Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:21:18.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Case 2. The SARS case. IP fragmentation and patent pools

from Part I - Patent pools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Geertrui van Overwalle
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, Belgium/University of Tilburg, the Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the last ten years diverse entities have filed for patents in the field of genomics. The race for patenting DNA sequences started around 1980 growing steadily until reaching its peak by the late nineties. Nowadays, the race seems to have slowed down and the number of patents actually granted in the field of genomics is not significantly high in proportion to the number of applications. However, despite of the possibility that the patenting of DNA decreases due to the increase of patenting thresholds and, the fact that many patent applications are dropped as they prove to lack commercial viability (30% of US patents granted by the 1990s were abandoned by 2005), the amount of patents claiming DNA seems still relevant enough to raise concerns regarding access to the covered technology for further development.

The entities filing patents on DNA sequences range from big pharmaceutical companies to academic institutions. This diversity has resulted in IP fragmentation (one technology/many owners). This fragmentation has originated different concerns and controversy as to whether it represents a problem to R&D and how it may affect public health.

This paper briefly explains the effects of IP fragmentation. It continues with the presentation of patent pools as a solution to the negative effects of IP fragmentation. Finally, it discusses whether a patent pool represents an option for the SARS case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models
Patent Pools, Clearinghouses, Open Source Models and Liability Regimes
, pp. 42 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×