Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:53:59.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Lessons Learned Conducting Online Qualitative Interviews during Covid-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

By
Sally Lindsay ,
Hiba Ahmed ,
Vanessa Tomas  and
Abirami Vijaykaumar
Edited by
Paul M.W. Hackett ,
Christopher M. Hayre ,
Dave Muller ,
Marcia Scherer  and
Ava Gordley-Smith
Paul M.W. Hackett
Affiliation:
Emerson College, Boston
Christopher M. Hayre
Affiliation:
The University of Canberra
Dave Muller
Affiliation:
Suffolk University, Massachusetts
Marcia Scherer
Affiliation:
University of Rochester Medical Center, New York
Ava Gordley-Smith
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

During the COVID-19 pandemic, collecting data online was the only option for many researchers. This chapter describes the barriers to, advantages of, and key lessons learned in conducting online interviews during the pandemic. We draw on a qualitative study focusing on employment experiences during the pandemic among youth with and without disabilities. Thirty interviews were conducted synchronously via Zoom. Barriers to conducting online interviews included technical difficulties and some challenges with building rapport. Benefits of conducting online interviews included greater efficiency and flexibility, technical advantages, and perceived anonymity and privacy. Key lessons learned in conducting online interviews included testing equipment in advance and having a back-up recorder, giving participants questions in advance or having it on the shared screen, and providing technical information to participants in an easy-to-understand format.

Keywords

online interviewspandemicqualitativeyouth
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
The Role and Management of Digital Methods
 , pp. 87 - 106
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archibald, M., Ambagtsheer, R., Casey, M., and Lawless, M. (2019) “Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, R. and Mewse, A. (2012) “Evaluating internet interviews with gay men,” Sage Internet Research Methods, 19(4), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309332121.Google Scholar
Best, P., McConnell, T., Davidson, G., Badham, J., and Neill, R. (2019) “Group based video-conferences for adults with depression: Findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation,” Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(40). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0173-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstynsky, J. 2020. Zoom shares pop after users grow from 200 million to 300 million in a matter of days. CNBC News. www.cnbc.com/2020/04/23/zoom-shares-pop-after-users-grow-from-to-300-million.html.Google Scholar
Campbell, M., Meier, A., Carr, C., et al. (2001) “Health behaviour changes after colon cancer: A comparison of findings from face-to-face and online focus groups,” Family & Community Health, 24(3), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. (2007) “Going beyond our limits: Issues for able and disabled students,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(1), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. and Poth, C. (2017) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Deakin, H. and Wakefield, K. (2014) “Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers,” Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, E., Hines, D., Dixon, L., Celi, E., and Lysova, A. (2021) “Using technology to conduct focus groups with a hard-to-reach population: A methodological approach concerning male victims of partner abuse in four English-speaking countries,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(9–10), 5257–5280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmir, R., Schmied, V., Jackson, D., and Wilkes, L. (2011) “Interviewing people on potentially sensitive topics,” Nurse Researcher, 19, 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Ontario (2021) All Ontario: Case numbers and spread. Available at: https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data (Accessed: May 3 2021).Google Scholar
Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G., and Cook, K. (2020) “Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications,” The Qualitative Report, 25, 1292–1301.Google Scholar
Han, J., Torok, M., Gale, N., et al. (2019) “Use of web conferencing technology for conducting online focus groups among young people with lived experience of suicidal thoughts: Mixed methods research,” Journal of Medical Internet Research Mental Health, 6(10), e14191.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2021) “Looking at the field through a zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducing online research during a global pandemic,” Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazmer, M. and Xie, B. (2008) “Qualitative interviewing in internet studies: Playing with the method,” Information, Communication & Society, 11(2), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouwel, M., Jolly, K., and Greenfield, S. (2019) “Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome: An exploratory comparative analysis,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, S. (2010) “Disability and the digital divide: Gaps and future directions,” in Evans, C. (ed.) Internet Issues: Blogging, Digital Divide and Digital Libraries (pp. 215–20). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Lindsay, S., Ahmed, A., and Apostolopoulos, D. (2021) “Facilitators for coping with the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study comparing youth with and without disabilities,” Disability and Health, 14(4), 10113.Google ScholarPubMed
Lobe, B., Morgan, D. and Hoffman, K. (2020) “Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, C. and Stewart, F. (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, D. and Ide, B. (2014) “Adapting qualitative research strategies to technology savvy adolescents,” Nurse Researcher, 21(5), 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, M., Dietrich, A., Strickland, O., and Myerburg, S. (2003) “Using internet discussion boards as virtual focus groups,” Advances in Nursing Science, 26(4), 274–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Namey, E., Guest, G., O’Regan, A., et al. (2019) “How does mode of qualitative data collection affect data and cost? Findings from a quasi-experimental study,” Field Methods, 32(1), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neville, S., Adams, J., and Cook, C. (2016) “Using internet-based approaches to collect qualitative data from vulnerable groups: Reflections from the field,” Contemporary Nurse, 52(6), 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, H. and Madge, C. (2017) The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reissman, C. (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. California: Sage.Google Scholar
Salmons, J. (2012) “Designing and conducting research with online interviews,” in Cases in Online Interview Research, Sage [Online]. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/cases-in-online-interview-research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapka, J., Domene, J., Khan, S., and Yang, L. (2016) “Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data evidence,” Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyay, U. and Lipkovich, H. (2020) “Using online technologies to improve diversity and inclusion in cognitive interviews with young people,” BMC Medical Research Sage. Methodology, 20(159), 1–10.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, U. and Lipkovich, H. (2020) “Using online technologies to improve diversity and inclusion in cognitive interviews with young people,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(159), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wettergren, L., Eriksson, L., Nilsson, J., Jervaeus, A., and Lampic, C. (2016) “Online focus group discussion is a valid and feasible mode when investigating sensitive topics among young persons with a cancer experience,” Journal of Medical Internet Research Protocols, 5(2), e86.Google ScholarPubMed
Wettergren, L., Eriksson, L., Nilsson, J., Jervaeus, A., and Lampic, C. (2016) “Online focus group discussion is a valid and feasible mode when investigating sensitive topics among young persons with a cancer experience,” Journal of Medical Internet Research Protocols, 5(2), e86.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilkerson, J., Iantaffi, A., Grey, J., Bockting, W., and Rosser, B. (2014) “Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-research populations,” Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodyatt, C., Finneran, C., and Stephenson, R. (2016) “In-person versus online focus group discussions: A comparative analysis of data quality,” Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 741–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zolyomi, A., Begel, A., Waldern, J., et al. (2019) “Managing stress: The needs of autistic adults in video calling,” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×