Alnes, H., Eiken, O., and Stenvold, T. (2008). Monitoring gas production and CO₂ injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry. Geophysics, 73(6): 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachu, S., and Hitchon, B. (1996). Regional-scale flow of formation waters in the Williston Basin. AAPG Bulletin, 80(2): 248–264.Google Scholar

Black, A., Hare, J., and MacQueen, J. (2016). Borehole gravity monitoring in the Aquistore Boundary Dam CO₂ sequestration well. Expanded Abstract, Society of Exploration Geophysicists.Google Scholar

Boullenger, B., Verdel, A., Paap, B., Thorbecke, J., and Draganov, D. (2015). Studying CO₂ storage with ambient-noise seismic interferometry: A combined numerical feasibility study and field-data example for Ketzin, Germany. Geophysics, 80(1): Q1–Q13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, J. L., Hare, J. L., Ferguson, J. F., et al. (2006). Results of the world’s first 4D microgravity surveillance of a waterflood – Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. SPE Paper 101762, 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunskill, B. (2004). CO₂ disposal potential in the deep subsurface of southeast Saskatchewan. Internal report, prepared for the University of Regina and Saskatchewan Power Corporation.Google Scholar

Cheraghi, S., White, D. J., Draganov, D., Bellefleur, G., Craven, J. A., and Roberts, B. (2017). Passive seismic reflection interferometry: A case study from the Aquistore CO₂ storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geophysics, 82(3): B79–B93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craymer, M., Henton, J., Piraszewski, M., and Lapelle, E. (2011). An updated velocity field for Canada. Eos Transactions, AGU, 92(51), Fall Meeting Supplement, Abstract G21A-0793.Google Scholar

Craymer, M., White, D., Piraszewksi, M., Zhao, Y., Henton, J., Silliker, J., and Samsonov, S. (2015). First results of geodetic deformation monitoring after commencement of CO₂ injection at the Aquistore underground CO₂ storage site. Eos Transactions, American Geophysical Fall Meeting, Paper G33A-1132.Google Scholar

Czarnogorska, M., Samsonov, S., and White, D. (2016). Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing for Aquistore carbon capture and storage site characterization. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42(3): 274–290. DOI:10.1080/07038992.2016.1171131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daley, T. M., Smithy, J. T., Beyer, J. H., and LaBrecque, D. (2015). Borehole EM monitoring at Aquistore with a downhole source. In Gerdes, K. F. (ed.), Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geological formations: Results from the CO₂ Capture Project, Vol. 4. Thatcham, Berks, UK: CPL Press, 733–758.Google Scholar

Dodds, K., Krahenbuhl, R., Reitz, A., Li, Y., and Hovorka, S. (2015). Evaluating time-lapse borehole gravity for CO₂ plume detection at SECARB Cranfield. In Gerdes, K. F. (ed.), Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geological formations: Results from the CO₂ Capture Project, Vol. 4. Thatcham, Berks, UK: CPL Press, 651–664.Google Scholar

Energy and Environmental Research Center. (2014). Geologic modeling and simulation report for the Aquistore Project: University of North Dakota & U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory.Google Scholar

Gasperikova, E., and Hoversten, G. M. (2006). A feasibility study of nonseismic geophysical methods for monitoring geologic CO₂ sequestration. Leading Edge, 25, 1282–1288. DOI:10.1190/1.2360621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasperikova, E., and Hoversten, G. M. (2008). Gravity monitoring of CO₂ movement during sequestration: Model studies. Geophysics, 73(6): WA105–WA112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gassenmeier, M., Sens-Schönfelder, C., Delatre, M., and Korn, M. (2015). Monitoring of environmental influences on seismic velocity at the geological storage site for CO₂ in Ketzin (Germany) with ambient seismic noise. Geophysical Journal International, 200: 524–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowan, E. J., Ferguson, I. J., Jones, A. G., and Craven, J. A. (2009). Geoelectric structure of the northeastern Williston basin and underlying Precambrian lithosphere. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 46: 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardage, B. A. (2000). Vertical seismic profiling: Principles. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Harris, K., White, D., Samson, C., Daley, T., and Miller, D. (2015). Evaluation of distributed acoustic sensing for 3D time-lapse VSP monitoring of the Aquistore CO₂ storage site, GeoConvention, May 4–8, Calgary, Expanded Abstract.Google Scholar

Harris, K., White, D., Melanson, D., Samson, C. and Daley, T. (2016). Feasibility of time-lapse VSP monitoring at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site using a distributed acoustic sensing system. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 50: 248–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, K., White, D., Samson, C. (2017). 4D VSP monitoring at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site. Geophysics , 82(6), M81–M96.Google Scholar

Hibbs, A. D. (2015). Test of a new BSEM configuration at Aquistore, and its application to mapping injected CO₂. In Gerdes, K. F. (ed.), Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geological formations: Results from the CO₂ Capture Project, Vol. 4. Thatcham, Berks, UK: CPL Press, 759–776.Google Scholar

Jiang, T., Pekot, L. J., Jin, L., et al. (2016). Numerical modelling of the Aquistore CO₂ Project: GHGT-13 Proceedings. Energy Procedia, 114.Google Scholar

Kaven, J. O., Hickman, S. H., McGarr, A. F., and Ellsworth, W. L. (2015). Surface monitoring of microseismicity at the Decatur, Illinois, CO₂ sequestration demonstration site. Seismological Research Letters, 86(4): 1–6. DOI:10.1785é0220150062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, D. M., and Christopher, J. E. (1994). Geological history of the Williston Basin and Sweetgrass River Arch. In G. D. Mossop and I. Shetsen (comp.), Geological atlas of the Western Canada sedimentary basin. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Alberta Research Council, 421–430.Google Scholar

Khan, D. K., and Rostron, B. J. (2005). Regional hydrogeological investigation around the IEAWeyburn CO₂ Monitoring and Storage Project Site. In Rubin, E. S., Keith, D. W., and Gilboy, C. F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 5–9, 2004, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 1: Peer Reviewed Papers and Overviews, 741–750.Google Scholar

Kuzmiski, L., Charters, B., and Galbraith, M. (2009). Processing considerations for 3D VSP: CSEG Recorder, 34(4). https://csegrecorder.com/articles/view/processing-considerations-for-3d-vspGoogle Scholar

Liard, J., Huang, J., Silliker, J., Jobin, D., Wand, S. and Doherty, , A. (2011). Detecting groundwater storage change using micro-gravity survey in Waterloo Moraine, Proceeding. Geohydro.Google Scholar

Marsh, A., and Love, M. (2014). Middle Devonian prairie evaporite: Isopach map, map 132. In Regional Stratigraphic Framework of the Phanerozoic in Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Phanerozoic Fluids and Petroleum Systems Project, Saskatchewan Ministry of the Economy, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Open File 2014–1, set of 156 maps.Google Scholar

Mathias, S., Hardisty, P., Trudell, M., and Zimmerman, R. (2009). Approximate solutions for pressure buildup during CO₂injection in brine aquifers. Transport in Porous Media, 79: 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, J. (2016). Magnetotelluric and controlled-source electromagnetic pre-injection study of Aquistore CO₂ sequestration site, near Estevan, Saskatchewan, Canada. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar

McLeod, J., Craven, J. A., Ferguson, I. J., Roberts, B. J., Bancroft, B., and Liveda, T (2014). Overview of the 2013 baseline magnetotelluric and controlled-source electromagnetic geophysical study of CO₂ sequestration at the Aquistore site near Estevan, Saskatchewan. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7617. DOI:10.4095/293921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, J., Craven, J. A., Ferguson, I. J., and Roberts, B. J. (2016). Overview of the 2013 and 2014 baseline magnetotelluric and controlled-source electromagnetic studies of CO₂ sequestration at the Aquistore site near Estevan, Saskatchewan. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mestayer, J., Cox, B., Wills, P. (2011). Field trials of distributed acousticsensing for geophysical monitoring. In 81st Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysics, Expanded Abstract, 4253–4257.Google Scholar

Miller, D. E., Daley, T. M., White, D., et al. (2016). Simultaneous acquisition of distributed acoustic sensing VSP with multi-mode and singlemode fibre optic cables and 3 C-geophones at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site. CSEG Recorder, 28–33.Google Scholar

Nixon, C. G., Schmitt, D. R., Kofman, R. S., et al. (2017). Experiences in deep downhole digital micro-seismic monitoring near 3 km at the PTRC Aquistore CO₂ Sequestration Project, 2017 Geoconvention, Expanded Abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, J., Kilbride, F., and Lim, F. (2004). Time-lapse VSP reservoir monitoring. Geophysics, 23(11), 1178–1184.Google Scholar

Palombi, D. D. (2008). Regional hydrogeological characterization of the northeastern margin in the Williston Basin. M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar

Roach, L. A. N., White, D. J., and Roberts, B. (2015). Assessment of 4D seismic repeatability and CO₂ detection limits using a sparse permanent land array at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site. Geophysics, 80(2): WA1–WA13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roach, L. A. N., White, D. J., Roberts, B., and Angus, D. (2017). Initial 4D seismic results after CO₂ injection start-up at the Aquistore storage site. Geophysics, 82(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0488.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostron, B., White, D., Hawkes, C., and Chalaturnyk, R. (2014). Characterization of the Aquistore CO₂ Project storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada. In 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-12. Energy Procedia, 63: 2977–2984, DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

RPS Boyd PetroSearch. (2011). Interpretation of 2D seismic data for the Aquistore Project near Estevan, Saskatchewan: Internal Report for Petroleum Technology Research Centre, Regina, 54.Google Scholar

