Gülen, S. C., Kim, K., Gas Turbine Combined Cycle Dynamic Simulation: A Physics Based Simple Approach, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 136 (2014), 011601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rowen, W. I., Simplified Mathematical Representations of Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines, ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, 105 (1983), 865–869.Google Scholar

Rowen, W. I., “Simplified Mathematical Representations of Single-Shaft Gas Turbines in Mechanical Drive Service,” ASME Paper 92-GT-22, ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, June 1–4, 1992, Köln, Germany.Google Scholar

Yee, S. K., Milanovic, J. V., Hughes, F. M., Overview and Comparative Analysis of Gas Turbine Models for System Stability Studies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23: 1 (2008), 108–118.Google Scholar

De Mello, F. P., Ahner, D. J., Dynamic Models for Combined Cycle Plants in Power System Studies, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9: 3 (1994), 1698–1708.Google Scholar

Hannett, L. N., Khan, A., Combustion Turbine Dynamic Model Validation from Tests, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 98: 1 (1993), 152–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannett, L. N., Feltes, J. W., “Testing and Model Validation for Combined Cycle Power Plants,” IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, January 28–February 1, 2001, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Kundur, P., Power System Stability and Control (New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994).Google Scholar

Incropera, F. P., Dewitt, D. P., Introduction to Heat Transfer, 4th edition (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002).Google Scholar

Özışık, N., Conduction Heat Transfer (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1988).Google Scholar

Gülen, S. C., Jones, C. M., “GE’s Next Generation CCGT Plants: Operational Flexibility Is the Key,” Modern Power Systems, June 2011, pp. 16–18.Google Scholar

Diegel, D. et al., “Fullfillment of Grid Code Requirements in the Area Served by UCTE by Combined Cycle Power Plants,” POWER-GEN Europe 2004, May 25–27, 2004, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar