Book contents
- The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany
- Science in History
- The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Structures of Violence: Fritz Haber and the Institutionalization of Gas Warfare
- 2 The Man in the Rubber Mask: World War I and the Development of the Modern Gas Mask
- 3 The First “Chemical Subjects”: Soldier Encounters with the Gas Mask in World War I
- 4 The Limits of Sympathy: The Medical Treatment of Poison Gas during and after World War I
- 5 Atmos(fears): The Poison Gas Debates in the Weimar Republic
- 6 Technologies of Fate: Cultural and Intellectual Prophesies of the Future Gas War
- 7 Synthesizing the “Nazi Chemical Subject”: Gas Masks, Personal Armoring, and Vestiary Discipline in the Third Reich
- 8 Prophets of Poison: Industrialized Murder in the Gas Chambers of the Holocaust
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2023
Book contents
- The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany
- Science in History
- The Gas Mask in Interwar Germany
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Structures of Violence: Fritz Haber and the Institutionalization of Gas Warfare
- 2 The Man in the Rubber Mask: World War I and the Development of the Modern Gas Mask
- 3 The First “Chemical Subjects”: Soldier Encounters with the Gas Mask in World War I
- 4 The Limits of Sympathy: The Medical Treatment of Poison Gas during and after World War I
- 5 Atmos(fears): The Poison Gas Debates in the Weimar Republic
- 6 Technologies of Fate: Cultural and Intellectual Prophesies of the Future Gas War
- 7 Synthesizing the “Nazi Chemical Subject”: Gas Masks, Personal Armoring, and Vestiary Discipline in the Third Reich
- 8 Prophets of Poison: Industrialized Murder in the Gas Chambers of the Holocaust
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Gas Mask in Interwar GermanyVisions of Chemical Modernity, pp. 288 - 322Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Aftalion, Fred, and Benfey, Otto Theodor. A History of the International Chemical Industry. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. “The Invention of Epidemic,” February 26, 2020. www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-l-invenzione-di-un-epidemia.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jennifer Karns. The Mantra of Efficiency: From Waterwheel to Social Control. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael Thad. The Business of Genocide: The SS, Slave Labor, and the Concentration Camps. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Allen, Michael Thad “The Devil in the Details: The Gas Chambers of Birkenau, October 1941.” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 16, no. 2 (2002): 189–216.Google Scholar
Aly, Götz, and Heim, Susanne. Architects of Annihilation: Auschwitz and the Logic of Destruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Amend, Niko. “Die Sanitätsdienstliche Versorgung der Gasversehrten Deutschen Soldaten des Ersten Weltkrieges.” Dissertation, Universität Ulm, 2014.Google Scholar
Apel, Dora. “Cultural Battlegrounds: Weimar Photographic Narratives of War.” New German Critique 76, Special Issue on Weimar Visual Culture (Winter 1999): 49–84.Google Scholar
Armitage, John. “On Ernst Jünger’s ‘Total Mobilization’: A Re-evaluation in the Era of the War on Terrorism.” Body and Society 9, no. 4 (2003): 191–213.Google Scholar
Babington, Anthony. Shell-Shock: A History of the Changing Attitudes to War Neurosis. London: Leo Cooper, 1997.Google Scholar
Baird, Jay W. To Die for Germany: Heroes in the Nazi Pantheon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Balfour, Sebastian. Deadly Embrace: Morocco and the Road to the Spanish Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bartov, Omer. Murder in Our Midst: The Holocaust, Industrial Killing, and Representation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bauer, Richard. Fliegeralarm: Luftangriffe auf München 1940–1945. Munich: Heinrich Hugendubel Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
Baumslag, Naomi. Murderous Medicine: Nazi Doctors, Human Experimentation, and Typhus. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005.Google Scholar
Beck, Matthias, and Kewell, Beth. Risk: A Study of Its Origins, History and Politics. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated by Mark Ritter. London: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich, ed. World at Risk. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Beer, John J. “Coal Tar Dye Manufacture and the Origins of the Modern Industrial Research Laboratory.” Isis 49, no. 2 (1958): 123–131.Google Scholar
Bein, Alex. The Jewish Question: Biography of a World Problem. Translated by Harry Zohn. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony, and Joyce, Patrick, eds. Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Bennette, Rebecca Ayako. Diagnosing Dissent: Hysterics, Deserters, and Conscientious Objectors in Germany during World War One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Bentley, Michelle. Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo: Exploiting the Forbidden. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Bevan, John. The Infernal Diver: The Lives of John and Charles Deane, Their Invention of the Diving Helmet, and Its First Application to Salvage, Treasure Hunting, Civil Engineering and Military Uses. London: Submex, 1996.Google Scholar
Birdsall, Carolyn. Nazi Soundscapes: Sound, Technology and Urban Space in Germany, 1933–1945. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Birn, Donald S. “Open Diplomacy at the Washington Conference of 1921–2: The British and French Experience.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 12, no. 3 (1970): 297–319.Google Scholar
Bloxham, Donald. The Final Solution: A Genocide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bogousslavsky, Julien, and Tatu, Laurent. “French Neuropsychiatry in the Great War: Between Moral Support and Electricity.” Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 22 (2013): 144–154.Google Scholar
Böttcher, Welf, and Thoemmes, Martin. Heinrich Dräger: Eine Biographie. Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Boudia, Soraya, Creager, Angela N. H., Frickel, Scott, et al. “Residues: Rethinking Chemical Environments.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4 (2018): 165–178.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna. “The Body in Modern Warfare: Myth and Meaning 1914–1945.” In What History Tells: George L. Mosse and the Culture of Modern Europe, edited by Stanley Payne, David J. Sorkin, and John Tortorice, 202–223. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bourke, Joanna “Pain, Sympathy and the Medical Encounter between the Mid Eighteenth and the Mid Twentieth Centuries.” Historical Research 85, no. 229 (2012): 430–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, Joanna “Bodily Pain, Combat, and the Politics of Memoirs: Between the American Civil War and the War in Vietnam.” Histoire Sociale 46, no. 91 (2013): 43–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bousquet, Antoine. “Ernst Jünger and the Problem of Nihilism in the Age of Total War.” Thesis Eleven 132, no. 1 (2016): 17–38.Google Scholar
Boutwell, Jeffrey. The German Nuclear Dilemma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Braker, Regina. “Helene Stocker’s Pacifism in the Weimar Republic: Between Ideal and Reality.” Journal of Women’s History 13, no. 3 (2001): 70–97.Google Scholar
Brauch, Hans Günter, and Müller, Rolf-Dieter, eds. Chemische Kriegführung – Chemische Abrüstung: Dokumente Und Kommentare. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Brinkhaus, Jörn. Luftschutz Und Versorgungspolitik: Regionen Und Gemeinden in NS-Staat, 1042–1944/45. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte, 2010.Google Scholar
Brose, Eric Dorn. The Kaiser’s Army: The Politics of Military Technology in Germany during the Machine Age, 1870–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, Susan. “Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s Artwork Essay Reconsidered.” October 62 (Autumn 1992): 3–41.Google Scholar
Buggeln, Marc. Slave Labor in Nazi Concentration Camps. Translated by Paul Cohen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Burleigh, Michael. Death and Deliverance: “Euthanasia” in Germany, c.1900 to 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Cabanes, Bruno. The Great War and the Origins of Humanitarianism, 1918–1924. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Canning, Kathleen, Barndt, Kerstin, and McGuire, Kristin, eds. Weimar Publics/Weimar Subjects: Rethinking the Political Culture of Germany in the 1920s. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Carrington, Tyler. Love at Last Sight: Dating, Intimacy, and Risk in Turn-of-the-Century Berlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Cassidy, David C. Uncertainty: The Life and Science of Werner Heisenberg. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1992.Google Scholar
Channell, David F. A History of Technoscience: Erasing the Boundaries between Science and Technology. London: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapoutot, Johann. The Law of Blood: Thinking and Acting as a Nazi. Translated by Richmond Mouillot, Miranda. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Charles, Daniel. Master Mind: The Rise and Fall of Fritz Haber, the Nobel Laureate Who Launched the Age of Chemical Warfare. New York: HarperCollins, 2005.Google Scholar
Chickering, Roger, and Förster, Stig, eds. Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Christianson, Scott. Fatal Airs: The Deadly History and Apocalyptic Future of Lethal Gases That Threaten Our World. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Christianson, Scott The Last Gasp: The Rise and Fall of the American Gas Chamber. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Citino, Robert M. The Path to Blitzkrieg: Doctrine and Training in the German Army, 1920–39. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1999.Google Scholar
Closmann, Charles E., ed. War and the Environment: Military Destruction in the Modern Age. College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cohen, Deborah. The War Come Home: Disabled Veterans in Britain and Germany, 1914–1939. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert E. “The Mist that Rolled into the Trenches: Chemical Escalation in World War I.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 27, no. 1 (January 1971): 34–38.Google Scholar
Cook, Tim. “Creating the Faith: The Canadian Gas Services in the First World War.” Journal of Military History 62, no. 4 (October 1998): 755–786.Google Scholar
Cornwell, John. Hitler’s Scientists: Science, War, and the Devil’s Pact. New York: Penguin Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Corum, James S. The Roots of the Blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German Military Reform. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Crew, David F. Bodies and Ruins: Imagining the Bombing of Germany, 1945 to the Present. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Croddy, Eric. Chemical and Biological Warfare: A Comprehensive Survey for the Concerned Citizen. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Crouthamel, Jason. “Nervous Nazis: War Neurosis, National Socialism and the Memory of the First World War.” War & Society 21, no. 2 (2013): 55–75.Google Scholar
Crouthamel, Jason “War Neurosis versus Savings Psychosis: Working-Class Politics and Psychological Trauma in Weimar Germany.” Journal of Contemporary History 37, no. 2 (2002): 163–182.Google Scholar
Das, Santanu. “‘An Ecstasy of Fumbling’: Gas Warfare, 1914–18 and the Uses of Affect.” In The Edinburgh Companion to Twentieth-Century British and American War Literature, edited by Piette, Adam and Rawlinson, Mark, 396–405. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Das, Santanu Touch and Intimacy in First World War Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Davis, Belinda. Home Fires Burning: Food, Politics, and Everyday Life in World War I Berlin. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Deist, Wilhelm, ed. The German Military in the Age of Total War. Warwickshire: Berg, 1985.Google Scholar
Dove, Richard, and Lamb, Stephen, eds. German Writers and Politics 1918–39. London: Macmillan Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dräger, Lisa, ed. Von Biermaschine zum Rettungswesen: Die Aufbaujahre des Drägerwerks. Lübeck: DrägerDruck, 2007.Google Scholar
Eckart, Wolfgang. “Aesculap in the Trenches: Aspects of German Medicine in the First World War.” In War, Violence and the Modern Condition, edited by Hüppauf, Bernd, 177–193. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1997.Google Scholar
Eckart, Wolfgang Medizin und Krieg: Deutschland 1914–1924. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2014.Google Scholar
Ede, Andrew. “Science Born of Poison, Fire and Smoke: Chemical Warfare and the Origins of Big Science.” In The Romance of Science: Essays in Honour of Trevor H. Levere, edited by Buchwald, Jed and Stewart, Larry. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 2017.Google Scholar
Ede, Andrew. “The Natural Defense of a Scientific People: The Public Debate over Chemical Warfare in Post-WWI America.” Bulletin of the History of Chemistry 27, no. 2 (2002): 128–135.Google Scholar
Eksteins, Modris. “All Quiet on the Western Front and the Fate of a War.” Journal of Contemporary History 15, no. 2 (April 1980): 345–366.Google Scholar
Eksteins, Modris Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1989.Google Scholar
Emery, Theo. Hellfire Boys: The Birth of the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service and the Race for the World’s Deadliest Weapons. New York: Little, Brown, 2017.Google Scholar
Encke, Julia, Augenblicke der Gefahr: Der Krieg und die Sinne. 1914–1934. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Enghigian, Greg, and Berg, Matthew Paul, eds. Sacrifice and National Belonging in Twentieth-Century Germany. College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Evers, Kai. “Gassing Europe’s Capitals: Planning, Envisioning, and Rethinking Modern Warfare in European Discourses of the 1920s and 1930s.” In Visions of Europe: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Contemporary Cultural Debates, edited by Hart, Gail K. and Biendarra, Anke S., 65–83. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2014.Google Scholar
Evers, Kai “Risking Gas Warfare: Imperceptible Death and the Future of War in Weimar Culture and Literature.” Germanic Review 89, no. 3 (2014): 269–284.Google Scholar
Evers, Kai Violent Modernists: The Aesthetics of Destruction in Twentieth-Century German Literature. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Faber, David. Munich, 1938: Appeasement and World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2008.Google Scholar
Faith, Thomas Ian. Behind the Gas Mask: The U.S. Chemical Warfare Service in War and Peace. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Faith, Thomas. “‘As Is Proper in Republican Form of Government’: Selling Chemical Warfare to Americans in the 1920s.” Federal History 2 (2010): 28–41.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, Anna. Tear Gas: From the Battlefields of World War I to the Streets of Today. London: Verso, 2017.Google Scholar
Feldman, Gerald D., and Seibel, Wolfgang, eds. Networks of Nazi Persecution: Bureaucracy, Business, and the Organization of the Holocaust. New York: Berghahn Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Fischer, William B. The Empire Strikes Out: Kurd Lasswitz, Hans Dominik, and the Development of German Science Fiction. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Gerard J. “Chemical Warfare and Medical Response during World War I.” American Journal of Public Health 98, no. 4 (April 2008): 611–625.Google Scholar
Förster, Stig, ed. An Der Schwelle Zum Totalen Krieg: Die Militärische Debatte Über Den Krieg Der Zukunft 1919–1939. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2002.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. “Society Must Be Defended” Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador, 1997.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel The History of Sexuality. Translated by Robert Hurley. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Freemantle, Michael. Gas! Gas! Quick, Boys! How Chemistry Changed the First World War. Brimscombe Port, Stroud: The History Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Freemantle, Michael The Chemists’ War 1914–1918. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.Google Scholar
Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste. “Beck Back in the 19th Century: Towards a Genealogy of Risk Society.” History and Technology 23, no. 4 (2007): 333–350.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Henry. The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Saul. The Years of Extermination: Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1939–1945. New York: HarperCollins, 2007.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Bretislav. “Fritz Haber Und Der ‘Krieg Der Chemiker.’” Physik in Unserer Zeit 46, no. 3 (May 2015): 118–125.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Bretislav, Hoffmann, Dieter, Renn, Jürgen, Schmaltz, Florian, and Wolf, Martin, eds. One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences. New York: Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter A Nation of Fliers: German Aviation and the Popular Imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter “Did Weimar Fail?” The Journal of Modern History 68, no. 3 (1996): 629–656.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter Life and Death in the Third Reich. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter “Machine Dreams: Airmindedness and the Reinvention of Germany.” American Historical Review 98, no. 3 (1993): 685–709.Google Scholar
Fritzsche, Peter The Turbulent World of Franz Göll: An Ordinary Berliner Writes the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon. “Defending Civilians against Aerial Bombardment: A Comparative/Transnational History of Japanese, German, and British Home Fronts, 1918–1945.” The Asia-Pacific Journal 14, no. 23 (2016). https://apjjf.org/2016/23/Garon.html.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon “On the Transnational Destruction of Cities: What Japan and the United States Learned from the Bombing of Britain and Germany in the Second World War.” Past & Present 247, no. 1 (2020): 235–271.Google Scholar
Garrett, Benjamin. “Hugo Stoltzenberg and Chemical Weapons Proliferation.” The Monitor 1, no. 2 (Spring 1995): 11, 23.Google Scholar
Geist, Edward M. Armageddon Insurance: Civil Defense in the United States and Soviet Union, 1945–1991. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Meyers, Todd. The Human Body in the Age of Catastrophe: Brittleness, Integration, Science, and the Great War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Gerstenberger, Katharina, and Nusser, Tanja, eds. Catastrophe and Catharsis: Perspectives on Disaster and Redemption in German Culture and Beyond. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 2015.Google Scholar
Geyer, Michael. “How the Germans Learned to Wage War: On the Question of Killing in the First and Second World Wars.” In Between Mass Death and Individual Loss: The Place of the Dead in Twentieth-Century Germany, edited by Confino, Alan, Betts, Paul, and Schuman, Dirk, 25–50. New York: Berghahn Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Gil, Isabel Capeloa. “The Visuality of Catastrophe in Ernst Jünger’s Der Gefährliche Augenblick and Die Veränderte Welt.” KulturPoetik 10, no. 1 (2010): 62–84.Google Scholar
Girard, Marion. A Strange and Formidable Weapon: British Responses to World War I Poison Gas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Goodbody, Axel. Nature, Technology and Cultural Change in Twentieth-Century German Literature: The Challenge of Ecocriticism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Grady, Tim. A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Grayzel, Susan R. At Home and Under Fire: Air Raids and Culture in Britain from the Great War to the Blitz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Grayzel, Susan R. “‘Macabre and Hilarious’, The Emotional Life of the Civilian Gas Mask in France during and after the First World War.” In Total War: and Emotional History, edited by Langhammer, Claire, Noakes, Lucy, and Siebrecht, Claudia, 40–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Grayzel, Susan R. The Age of the Gas Mask: How British Civilians Faced the Terrors of Total War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Grayzel, Susan R. “The Baby in the Gas Mask: Motherhood, Wartime Technology, and the Gendered Division between the Fronts during and after the First World War.” In Gender and the First World War, edited by Hämmerle, Christa, Überegger, Oswald, and Zaar, Birgitta Bader, 127–144. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Griech-Polelle, Beth A. Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust: Language, Rhetoric and the Traditions of Hatred. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Guillemin, Jeanne. Biological Weapons: From the Invention of State-Sponsored Programs to Contemporary Bioterrorism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haapamaki, Michele. The Coming of the Aerial War: Culture and the Fear of Airborne Attack in Inter-War Britain. New York: I.B. Taurus, 2014.Google Scholar
Habeck, Mary R. “Technology in the First World War: The View from Below.” In The Great War and the Twentieth Century, edited by Winter, Jay, Parker, Geoffrey, and Habeck, Mary R., 99–131. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Haber, L. F. The Chemical Industry 1900–1930: International Growth and Technological Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Haber, L.F. The Chemical Industry during the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Haber, L.F. The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical Warfare in the First World War. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hachtmann, Rüdiger. Wissenschaftsmanagement Im “Dritten Reich”: Geschichte Der Generalverwaltung Der Kaiser‐Wilhelm‐Gesellschaft. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2007.Google Scholar
Hager, Thomas. The Alchemy of Air: A Jewish Genius, a Doomed Tycoon, and the Scientific Discovery That Fed the World but Fueled the Rise of Hitler. New York: Harmony, 2008.Google Scholar
Hallett, Christine E. Containing Trauma: Nursing Work in the First World War. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Jacob Darwin. Arming Mother Nature: The Birth of Catastrophic Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hammond, James W. Poison Gas: The Myths versus Reality. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Harris, Henry. “To Serve Mankind in Peace and the Fatherland in War: The Case of Fritz Haber.” German History 10, no. 1 (1992): 24–38.Google Scholar
Harrison, Mark. The Medical War: British Military Medicine in the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Guy R. Villainous Compounds: Chemical Weapons and the American Civil War. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter. “Carl Bosch and Carl Krauch: Chemistry and the Political Economy of Germany, 1925–1945.” The Journal of Economic History 47, no. 2 (1987): 353–363.Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter “The Chemistry of Business-State Relations in the Third Reich.” In Business and Industry in Nazi Germany, edited by Francis R. Nicosia and Jonathan Huener, 66–80. New York: Berghahn Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter From Cooperation to Complicity: Degussa in the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Heim, Susanne, Sachse, Carola, and Walker, Mark, eds. The Kaiser Wilhelm Society under National Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Herf, Jeffrey. Reactionary Modernists: Technology, Culture, and Politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Herzog, Dagmar. Unlearning Eugenics: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Disability in Post-Nazi Europe. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hett, Benjamin Carter. Burning the Reichstag: An Investigating into the Third Reich’s Enduring Mystery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Heynen, Robert. Degeneration and Revolution: Radical Cultural Politics and the Body in West Germany. Boston: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar
Hilberg, Raul. The Destruction of European Jews. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hippel, Frank A. von. The Chemical Age: How Chemists Fought Famine and Disease, and Changed Our Relationship with the Earth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Gerhard and Krumeich, Gerd. Deutschland im Ersten Weltkrieg. Frankfurt: S. Fischer Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Hobsbawn, Eric. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991. New York: Pantheon Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Hogg, Ian. “Bolimov and the First Gas Attack.” In Tanks and Weapons of World War I, edited by Fitzsimons, Bernard, 17–19. New York: Beekman House, 1973.Google Scholar
Holman, Brett. The Next War in the Air: Britain’s Fear of the Bomber, 1908–1941. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Horn, Eva. The Future as Catastrophe: Imagining Disaster in the Modern Age. Translated by Valentine Pakis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas. “Technological Momentum.” In Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, edited by Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo, 101–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hugill, Peter J. Global Communications since 1844: Geopolitics and Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hull, Isabel V. A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hull, Isabel V. Absolute Destruction: Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Huyssen, Andres. “Fortifying the Heart – Totally: Ernst Jünger’s Armored Texts.” New German Critique 59 (1993): 3–23.Google Scholar
Hynes, Samuel. The Soldiers’ Tale: Bearing Witness to Modern War. New York: Penguin Press, 1997.Google Scholar
James, Jeremiah, Steinhauser, Thomas, Hoffmann, Dieter, and Friedrich, Bretislav. One Hundred Years at the Intersection of Chemistry and Physics: The Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society 1911–2011. Boston: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sarah. “Histoire d’un Transfert de Technologie: De l’étude Des Insectes à La Mise Au Point Du Zyklon B.” La Recherche 340 (2001): 55–59.Google Scholar
Jansen, Sarah “Schädlinge”: Geschichte Eines Wissenschaftlichen Und Politischen Konstrukts, 1840–1920. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad, and Geyer, Michael. Shattered Past: Reconstructing German Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Diarmuid. Hell’s Cartel: IG Farben and the Making of Hitler’s War Machine. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Jelavich, Peter. “German Culture in the Great War.” In European Culture in the Great War: The Arts, Entertainment, and Propaganda, 1914–1918, edited by Roshwald, Aviel and Stites, Richard, 32–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Joerges, Bernward. “Do Politics Have Artefacts?” Social Studies of Science 29, no. 3 (1999): 411–431.Google Scholar
Johler, Reinhard, Marchetti, Christian, and Scheer, Monique, eds. Doing Anthropology in Wartime and War Zones. World War I and the Cultural Sciences in Europe. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2010.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ann. Hitting the Brakes: Engineering Design and the Production of Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ian Ona. Faustian Bargain: The Soviet-German Partnership and the Origins of the Second World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeffrey A. “Academic, Proletarian … Professional? Shaping Professionalization for German Industrial Chemists, 1887–1920” in German Professions, 1800–1950, edited by Konrad Jarausch and Geoffrey Cocks, 123–142. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeffrey A. “The Scientist behind Poison Gas: The Tragedy of the Habers.” Humanities 17, no. 5 (1996): 25–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeffrey A. The Kaiser’s Chemists: Science and Modernization in Imperial Germany. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ryan Mark. “A Suffocating Nature: Environment, Culture, and German Chemical Warfare on the Western Front.” Dissertation, Temple University, 2013.Google Scholar
Jones, Edgar. “Terror Weapons: The British Experience of Gas and Its Treatment in the First World War.” War in History 21, no. 3 (July 2014): 355–375.Google Scholar
Kaes, Anton. Shell Shock Cinema: Weimar Culture and the Wounds of War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Gerhard. “Wie Die Kultur Einbrach Giftgas Und Wissenschaftsethos Im Ersten Weltkrieg.” Merkur 56 (2002): 210–220.Google Scholar
Kalthoff, Jürgen, and Werner, Martin. Die Händler des Zyklon B Tesch & Stabenow Eine Firmengeschichte zwischen Hamburg und Auschwitz. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
Kamp, Michael. Bernhard Dräger: Erfinder, Unternehmer, Bürger 1970 bis 1928. Kiel/Hamburg: Wachholtz Verlag, 2017.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Marion A. Between Dignity and Despair: Jewish Life in Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Katz, Eric, ed. Death by Design: Science, Technology, and Engineering in Nazi Germany. New York: Pearson, 2006.Google Scholar
Katz, Eric. “On the Neutrality of Technology: The Holocaust Death Camps as a Counter-Example.” Journal of Genocide Research 7, no. 3 (September 2005): 409–421.Google Scholar
Katz, Eric “The Nazi Engineers: Reflections on Technological Ethics in Hell.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17, no. 3 (2011): 571–582.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Doris. “‘Gas, Gas, Gaas!’ The Poison Gas War in the Literature and Visual Arts of Interwar Europe.” In One Hundred Years of Chemical Warfare: Research, Deployment, Consequences, 169–187. Springer, n.d.Google Scholar
Kay, Alex J., and David, Stahel, eds. Mass Violence in Nazi-Occupied Europe. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Keegan, John. The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme. London: Pimlico, 2004.Google Scholar
Kenez, Peter. The Coming of the Holocaust: From Antisemitism to Genocide. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Ian The Nazi Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives of Interpretation. London: Edward Arnold, 1985.Google Scholar
Kidd, Ian James. “Oswald Spengler, Technology, and Human Nature.” The European Legacy 17, no. 1 (2012): 19–31.Google Scholar
Kitchen, Martin. “Militarism and the Development of Fascist Ideology: The Political Ideas of Colonel Max Bauer, 1916–18.” Central European History 8, no. 3 (1975): 199–220.Google Scholar
Kittler, Wolf. “From Gestalt to Ge-Stell: Martin Heidegger Reads Ernst Jünger.” Cultural Critique 69 (2008): 79–97.Google Scholar
Klemperer, Klemens von. German Incertitudes 1914–1945: The Stones and the Cathedral. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2001.Google Scholar
Kluge, Alexander. The Air Raid on Halberstadt on 8 April 1945. Translated by Martin Chalmers. London: Seagull, 2014.Google Scholar
Knell, Hermann. To Destroy a City: Strategic Bombing and Its Human Consequences in World War II. Cambridge, MA: De Capo Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Knust, Herbert. “George Grosz: Literature and Caricature.” Comparative Literature Studies 12, no. 3 (1975): 218–247.Google Scholar
Kramer, Alan. Dynamic of Destruction: Culture and Mass Killing in the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kramer, Nicole. Volksgenossinnen an Der Heimatfront. Mobilisierung, Verhalten, Erinnerung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Krause, Jonathan. “The Origins of Chemical Warfare in the French Army.” War in History 20, no. 4 (2013): 545–556.Google Scholar
Kreike, Emmanuel. Scorched Earth: Environmental Warfare as a Crime against Humanity and Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Kühne, Thomas. Belonging and Genocide: Hitler’s Community, 1918–1945. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kunz, Rudibert, and Müller, Rolf-Dieter. Giftgas gegen Abd El Krim: Deutschland, Spanien und der Gaskrieg in Spanisch-Marokko, 1922–1927. Freiburg: Verlag Rombach Freiburg, 1990.Google Scholar
Laakkonen, Simo, Tucker, Richard, and Vuorisalo, Timo, eds. The Long Shadows: A Global Environmental History of the Second World War. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Leed, Eric J. No Man’s Land: Combat and Identity in World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W. Cooperation under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint during World War II. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Leitner, Gerit von. Wollen Wir Unsere Hände in Unschuld Waschen? Gertrud Woker (1878–1968) Chemikerin & Internationale Frauenliga 1915–1968. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag, 1998.Google Scholar
Lemke, Bernd, ed. Luft- Und Zivilschutz in Deutschland Im 20. Jahrhundert. Potsdam: Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt, 2007.Google Scholar
Lemke, Bernd. Luftschutz in Grossbritannien Und Deutschland 1923 Bis 1939. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Lemmerich, Jost, and Hentschel, Ann. Science and Conscience: The Life of James Franck. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Leonhard, Jörn. Pandora’s Box: A History of the First World War. Translated by Patrick Camiller. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lepick, Olivier. La Grande Guerre Chimique, 1914–1918. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Lerner, Paul. Hysterical Men: War, Psychiatry, and the Politics of Trauma in Germany, 1890–1930. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Lethen, Helmut. Cool Conduct: The Culture of Distance in Weimar Germany. Translated by Don Reneau. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lewin Sime, Ruth. Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Lindner, Stephan H. Inside IG Farben: Hoechst during the Third Reich. Translated by Helen Schoop. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Linhardt, Andreas. “Die Fachzeitschrift ‘Gasschutz Und Luftschutz’ Unter Dem Einfluss Des Nationalsozialismus,” n.d. www.bbk.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/BBK/DE/FIS/DownloadsDigitalisierteMedien/FachzeitschriftNotfallvorsorge/GasschutzundLuftschutz/Ausarbeitung_Dr_Linhardt_PDF.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.Google Scholar
Linton, Derek. “The Obscure Object of Knowledge: German Military Medicine Confronts Gas Gangrene during World War I.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 74, no. 2 (2000): 291–316.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Nick. The Western Front: A History of the Great War, 1914–1918. New York: W.W. Norton, 2021.Google Scholar
Lorentz, Bernhard. Industrieelite und Wirtschaftspolitik 1928–1950: Heinrich Dräger und das Drägerwerk. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2001.Google Scholar
Loughran, Tracey. “Shell-Shock and Psychological Medicine in First World War Britain.” Social History of Medicine 22, no. 1 (2009): 79–95.Google Scholar
Lüdtke, Alf, ed. Everyday Life in Mass Dictatorship: Collusion and Evasion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Macleod, Roy, and Johnson, Jeffrey Allan, eds. Frontline and Factory: Comparative Perspectives on the Chemical Industry at War, 1914–1924. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Roy M. “Chemistry for King and Kaiser: Revisiting Chemical Enterprise and the European War.” In Determinants in the Evolution of the European Chemical Industry, 1900–1939, edited by Travis, Anthony S., Schröter, Harm G., Homburg, Ernst, and Morris, Peter J. T., 23–49. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1998.Google Scholar
Macrakis, Kristie. Surviving the Swastika: Scientific Research in Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Maier, Helmut. Chemiker Im “Dritten Reich” Die Deutsche Chemische Gesellschaft Und Der Verein Deutscher Chemiker Im NS-Herrschaftsapparat. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2015.Google Scholar
Maier, Helmut Rüstungsforschung in Der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gesellschaft Und Das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut Für Metallforschung, 1900–1945/48. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2007.Google Scholar
Main, Steven J. “Gas on the Eastern Front during the First World War (1915–1917).” Slavic Military Studies 28, no. 1 (2015): 99–132.Google Scholar
Malfoy, Jordan. “Britain Can Take It: Chemical Warfare and the Origins of Civil Defense in Great Britain, 1915–1945.” Dissertation, Florida International, 2018.Google Scholar
Martinetz, Dieter. Der Gaskrieg 1914–1918: Entwicklung, Herstellung, und Einsatz chemischer Kampfstoffe. Bonn: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1996.Google Scholar
Masco, Joseph. The Theater of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Meise, Klaus. “Der Giftgas-Unfall am 20. Mai 1928: Phosgen-Explosion in Der Chemischen Fabrik Stoltzenburg Am Hovenweg.” Die Insel: Zeitschrift Des Vereins Museum Elbinsel Wilhelmsburg 5314 (2012): 63–65.Google Scholar
Mercelis, Joris. Beyond Bakelite: Leo Baekeland and the Business of Science and Invention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitcham, Carl. Steps toward a Philosophy of Engineering: Historico-Philosophical and Critical Essays. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2020.Google Scholar
Möbius, Torben. “World War II Aerial Bombings of Germany: Fear as Subject of National Socialist Governmental Practices.” Storicamente 11, no. 21 (2015): 1–21.Google Scholar
Moore, William. Gas Attack! Chemical Warfare 1915–19 and Afterwards. London: Leo Cooper, 1987.Google Scholar