Rutqvist, J., Vasco, D., and Myer, L. (2010). Coupled reservoir geomechanical analysis of CO₂ injection and ground deformation at In Salah, Algeria. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4(2): 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samsonov, S., Czarnogorska, M., and White, D. (2015). Satellite interferometry for high-precision detection of ground deformation at a carbon dioxide storage site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42: 188–199, DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sato, K., Mito, S., Horie, T., et al. (2011). Monitoring and simulation studies for assessing macro- and meso-scale migration of CO₂ sequestered in an onshore aquifer: Experiences from the Nagaoka pilot site, Japan. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5: 125–137, DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schenkel, C. J., and Morrison, H. F. (1994). Electrical resistivity measurement through metal casing. Geophysics, 59(7): 1072–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sherlock, D. A., Toomey, A., Hoversten, M., Gasperikova, E., and Dodds, K. (2006). Gravity monitoring of CO₂ storage in a depleted gas field: A sensitivity study. Exploration Geophysics, 37: 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stork, A. L, Nixon, C., Schmitt, D. R., White, D. J., Kendall, J.-M., and Worth, K. (2016). The seismic response at the Aquistore CO₂ injection project, Saskatchewan, Canada. Seismological Research Letters, 87(2B): 477. DOI:10.1785/0220160046.Google Scholar

Streich, R. (2016). Controlled-source electromagnetic approaches for hydrocarbon exploration and monitoring on land. Surveys in Geophysics, 37: 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasco, D., Rucci, A., Ferretti, A., et al. (2010). Satellite-based measurements of surface deformation revealfluid flow associated with the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Geophysics Research Letters, 37(3): L03303, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vasco, D. W., Ferretti, A., Rucci, A., et al. (2016). Geodetic monitoring of the geological storage of greenhouse gas emissions. Submitted to AGU books.Google Scholar

Verdon, J. P., Kendall, J.-M., Horleston, A. C., and Stork, A. (2016). Subsurface fluid injection and induced seismicity in southeast Saskatchewan. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vigrass, L., Jessop, A., and Brunskill, B. (2007). Regina Geothermal Project. In Summary of Investigations 2007, Vol. 1, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Saskatchewan Industry Resources, Misc. Rep. 2007–4.1, CD-ROM, Paper A-2.Google Scholar

Vozoff, K. (1991). The magnetotelluric method. In Nabighian, M. N., (ed.), Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, Vol. 2: Applications. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 641–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Y. (2015). Design, deployment, performance and baseline data assessment of surface tiltmeter array technology in Aquistore geologic CO₂ storage project. M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar

Washbourne, J. K., Rector, J. W., and Bube, K. P. (2002). Crosswell traveltime tomography in three dimensions. Geophysics, 67(3) (May–June): 853–871, DOI 10.1190/1.1484529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D. (2012). Geophysical monitoring. In Hitchon, B. (ed.), Best practices for validating CO₂ geological storage. Sherwood Park, AB: Geoscience Publishing, 155–210.Google Scholar

White, D. J. (2013a). Seismic characterization and time-lapse imaging during seven years of CO₂ flood in the Weyburn Field, Saskatchewan, Canada. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16S: S78–S94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D. J. (2013b). Toward quantitative CO₂ storage estimates from time-lapse 3D seismic travel times: An example from the IEA GHG Weyburn–Midale CO₂ monitoring and storage project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 16S: S95–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D., Roach, L. A. N., Roberts, B., and Daley, T. M. (2014). Initial results from seismic monitoring at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada. Energy Procedia, 63: 4418–4423. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D. J., Roach, L. A. N., and Roberts, B. (2015). Time-lapse seismic performance of a sparse permanent array: Experience from the Aquistore CO₂ storage site. Geophysics, 80(2): WA35–WA48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D. J., Hawkes, C. D., and Rostron, B. J. (2016). Geological characterization of the Aquistore CO₂ storage site from 3D seismic data. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 54(1), 330–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, D., Harris, K., Roach, L., et al. (2017). Monitoring results after 36 ktonnes of deep CO₂ injection at the Aquistore CO₂ storage site, Saskatchewan, Canada. In 13th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-13. Energy Procedia, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, S., and Worth, K. (2011). Aquistore: A fully integrated demonstration of the capture, transportation and geologic storage of CO₂. Energy Procedia, 4: 5607–5614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whittaker, S., Rostron, B., Khan, D., et al. (2004). Theme 1: Geological characterization. In Wilson, M. and Monea, M. (eds.), IEA GHG Weyburn CO₂ Monitoring and Storage Project summary report 2000–2004, from the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Regina: Petroleum Technology Research Centre, 1–72.Google Scholar

Worth, K., White, D., Chalaturnyk, R., et al. (2014). Aquistore Project measurement, monitoring and verification: From concept to CO₂ injection. In 12th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, GHGT-12. Energy Procedia, 63: 3202–3208. DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, Z., Fang, Y., Scheibe, T., and Bonneville, A. (2012a). A fluid pressure and deformation analysis for geological sequestration of carbon dioxide. Computational Geosciences, 46: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xu, Z., Juhlin, C., Gudmundsson, O., et al. (2012b). Reconstruction of subsurface structure from ambient seismic noise: An example from Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Journal International, 189: 1085–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar