Forensic DNA profiling and databasing: the Philippine experience

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511778193.016

15 - Forensic DNA profiling and databasing: the Philippine experience

from Section 2 - National contexts of forensic DNA technologies and key issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012

Maria Corazon De Ungria and

Jose Manguera Jose

Edited by

Richard Hindmarsh and

Barbara Prainsack

Show author details

Richard Hindmarsh: Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Barbara Prainsack: Affiliation:
King's College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Philippines, an archipelagic country of over 92 million people (USAID 2008), is a member state of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Unlike Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, the Philippines does not yet have a national DNA database or any legislation that would facilitate its establishment. The Philippine Supreme Court has recognised the admissibility of DNA evidence in court and has provided judicial guidelines for the collection, handling and storage of biological samples in the Rule on DNA Evidence, which it promulgated in 2007 (Supreme Court of the Philippines 2007). Forensic DNA testing in criminal investigations is performed by the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), an agency under the Department of Justice, and the Philippine National Police (PNP), an agency under the Department of Interior and Local Government. A third DNA laboratory, which is based at the University of the Philippines (UP), not only performs forensic DNA testing in both criminal and civil cases but also validates DNA testing procedures and conducts research on the genetics of the Philippine population. The three DNA laboratories operate independently and are under the control and supervision of the institutions to which they are attached.

This chapter provides a historical overview of the development of forensic DNA technology and its use in Philippine courts, as well as a discussion on legislative issues in the establishment of a national DNA database.

Type: Chapter
Information: Genetic Suspects
Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing
, pp. 309 - 330

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778193.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agabin, P. (2003). DNA as evidence. Lecture at the Conference on Bioscience and Biotechnology: Science and the Law, Philippine Judicial Academy Development Center, Tagaytay City.Google Scholar

Ambat, G. (2008). Conquering Poverty: Funding Requirements, Issues and Challenges. Manila: Senate Economic Planning Office.Google Scholar

,Asian Development Bank (2005). Poverty in the Philippines: Income, Assets and Access. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar

Asplen, C. (2008). The DNA connection: international updates. Forensic Magazine, April/May. www.forensicmag.com/ (accessed 29 June 2009).

Bailen, A. (1998). The Odyssey of Lorenzo M. Tañada. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar

Bartolome, N. (2008). PNP Gets Interpol Support to Develop Counter Cyber Crime and Bioterrorism Capability. [News Release No. 08–0306.] Quezon City: Philippine National Police,Google Scholar

,Bureau of Democracy Human Rights and Labor (2007). Country Report on Human Rights Practices, 2006. Washington, DC: US Department of State.Google Scholar

Calderon, O. (2007). Report from the Philippine National Police. In National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances: Searching for Solutions. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

,Center for Public Resource Management (2003). Strengthening the Other Pillars of Justice through Reforms in the Pillars of Justice. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

,Civil Liberties Union of the Philippines (1975). The State of the Nation after Three Years of Martial Law. Manila: Civil Liberties Union of the Philippines.Google Scholar

,Committee on Science and Technology (2006). Prospects of DNA Technology. [Summary of the Meeting of theSubcommittee.] Quezon City: House of Representatives Committee News.Google Scholar

Leon, H. (2002). Textbook on the Philippine Constitution. Quezon City: Rex Printing.Google Scholar

Delfin, F., Madrid, B., Tan, M.et al. (2005). Y-STR analysis for detection and objective confirmation of child sexual abuse. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 119, 158–163.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ungria, M., Roby, R., Tabbada, K.et al. (2005). Allele frequencies of 19 STR loci in a Philippine population generated using AmpFlSTR multiplex and ALF singleplex systems. Forensic Science International, 152, 281–284.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ungria, M., Sagum, M., Calacal, G.et al. (2008). Forensic DNA evidence and the death penalty in the Philippines. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2, 329–332.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ebdane, H. (2007). Report from the Armed Forces of the Philippines. In National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances: Searching for Solutions. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

Encinas-Franco, J. (2005). National Identification System: Do we Need One?Manila: Senate Economic Planning Service.Google Scholar

,European Commission (2007). Furthering Human Rights and Democracy Across the Globe. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar

,Free Legal Assistance Group (2006). Newsletter. Manila: Free Legal Assistance Grouphttp://flagfaqs. blogspot.com/ (accessed 10 April 2008).Google Scholar

Hood, R. (2002). The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lessig, R., Willuweit, S., Krawczak, M.et al. (2003). Asian online Y-STR haplotype reference database. Legal Medicine (Tokyo), 5(Suppl. 1), 160–163.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

,Melo Commission (2007). Report of the Independent Commission to Address Media and Activist Killings. Manila: Melo Commission.Google Scholar

Ochave, J. (2003). The double helix in chambers: forensic DNA evidence in criminal investigation and prosecution. Integrated Bar of the Philippines, 29, 88–115.Google Scholar

,Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism (2008). Country Reports: East Asia and Pacific Overview. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar

Orendain, J. (2008). Not in our name. Quezon City: Free Legal Assistance Group.Google Scholar

Puno, R. (2007). Keynote address. In National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances: Searching for Solutions. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

Saks, M. and Koehler, J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309, 892–895.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Salvador, J., Calacal, G., Villamor, L.et al.(2007). Allele frequencies for two pentanucleotide STR loci Penta D and Penta E in a Philippine population. Legal Medicine (Tokyo), 9, 282–283.CrossRef Google Scholar

San Juan, J. (2007). Expedite human rights cases, prosecutors told. Business Mirror, 2, 1–2.Google Scholar

Sevilla, N. (2007). Report from the families of involuntary disappearance. In National Consultative Summit on Extrajudicial Killings and Forced Disappearances: Searching for Solutions. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

,Solidarity Philippines-Australia Network (1997). Ramos orders ID card. Kasama, 11, 1–5.Google Scholar

,Supreme Court of the Philippines (1989). Revised Rules on Evidence. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

,Supreme Court of the Philippines (2007). Rule on DNA Evidence. Manila: Supreme Court.Google Scholar

,Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (1998). Philippines – political prisoners: the forgotten heroes. Human Rights Solidarity, 8, 1626.Google Scholar

Thompson, W. (2007). The potential for error in forensic DNA testing. GeneWatch (USA), 21, 1–43.Google Scholar

,USAID (2008). Country Health Statistical Report: Philippines. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar

Administrative Order No. 308, 1996.

Andal v. People (1999). Supreme Court General Register No. 138268 and 138269–69. En Banc.

Executive Order No. 420, 2005.

General Order No. 60, 1977.

Herrera v. Alba (2005). Supreme Court (First Division) General Register No. 148220 (Justice Antonio T. Carpio).

House Bill No. 3452, 2001.

House Bill No. 136, 2006.

House Resolution No. 611, 2005.

House Resolution No. 659, 2005.

In Re: Writ of habeas corpus for Reynaldo de Villa (2004). Supreme Court General Register No. 158802. En Banc.

Kilusang Mayo Uno v. The National Economic Development Authority and the Department of Budget and Economic Development (2006). Supreme Court General Register No. 167798. En Banc.

Letter of Instruction No. 621, 1977.

Ople v. Torres (1998). Supreme Court General Register No. 1276 85. En Banc.

People v. Corpuz (1993). Supreme Court General Register No. 101005. En Banc.

People v. de Villa (2001). Supreme Court General Register No. 124639. En Banc.

People v. Echegaray (1996). Supreme Court General Register No. 117472. En Banc.

People v. Mateo (2004). Supreme Court General Register No. 147678–87. En Banc.

People v. Paras (1999). Criminal case no. 85974–85978, Pasig City, Branch 163.

People v. Vallejo (2002). Supreme Court General Register No. 144656. En Banc.

People v. Yatar (2004). Supreme Court General Register No. 150224. En Banc.

Philippine Constitution, 1987.

Proclamation No. 1081, 1972.

Republic Act No. 157, 1957.

Republic Act No. 9346, 2006.

Senate Bill No. 914, 1998.

Senate Bill No. 1636, 1999.

Senate Bill No. 1172, 2001.

Senate Bill No. 1765, 2001.

Senate Bill No. 2300, 2001.

Senate Bill No. 2245, 2006.

Tijing v. Court of Appeals (2001). Supreme Court (Second Division). General Register No. 125901. March 8, 2001 (Justice Leonardo A. Quisumbing).