London Bills of Mortality of the Seventeenth Century

doi:10.1017/9781009105347.013

Chapter 12 - London Bills of Mortality of the Seventeenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022

Edited by

Jeremy J. Smith and

Irma Taavitsainen: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Turo Hiltunen: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Jeremy J. Smith: Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Carla Suhr: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter examines the genre of bills of mortality covering plague epidemics of seventeenth-century London. The texts consist of largely numerical data, but providing up-to-date news about the progress of epidemics in different parts of the city was not their only function. Description of earlier, historical plague outbreaks was sometimes included and later, with the worsening of the epidemics, various remedies and religious advice were often added. Statistical information about the increase or decrease in the number of victims could also be given. The analysis combines linguistic analysis with that of the visual features, which were abundant especially towards the end of the period, used to emphasise certain elements and distinguish between different functions of the text. The study shows that these broadsheets adapted in multiple ways to the changing needs and wants of their readers in the course of the seventeenth century.

Keywords

bills of mortality seventeenth-century London the plague genre analysis visual features

Type: Chapter
Information: Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use
, pp. 187 - 210

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009105347.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1582. The number of all those that hath dyed in the Citie of London & the liberties of the same […]. London: J. Charlewood.Google Scholar

Anon. 1603a. [TEXT 1, by ‘Henry Chettle’]. A true bill of the whole number that hath died in the cittie of London, the citty of Westminster, the citty of Norwich, and diuers other places, […]. London: Printed by I.R. for Iohn Trundle.Google Scholar

Anon. 1603b. [TEXT 1]. A true bill of the vvhole number that hath died in the cittie of London, the citty of VVestminster, the citty of Norwich, and diuers other places, […]. London: Printed by I. R[oberts] for Iohn Trundle.Google Scholar

Anon. 1625. [TEXT 2]. The Red-Crosse: or, Englands Lord haue mercy vpon vs […]. London: Printed for Iohn Trundle.Google Scholar

Anon. 1636a. [TEXT 2]. The red-crosse, or, englands lord have mercie upon us […]. London: Printed for H. Gosson.Google Scholar

Anon. 1636b. [TEXT 3]. Lord haue mercy vpon vs. A speciall remedy for the plague. London: Printed [by R. Young and M. Flesher] for M. S[parke] Junior.Google Scholar

Anon. 1665a. [TEXT 4]. LONDON’S Lord have mercy upon us. […]. Printed at London.Google Scholar

Anon. 1665b. [TEXT 4]. LONDONS LORD HAVE MERCY UPON US. […]. London: Printed for Francis Coles, Thomas Vere, and John Wright.Google Scholar

Anon. 1665c. [TEXT 6]. Londons loud cryes to the Lord by prayer: […]. London: Printed for T. Mabb, for R. Burton, and R. Gilberson.Google Scholar

Anon. 1665d. [TEXT 7]. The Four great years of the plague, viz. 1593, 1603, 1625, and 1636 […]. London: Printed for Peter Cole […].Google Scholar

Anon. 1665e. [TEXT 5]. The mourning-cross: or, England’s Lord have mercy upon us […]. London: Printed by Tho. Milbourn in Jewen-street.Google Scholar

Anon. 1666. [TEXT 8]. The general bill of mortallity: with a continuation of this present year 1666. […]. London: Printed for Francis Coles, Thomas Vere and John Wright.Google Scholar

Balmford, James. 1603. Short dialogve concerning the plagves infection. Published to preserue bloud, through the blessing of God. London: [R. Rield] for Richard Boyle.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Buck, Peter. 1977. Seventeenth-century political arithmetic: Civil strife and vital statistics. Isis 68(1): 67–84. www.jstor.org/stable/230374 (accessed 28 October 2020).CrossRef Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia. 2013. From page to screen: The relevance of encoded visual features in the Lampeter Corpus. In Meurman-Solin, Anneli & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing of diachronic data. Helsinki: Varieng. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/14 (accessed 17 May 2022).Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas. 1625. A Rod for Run-awayes. London: [By G. Purslowe] for Iohn Trundle.Google Scholar

Fissell, Mary E. 2007. The marketplace of print. In Jenner, Mark S. R. & Wallis, Patrick (eds.), Medicine and the market in England and its colonies, c. 1450–c. 1850, 108–32. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Stephen J. 1997. The ‘Dreadful Visitation’: Public health and public awareness in seventeenth-century London. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 85(4): 391–401.Google Scholar PubMed

Greenberg, Stephen. 2004. Plague, the printing press, and public health in seventeenth-century London. Huntington Library Quarterly 67(4): 508–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

H. C. 1637. [TEXT 4, by Crouch, Humphrey]. LONDONS LORD HAVE MERCY VPON VS […]. London: Printed for Richard Harper.Google Scholar

Jenner, Mark S. R. 2012. Plague on a page: Lord Have Mercy Upon Us in early modern London. Seventeenth Century 27(3): 255–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

McConchie, R. W. 2013. Some reflections on early modern printed title-pages. In Meurman-Solin, Anneli & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing of diachronic data. Helsinki: Varieng. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/14 (accessed 17 May 2022).Google Scholar

Munkhoff, Richelle. 1999. Searchers of the dead: Authority, marginality, and the interpretation of plague in England, 1574–1665. Gender & History 11(1): 1–29.Google Scholar

Pahta, Päivi, & Ratia, Maura. 2010. Treatises on specific topics. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus description and studies, 73–100. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Paltridge, Brian. 1996. Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal 50(3): 237–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Porter, Stephen. 2009. The Great Plague. Stroud: Amberley.Google Scholar

Ratia, Maura. 2013. Investigating genre through title-pages: Plague treatises of the Stuart period in focus. In Meurman-Solin, Anneli & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Principles and practices for the digital editing of diachronic data. Helsinki: Varieng. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/14 (accessed 17 May 2022).Google Scholar

Ratia, Maura, & Suhr, Carla. 2017. Visual and verbal communication in title-pages of early modern medical texts. In Peikola, Matti, Mäkilähde, Aleksi, Salmi, Hanna, Varila, Mari-Liisa, & Skaffari, Janne (eds.), Verbal and visual communication in Early English texts (Utrecht Studies in Medieval Literacy), 67–93. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Shevlin, Eleanor F. 1999. ‘To reconcile book and title, and make ’em kin to one another’: The evolution of the title’s contractual functions. Book History 2(1): 42–77.Google Scholar

Slauter, Will. 2011. WRITE UP YOUR DEAD: The bills of mortality and the London plague of 1665. Media History 17(1): 1–15.Google Scholar

Stage, Kelly J. 2011. Plague space and played space in urban drama, 1604. In Totaro, Rebecca & Gilman, Ernest B., Representing the plague in early modern England, vol. 14, 54–75. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Suhr, Carla. 2011. Publishing for the masses: Early modern English witchcraft pamphlets. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 83. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Erin. 2011. Physical and spiritual illness: Narrative appropriations of the bills of mortality. In Totaro, Rebecca & Gilman, Ernest B., Representing the plague in early modern England, vol. 14, 76–94. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 85–113.Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma. 2004. Transferring classical discourse conventions into the vernacular. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical and scientific writing in early modern English, 37–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Keith. 1973. Religion and the decline of magic. Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Watt, Tessa. 1991. Cheap print and popular piety 1550–1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wear, Andrew. 2000. Knowledge and practice in English medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werlich, Egon. 1976. A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 12 - London Bills of Mortality of the Seventeenth Century

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive