Book contents
- Geoffrey Chaucer in Context
- Geoffrey Chaucer in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Chaucer as Context
- Part II Books, Discourse and Traditions
- Part III Humans, the World and Beyond
- Part IV Culture, Learning and Disciplines
- Part V Political and Social Contexts
- Part VI Chaucer Traditions
- Chapter 48 The First Chaucerians
- Chapter 49 The Reception of Chaucer in the Renaissance
- Chapter 50 The Reception of Chaucer from Dryden to Wordsworth
- Chapter 51 The Reception of Chaucer from the Victorians to the Twenty-First Century
- Chapter 52 Cyber-Chaucer
- Further Reading
- Index
Chapter 52 - Cyber-Chaucer
from Part VI - Chaucer Traditions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 June 2019
- Geoffrey Chaucer in Context
- Geoffrey Chaucer in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Chaucer as Context
- Part II Books, Discourse and Traditions
- Part III Humans, the World and Beyond
- Part IV Culture, Learning and Disciplines
- Part V Political and Social Contexts
- Part VI Chaucer Traditions
- Chapter 48 The First Chaucerians
- Chapter 49 The Reception of Chaucer in the Renaissance
- Chapter 50 The Reception of Chaucer from Dryden to Wordsworth
- Chapter 51 The Reception of Chaucer from the Victorians to the Twenty-First Century
- Chapter 52 Cyber-Chaucer
- Further Reading
- Index
Summary
This essay assesses the challenge of digital culture to the representation and reproduction of Chaucer’s work, arguing that scholarly projects associated with the emergence of ‘digital humanities’ have in the main replicated the humanist goals of traditional literary scholarship. With the rapidly changing nature of digital textualities, the essay concludes by suggesting that a proper reckoning between Chaucer’s works and digital culture has yet to take place.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Geoffrey Chaucer in Context , pp. 436 - 444Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019