar
and . 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. and D. T. Langendoen. 1972. The Interaction of Speech Perception and Grammatical Structure in the Evolution of Language. In and , eds., Linguistic Change and Generative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 32–95.Google Scholar
Birkmann, Thomas. 1997. Das neuisländische Mediopassiv: Flexion oder Wortbildung? In et al., eds., Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik: Festschrift fïr Otmar Werner. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The Syllable in Phonological Theory. In , ed., Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 206–244.Google Scholar
Boekx, Cedric. 2002. On the Co-occurrence of Expletives and Definite Subjects in Germanic. In and , eds., Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Historical Labial-Velar Changes in Germanic: A Study of the Counterdirectional Sound Changes in English and Netherlandic. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1999. Aspect and Temporal Ordering: A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit.
Booij, Geert.2002a. Separable Complex Verbs in Dutch: A Case of Periphrastic Word Formation. In et al., eds., Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Renate. 1979. Disintegration and Reintegration—the History of the Verbal Ablaut from Proto-Germanic to Modern German. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1874. Die altslovenischen Freisinger Denkmäler in ihrem Verhältnisse zur althochdeutschen Orthographie. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1: 527–35.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm.1963. Althochdeutsche Grammatik, 11th edn., revised by Walther Mitzka. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
. 1973. Gotische Grammatik, 18th edn., revised by Ernst Ebbinghaus. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt.2000. Gender in North Germanic: A Diasystematic and Functional Approach. In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broekman, Henny. 1993. Verb Clusters in Germanic: The Non-Existence of the Third Construction. In and , eds., The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993: Dutch Linguistics in a Changing Europe. Lanham: University Press of America. 117–130.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith. 1991. Double Modals in Harwick Scots. In and , eds., Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta and Ben Hermans. 1999. Word Tone in Germanic Languages. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 605–658.Google Scholar
Buccini, Anthony. 1988. Umlaut Alternation, Variation, and Dialect Contact: Reconditioning and Deconditioning of Umlaut in the Prehistory of Dutch. In , ed., Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 63–80.Google Scholar
. 1993. There is an Argument for a Cycle at LF, here. CLS 28. Volume 2: The Parasession. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 14–35.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi.1988. On the Non-Existence of Disjoint Reference Principles. Paper presented at LSA Annual Meeting.
1977. The Reanalysis of Object as Subject in Middle English Impersonal Constructions. Glossa 11: 155–170.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. On the Deficient/Strong Opposition in Possessive Systems. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna.1999. Pronouns in Germanic Languages: An Overview. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–82.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Michal Starke. 1999. The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 145–234.Google Scholar
. 1980. The Gender of English Loan-Words in German. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 12: 3–25.Google Scholar
. 2004. Nominale Wortbildung der gotischen Sprache: Die Derivation der Substantiva. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Chevillet, François. 1981. Les relatifs au debut du Moyen-anglais. PhD dissertation, Université de Lille 3.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In and , eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 184–221.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1984. Infinitival (Pseudo-)Complementation of Noun Phrases in Norwegian. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 75–82.Google Scholar
. 1985. Complex Passives and Conditions on Reanalysis. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 19: 1–49.Google Scholar
. 1986. Complex Passives, Reanalysis and Word Formation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9: 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. AGR Adjunction and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–177.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1990. The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification. In and , eds., Between Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.Google Scholar
and . 1997. Quotative Inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1995. Sprache und Sprachen: Universalien und Typologie. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 16–30.Google Scholar
. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historischer Grundlage, 5th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1996. Discourse Particles in Danish. In et al., eds., Content, Expression and Structure: Studies in Danish Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1994. Thl- in Gothic. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 107: 155–164.Google Scholar
and . 1996. Gothic thl-: A Response to Woodhouse. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 109: 276–278.Google Scholar
and . 2002. Syntax of West Germanic: The Syntax of Old English and Old High German. Göppingen: Kümerle.Google Scholar
de Schutter, Georges. 1994. Dutch. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 439–377.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1990. Preposition Stranding and Relative Complementizer Deletion: Implicational Tendencies in English and the Other Germanic Languages. In , , and , eds., Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Possession in Germanic. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H. 1985. The Ergative Hypothesis and Free Word Order in Dutch and German. In , ed., Studies in German Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 23–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H.1996. Associative DP's. In and , eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 13–24.
and . 1981. The Verbal Complex in Continental West Germanic. Groninger Arbeiten zur generativen Linguistik 19.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans and Corretje Moed-van Walraven. 1986. The Syntax of Verbs in Yiddish. In and , eds., Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, Hans and Gert Webelhuth. 1990. Stranding. In and , eds., Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1981. The Origins of Completive Up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 37–61.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 2003. On the Nature of Multiple Fronting in Yiddish. In and , eds., Multiple Fronting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce.1994. Afrikaans. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 478–504.Google Scholar
Donhauser, Karin. 1995. Negationssyntax in der deutschen Sprachgeschichte: Grammatikalisierung oder Degrammatikalisierung? In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: de Gruyter. 201–217.Google Scholar
and . 1991. The Germanic Foot: Metrical Coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 251–286.Google Scholar
. 1969–1997. The Poetic Edda, Edited with Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language 62: 808–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1970. Gothic Ḷ, Ṛ, Ṃ, Ṇ? The Evidence Reviewed. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 69: 580–583.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 2000. Progressive Markers in Germanic Languages. In , ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Robert. 1975. Subject-Raising, the Clause Squish, and German scheinen-Constructions. In , and , eds., CLS 11. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 177–187.
Eckhardt, E. 1875. Über die Syntax des Relativpronomens. PhD dissertation, Halle.
, ed. 1964. Der althochdeutsche Isidor nach der Pariser Handschrift und den Monseer Fragmenten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ehrich, Veronika and Heinz Vater. 1989. Perfekt im Dänischen und Deutschen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1994. German. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 349–387.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion. 2003. Particle Verbs in Early Middle English: The Case of Up. In and , eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003. Amsterdam: Benjamins 45–57.Google Scholar
. 1981. Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1982. Restrictions on Unbounded Dependencies in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 151–174.Google Scholar
and , eds. 1982. Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
. 1984. On the Development of the Complex Passive. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
. 1874. Untersuchungen ïber die Syntax der Sprache Otfrids. Volume 1. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
. 1972. Form and Function of German Adjective Endings. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 6: 136–145.Google Scholar
Evans, Eston. 1975. Psychological Process Experiencer Verb-Impersonals: A Case Grammar Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
. 1980. Inherent Reflexive Verbs and the “zich”/ “zichzelf”-Distribution in Dutch. Utrecht Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–50.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Everaert, Martin.1991. Contextual Determination of the Anaphor/ Pronominal Distinction. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 77–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht [reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club].
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 1995. Verb Position and Verb Movement in Early Germanic. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur.2002. Changes in Subject Case Marking in Icelandic. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje.1994. Old and Middle Scandinavian. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 38–71.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen. 1994. Das dänische und norwegische Tempussystem im Vergleich mit dem Deutschen. In and , eds., Tense Systems in European Languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 49–68.Google Scholar
. 1989. Geminates in Intensive and Iterative Germanic Class II Weak Verbs. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 111: 35–58.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah.1996. The Epistemic Use of German and English Modals. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. English Verb-Preposition Constructions: Constituency and Order. Language 81: 96–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1923. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der gothischen Sprache. 2nd edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fertig, David L. 1996. Phonology, Orthography and the Umlaut Puzzle. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Syntactic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku.2004. Irish English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 73–101.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1990. Syntactic Change and Causation: Developments in Infinitival Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Fischer, Olga.1992. Syntax. In , ed., Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshuah. 2001 A Decade in the Life of a Two-in One Language. In , ed., Can Threatened Languages be Saved?Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 74–100.
Foolen, Ad. 1995. Dutch Modal Particles: The Relevance of Grammaticalized Elements. In and , eds., The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993. Lanham, MD:University Press of America. 57–70.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert and Rex Sprouse. 1991. Lexical Case Phenomena. In , ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1996. Verb Alternation and Semantic Classes in English and German. Language Sciences 18: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The Change in Negation in Middle English: A NEGP Licensing Account. Lingua 101: 21–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudeman, Kirsten. 1999. Topics in the Morphology of Balanta, An Atlantic Language of Senegal. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1990. Floating Quantifiers, Scrambling, and Configurationality. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 633–641.Google Scholar
. 1994. A Comparative Study of the Scandinavian Consonant Shift. General Linguistics 34: 195–202.Google Scholar
Goossens, L. 1982. On the Development of the Modals and of the Epistemic Function in English. In , ed., Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 74–84.Google Scholar
Gordon, Raymond G., Jr., ed. 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/.
. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorter, Durk, Alex Riemersma and Jehannes Ytsma. 2001. Frisian in the Netherlands. In and , eds., The Other Languages of Europe. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 103–118.
et al., eds. 1966. Der große Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In , ed., Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 73–113.Google Scholar
. 1983. Genuszuordnung: Das Genus englischer Lehnwörter im Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob.1866. Über einige Fälle der Attraktion. In Kleinere Schriften. Volume 3. Berlin. 312–347.
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 1997. Pronouns and the Left Periphery of West Germanic Embedded Clauses. In and , eds., German: Syntactic Problems—Problematic Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar. In , and , eds., Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Pisa. 171–197.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Proper Analysis of “Missing-P” Free Relative Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 257–293.Google Scholar
. 1999. Dutch. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 74–77.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos.2000. On the Origin and Development of the Central Franconian Tone Contrast. In , ed., Analogy, Levelling and Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos and Gösta Bruce. 1999. Word Prosody and Intonation. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 233–272.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 1994. Danish. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 313–348.Google Scholar
. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Grammar: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane.1993. Some Speculations on Argument Shift, Clitics and Crossing in West-Flemish. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 131–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane.1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1996. Negative Concord in West Flemish. In and , eds., Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 117–180.Google Scholar
. 1964. Relative and Antecedent. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 95: 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark. 1994. Recovering the Prosody-Syntax Interface in Notker. Paper presented at the Berkeley/Michigan Germanic Linguistics Roundtable, Berkeley, April 8, 1994.
Harbert, Wayne. 1978. Gothic Syntax: A Relational Grammar. Dissertation, University of Illinois.
Harbert, Wayne.1985. Markedness and the Bindability of Subject of NP. In , and , eds., Markedness. New York: Plenum Press. 139–154.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne.1992. Gothic Relative Clauses and Syntactic Theory. In , and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin Mouton de Gruyter. 109–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne.1999. Erino portun ih firchnussu. In et al., eds., Interdigitations: Essays for Irmengard Rauch. New York: Peter Lang. 257–268.Google Scholar
. 2002. The Syntax of Indefinite Phrases in Negative Sentences in Germanic. International Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 7: 101–126.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1993. The Grammar of Irish English. In and , eds., Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman. 139–186.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin.1999. External Possession in a European Areal Perspective. In and , eds., External Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar.1982. Scandinavian Language Structures. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1954. Studien zum bestimmten Artikel in den germanischen Sprachen. Giessen: Wilhelm Schmitz.Google Scholar
. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Syntax. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 5. Trondheim: University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
. 1984. A GB-Type Analysis of Complex Passives and Related Constructions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 10. Trondheim: University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars and Christer Platzack. 1999. Pronouns in Scandinavian Languages: An Overview. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 123–142.Google Scholar
Helthoft, Lars. 2001. Recasting Danish Subjects: Case System, Word Order and Subject Development. In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, Ronald V. 1981. Aspect and Adverbs in German. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison.1996. Imperative Inversion in Belfast English. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1986. The Double Object Construction in Danish. In and , eds., Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestvik. A. G. 1990. LF-Movement of Pronouns and the Computation of Binding Domains. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.
Hickey, Raymond. 2000. On the Phonology of Gender in Modern German. In , , and , Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 621–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich. 1995. Preposition Stranding and Resumptivity in West Germanic. In , and , eds., Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich.1997. The Syntax of Infinitives in Frisian. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Hoekstra, Jarich and Peter Meijes Tiersma. 1994. Frisian. In and eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 505–531.Google Scholar
. 1984. Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Jan Rijkhoff. 1998. Word Order in the Germanic Languages. In , ed., Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Görel Sandström. 1996. Scandinavian Possessive Constructions from a Northern Swedish Viewpoint. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages: A Study of Personal Pronoun Morphology and Change in the Germanic Languages from the First Records to the Present Day. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . forthcoming. The History of the Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. and . 1997. Umlautless Residues in Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
. 2000. Negation and OV Order in Late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 36: 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1995. Aspiration and Laryngeal Representation in Germanic. Phonology 12: 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1999. Glottal Spreading Bias in Germanic. Linguistische Berichte 178: 135–151.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. English Particles Constructions, the Lexicon, and the Autonomy of Syntax. In , , and , eds., Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Neil et al. 1994. Yiddish. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 388–419.Google Scholar
. 1994. Nonrestrictive Relative That-Clauses Revisited. Studia Neophilologica 66: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Kenneth Safir. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory. In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1994. Tense in Dutch: Eight “Tenses” or Two Tenses? In and , eds., Tense Systems in European Languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 93–118.Google Scholar
. 1927. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Volume 3. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael. 1996. Phonetics and Phonology of the Tense and Lax Obstruents in German. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1998. Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1996a. Residual V-to-I. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 251–270.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure, Expletives and Verb Movement. In et al., eds., Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Minimal Words in a Minimal Syntax: Word Formation in Swedish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagjosova, Elena. 2003. Modal Particles and the Common Ground: Meaning and Functions of German ja, doch, eben, halt, and auch. In et al., eds., Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. Semantics and Vocabulary. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter.1994. Typological Differences between English and German and their Causes. In et al., eds., Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter.2000. Inflectional Classes, Morphological Restructuring and the Dissolution of Old English Grammatical Gender. In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 709–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1961. German Dialects: Phonology and Morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. and . 1998. On the Origins of German Uvular [R]: The Yiddish Evidence. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 10: 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995a. Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 140–170.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul.1995b. The Shift to Head-Initial VP in Germanic. In , and , eds., Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 140–179.Google Scholar
Kiparksy, Paul.1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460–494.Google Scholar
. 1997. Middle Verbs in Icelandic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1877. Die Syntax der gotischen Partikel ei. Zeitschrift f ür deutsche Philologie 8: 142–180, 289–329.Google Scholar
. 1913. Urgermanisch: Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte, 3rd edn. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1996. Kontrastive Grammatik und Typologie. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 31–54.Google Scholar
Köpke, Klaus-Michael and David Zubin. 1995. Prinzipien für Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: de Gruyter. 473–491.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaya-Tamm, Maria. 2003. Possessive Noun Phrases in the Languages of Europe. In , ed., Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 621–722.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan and Eric Reuland. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Sentence Adverbials in a Functional Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Gotischen, 2nd edn, revised by Elmar Seebold. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark. Volume 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony and Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb Movement in Old And Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 297–325.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, Tomas Riad and Haike Jacobs. 1999. Diachronic Prosody. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 335–424.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lanouette, Ruth. 1996. The Attributive Genitive in the History of German. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Olga is a Beautiful Dancer. Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans.Google Scholar
. 1988. How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Linguistic Evolution. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 17: 33–61.Google Scholar
. 1992. Phonology and Morphology. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23–155.Google Scholar
. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winifred.1994. Gothic and the Reconstruction of Proto-Germanic. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 19–37.Google Scholar
. 1982. Germanic Accentology. Volume 1: The Scandinavian Languages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly.1992. Vowel Lengthening before Resonant + Another Consonant and Svarabhakti in Germanic. In , and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 163–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, Sven. 1982. Discontinuous Questions and Subjacency in Norwegian. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 193–204.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David.1995. Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 31–52.Google Scholar
Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive Genitive Constructions in German. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The Perfect-Aspectual, Temporal and Evidential. In , ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 365–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Verb Raising and the Position of the Finite Verb in Pennsylvania German. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 470–477.Google Scholar
. 1977. Relative Clauses in Yiddish: A Case for Movement. Linguistic Analysis 4: 197–216.Google Scholar
. 1991. Phonotaktisch gesteuerte Konsonantenveränderungen in der Geschichte des Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1983. Transitive Adjectives: A Case of Categorial Reanalysis. In and , eds., Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Other Puzzles. Dordrecht: Reidel. 253–289.Google Scholar
. 1984. Non-Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Preposition Stranding and Passive. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press. 153–164. [First published 1985]Google Scholar
Mallén, Enrique. 1989. The Internal Structure of Determiner Phrases. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 2004. The Cambridge Old English Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1926. Untersuchung über die deutsche Wortstellung in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1981. A Metrical Analysis of Umlaut. Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 126–137.Google Scholar
. 1989. Partial and Multiple WH-Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchers, Gunnel. 1992. “Du's no heard da last o' dis”—on the Use of be as a Perfective Auxiliary Dialect. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2004. Scottish English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 47–72.Google Scholar
, ed. 1890. The Old English Version of Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Part I. London: N. Trübner.Google Scholar
. 2003. Alliteration and Sound Change in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2004. Appalachian English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 245–280.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael and Curtis Chapman. 1992. The Pace of Change in Appalachian English. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 624–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre. 1994. The Distribution of Subject Properties and the Acquisition of Subjecthood in the West Scandinavian Languages. In , and , eds., Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages from a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G.1973. Vowel System with Five Heights. In and , eds., Lexicography and Dialect Geography: Festgabe for Hans Kurath. Wiesbaden: Steiner. 187–194.Google Scholar
. and . 1983. Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language 59: 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Present Perfect in German: Outline of its Semantic Composition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 355–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. An Example of a Syntactic Blend in Old English. Indogermanische Forschungen 72: 261–274.Google Scholar
1989. The Germanic Dialects: Origins and Early Dialectal Relations. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 1995. Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: The Case of Possessive Constructions in Germanic. In and , eds., Historical Linguistics. Volume 2: Germanic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–222.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel.2001. The Loss of Lexical Case in Swedish. In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordgård, Torbjørn. 1986. COMP-Features and Word Order. In and , eds., Scandinavian Syntax. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 113–122.Google Scholar
. 1952. On the Origin of the Scandinavian Tone Distinction. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 201–225.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Twofold Adjective Declension in Germanic and Slavic (with some consideration of Baltic): A Contrastive/Comparative Analysis. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 96: 104–118.Google Scholar
. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
. 1997. On the Origin of Preaspiration in Scandinavian. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1962. Kurze deutsche Syntax, 3rd edn., revised by Heinz Stolte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn., revised by Pieter Wiehl and Siegfrid Grosse. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. In press. Small Nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24.
. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 126–70.Google Scholar
Philippi, Julia. 1997. The Rise of the Article in the Germanic Languages. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 69–93.Google Scholar
. 1993. Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Verbs and Objects in Semantic Agreement. Minor Differences between English and German that Might Suggest a Major One. Journal of Semantics 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans.2003. Double Articulation. In , ed., Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 337–396.Google Scholar
. 1985. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer1986. The Structure of Infinitive Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In and , eds., Scandinavian Syntax. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 123–137.Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara. 2002. Double Objects and Morphological Triggers. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1997. Yiddish Subject-Prodrop: Languages in Contact and the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Paper presented at the LSA Institute.
Ramat, Paolo and Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence Adverbs in the Languages of Europe. In ed., Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 187–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1942. The Gender of English Loan Words in Pennsylvania German. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 17: 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reskiewicz, Alfred. 1966. Split Constructions in Old English. In , and , eds., Studies in Language and Literature in Honour of Margaret Schlauch. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publications. 313–326.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas. 2000. The Origin of Danish Stød. In , ed., Analogy, Levelling and Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 261–300.Google Scholar
. 1999. African American Vernacular English: Features, Evolution, Educational Implications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1999. Aspiration, Preaspiration, Deaspiration, Sonorant Devoicing and Spirantization in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22: 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1991. Residual Verb Second and the WH-Criterion. In and , eds., Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 63–90.Google Scholar
2000. Etymological Opacity, Hybridization, and the Afrikaans Brace Negation. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12: 101–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 2002. The History of the Future. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1991. Grammar and Usage of the Shetland Dialect. Lerwick: The Shetland Times. [First published 1952].Google Scholar
1974. Sekundäre Subjektivierung im Englischen und Deutschen: Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Verb- und Adjektivsyntax [PAKS-Arbeitsbericht 8]. Bielefeld: Cornelson-Velhagen and Klasing.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1994. The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1994. Germanic Creoles. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 566–603.Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol. 1984. The Interface between Semantic Roles and Initial Grammatical Relations. In and , eds., Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 38–80.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1968. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club. (1967 MIT dissertation).
. 2002. A Bard's Eye View of the Germanic Syllable. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 101: 305–328.Google Scholar
Rutten, Jean. 1991. Infinitival Complements and Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
1972. Linguistic Evolution, with Special Reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, Caroline. 2000. The Changing System of Grammatical Gender in the Swedish Dialects of Nyland, Finland. In and , eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Evidence for NegP and Object Shift in German. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 154–182.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1993. Jiddisch als gemischte OV/VO Sprache. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1995. Two Types of Verb Second in the History of Yiddish. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 53–79.Google Scholar
. 1984. Die Kriterien für die deutsche Genuszuweisung bei substantivischen Anglizismen. German Quarterly 57: 402–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2003. Early Developments of the Vowel Systems of North-West Germanic and Saami. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 195–226.Google Scholar
2000. The Velar Nasal in the Adaptation of the Runic Alphabet. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo. 1993. The Relative “That” Reconsidered. In , , , and , eds., Actes du XVe Congrès International des Linguistes, Québec, Université Laval, 9–14 aoüt 1992: Les langues menacées/Endangered Languages. Laval: Sainte-Foy. 369–372.Google Scholar
Seppännen, Aimo.2000. On the History of Relative that. In , , and , eds., Generative Theory and Corpus Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Old English Relative þe. English Language and Linguistics 8: 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1995. The Dog that's Leg Was Run over: On the Genitive of the Relative Pronoun. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 76: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Thomas. 1987. On Some Recent Claims of Relational Grammar. In et al., eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley. 247–262.Google Scholar
Shannon, Thomas.1990. The Unaccusative Hypothesis and the History of the Perfect Auxiliary in Germanic and Romance. In and , eds., Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 461–499.Google Scholar
. 1995. Explaining Perfect Auxiliary Variation: Some Modal and Aspectual Effects in the History of Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 7: 129–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1996. The Second Person Singular Interrogative in the Traditional Vernacular of the Bolton Metropolitan Area. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1892. Tatian, Lateinisch und Altdeutsch, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
. 1986. Moods and (Long-Distance) Reflexives in Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 25: 1–53.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic in a Comparative GB Approach. Dissertation, University of Iceland.
Sigurðsson, Halldór.1990. Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘Dative Sickness’ in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 675–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R. 1971. Word Order in the Older Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
Smith, Michael B. 2001. Why Quirky Case Really Isn't Quirky: Or, How to Treat Dative Sickness in Icelandic. In and , eds., Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 115–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs. Language 76: 859–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
. 1991. The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 637–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Crimean Gothic: Analysis and Etymology of the Corpus. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Donald. 2001. The Great Gender Shift and the Attrition of Neuter Nouns in West Germanic: The Example of German. In and , eds., New Insights in Germanic Linguistics, II. New York: Peter Lang. 201–224.Google Scholar
Stellmacher, Dieter. 1983. Neuniederdeutsche Grammatik, Phonologie und Morphologie. In and , eds., Handbuch zur niederdeutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Eric Schmidt. 238–278.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2002. WH-Expletives and Partial WH-Movement: Two Non-Existing Concepts? In and , eds., Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. 1977. Motivation for Exbraciation in Old English. In , ed., Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 291–314.Google Scholar
1923 [1968]. Middelnederlandsche Spraakkunst: Syntaxis, 3rd edn. The Hague: Martijnus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
. 1984. Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter. The Linguistic Review 3: 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Germanisch /sp/, /st/, /sk/ und /skw/als Lautgruppen. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 33: 1–8.Google Scholar
1991. Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 480–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappe, Hans Tilo. 1984. On Infinitival Clauses without COMP. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 227–238.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T. 1982. Extraction from Relative Clauses in Norwegian. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 205–222.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1984. Remarks on Complex Passives. In and , eds., Riepmoćala: Essays in Honour of Knut Bergsland. Oslo: Novas Forlag.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1986a. On Verb Second and the Functional Content of Syntactic Categories. In and , eds., Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1986b. Som and the Binding Theory. In and , eds., Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. 149–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut.1996. Reflexives, Pronouns and Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Cate, Abraham P. 1989. Präsentische und präteritale Tempora im deutsch-niederländischen Sprachvergleich. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 1994/1995. Tense Systems in European Languages. 2 vols. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig. 1978. Topics in German Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Thornburg, Linda. 1984. The History of the Prepositional Passive in English. In , , and , eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 327–336.Google Scholar
. 1976a. Some Arguments against the Interpretive Theory of Pronouns and Reflexives. Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2: 573–624.Google Scholar
. 1976b. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society 6: 225–239.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1991. Long-Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Hösküldur.1994. Icelandic. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 142–189.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1996. On the (Non-)Universality of Functional Categories. In et al., eds., Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In , ed., Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax. Bern: Peter Lang. 335–363.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra. 1995. Cases of V-3 in Old High German. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 345–369.Google Scholar
Toon, Thomas. 1982. Variation in Contemporary American English. In and , eds., English as a World Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 210–250.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth.1992. Syntax. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax. 280–310.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa.1991. Parameters of Phrase Structure and Verb-Second Phenomena. In , ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 339–364.Google Scholar
Trnka, B. R. 1936. General Laws of Phonemic Combination. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 294–300. [Reprinted (party revised) in Vilém Fried, ed., Bohumil Trnka: Selected papers in Structural Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton, 1982. 113–118.]
. 1987. Bislama: An Introduction to the National Language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
, , and . 1981. On the Role of Function in Sound Change. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 166–185.Google Scholar
1985. Relative “that”—A Centennial Dispute. Journal of Linguistics 21: 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1928b. The Predicative Passive Infinitive in English. English Studies 10: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1999. Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marike. 1990. Passive Constructions in Old Frisian. In et al., eds., Aspects of Old Frisian Philology. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 495–505.Google Scholar
. 1997. Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans.1992. Structural Factors in the History of English Modals. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans.1997. V2 and Embedded Topicalization in Old and Middle English. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 326–352.Google Scholar
van Ness, Silke. 1994. Pennsylvania German. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 420–438.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1982. On Pied-Piped Infinitives in German Relative Clauses. In , ed., Studies in German Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 165–192.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk.1983a. Correspondence Effects and the Empty Category Principle. In et al., eds., Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University. 5–16.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk.1983b. The Case of German Adjectives. In and , eds., Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and other Puzzles. Dordrecht: Reidel. 223–232.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk 1994. Left Dislocation. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–12.Google Scholar
. 1996. Some Systematic Differences between the Dutch, French and English Transitive Construction. Language Sciences 18: 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1996. Verb-Second, Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Ms., Indiana University.
. 1978. On Footnote 2: Evidence for the Pronominal Status of þær in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 695–716.Google Scholar
Vat, Jan.1994. Left Dislocation, Connectedness and Reconstruction. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 67–92 [first published 1981].Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1988. Mittelkonstruktionen im Englischen, Dänischen und Deutschen. In and , eds., Valenzen im Kontrast. Heidelberg: Julius Groos. 398–417.Google Scholar
. 1984. Hochgermanisch und Niedergermanisch. Die Verzweigungstheorie der germanisch-deutschen Lautverschiebungen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 106: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003a. Languages in Prehistoric Europe North of the Alps. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 319–332.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003b. Syntax und Sprachkontakt: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der indogermanischen Sprachen des Nordwestens. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 333–364.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003c. Zur Frage der vorindogermanischen Substrate in Mittel- und Westeuropa. In , ed., Europa-Vasconica-Europa Semitica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 517–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23: 1–61.Google Scholar
. 1988. Modals in Danish and Event Expressions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 39: 1–33.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In and , eds., Verb Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Syllable in Frisian. Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics. (PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Vogel, Ralf. 2001. Case Conflict in German Free Relative Constructions: An Optimality Theoretic Treatment. In and , eds., Competition in Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 341–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ralf.2002. Free Relative Constructions in OT-Syntax. In and , eds., Resolving Conflicts in Grammars: Optimality Theory in Syntax, Morphology, and Phonology. Hamburg: Buske. 119–162.Google Scholar
. 1971. The Problem of West Germanic. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 5: 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voyles, Joseph.1992. On Old High German Umlaut. In and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Sheila. 2001. How to Become an Auxiliary: Progressive and Perfect in Old Saxon. In , , and , eds., Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The Grammar of the Old High German Modal Particles Thoh, Ia, Thanne. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 1997. Verbal Prefixation and the “Complexive” Aspect in Germanic. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98: 321–332.Google Scholar
. 1989. The V2 Conspiracy: A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred.1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460–494.Google Scholar
. 2003. Word-Order in WH-Questions in a North Norwegian Dialect: Some Evidence from an Acquisition Study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Origins of the English Language: A Social and Linguistic History. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2004. Rural and Ethnic Varieties in the Southeast: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 281–302.Google Scholar
. 1894. Die Syntax in den Werken Alfreds des Großen. Volume 1. Bonn: P. Hanstein's Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1901. Die Syntax in den Werken Alfreds des Großen. Volume 2. Bonn: P. Hanstein's Verlag.Google Scholar
and . 2003. The Speaker and the Perfect Auxiliaries Hafa and Vera in Icelandic. Language Sciences 25: 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie.1987. The Place of bevallen (Please) in the Syntax of Dutch. Unpublished paper, CSLI, Stanford.
Zaenen, Annie.1994. Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119–150.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Joan Maling. 1982. The Status of Resumptive Pronouns in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 223–230.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Joan Maling.1990. Unaccusative Passive and Quirky Case. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 137–152.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. Case and Grammatical Functions in the Icelandic Passive. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 95–136 [first published 1985].Google Scholar
Zonneveld, Wim, Mieke Trommelen, Michael Jessen, Gösta Bruce and Kristjan Árnason. 1999. Word-Stress in West-Germanic and North-Germanic Languages. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 477–604.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan Wouter. 1993. Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter.1996. Verb Clusters in Continental West Germanic. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 1989. Futur-Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 345–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.1995. Adjektivrektion. In , ed., Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. 241–280.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner.1997. The Interdependence of Case, Aspect and Referentiality in the History of German: The Case of the Verbal Genitive. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Uninversity Press. 29–61.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2000. Modal Particles in German: Word Classification and Legacy beyond Grammaticalization. In and , eds., Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 321–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2001a. Peculiarities of Verbal Classes in German, Particularly in Relation to English and Dutch. In et al., eds., Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner.2001b. How Far Does Semantic Bleaching Go? In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 15–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 1989. Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner and Anko Wiegel. 1993. Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 12–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The Syntax of Norwegian Passive Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Swedish Modal Particles in a Contrastive Perspective. Language Sciences 18: 393–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Dummy Subjects and the Verb-Second “Target” in Old English. English Studies 6: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, Jens. 1982. The Complex NP Constraint in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 15–32.Google Scholar
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn. 2000. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Andersson, Eric. 1994. Swedish. In and . The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 271–312.Google Scholar
Andersson, Erik.2000. How Many Gender Categories Are there in Swedish? In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, S.-G. 1989. Zur Interaktion von Temporalität, Modalität, Aspektualität, und Aktionsart bei nichtfuturischen Tempora im Deutschen, Englischen und Swedischen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, A. 1990. The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 165–186. [first published 1976]Google Scholar
1992. A Pragmatic Analysis of Norwegian Modal Particles. Arlington: SIL and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
. 1964. Zum Umlaut im Deutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 86: 177–196.Google Scholar
. 1969. Zur Umlautfeindlichkeit des Oberdeutschen. Zeitschrift fïr Dialektologie und Linguistik 36: 201–207.Google Scholar
. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1981. On the Syntax of the Older Runic Inscriptions. Michigan German Studies 7: 50–61.Google Scholar
Anward, Jan. 1982. Basic Swedish. In and , eds., Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 47–76.Google Scholar
. 1970. Nonrandom Assignment of Loanwords: German Noun Gender. Word: Journal of the International Linguistic Association 26: 244–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Perfect Auxiliary Selection in the Old Saxon Heliand. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 23–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askedal, John Ole. 1994. Norwegian. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 219–270.Google Scholar
Ballweg, Joachim. 1989. Preterite, (Present-) Perfect and Future. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, Isabella. 1996. On the Syntax of Dutch er. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Passive in Icelandic—Compared to Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 65: 109–146.Google Scholar
Barnes, Michael P., with Eivind Weyhe. 1994. Faroese. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge 190–218.Google Scholar
. 2003. Prosody, Productivity and Word Stress: The stød Pattern of Modern Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984a. Toward an Explanation of Certain That-t Phenomena: The COMP-Node in Bavarian. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 23–32.Google Scholar
. 1923–1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. 4 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1965. Heliand und Genesis. 8th edn., revised by Walther Mitzka. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Arthur. 2004. Bipartite Negation and the Fine Structure of the Negative Phrase. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Bennis, Hans and Liliane Haegeman. 1984. On the Status of Agreement and Relative Clauses in West Flemish. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 33–54.Google Scholar
et al., eds. 1972. Duden Zweifelsfälle der deutschen Sprache. (Der Grosse Duden vol. 9). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim.Google Scholar
and . 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G. and D. T. Langendoen. 1972. The Interaction of Speech Perception and Grammatical Structure in the Evolution of Language. In and , eds., Linguistic Change and Generative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 32–95.Google Scholar
Birkmann, Thomas. 1997. Das neuisländische Mediopassiv: Flexion oder Wortbildung? In et al., eds., Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik: Festschrift fïr Otmar Werner. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The Syllable in Phonological Theory. In , ed., Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. 206–244.Google Scholar
Boekx, Cedric. 2002. On the Co-occurrence of Expletives and Definite Subjects in Germanic. In and , eds., Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1979. Historical Labial-Velar Changes in Germanic: A Study of the Counterdirectional Sound Changes in English and Netherlandic. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1999. Aspect and Temporal Ordering: A Contrastive Analysis of Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit.
Booij, Geert.2002a. Separable Complex Verbs in Dutch: A Case of Periphrastic Word Formation. In et al., eds., Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, Renate. 1979. Disintegration and Reintegration—the History of the Verbal Ablaut from Proto-Germanic to Modern German. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1874. Die altslovenischen Freisinger Denkmäler in ihrem Verhältnisse zur althochdeutschen Orthographie. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1: 527–35.Google Scholar
Braune, Wilhelm.1963. Althochdeutsche Grammatik, 11th edn., revised by Walther Mitzka. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
. 1973. Gotische Grammatik, 18th edn., revised by Ernst Ebbinghaus. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt.2000. Gender in North Germanic: A Diasystematic and Functional Approach. In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broekman, Henny. 1993. Verb Clusters in Germanic: The Non-Existence of the Third Construction. In and , eds., The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993: Dutch Linguistics in a Changing Europe. Lanham: University Press of America. 117–130.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith. 1991. Double Modals in Harwick Scots. In and , eds., Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta and Ben Hermans. 1999. Word Tone in Germanic Languages. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 605–658.Google Scholar
Buccini, Anthony. 1988. Umlaut Alternation, Variation, and Dialect Contact: Reconditioning and Deconditioning of Umlaut in the Prehistory of Dutch. In , ed., Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 63–80.Google Scholar
. 1993. There is an Argument for a Cycle at LF, here. CLS 28. Volume 2: The Parasession. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 14–35.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi.1988. On the Non-Existence of Disjoint Reference Principles. Paper presented at LSA Annual Meeting.
1977. The Reanalysis of Object as Subject in Middle English Impersonal Constructions. Glossa 11: 155–170.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1998. On the Deficient/Strong Opposition in Possessive Systems. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna.1999. Pronouns in Germanic Languages: An Overview. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–82.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Michal Starke. 1999. The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 145–234.Google Scholar
. 1980. The Gender of English Loan-Words in German. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies 12: 3–25.Google Scholar
. 2004. Nominale Wortbildung der gotischen Sprache: Die Derivation der Substantiva. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Chevillet, François. 1981. Les relatifs au debut du Moyen-anglais. PhD dissertation, Université de Lille 3.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In and , eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 184–221.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1984. Infinitival (Pseudo-)Complementation of Noun Phrases in Norwegian. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris 75–82.Google Scholar
. 1985. Complex Passives and Conditions on Reanalysis. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 19: 1–49.Google Scholar
. 1986. Complex Passives, Reanalysis and Word Formation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9: 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. AGR Adjunction and the Structure of Scandinavian Existential Sentences. Lingua 84: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–177.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 1990. The Role of the Sonority Cycle in Core Syllabification. In and , eds., Between Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.Google Scholar
and . 1997. Quotative Inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1995. Sprache und Sprachen: Universalien und Typologie. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 16–30.Google Scholar
. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historischer Grundlage, 5th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, Niels. 1996. Discourse Particles in Danish. In et al., eds., Content, Expression and Structure: Studies in Danish Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1994. Thl- in Gothic. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 107: 155–164.Google Scholar
and . 1996. Gothic thl-: A Response to Woodhouse. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 109: 276–278.Google Scholar
and . 2002. Syntax of West Germanic: The Syntax of Old English and Old High German. Göppingen: Kümerle.Google Scholar
de Schutter, Georges. 1994. Dutch. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 439–377.Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1990. Preposition Stranding and Relative Complementizer Deletion: Implicational Tendencies in English and the Other Germanic Languages. In , , and , eds., Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1998. Possession in Germanic. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H. 1985. The Ergative Hypothesis and Free Word Order in Dutch and German. In , ed., Studies in German Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 23–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H.1996. Associative DP's. In and , eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 13–24.
and . 1981. The Verbal Complex in Continental West Germanic. Groninger Arbeiten zur generativen Linguistik 19.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans and Corretje Moed-van Walraven. 1986. The Syntax of Verbs in Yiddish. In and , eds., Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, Hans and Gert Webelhuth. 1990. Stranding. In and , eds., Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1981. The Origins of Completive Up in English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 86: 37–61.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 2003. On the Nature of Multiple Fronting in Yiddish. In and , eds., Multiple Fronting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce.1994. Afrikaans. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 478–504.Google Scholar
Donhauser, Karin. 1995. Negationssyntax in der deutschen Sprachgeschichte: Grammatikalisierung oder Degrammatikalisierung? In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: de Gruyter. 201–217.Google Scholar
and . 1991. The Germanic Foot: Metrical Coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 251–286.Google Scholar
. 1969–1997. The Poetic Edda, Edited with Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language 62: 808–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1970. Gothic Ḷ, Ṛ, Ṃ, Ṇ? The Evidence Reviewed. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 69: 580–583.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen H. 2000. Progressive Markers in Germanic Languages. In , ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Robert. 1975. Subject-Raising, the Clause Squish, and German scheinen-Constructions. In , and , eds., CLS 11. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 177–187.
Eckhardt, E. 1875. Über die Syntax des Relativpronomens. PhD dissertation, Halle.
, ed. 1964. Der althochdeutsche Isidor nach der Pariser Handschrift und den Monseer Fragmenten. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ehrich, Veronika and Heinz Vater. 1989. Perfekt im Dänischen und Deutschen. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1994. German. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 349–387.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion. 2003. Particle Verbs in Early Middle English: The Case of Up. In and , eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003. Amsterdam: Benjamins 45–57.Google Scholar
. 1981. Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1982. Restrictions on Unbounded Dependencies in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 151–174.Google Scholar
and , eds. 1982. Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
. 1984. On the Development of the Complex Passive. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
. 1874. Untersuchungen ïber die Syntax der Sprache Otfrids. Volume 1. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
. 1972. Form and Function of German Adjective Endings. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 6: 136–145.Google Scholar
Evans, Eston. 1975. Psychological Process Experiencer Verb-Impersonals: A Case Grammar Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
. 1980. Inherent Reflexive Verbs and the “zich”/ “zichzelf”-Distribution in Dutch. Utrecht Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–50.Google Scholar
Everaert, Martin.1986. The Syntax of Reflexivization. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Everaert, Martin.1991. Contextual Determination of the Anaphor/ Pronominal Distinction. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 77–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht [reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club].
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 1995. Verb Position and Verb Movement in Early Germanic. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Eythórsson, Thórhallur.2002. Changes in Subject Case Marking in Icelandic. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2005. Oblique Subjects: A Common Germanic Inheritance. Language 81: 824–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje.1994. Old and Middle Scandinavian. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 38–71.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen. 1994. Das dänische und norwegische Tempussystem im Vergleich mit dem Deutschen. In and , eds., Tense Systems in European Languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 49–68.Google Scholar
. 1989. Geminates in Intensive and Iterative Germanic Class II Weak Verbs. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 111: 35–58.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, Sarah.1996. The Epistemic Use of German and English Modals. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. English Verb-Preposition Constructions: Constituency and Order. Language 81: 96–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1923. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der gothischen Sprache. 2nd edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fertig, David L. 1996. Phonology, Orthography and the Umlaut Puzzle. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Syntactic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku.2004. Irish English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 73–101.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1990. Syntactic Change and Causation: Developments in Infinitival Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Fischer, Olga.1992. Syntax. In , ed., Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshuah. 2001 A Decade in the Life of a Two-in One Language. In , ed., Can Threatened Languages be Saved?Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 74–100.
Foolen, Ad. 1995. Dutch Modal Particles: The Relevance of Grammaticalized Elements. In and , eds., The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1993. Lanham, MD:University Press of America. 57–70.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert and Rex Sprouse. 1991. Lexical Case Phenomena. In , ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
, and . 1996. Verb Alternation and Semantic Classes in English and German. Language Sciences 18: 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The Change in Negation in Middle English: A NEGP Licensing Account. Lingua 101: 21–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudeman, Kirsten. 1999. Topics in the Morphology of Balanta, An Atlantic Language of Senegal. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1990. Floating Quantifiers, Scrambling, and Configurationality. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 633–641.Google Scholar
. 1994. A Comparative Study of the Scandinavian Consonant Shift. General Linguistics 34: 195–202.Google Scholar
Goossens, L. 1982. On the Development of the Modals and of the Epistemic Function in English. In , ed., Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 74–84.Google Scholar
Gordon, Raymond G., Jr., ed. 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/.
. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorter, Durk, Alex Riemersma and Jehannes Ytsma. 2001. Frisian in the Netherlands. In and , eds., The Other Languages of Europe. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. 103–118.
et al., eds. 1966. Der große Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Mannheim.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In , ed., Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 73–113.Google Scholar
. 1983. Genuszuordnung: Das Genus englischer Lehnwörter im Deutschen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob.1866. Über einige Fälle der Attraktion. In Kleinere Schriften. Volume 3. Berlin. 312–347.
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 1997. Pronouns and the Left Periphery of West Germanic Embedded Clauses. In and , eds., German: Syntactic Problems—Problematic Syntax. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1981. Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar. In , and , eds., Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Pisa. 171–197.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Proper Analysis of “Missing-P” Free Relative Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 257–293.Google Scholar
. 1999. Dutch. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 74–77.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos.2000. On the Origin and Development of the Central Franconian Tone Contrast. In , ed., Analogy, Levelling and Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos and Gösta Bruce. 1999. Word Prosody and Intonation. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 233–272.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut. 1994. Danish. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 313–348.Google Scholar
. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Grammar: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane.1993. Some Speculations on Argument Shift, Clitics and Crossing in West-Flemish. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 131–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane.1995. The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haegeman, Liliane and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1996. Negative Concord in West Flemish. In and , eds., Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 117–180.Google Scholar
. 1964. Relative and Antecedent. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 95: 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark. 1994. Recovering the Prosody-Syntax Interface in Notker. Paper presented at the Berkeley/Michigan Germanic Linguistics Roundtable, Berkeley, April 8, 1994.
Harbert, Wayne. 1978. Gothic Syntax: A Relational Grammar. Dissertation, University of Illinois.
Harbert, Wayne.1985. Markedness and the Bindability of Subject of NP. In , and , eds., Markedness. New York: Plenum Press. 139–154.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne.1992. Gothic Relative Clauses and Syntactic Theory. In , and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin Mouton de Gruyter. 109–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne.1999. Erino portun ih firchnussu. In et al., eds., Interdigitations: Essays for Irmengard Rauch. New York: Peter Lang. 257–268.Google Scholar
. 2002. The Syntax of Indefinite Phrases in Negative Sentences in Germanic. International Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 7: 101–126.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1993. The Grammar of Irish English. In and , eds., Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman. 139–186.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin.1999. External Possession in a European Areal Perspective. In and , eds., External Possession. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1976. The Scandinavian Languages: An Introduction to their History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar.1982. Scandinavian Language Structures. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
. 1986. A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1954. Studien zum bestimmten Artikel in den germanischen Sprachen. Giessen: Wilhelm Schmitz.Google Scholar
. 1983. Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Syntax. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 5. Trondheim: University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
. 1984. A GB-Type Analysis of Complex Passives and Related Constructions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 10. Trondheim: University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars and Christer Platzack. 1999. Pronouns in Scandinavian Languages: An Overview. In , ed., Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 123–142.Google Scholar
Helthoft, Lars. 2001. Recasting Danish Subjects: Case System, Word Order and Subject Development. In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 171–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, Ronald V. 1981. Aspect and Adverbs in German. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1995. Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison.1996. Imperative Inversion in Belfast English. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael. 1986. The Double Object Construction in Danish. In and , eds., Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestvik. A. G. 1990. LF-Movement of Pronouns and the Computation of Binding Domains. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.
Hickey, Raymond. 2000. On the Phonology of Gender in Modern German. In , , and , Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 621–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich. 1995. Preposition Stranding and Resumptivity in West Germanic. In , and , eds., Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich.1997. The Syntax of Infinitives in Frisian. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Hoekstra, Jarich and Peter Meijes Tiersma. 1994. Frisian. In and eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 505–531.Google Scholar
. 1984. Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government Binding Theory. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Jan Rijkhoff. 1998. Word Order in the Germanic Languages. In , ed., Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Görel Sandström. 1996. Scandinavian Possessive Constructions from a Northern Swedish Viewpoint. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. The Syntax of the Simple Sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 2000. Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages: A Study of Personal Pronoun Morphology and Change in the Germanic Languages from the First Records to the Present Day. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Old English Breaking and its Germanic Analogues. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . forthcoming. The History of the Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. and . 1997. Umlautless Residues in Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
. 2000. Negation and OV Order in Late Middle English. Journal of Linguistics 36: 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1995. Aspiration and Laryngeal Representation in Germanic. Phonology 12: 369–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1999. Glottal Spreading Bias in Germanic. Linguistische Berichte 178: 135–151.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. English Particles Constructions, the Lexicon, and the Autonomy of Syntax. In , , and , eds., Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Neil et al. 1994. Yiddish. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 388–419.Google Scholar
. 1994. Nonrestrictive Relative That-Clauses Revisited. Studia Neophilologica 66: 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Kenneth Safir. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter and Parametric Theory. In and , eds., The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Theo A. J. M. 1994. Tense in Dutch: Eight “Tenses” or Two Tenses? In and , eds., Tense Systems in European Languages. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 93–118.Google Scholar
. 1927. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Volume 3. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael. 1996. Phonetics and Phonology of the Tense and Lax Obstruents in German. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 1998. Phonetics and Phonology of Tense and Lax Obstruents in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne. 1996a. Residual V-to-I. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 251–270.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne.1996b. Clause Structure, Expletives and Verb Movement. In et al., eds., Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Minimal Words in a Minimal Syntax: Word Formation in Swedish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karagjosova, Elena. 2003. Modal Particles and the Common Ground: Meaning and Functions of German ja, doch, eben, halt, and auch. In et al., eds., Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1992. Semantics and Vocabulary. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter.1994. Typological Differences between English and German and their Causes. In et al., eds., Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter.2000. Inflectional Classes, Morphological Restructuring and the Dissolution of Old English Grammatical Gender. In et al., eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 709–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1961. German Dialects: Phonology and Morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. and . 1998. On the Origins of German Uvular [R]: The Yiddish Evidence. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 10: 279–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1995a. Indo-European Origins of Germanic Syntax. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 140–170.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul.1995b. The Shift to Head-Initial VP in Germanic. In , and , eds., Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 140–179.Google Scholar
Kiparksy, Paul.1997. The Rise of Positional Licensing. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460–494.Google Scholar
. 1997. Middle Verbs in Icelandic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1877. Die Syntax der gotischen Partikel ei. Zeitschrift f ür deutsche Philologie 8: 142–180, 289–329.Google Scholar
. 1913. Urgermanisch: Vorgeschichte der altgermanischen Dialekte, 3rd edn. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1996. Kontrastive Grammatik und Typologie. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 31–54.Google Scholar
Köpke, Klaus-Michael and David Zubin. 1995. Prinzipien für Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. In and , eds., Deutsch—Typologisch. Berlin: de Gruyter. 473–491.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaya-Tamm, Maria. 2003. Possessive Noun Phrases in the Languages of Europe. In , ed., Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 621–722.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan and Eric Reuland. 1991. Long-Distance Anaphora: An Overview. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Sentence Adverbials in a Functional Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Gotischen, 2nd edn, revised by Elmar Seebold. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark. Volume 1. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony and Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb Movement in Old And Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 297–325.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi, Tomas Riad and Haike Jacobs. 1999. Diachronic Prosody. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 335–424.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lanouette, Ruth. 1996. The Attributive Genitive in the History of German. In and , eds., Germanic Linguistics: Synchronic and Diachronic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Olga is a Beautiful Dancer. Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New Orleans.Google Scholar
. 1988. How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Linguistic Evolution. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 17: 33–61.Google Scholar
. 1992. Phonology and Morphology. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 2: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 23–155.Google Scholar
. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winifred.1994. Gothic and the Reconstruction of Proto-Germanic. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 19–37.Google Scholar
. 1982. Germanic Accentology. Volume 1: The Scandinavian Languages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, Anatoly.1992. Vowel Lengthening before Resonant + Another Consonant and Svarabhakti in Germanic. In , and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 163–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, Sven. 1982. Discontinuous Questions and Subjacency in Norwegian. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 193–204.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David.1995. Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 31–52.Google Scholar
Lindauer, Thomas. 1998. Attributive Genitive Constructions in German. In and , eds., Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 109–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The Perfect-Aspectual, Temporal and Evidential. In , ed., Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 365–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Verb Raising and the Position of the Finite Verb in Pennsylvania German. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 470–477.Google Scholar
. 1977. Relative Clauses in Yiddish: A Case for Movement. Linguistic Analysis 4: 197–216.Google Scholar
. 1991. Phonotaktisch gesteuerte Konsonantenveränderungen in der Geschichte des Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1983. Transitive Adjectives: A Case of Categorial Reanalysis. In and , eds., Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Other Puzzles. Dordrecht: Reidel. 253–289.Google Scholar
. 1984. Non-Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen. 1990. Preposition Stranding and Passive. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press. 153–164. [First published 1985]Google Scholar
Mallén, Enrique. 1989. The Internal Structure of Determiner Phrases. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
. 2004. The Cambridge Old English Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1926. Untersuchung über die deutsche Wortstellung in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
. 1981. A Metrical Analysis of Umlaut. Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 126–137.Google Scholar
. 1989. Partial and Multiple WH-Movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchers, Gunnel. 1992. “Du's no heard da last o' dis”—on the Use of be as a Perfective Auxiliary Dialect. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2004. Scottish English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 47–72.Google Scholar
, ed. 1890. The Old English Version of Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Part I. London: N. Trübner.Google Scholar
. 2003. Alliteration and Sound Change in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2004. Appalachian English: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 245–280.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael and Curtis Chapman. 1992. The Pace of Change in Appalachian English. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 624–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre. 1994. The Distribution of Subject Properties and the Acquisition of Subjecthood in the West Scandinavian Languages. In , and , eds., Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages from a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G.1973. Vowel System with Five Heights. In and , eds., Lexicography and Dialect Geography: Festgabe for Hans Kurath. Wiesbaden: Steiner. 187–194.Google Scholar
. and . 1983. Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology. Language 59: 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The Present Perfect in German: Outline of its Semantic Composition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 355–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. An Example of a Syntactic Blend in Old English. Indogermanische Forschungen 72: 261–274.Google Scholar
1989. The Germanic Dialects: Origins and Early Dialectal Relations. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 1995. Grammaticalization vs. Reanalysis: The Case of Possessive Constructions in Germanic. In and , eds., Historical Linguistics. Volume 2: Germanic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 211–222.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel.2001. The Loss of Lexical Case in Swedish. In , ed., Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordgård, Torbjørn. 1986. COMP-Features and Word Order. In and , eds., Scandinavian Syntax. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 113–122.Google Scholar
. 1952. On the Origin of the Scandinavian Tone Distinction. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 201–225.Google Scholar
. 1982. The Twofold Adjective Declension in Germanic and Slavic (with some consideration of Baltic): A Contrastive/Comparative Analysis. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 96: 104–118.Google Scholar
. 1989. VP-Specifier Subjects and the CP/IP Distinction in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Icelandic Middle Voice: The Morphological and Phonological Development. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
. 1997. On the Origin of Preaspiration in Scandinavian. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 9: 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1962. Kurze deutsche Syntax, 3rd edn., revised by Heinz Stolte. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn., revised by Pieter Wiehl and Siegfrid Grosse. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. In press. Small Nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24.
. 1978. Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 126–70.Google Scholar
Philippi, Julia. 1997. The Rise of the Article in the Germanic Languages. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 69–93.Google Scholar
. 1993. Verb Seconding in Old English: Verb Movement to Infl. The Linguistic Review 10: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Verbs and Objects in Semantic Agreement. Minor Differences between English and German that Might Suggest a Major One. Journal of Semantics 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans.2003. Double Articulation. In , ed., Noun Phrase Structure in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 337–396.Google Scholar
. 1985. A Survey of Generative Analyses of the Verb Second Phenomenon in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer1986. The Structure of Infinitive Clauses in Danish and Swedish. In and , eds., Scandinavian Syntax. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 123–137.Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara. 2002. Double Objects and Morphological Triggers. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1997. Yiddish Subject-Prodrop: Languages in Contact and the Syntax–Discourse Interface. Paper presented at the LSA Institute.
Ramat, Paolo and Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence Adverbs in the Languages of Europe. In ed., Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 187–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1942. The Gender of English Loan Words in Pennsylvania German. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 17: 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reskiewicz, Alfred. 1966. Split Constructions in Old English. In , and , eds., Studies in Language and Literature in Honour of Margaret Schlauch. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publications. 313–326.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas. 2000. The Origin of Danish Stød. In , ed., Analogy, Levelling and Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 261–300.Google Scholar
. 1999. African American Vernacular English: Features, Evolution, Educational Implications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1999. Aspiration, Preaspiration, Deaspiration, Sonorant Devoicing and Spirantization in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22: 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. 1991. Residual Verb Second and the WH-Criterion. In and , eds., Parameters and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 63–90.Google Scholar
2000. Etymological Opacity, Hybridization, and the Afrikaans Brace Negation. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12: 101–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 2002. The History of the Future. In , ed., Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and . 1991. Grammar and Usage of the Shetland Dialect. Lerwick: The Shetland Times. [First published 1952].Google Scholar
1974. Sekundäre Subjektivierung im Englischen und Deutschen: Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Verb- und Adjektivsyntax [PAKS-Arbeitsbericht 8]. Bielefeld: Cornelson-Velhagen and Klasing.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard. 1994. The Germanic VO Languages and the Full Paradigm Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1994. Germanic Creoles. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 566–603.Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol. 1984. The Interface between Semantic Roles and Initial Grammatical Relations. In and , eds., Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 38–80.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1968. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Reproduced by Indiana University Linguistics Club. (1967 MIT dissertation).
. 2002. A Bard's Eye View of the Germanic Syllable. Journal of English and Germanic Philology 101: 305–328.Google Scholar
Rutten, Jean. 1991. Infinitival Complements and Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
1972. Linguistic Evolution, with Special Reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandström, Caroline. 2000. The Changing System of Grammatical Gender in the Swedish Dialects of Nyland, Finland. In and , eds., Gender in Grammar and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Evidence for NegP and Object Shift in German. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 154–182.Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1993. Jiddisch als gemischte OV/VO Sprache. In and , eds., Dialektsyntax. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice.1995. Two Types of Verb Second in the History of Yiddish. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. New York: Oxford University Press. 53–79.Google Scholar
. 1984. Die Kriterien für die deutsche Genuszuweisung bei substantivischen Anglizismen. German Quarterly 57: 402–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, Peter. 2003. Early Developments of the Vowel Systems of North-West Germanic and Saami. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 195–226.Google Scholar
2000. The Velar Nasal in the Adaptation of the Runic Alphabet. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 12: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Aimo. 1993. The Relative “That” Reconsidered. In , , , and , eds., Actes du XVe Congrès International des Linguistes, Québec, Université Laval, 9–14 aoüt 1992: Les langues menacées/Endangered Languages. Laval: Sainte-Foy. 369–372.Google Scholar
Seppännen, Aimo.2000. On the History of Relative that. In , , and , eds., Generative Theory and Corpus Studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The Old English Relative þe. English Language and Linguistics 8: 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . 1995. The Dog that's Leg Was Run over: On the Genitive of the Relative Pronoun. English Studies: A Journal of English Language and Literature 76: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Thomas. 1987. On Some Recent Claims of Relational Grammar. In et al., eds., Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley. 247–262.Google Scholar
Shannon, Thomas.1990. The Unaccusative Hypothesis and the History of the Perfect Auxiliary in Germanic and Romance. In and , eds., Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 461–499.Google Scholar
. 1995. Explaining Perfect Auxiliary Variation: Some Modal and Aspectual Effects in the History of Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics and Literatures 7: 129–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham. 1996. The Second Person Singular Interrogative in the Traditional Vernacular of the Bolton Metropolitan Area. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1892. Tatian, Lateinisch und Altdeutsch, 2nd edn. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
. 1986. Moods and (Long-Distance) Reflexives in Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 25: 1–53.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór.1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic in a Comparative GB Approach. Dissertation, University of Iceland.
Sigurðsson, Halldór.1990. Declaratives and Verb Raising in Icelandic. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. ‘Dative Sickness’ in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 675–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R. 1971. Word Order in the Older Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
Smith, Michael B. 2001. Why Quirky Case Really Isn't Quirky: Or, How to Treat Dative Sickness in Icelandic. In and , eds., Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 115–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs. Language 76: 859–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and its Corollaries for Constituent Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.Google Scholar
Sprouse, Rex. 1989. On the Syntax of the Double Object Construction in Selected Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
. 1991. The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 637–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Crimean Gothic: Analysis and Etymology of the Corpus. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Donald. 2001. The Great Gender Shift and the Attrition of Neuter Nouns in West Germanic: The Example of German. In and , eds., New Insights in Germanic Linguistics, II. New York: Peter Lang. 201–224.Google Scholar
Stellmacher, Dieter. 1983. Neuniederdeutsche Grammatik, Phonologie und Morphologie. In and , eds., Handbuch zur niederdeutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Eric Schmidt. 238–278.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2002. WH-Expletives and Partial WH-Movement: Two Non-Existing Concepts? In and , eds., Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. 1977. Motivation for Exbraciation in Old English. In , ed., Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 291–314.Google Scholar
1923 [1968]. Middelnederlandsche Spraakkunst: Syntaxis, 3rd edn. The Hague: Martijnus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
. 1984. Free Relatives and the Matching Parameter. The Linguistic Review 3: 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Germanisch /sp/, /st/, /sk/ und /skw/als Lautgruppen. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 33: 1–8.Google Scholar
1991. Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 480–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappe, Hans Tilo. 1984. On Infinitival Clauses without COMP. In and , eds., Sentential Complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 227–238.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T. 1982. Extraction from Relative Clauses in Norwegian. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 205–222.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1984. Remarks on Complex Passives. In and , eds., Riepmoćala: Essays in Honour of Knut Bergsland. Oslo: Novas Forlag.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1986a. On Verb Second and the Functional Content of Syntactic Categories. In and , eds., Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut T.1986b. Som and the Binding Theory. In and , eds., Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. 149–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut.1996. Reflexives, Pronouns and Agreement in Icelandic and Faroese. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Cate, Abraham P. 1989. Präsentische und präteritale Tempora im deutsch-niederländischen Sprachvergleich. In and , eds., Tempus-Aspekt-Modus: Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. 1994/1995. Tense Systems in European Languages. 2 vols. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig. 1978. Topics in German Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Thornburg, Linda. 1984. The History of the Prepositional Passive in English. In , , and , eds., Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 327–336.Google Scholar
. 1976a. Some Arguments against the Interpretive Theory of Pronouns and Reflexives. Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2: 573–624.Google Scholar
. 1976b. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society 6: 225–239.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1991. Long-Distance Reflexives and the Typology of NPs. In and , eds., Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Hösküldur.1994. Icelandic. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 142–189.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1996. On the (Non-)Universality of Functional Categories. In et al., eds., Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur.1998. Infinitival Complements in Some Old and Modern Germanic Languages. In , ed., Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax. Bern: Peter Lang. 335–363.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra. 1995. Cases of V-3 in Old High German. In and , eds., Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 345–369.Google Scholar
Toon, Thomas. 1982. Variation in Contemporary American English. In and , eds., English as a World Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 210–250.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth.1992. Syntax. In , ed., The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 168–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. The Syntax of Adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax. 280–310.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa.1991. Parameters of Phrase Structure and Verb-Second Phenomena. In , ed., Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 339–364.Google Scholar
Trnka, B. R. 1936. General Laws of Phonemic Combination. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 294–300. [Reprinted (party revised) in Vilém Fried, ed., Bohumil Trnka: Selected papers in Structural Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton, 1982. 113–118.]
. 1987. Bislama: An Introduction to the National Language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
, , and . 1981. On the Role of Function in Sound Change. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 166–185.Google Scholar
1985. Relative “that”—A Centennial Dispute. Journal of Linguistics 21: 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1928b. The Predicative Passive Infinitive in English. English Studies 10: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ed. 1999. Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marike. 1990. Passive Constructions in Old Frisian. In et al., eds., Aspects of Old Frisian Philology. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 495–505.Google Scholar
. 1997. Negative Contexts: Collocation, Polarity and Multiple Negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans.1992. Structural Factors in the History of English Modals. In et al., eds., History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans.1997. V2 and Embedded Topicalization in Old and Middle English. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 326–352.Google Scholar
van Ness, Silke. 1994. Pennsylvania German. In and , eds., The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge. 420–438.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1982. On Pied-Piped Infinitives in German Relative Clauses. In , ed., Studies in German Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 165–192.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk.1983a. Correspondence Effects and the Empty Category Principle. In et al., eds., Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition. Tokyo: International Christian University. 5–16.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk.1983b. The Case of German Adjectives. In and , eds., Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and other Puzzles. Dordrecht: Reidel. 223–232.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk 1994. Left Dislocation. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–12.Google Scholar
. 1996. Some Systematic Differences between the Dutch, French and English Transitive Construction. Language Sciences 18: 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1996. Verb-Second, Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Ms., Indiana University.
. 1978. On Footnote 2: Evidence for the Pronominal Status of þær in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 695–716.Google Scholar
Vat, Jan.1994. Left Dislocation, Connectedness and Reconstruction. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 67–92 [first published 1981].Google Scholar
Vater, Heinz. 1988. Mittelkonstruktionen im Englischen, Dänischen und Deutschen. In and , eds., Valenzen im Kontrast. Heidelberg: Julius Groos. 398–417.Google Scholar
. 1984. Hochgermanisch und Niedergermanisch. Die Verzweigungstheorie der germanisch-deutschen Lautverschiebungen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 106: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. With Special Reference to German, Germanic, Italian and Latin. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003a. Languages in Prehistoric Europe North of the Alps. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 319–332.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003b. Syntax und Sprachkontakt: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der indogermanischen Sprachen des Nordwestens. In and , eds., Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. 333–364.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo.2003c. Zur Frage der vorindogermanischen Substrate in Mittel- und Westeuropa. In , ed., Europa-Vasconica-Europa Semitica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 517–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Parameters of Binder and Binding Category in Danish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23: 1–61.Google Scholar
. 1988. Modals in Danish and Event Expressions. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 39: 1–33.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten.1994. Finite Verb Movement in Scandinavian Embedded Clauses. In and , eds., Verb Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1963–1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 3 vols. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Syllable in Frisian. Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics. (PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Vogel, Ralf. 2001. Case Conflict in German Free Relative Constructions: An Optimality Theoretic Treatment. In and , eds., Competition in Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 341–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Ralf.2002. Free Relative Constructions in OT-Syntax. In and , eds., Resolving Conflicts in Grammars: Optimality Theory in Syntax, Morphology, and Phonology. Hamburg: Buske. 119–162.Google Scholar
. 1971. The Problem of West Germanic. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 5: 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voyles, Joseph.1992. On Old High German Umlaut. In and , eds., On Germanic Linguistics: Issues and Methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Sheila. 2001. How to Become an Auxiliary: Progressive and Perfect in Old Saxon. In , , and , eds., Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The Grammar of the Old High German Modal Particles Thoh, Ia, Thanne. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 1997. Verbal Prefixation and the “Complexive” Aspect in Germanic. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98: 321–332.Google Scholar
. 1989. The V2 Conspiracy: A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred.1997. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. In and , eds., Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 460–494.Google Scholar
. 2003. Word-Order in WH-Questions in a North Norwegian Dialect: Some Evidence from an Acquisition Study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Origins of the English Language: A Social and Linguistic History. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2004. Rural and Ethnic Varieties in the Southeast: Morphology and Syntax. In et al., eds., A Handbook of Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 281–302.Google Scholar
. 1894. Die Syntax in den Werken Alfreds des Großen. Volume 1. Bonn: P. Hanstein's Verlag.Google Scholar
. 1901. Die Syntax in den Werken Alfreds des Großen. Volume 2. Bonn: P. Hanstein's Verlag.Google Scholar
and . 2003. The Speaker and the Perfect Auxiliaries Hafa and Vera in Icelandic. Language Sciences 25: 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie.1987. The Place of bevallen (Please) in the Syntax of Dutch. Unpublished paper, CSLI, Stanford.
Zaenen, Annie.1994. Contrastive Dislocation in Dutch and Icelandic. In et al., eds., Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 119–150.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Joan Maling. 1982. The Status of Resumptive Pronouns in Swedish. In and , eds., Readings in Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Almqvist and Wiksell. 223–230.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie and Joan Maling.1990. Unaccusative Passive and Quirky Case. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 137–152.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1990. Case and Grammatical Functions in the Icelandic Passive. In and , eds., Modern Icelandic Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 24]. San Diego: Academic Press. 95–136 [first published 1985].Google Scholar
Zonneveld, Wim, Mieke Trommelen, Michael Jessen, Gösta Bruce and Kristjan Árnason. 1999. Word-Stress in West-Germanic and North-Germanic Languages. In , ed., Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 477–604.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan Wouter. 1993. Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Zwart, Jan-Wouter.1996. Verb Clusters in Continental West Germanic. In and , eds., Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar