This chapter makes a conceptual and empirical case for empowered participatory jurisprudence (EPJ), a hybrid approach to the justiciability of socioeconomic rights (SERs) that brings together normative and democratic experimentalist theories of adjudication. EPJ’s institutional mechanisms entail a strong affirmation of rights, moderate court orders and strong monitoring of the implementation of those orders. Conceptually, EPJ is an instance of bounded democratic experimentalism, whereby courts act as catalysts of collective and iterative processes of collective problem solving. Such processes take place within the legal parameters of substantive SERs, on the one hand, and procedural (enabling) rights, on the other hand. The latter are meant to facilitate the empowered participation of victims of SER violations and their allies, as well as other sources of countervailing power in the implementation of court orders and relevant socioeconomic policies. Empirically, the chapter sketches a case study of the right to food case in India, which, it is argued, exemplifies several EPJ institutional principles and mechanisms.