Moshenka, Gabriel. “Gas Masks: Material Culture, Memory, and the Senses.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16, no. 3 (2010): 609–628.Google Scholar
Mosse, George. Fallen Soldiers: Reshaping the Memory of the World Wars. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Müller, Rolf-Dieter, “Die deutschen Gaskriegsvorbereitungen 1919–45: Mit Giftgas zur Weltmacht?” Militärgeschichtliche Zeitschrift 27, no. 1 (1980): 25–54.Google Scholar
Müller, Rolf-Dieter Das Tor zur Weltmacht: Die Bedeutung der Sowjetunion für die Deutsche Wirschafts- und Rüstungspolitik zwischen den Weltkriegen. Boppard am Rhein: Harald Boldt Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
Müller, Rolf-Dieter, “Total War as a Result of New Weapons? The Use of Chemical Agents in World War I.” In Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918, edited by Roger Chickering and Stig Förster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Müller, Simone. “‘Cut Holes and Sink ‘em’: Chemical Weapons Disposal and Cold War History as a History of Risk.” Historical Social Research 41, no. 1 (2016): 263–284.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Brian. German Literature and the First World War: The Anti-War Tradition. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Murmann, Johann Peter. “Knowledge and Competitive Advantage in the Synthetic Dye Industry, 1850–1914: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions in Great Britain, Germany, and the United States.” Enterprise and Society 1, no. 4 (2000): 699–704.Google Scholar
Murphy, David Thomas. The Heroic Earth: The Flowering of Geopolitical Thought in Weimar Germany, 1924–1933. Kent: Kent State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. “What Role Do Metaphors Play in Racial Prejudice? The Function of Antisemitic Imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf.” Patterns of Prejudice 41, no. 1 (2007): 21–43.Google Scholar
Neaman, Elliot Y. A Dubious Past: Ernst Jünger and the Politics of Literature after Nazism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Neuner, Stephanie. Politik Und Psychiatrie: Die Staatliche Versorgung Psychisch Kriegsbeschädigter in Deutschland 1920–1939. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011.Google Scholar
Nevis, Thomas. Ernst Jünger and Germany: Into the Abyss, 1914–1945. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Overy, R. J. The Bombers and the Bombed: Allied Air War over Europe 1940–1945. New York: Viking, 2013.Google Scholar
Palmer, Scott W. Dictatorship of the Air: Aviation Culture and the Fate of Modern Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Panchasi, Roxanne. Future Tense: The Culture of Anticipation in France between the Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Paxman, Jeremy, and Harris, Robert. A Higher Form of Killing: The Secret Story of Chemical and Biological Warfare. New York: Hill and Wang, 1982.Google Scholar
Pehnke, Andreas. Der Hamburger Schulreformer Wilhelm Lamszus (1881–1965) Und Seine Antikriegsschrift “Giftgas Über Uns”: Erstveröffentlichen Des Verschollen Geglaubten Manuskripts von 1932. Beucha: Sax Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Perry, Heather R. Recycling the Disabled: Army, Medicine, and Modernity in WWI Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev. Inside Nazi Germany: Conformity, Opposition, and Racism in Everyday Life. Translated by Richard Deveson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Pfeiler, W. M. K. War and the German Mind: The Testimony of Men of Fiction Who Fought at the Front. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Philpott, William. War of Attrition: Fighting the First World War. New York: Overlook Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Plumpe, Werner. Carl Duisberg 1861–1935: Anatomie Eines Industriellen. München: C.H. Beck, 2016.Google Scholar
Plumpe, Werner German Economic and Business History in the 19th and 20th Centuries. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar
Poore, Carol. Disability in Twentieth-Century German Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Presner, Todd. Mobile Modernity: Germans, Jews, Trains. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Preston, Diana. A Higher Form of Killing: Six Weeks in World War I That Forever Changed the Nature of Warfare. New York: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar
Preston, Diana Before the Fallout: From Marie Curie to Hiroshima. New York: Walker & Company, 2005.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo.” International Organization 49, no. 1 (Winter 1995): 73–103.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Sara B., and Zimring, Carl A.. Technology and the Environment in History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Pruemm, Karl. Die Literatur des Soldatischen Nationalismus der 20er Jahre. Kronberg: Taunus, 1974.Google Scholar
Reid, Fiona. Broken Men: Shell Shock, Treatment and Recovery in Britain 1914–30. New York: Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
Reid, Fiona Medicine in First World War Europe: Soldiers, Medics, Pacifists. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Reynolds, David. The Long Shadow: The Great War and the Twentieth Century. London: Simon & Schuster, 2013.Google Scholar
Rieger, Bernhard. Technology and the Culture of Modernity in Britain and Germany 1890–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rose, Shelley E. “The Penumbra of Weimar Political Culture: Pacifism, Feminism, and Social Democracy.” Peace & Change 36, no. 3 (2011): 313–343.Google Scholar
Rosenwald, Lawrence. “On Modern Western Antiwar Literature.” Raritan 34, no. 1 (2014): 155–173.Google Scholar
Ross, Corey. “Mass Culture and Divided Audiences: Cinema and Social Change in Inter-War Germany.” Past & Present 193 (November 2006): 157–195.Google Scholar
Rotter, Andrew J. Hiroshima: The World’s Bomb. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Russell, Edmund P. “‘Speaking of Annihilation’: Mobilizing for War against Human and Insect Enemies, 1914–1945.” Journal of American History 82, no. 4 (1996): 1505–1529.Google Scholar
Saint-Amour, Paul K. “Air War Prophecy and Interwar Modernism.” Comparative Literature Studies 42, no. 2 (2005): 130–161.Google Scholar
Saint-Amour, Paul K. Tense Future: Modernism, Total War, Encyclopedic Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Sammartino, Annemarie H. The Impossible Border: Germany and the East 1914–1922. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sannwald, Wolfgang. Schiefertafel, Gasmaske Und Petticoat: Erlebte Dinge Und Erinnerungen Aus Dem Landkreis Tübingen. Gomaringen und Tübigen: Gomaringer Verlag und Schwäbisches Tagblatt, 1994.Google Scholar
Saraiva, Tiago. Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Sax, Boria. Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust. New York: Continuum, 2000.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang, The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Florian. “Neurosciences and Research on Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction in Nazi Germany.” Translated by Stefani Ross. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 15, no. 3 (2006): 186–209.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, Florian Kampfstoff-Forschung Im Nationalsozialismus: Zur Kooperation von Kaiser-Weilhelm Instituten, Militär Und Industrie. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ulf. Secret Science: A Century of Poison Warfare and Human Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Schneider, Thomas F. “Narrating the War in Pictures: German Photo Books on World War I and the Construction of Pictorial War Narrations.” Journal of War and Culture Studies 4, no. 1 (2011): 31–49.Google Scholar
Schütz, Erhard. “Wahn-Europa. Mediale Gas-Luftkrieg Szenarien Der Zwischenkriegszeit.” In Krieg in Den Medien, edited by Preußler, Heinz-Peter, 127–149. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2005.Google Scholar
Schweer, Henning. Die Geschichte der chemischen Fabrik Stoltzenburg bis zum Ende des zweiten Weltkrieges. Diepholz: Verlag für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften und der Technik, 2008.Google Scholar
Shephard, Ben. A War of Nerves: Soldiers and Psychiatrists in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shephard, Ben H. War in the Wild East: The German Army and Soviet Partisans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sloterdijk, Peter. Terror from the Air. Translated by Amy Patton and Steven Corcoran. Los Angeles: Semiotext, 2009.Google Scholar
Slotten, Hugh R. “Humane Chemistry or Scientific Barbarism? American Responses to World War I Poison Gas, 1915–1930.” Journal of American History 77, no. 2 (September 1990): 476–498.Google Scholar
Smith, Frank L. American Biodefense: How Dangerous Ideas about Biological Weapons Shape National Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, Jessica M. Extracting Accountability: Engineers and Corporate Social Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Smith, Susan L. Toxic Exposures: Mustard Gas and the Health Consequences of World War II in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Speier, Hans. German Rearmament and the Atomic War: The Views of German Military and Political Leaders. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company, 1957.Google Scholar
Stanley, Matthew. Einstein’s War: How Relativity Triumphed Amid the Vicious Nationalism of World War I. New York: Dutton, 2020.Google Scholar
