Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The continuing need for a strong European Union in the foreseeable future
- Chapter 2 An assessment of the present situation of the European Union
- Chapter 3 First option: substantially revising the European Union treaties
- Chapter 4 Second option: continuing on the present path while developing further closer cooperation
- Chapter 5 Third option: politically progressing towards a two-speed Europe
- Chapter 6 Fourth option: legally building a two-speed Europe
- Conclusion
- Further reading
- Index
Foreword
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The continuing need for a strong European Union in the foreseeable future
- Chapter 2 An assessment of the present situation of the European Union
- Chapter 3 First option: substantially revising the European Union treaties
- Chapter 4 Second option: continuing on the present path while developing further closer cooperation
- Chapter 5 Third option: politically progressing towards a two-speed Europe
- Chapter 6 Fourth option: legally building a two-speed Europe
- Conclusion
- Further reading
- Index
Summary
I recall it being said of a legendary former Director General of the Legal Service of the Commission of the European Union that it was as if the Commission had an extra Member. What, then, is one to say of the legendary former Director General of the Legal Service of the Council – the author of this study? That during his tenure it was as if the Council had an extra Member State? If power and influence were the measure, I would have no problem with such a statement as long as it was not a Malta or an Estonia that one had in mind, but one of the ‘biggies’: a France or a Germany or, perhaps, a United Kingdom. It is difficult to overstate the mark of Jean-Claude Piris on the fortunes of Europe. Cast your mind to any major development, challenge or crisis in recent Union history – whether the Charter of Fundamental Rights or the deliciously bureaucratically named Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the large fingerprints of Jean-Claude Piris will be detected. Never at the forefront, but ever present. It is not only in Praxis that Piris has left his mark. Peruse the pages of the European literature and his writing stands out – it was quite laughable when he tried to hide behind a pseudonym: Justus Lipsius. The consummate political-legal fixer has not only a distinct style, direct with a touch of irony, but is refreshingly politically incorrect, compared with the typically smooth, Barbie-style spin-doctors of the European bureaucracy.
That Europe is in crisis – the travails of the euro actually mask how deep and structural the crisis runs – is a common place. Lisbon?, the Constitutional-Mountain-turned-into-Molehill-except-the-Mountain-was-a-Molehill-to-begin-with, is more the problem than a solution. If you wish to read one of the most incisive analyses of the current circumstance of Europe (grim), you will find it here. If you wish to read an equally incisive analysis of the various institutional options (grimmer), you will find that here too. But Piris is no Cassandra. You will also find one the most incisive analyses of the indispensability of the European construct for the future welfare of European citizens and their Member States. What, then, to do with the willing patient betrayed by the ageing organs? Where is the Viagra going to come from?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Future of EuropeTowards a Two-Speed EU?, pp. viii - ixPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 1
- Cited by