Stargardt, Nicholas. The German War: A Nation under Arms, 1939–45. New York: Basic Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Stargardt, Nicholas Witnesses of War: Children’s Lives under the Nazis. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005.Google Scholar
Steen, Kathryn. The American Synthetic Organic Chemicals Industry: War and Politics, 1910–1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Charles. The Admiral’s Secret Weapon: Lord Dundonald and the Origins of Chemical Warfare. Rochester, NY: Boydell Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stern, Fritz. Dreams and Delusions: The Drama of German History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1988.Google Scholar
Stern, Fritz. “Freunde im Widerspruch. Haber und Einstein.” In Forschung im Spannungsfeld von Politik und Gesellschaft, Geschichte, und Struktur der Kaiser, edited by Vierhaus, Rudolf and von Brocke, Bernhard, 516–543. München: Deutsches Verlag-Anstalt, 1990.Google Scholar
Stoltzenberg, Dietrich. Fritz Haber: Chemiker, Nobelpreisträger Deutscher, Jude. Weinheim: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, 1994.Google Scholar
Stoltzenberg, Dietrich Fritz Haber: Chemist, Nobel Laureate, German, Jew. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Strathausen, Carsten. “The Return of the Gaze: Stereoscopic Vision in Jünger and Benjamin.” New German Critique 80 (2000): 125–248.Google Scholar
Strohn, Matthias. The German Army and the Defense of the Reich: Military Doctrine and the Conduct of the Defensive Battle 1918–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sumner, Judith. Plants Go to War: A Botanical History of World War II. Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 2019.Google Scholar
Süss, Dietmar. “Wartime Societies and Shelter Politics in National Socialist Germany and Britain.” In Bombing, States and Peoples in Western Europe, 1940–1945, edited by Overy, Richard, Baldoli, Claudia, and Knapp, Andrew. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Süss, Dietmar Death from the Skies: How the British and Germans Survived the Bombing in World War II. Translated by Lesley Sharpe and Jeremy Noakes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Süss, Dietmar, ed. Deutschland Im Luftkrieg: Geschichte und Erinnerung. München: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Szöllösi-Janze, Margit. “Losing the War, but Gaining Ground: The German Chemical Industry during World War I.” In The German Chemical Industry in the Twentieth Century, edited by Lesch, John, 91–123. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2000.Google Scholar
Szöllösi-Janze, Margit “Pesticides and War: The Case of Fritz Haber.” European Review 9, no. 1 (2001): 97–108.Google Scholar
Szöllösi-Janze, Margit Fritz Haber, 1868–1934: eine Biographie. München: C.H. Beck Verlag, 1998.Google Scholar
Tammen, Helmuth. Die I.G. Farbenindustrie Aktiengesellschaft (1925–1933): Ein Chemiekonzern in der Weimarer Republik. Berlin: H. Tammen, 1978.Google Scholar
Taylor, Dorceta E. Toxic Communities: Environmental Racism, Industrial Pollution, and Residential Mobility. New York: New York University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter. “From Gas Hysteria to Nuclear Fear: A Historical Synthesis of Chemical and Atomic Weapons.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 52, no. 2 (2022): 223–264.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter “The Pale Death: Poison Gas and German Racial Exceptionalism, 1915–1945.” Central European History 54 (2021): 273–296.Google Scholar
Thompson, Peter. “Wardens of the Toxic World: German Women’s Encounters with the Gas Mask, 1915–1945.” German Studies Review 43, no. 2 (2020): 353–376.Google Scholar
Torrie, Julia S. “For Their Own Good”: Civilian Evacuations in Germany and France, 1939–1945. New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Trauma, 1914–1945. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Travers, Martin. Critics of Modernity: The Literature of the Conservative Revolution in Germany, 1890–1933. New York: Peter Lang, 2001.Google Scholar
Trumpener, Ulrich. “The Road to Ypres: The Beginnings of Gas Warfare in World War I.” The Journal of Modern History 47 (1975): 460–480.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Neil. “Heidegger and Jünger on the ‘Significance of the Century’: Technology as a Theme in Conservative Thought.” Writing Technologies 2, no. 2 (2009): 9–34.Google Scholar
Tubach, Frederic C. German Voices: Memories of Life during Hitler’s Third Reich. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Berndt, and Ziemann, Benjamin, eds. German Soldiers in the Great War: Letters and Eyewitness Accounts. Translated by Christine Brocks. Barnsley: Pen and Sword, 2010.Google Scholar
Uziel, Daniel. The Propaganda Warriors: The Wehrmacht and the Consolidation of the German Home Front. Bern: Peter Lang AG, 2008.Google Scholar
van Bergen, Leo. “The Poison Gas Debate in the Inter-War Years.” Medicine, Conflict and Survival 24, no. 3 (2008): 174–187.Google Scholar
Vellacott, Jo. “Feminism as If All People Mattered: Working to Remove the Causes of War, 1919–1929.” Contemporary European History 10, no. 3 (2001): 375–394.Google Scholar
von Bruch, Rüdiger, and Kaderas, Brigitte, eds. Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftspolitik Bestandsaufnahmen zu Formationen, Brüchen und Kontinuitäten im Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar
Voskuhl, Adelheid. “Engineering Philosophy: Theories of Technology, German Idealism, and Social Order in High-Industrial Germany.” Technology and Culture 57, no. 4 (2016): 721–752.Google Scholar
Vourkoutiotis, Vasilis. Making Common Cause: German-Soviet Secret Relations, 1919–22. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Wagener, Hans. Understanding Erich Maria Remarque. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Watson, Alexander. Enduring the Great War: Combat, Morale and Collapse in the German and British Armies, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Weber, Thomas. Hitler’s First War: Adolf Hitler, The Men of the List Regiment, and the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul. Epidemics and Genocide in Eastern Europe 1890–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul “The Uses and Abuses of Biological Technologies: Zyklon B and Gas Disinfestation between the First World War and the Holocaust.” History and Technology 11 (1994): 291–298.Google Scholar
Weisenfeld, Gennifer. “Gas Mask Parade: Japan’s Anxious Modernism.” Modernism/Modernity 21, no. 1 (January 2014): 179–199.Google Scholar
Westermann, Edward B. Flak: German Anti-Aircraft Defenses, 1914–1945. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wette, Wolfram. The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Adrian E. “Urban Warfare Doctrine on the Eastern Front.” In Nazi Policy on the Eastern Front, 1941: Total War, Genocide, and Racialization, edited by Kay, Alex J., Rutherford, Jeff, and Stahel, David, 45–73. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Wietzker, Wolfgang. Giftgas im Ersten Weltkrieg: Was konnte die deutsche Öffentlichkeit wissen? Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller, 2007.Google Scholar
Wildt, Michael. Hitler’s Volksgemeinschaft and the Dynamics of Racial Exclusion: Violence Against Jews in Provincial Germany, 1919–1939. Translated by Bernhard Heise. New York: Berghahn Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Wright, Jonathan. Germany and the Origins of the Second World War. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Ziemann, Benjamin. Contested Commemorations: Republican War Veterans and Weimar Political Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Ahrends, Otto. Mit dem Regiment “Hamburg” in Frankreich 1914–1916. München: Verlag von Ernst Reinhardt, 1929.Google Scholar
Akademisches Wissenschaftliches Arbeitsamt. A.W.A. Gasschutz-Lehrgang. Berlin: Akademisches Wissenschaftliches Arbeitsamt e.V., 1932.Google Scholar
Dorn, Albrecht, and Staszewsky, , eds. Kriegstagebuch Der 6. Kompagnie 18. Rgl. Sächs.Inf.Regt. Nr. 192. Leipzig: Buchhandlung Sebr. Fändrich, 1930.Google Scholar
Alexander, Hans. Der Völkermord Im Kommenden Giftgas-Kriege. Wiesbaden: Westverlag D. Reisdorf & Co, 1926.Google Scholar
Aschoff, Ludwig. Über anatomische und histologische Befunde bei “Gas”- Vergiftungen. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, 1916.Google Scholar
Auer-Gesellschaft, . Schulungs- Und Lehrmittel Für Den Gasschutz. Berlin: Auergesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft, 1941.Google Scholar
Bauer, Max. Der Grosse Krieg in Feld Und Heimat. Tübingen: Osiander’sche Buchhandlung, 1922.Google Scholar
Becher, Johannes, (CHCl=CH)3As (Levisite) oder Der einzig gerechte Krieg. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Dora Sophie. “Die Waffen von Morgen.” Vossische Zeitung no. 303 (1925): 1–2.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Theories of German Fascism: On the Collection of Essays War and Warrior, Edited by Ernst Jünger.” New German Critique 17, Special Walter Benjamin Issue (Spring 1979): 120–128.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media. Edited by Jennings, Michael, Doherty, Brigid, and Levin, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Biha, Otto. “Der Proletarische Massenroman. Eine Neue Eine-Mark-Serie des ‘Internationalen Arbeiterverlages.’ ” Die Rote Fahne 178 (August 2, 1930).Google Scholar
Binding, Rudolf. A Fatalist at War. Translated by Ian F.D. Morrow. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1929.Google Scholar
Bruchmüller, Georg. Die Artillerie beim Angriff im Stellungskrieg. Berlin: Offene Worte, 1926.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Ferdinand, ed. Der Gefährliche Augenblick. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt Verlag, 1931.Google Scholar
Burr, Hans. Das Württemburgische Infatrie-Regiment Nr. 475 im Weltkrieg. Stuttgart: C. Belsersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1921.Google Scholar
Büscher, Hermann. Giftgas und wir?: Die Welt der Giftgase Wesen und Wirkung, Hilfe und Heilung. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1937.Google Scholar
Büscher, Hermann. Grün- und Gelbkreuz: Spezielle Pathologie und Therapie der Körperschädigungen durch die chemischen Kampfstoffe der Grünkreuz- (Phosgen und Perchlorameisensäuremethylester [Perstoff]) und der Gelbkreuz-Gruppe (Dichloraethylsulfid und β-Chlorvinylarsindichlorid [Lewisit]). Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, 1932.Google Scholar
Chemische Fabrik Stoltzenberg. “Instruktionskasten Fur Chemische Kampfstoffe Und Ihren Sanitatskoffer Fur Kampfgaserkrankungen,” n.d. Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. http://zbw.eu/beta/p20/company/42006/00002/about.en.html.Google Scholar
Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague, II) (29 Jul 1899), Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. www.opcw.org/cheimcal-weapons-convention/related-international-agreements/chemical-warfare-and-chemical-weapons/hague-convention-of-1899/.Google Scholar
Dehmel, Richard. Zwischen Volk und Menschheit: Kriegstagebuch von Richard Dehmel. Berlin: S. Fischer Verlag, 1919.Google Scholar
Döblin, Alfred. Berlin Alexanderplatz. Translated by Eugene Jolas. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1961.Google Scholar
Doebel, Peter, ed. “So Etwas Wie Weltuntergang”: Günter Goebel Kriegstagebücher 1939–1945. Mainz: C.P. Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar
Doering, Walther. Luftschutz Und Gasschutz: Markbuch Für Den Wehrfähigen, vol. 3. Breslau: Völkischer Verlag Walter Uttikal, 1934.Google Scholar
Dollen, Ingrid von der, ed. Briefe an Die Eltern von Hermann Boeddinghaus 1898–1941. Bad Honnef: KAT-Verlag, 2009.Google Scholar
Douhet, Giulio. The Command of the Air. Translated by Dino Ferrarri. Washington, DC: Air Force History and Museums Program, 1998.Google Scholar
Dräger Gasschutz Im Luftschutz: Individual-Gasschutz Kollektiv-Gasschutz; Charakter Des Chemischen Krieges Chemische Kampfstoffe; Organisation Des Luftschutzes Städtebau Und Luftschutz, vol. 2. Lübeck: Kommissionsverlag H.G. Rahtgens, 1933.Google Scholar
Duisberg, Carl. Meine Lebenserinnerungen. Edited by Puttkamer, Jesco v.. Leipzig: Philipp Reclam, 1933.Google Scholar
Ebeling, Fritz. Geschichte Des Infanterie Regiments Herzog Friedrich Wilhelm von Braunschweig Nr 78 Im Weltkriege. Berlin: Gerhard Stalling Verlag, 1924.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. Einstein on Politics: His Private Thoughts and Public Stands on Nationalism, Zionism, War, Peace, and the Bomb. Edited by Rowe, David E. and Schulmann, Robert. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Elsner, Richard, ed. Das Deutsche Drama: Ein Jahrbuch. Berlin-Pankow: Verlag der Deutschen Nationalbühne, 1929.Google Scholar
Fendrich, Anton. Mit Dem Auto an Der Front. Stuttgart: Franckh’sche Verlagshandlung, 1918.Google Scholar
Fessler, Gebele, and Prandtl. Gaskampstoffe Und Gasvergiftungen: Wie Schützen Wir Uns? München: Verlag der Ärtzlichen Rundschau, 1931.Google Scholar
Finzen, Dieter. “Kriegstagebuch: Das Tagebuch von Dieter Finzen Aus Beiden Weltkriegen.” The War Diaries of Dieter Finzen (blog), June 26, 2017. https://dieter-finzen.blogspot.com/search?q=gas.Google Scholar
Flury, Ferdinand, and Zernik, Franz. Schädliche Gase: Dämpfe, Nebel, Rauch- Und Staubarte. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1931.Google Scholar
Foerster, Wolfgang, ed. Wir Kämpfer im Weltkrieg: Feldzugsbriefe und Kriegstagebücher von Franktkämpfern aus dem Material des Reichsarchivs. Berlin: Neufeld & Henius Verlag, 1929.Google Scholar
Frauenholz, Eugen von, ed. Kronprinz Rupprecht von Bayern: Mein Kriegstagebuch. München: Deutscher National Verlag, 1929.Google Scholar
Fredewess-Wenstrup, Stephanie. Mutters Kriegstagebuch: Die Aufzeichnungen der Antonia Helming 1914–1922. Münster: Waxmann, 2005.Google Scholar
Frommhold, Hans. Luftschutzraum-Bauweisen. Berlin: Verlag Gasschutz und Luftschutz, 1939.Google Scholar
Gemeinhardt, K. “Gasschutz und Luftschutz der Zivilbevölkerung.” Archiv Der Pharmazie 270, no. 4 (1932): 232–246.Google Scholar
Geyer, Hermann. Der Weltkampf um Ehre und Recht: Der Seekrieg, der Krieg um die Kolonien, die Kampfhandlungen in der Türkei, der Gaskrieg, der Luftkrieg. Band 4. Leipzig: Alleinvertrieb durch Ernst Finking, 1922.Google Scholar
Göring, Hermann. Hermann Göring: Reden Und Aufsätze. Edited by Gritzbach, Erich. München: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1942.Google Scholar
Graus aus Schmechten, Karl. Elektrokardiographie Untersuchungen bei Belastun älterer Personen unter der Gasmaske. Höxter: Huxaria Druckerei und Verlagsanstalt, 1939.Google Scholar
Grimme, Hugo. Der Reichsluftschutzbund: Ziele, Leistungen Und Organisation. Berlin: Junker und Dünnhaupt Verlag, 1936.Google Scholar
Haase-Lampe, Wilhelm. Handbuch für das Grubenrettungsweser Sauerstoffretttungswesen und Gasschutz, Gerätebau und Organisation seit 1924. Lübeck: H.G. Rahtgens, 1929.Google Scholar
Haase-Lampe, Wilhelm Sauerstoffrettungswesen und Gasschutz Gerätebau und Organisation in ihrer internationalen Entwicklung: Gerätebau. Lübeck: H.G. Rahtgens, 1924.Google Scholar
Haber, Fritz. Fünf Vorträge Aus Den Jahren 1920–1923. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer, 1924.Google Scholar
Haeuber, E., and Gassert, G.. Der Kampf Um Den Luftschutz. Berlin: Verlag Deutscher Luftschutz, 1929.Google Scholar
Hahn, Otto. Mein Leben: Die Erringerung des grossen Atomforschers und Humanisten. München: Piper, 1986.Google Scholar
Hampe, Erich. Der Mensch Und Die Gase: Einführung in Die Gaskunde Und Anleitung Zum Gasschutz. Berlin: Räder-Verlag, 1932.Google Scholar
Hampe, Erich Der Mensch Und Die Gasgefahr: Einführung in Die Gaskunde Und Anleitung Zum Gasschutz. Berlin: Räder-Verlag, 1940.Google Scholar
Hampe, Erich Der Zivile Luftschutz Im Zweiten Weltkrieg: Dokumentation Und Erfahrungsberichte Über Aufbau Und Einsatz. Frankfurt: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar
Hänsel, Günter. Die Spätfolgen von Kampfgasvergiftungen an den Lungen und ihre versorgungsrechtliche Bewertung. Lippstadt: Thiele Lippstadt/Westf., 1934.Google Scholar
Hanslian, Rudolf Der deutsche Angriff bei Ypern am 22. April 1915. Berlin: Verlag Gasschutz und Luftschutz, 1934.Google Scholar
Hanslian, Rudolf Die Internationale Gasschutzkonferenz in Brüssel. München: Verlag für das gesamte Schiess- und Sprengstoffwesen, 1928.Google Scholar
Hanslian, Rudolf Vom Gaskrieg Zum Atomkrieg: Die Entwicklung Der Wissenschaftlichen Waffen. Stuttgart: Verlag Chemiker Zeitung, 1951.Google Scholar
Harder-Hamburg, Hans. “Der Gaskrieg Im Völkerrecht.” Die Friedens-Warte 27, no. 5 (1927): 137–139.Google Scholar
Hartley, Harold. “Report on German Chemical Warfare, Organisation and Policy, 1914–1918.” Public Record Office, Kew, WO 33 (A 2715) 1072.Google Scholar
Hartung, Wilhelm. Großkampf Männer und Granaten! Berlin: Verlag Tradition Wilhelm Kolk, 1930.Google Scholar
Heiber, Helmut, and Glantz, David M., eds. Hitler and His Generals: Military Conferences 1942–1945. New York: Enigma, 2003.Google Scholar
Helbig, Hans, and Sellien, E.. Der Luftschutz in Schulen Und Hochschulen: Eine Erläuterung Der LDv 755/2 Mit Einer Sammlung Der Einschlägigen Gesetze, Verordnungen, Erlasse. Berlin: Otto Stollberg, 1942.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Werner. Die Rote Fahne: Kritik, Theorie, Feuilleton 1918–1933. Edited by Brauneck, Manfred. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Rudolf, ed. Der deutsche Soldat: Briefe aus dem Weltkrieg. München: Albert Langen/Georg Müller, 1937.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Wilhelm. Die deutschen Ärzte im Weltkriege. Ihre Leistungen und Erfahrungen. Berlin: E.S. Mittler & Sohn, 1920.Google Scholar
Hugo Stoltzenberg Fabrik. “Gibt Es Ein Gaskampf?,” n.d. Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. http://zbw.eu/beta/p20/company/42006/00001/about.en.html.Google Scholar
Hulbert, Harold S. “Gas Neurosis Syndrome.” American Journal of Insanity LXXVII, no. 2 (October 1920): 213–216.Google Scholar
Hummel, Karl, and Schweinsberg, Friderich. Erste Hilfe Im Täglichen Leben Und Im Luftschutz. München: Dr. Friedrich Schwinsberg, 1936.Google Scholar
Hunke, Heinrich. Luftgefahr Und Luftschutz: Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung Des Deutschen Luftschutzes. Berlin: Verlag von E.S. Mittler & Sohn, 1935.Google Scholar
Imme, Theodor, Die deutsche Soldatensprache der Gegenwart und ihr Humor. Dortmund: Fr. Wilhelm Ruhfus, 1917.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl. General Psychopathology. Translated by J. Hoenig and Marian W. Hamilton. Vol. II. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jünger, Ernst. “Die Technik in Der Zukunftsschlacht.” Militär Wochenblatt 14, October 1, 1921.Google Scholar
Jünger, Ernst “On Danger.” In New German Critique, 59. New York: Telos Press, 1993, 27–33.Google Scholar
Jünger, Ernst “War and Photography.” In New German Critique, 59. New York: Telos Press, 1993, 24–27.Google Scholar
Jünger, Ernst Copse 125: A Chronicle from the Trench Warfare of 1918. Translated by Basil Creighton. New York: Zimmerman & Zimmerman, 1985.Google Scholar
Jünger, Ernst. The Worker: Dominion and Gestalt. Translated by Dirk Leach. Albany: SUNY Albany Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kalshoven, Hedda, ed. Between Two Homelands: Letters across the Borders of Nazi Germany. Translated by Peter Fritzsche and Hester Velmans. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Jerome G. “The German Reichstag Elections of July 31, 1932.” The American Political Science Review 26, no. 5 (1932): 921–926.Google Scholar
Kessel, Jürgen, ed. “Jezt gehts in die Männer mordende Schlacht…” Das Kriegstagebuch von Theodor Zuhöne 1914–1918. Damme: Heimatvereins, 2002.Google Scholar
Kessler, Harry. Berlin in Lights: The Diaries of Count Harry Kessler (1918–1937). Translated by Charles Kessler. New York: Grove Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Keun, Irmgard. After Midnight. Translated by Anthea Bell. Brooklyn: Melville House, 2011.Google Scholar
Kiesel, Helmuth, ed. Ernst Jünger Kriegstagebuch 1914–1918. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2010.Google Scholar
Knack, . “Kampfgasvergiftungen.” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrifft 43 (1917): 1246.Google Scholar
Knipfer, Kurt, and Hampe, Erich. “Der Zivile Luftschutz” Ein Sammelwerk Über Alle Fragen Des Luftschutzes. Berlin: Verlagsanstalt Otto Stollberg, 1937.Google Scholar
Knipfer, Kurt, and Burkhardt, Werner. Luftschutz in Bildern: Eine Gemeinverständliche Darstellung Des Gesamten Luftschutzes Für Jeden Volksgenossen. Berlin: Landsmann, 1935.Google Scholar
Kock, Oliver, ed. Das Tagebuch des Leutnants Nilius: Ostern 1916 bis 21.2.1918. Bayreuth: Scherzers-Militaer Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Krohne, Rudolf. Luftgefahr Und Luftschutzmöglichkeiten in Deutschland. Berlin: Verlag Deutscher Luftschutz, 1928.Google Scholar
Krüger, Friedrich. Der Luftschutz Für Jugend Und Schule. Leipzig: Verlag der Dürr’schen Buchhandlung, 1933.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Wilhelm. Luft- Und Gasschutz-Fibel Als Instruktion Für Die Hitler-Jugend Und B.D.M. Reichsjugendführung. Berlin, 1934.Google Scholar
Maier, Reinhold, ed. Feldpostbriefe Aus Dem Ersten Weltkrieg 1914–1918. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 1966.Google Scholar
Meyer, Andreas. It’s Not the Fatherland’s Fault!? – Keep the Letters for Later: Dr. Otto Meyer, from Gunner to Lieutenant, a German-Jewish War Career. Andreas Meyer, 2013.Google Scholar
Meyer, E, Sellien, E., and Borowietz, Pol-Major. Schule Und Luftschutz. München: Verlag von R. Oldenbourg, 1934.Google Scholar
Meyer, Julius. Der Gaskampf Und Die Chemischen Kampfstoffe. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel, 1925.Google Scholar
Mühsam, Erich. “Phosgen.” Fanal: Ararchistische Monatsschrift Jahrgang 2, Nummer 9 (June 1928): 208–210.Google Scholar
Müller-Kiel, Ulrich. Die Chemische Waffe: Im Weltkrieg Und Jetzt. Berlin: Verlag Chemie, GMBH, 1932.Google Scholar
Müller, Carl Werner. Verzicht auf Revanche: Das Kriegstagebuch 1914/18 des Divisionspfarrers der Landauer Gernison Dr. Anton Foohs. Speyer: Pfälizische Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften, 2010.Google Scholar
Muntsch, Otto. “Beiträge Zur Behandlung der Hautschädigungen Durch Dichloräthylsulfid.” In Med. Dissertationen Der Bayer Julius-Maximilians-Universität Zu Würzburg, 1–41. Würzburg: C.J. Becker Universitäts-Druckerei, 1928.Google Scholar
Muntsch, Otto. Leitfaden Der Pathologie Und Therapie Der Kampfstofferkrankungen. Leipzig: Georg Thieme, 1939.Google Scholar
Nestler, Waldus. “Collective and Individual Protection.” In Chemical Warfare: An Abridged Report of Papers Read at an International Conference at Frankfurt am Main. London: Williams & Norgate, 1930.Google Scholar
Olmütz-Luttein, . Die Gasmaske: Auszüge Aus Den in Den Gas- u. Luftschutzkursen in Olmütz-Luttein Vorgetragenen Vorträgen. Olmütz-Luttein: Olmütz-Luttein Verlag Chema, 1936.Google Scholar
Orts-Gruppe Heidenheim des Reichsluftschutzbundes, ed. Die Luftschutzgrundschule: Ein Laitfaden Für Die Schulung Im Luftschutz. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag, 1937.Google Scholar
Pfuhl, Karl Helmut. Gaskrieg Und Völkerrecht. Würzburg: Handelsdruckerei Würzburg, 1930.Google Scholar
Pick, Friedel. “Über Erkrankungen Durch Kampfgase.” Zentralblatt Für Innere Medizin 39, no. 20 (1918): 305–310.Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth. The Limits of Community: A Critique of Social Radicalism. Translated by Andrew Wallace. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Reck, Friedrich. Diary of a Man in Despair. Translated by Paul Rubens. New York: New York Review of Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Reichsluftschutzbund, . Luftschutz Ist Selbstbehauptungswille: Aufgaben Und Erfahrungen Über Die Ausbildung Im Zivilen Luftschutz. Berlin: Reichsluftschutzbund RLB, 1936.Google Scholar
Reimann, Günther. Giftgas in Deutschland: Die Machtstellung der I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. Berlin: Vereinigung Internationaler Verlagsanstalten, 1927.Google Scholar
Riedel, Freider, ed. Cornelius Breuninger: Kriegstagebuch 1914–1918. Leinfelden-Echterdingen: Numea Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Rosten, Curt. Was Man Vom Luftschutz Wissen Muss. Berlin: Verlag Deutsche Kultur-Wacht, 1935.Google Scholar
Rothe, Hans. “Die Liebe mit der Gasmaske.” Die Literarische Welt 7, no. 7 (1931): 5–6.Google Scholar
Sauter, Robert, ed. Ich setze mich nieder und schreibe. Gregor: Eine Lebensgeschichte zum Ersten Weltkrieg. Plaidt: Cardamina Verlag, 2014.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Walter. Das 7. Badische Infantrie-Regiment Nr. 142 im Weltkrieg 1914/18. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder Verlag, 1927.Google Scholar
Schneider, Karl. Blutgase und Kreislauf bei Arbeit under der Gasmaske. Würzburg, Universitätsdruckerei H. Stürtz A.G. Würzburg, 1939.Google Scholar
Schröder, Richard, von Fichte, Hans, Pomplum-Breslau, Karl, Schaefer, Klaus, and Bark, Kurt Oskar, eds. Luftschutz : Die Deutsche Schicksalsfrage. Stuttgart: Verlag Heinrich Plesken, 1934.Google Scholar
Schuster, Harald. Die Aufnahmeleistung von Atemfiltern und ihre Bedingtheiten. Lübeck: Heinr. & Bernh. Draeger, 1936.Google Scholar
Schütt, K. Die Chemischen Und Physikalischen Grundlagen des Luftschutzes in der Schule. Berlin: C.J.E Volckmann Nachf., 1935.Google Scholar
Schütter, Theo, ed. Feldpostbriefe Kriegstagebuch 1914–1918. Werne: Ventura Verlag Magnus See, 2009.Google Scholar
Schwarte, Max. Die militärischen Lehren des Grossen Krieges. Berlin: Ernst Siegfried Mittler und Sohn, 1920.Google Scholar
Schweisheimer, W. “Die Medizinischen Grundlagen Des Giftgaskrieges.” Militär Wochenblatt 17, no. 110 (1925): 577–582.Google Scholar
Shirer, William L. Berlin Diary: The Journal of a Foreign Correspondent, 1934–1941. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Speer, Albert. Inside the Third Reich. Translated by Richard and Clara Winston. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1970.Google Scholar
Spengler, Oswald. Man and Technics: A Contribution to the Philosophy of Life. Translated by Charles Francis Atkinson. New York: Greenwood Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Steuernagel, Konrad. Kriegstagebuch 1914/1918 des II. Batls. Ref.=Inf.=Regts. Nr. 221. Worms am Rhein, 1937.Google Scholar
Stoltzenberg-Bergius, Margarete. Was Jeder Vom Gaskampf Und Den Chemischen Kampfstoffen Wissen Sollte. Hamburg: Chemische Fabrik Stoltzenberg, 1930.Google Scholar
Stoltzenberg, Hugo. Experimente Und Demonstrationen Zum Luftschutz. Hamburg: Hugo Stoltzenberg Fabrik, 1933.Google Scholar
Stoltzenberg, Hugo. Anleitung Zur Herstellung von Ultra Giften. Hamburg: Norwi-Druck, 1930.Google Scholar
Teetzmann, Otto A. Der Luftschutz Leitfaden Für Alle. Berlin: Verlag des Reichsluftschutzbundes, 1935.Google Scholar
Tempelhoff, Friedrich von. Gaswaffe Und Gasabwehr: Einführung in Die Gastaktik. Berlin: Verlag von E.S. Mittler & Sohn, 1937.Google Scholar
The Avalon Project, Laws of War: Declaration on the Use of Projectiles the Object of Which is the Diffusion of Asphyxiating or Deleterious Gases; July 29, 1899, Published 2008. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/dec99–02.asp.Google Scholar
The Treaty of Versailles. www.loc.gov/law/help/us-treaties/bevans/m-ust000002-0043.pdf.Google Scholar
Tochenhausen, Friedrich von, ed. Wehrgedanken: Eine Sammlung Wehrpolitischer Aufsätze. Hamburg: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt, 1933.Google Scholar
Viktorit-Antiplyn, eds. Was Ein Jeder Über Die Gasmaske Wissen Soll Und Muss. Brünn: Viktoria Gummiindustrie, 1933.Google Scholar
Weber, Josef. Das Neue Handbuch Für Den Luftschutz: Ein Buch Für Jedermann! Berlin: J. Weber Buch-Verlag, 1935.Google Scholar
Woker, Gertrud. “Die Gaskampfinteressenten.” Die Friedens-Warte 27, no. 2 (February 1927): 41–42.Google Scholar
Woker, Gertrud. “Die Wahrheit Über Den Gaskrieg.” Die Friedens-Warte 27, no. 1 (1927): 5–8.Google Scholar
Woker, Gertrud. “Im Zeichen der Wissenschaft dem Abgrund Entgegen. (Betrachtungen Zum Chemischen Krieg).” Die Friedens-Warte 25, no. 1 (January 1925): 12–20.Google Scholar
Woker, Gertrud. Wissenschaft Und Wissenschaftlicher Krieg. Zürich: Zentralstelle für Friedensarbeit, 1925.Google Scholar
Woker, Getrud. “Ueber Giftgaskrieg.” Die Friedens-Warte 23, no. 11/12 (November 1923): 393–395.Google Scholar
Zweig, Stefan. Stefan Zweig Briefe 1932–1942. Edited by Beck, Knut and Berlin, Jeffrey B.. Frankfurt: S. Fischer Verlag, 2005.Google Scholar