Concentrating solar thermal power

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511718786.025

21 - Concentrating solar thermal power

from Part 3 - Renewable energy sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Abraham Kribus

Edited by

David S. Ginley and

David Cahen

Show author details

Abraham Kribus: Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
David S. Ginley: Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
David Cahen: Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Focus

Power generation from solar energy by thermomechanical conversion is a major path for creating clean renewable power, while building on the mature technology base of conventional power plants. This solar technology was the first for which it was possible to demonstrate full-scale power plants (using Luz parabolic troughs built in California during the 1980s). With plants generating several thousands of megawatts currently in operation and under construction around the world, concentrating solar thermal power is fast becoming a mainstream solar power technology.

Synopsis

Solar thermal power generation includes three conversion steps: from solar radiation to heat, from heat to mechanical work, and from work to electricity. The last two steps are well known from conventional power plants, with the leading technologies being heat engines based on the steam cycle and the gas turbine cycle. A solar thermal plant can use these mature heat-engine technologies with the replacement of fuel-fired heat by “solar-fired” heat. Providing heat from solar energy at the appropriate temperatures requires concentration of the sunlight, because, otherwise, heat losses to the environment are too high. The leading concentration methods are linear concentrators (parabolic trough and linear Fresnel), towers with heliostat fields, and parabolic dishes, each of which is suitable for a range of operating temperatures and types of heat engine. Considering the inherent energy losses in the process of concentration, the overall solar plant efficiency (from collected solar radiation to electricity) is typically in the range 15%–25%, with the best systems reaching around 30%.

Type: Chapter
Information: Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability , pp. 272 - 288

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511718786.025 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Reda, I.Andreas, A. 2004 “Solar position algorithm for solar radiation applications,”Solar Energy 76 577CrossRef Google Scholar

Winston, R.Minano, J. C.Benitez, P. G. 2005 Nonimaging OpticsNew YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar

Fernandez-Garcia, A.Zarza, E.Valenzuela, L.Perez, M. 2010 “Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications,”Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 1695CrossRef Google Scholar

Kennedy, C. E. 2002 Review of Mid- to High-Temperature Solar Selective Absorber MaterialsNRELhttp://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/31267.pdfCrossRef Google Scholar

Zarza, E. 2004 “Direct steam generation in parabolic troughs final results and conslusions of the DISS project,”Energy 29 635CrossRef Google Scholar

Kearney, D. 2004 “Engineering aspects of a molten salt heat transfer fluid in a trough solar field,”Energy 29 861CrossRef Google Scholar

Fend, T.Pitz-Paal, R.Reutter, O.Bauer, J.Hoffschmidt, B. 2004 “Two novel high-porosity materials as volumetric receivers for concentrated solar radiation,”Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 84 291CrossRef Google Scholar

Karni, J.Kribus, A.Rubin, R.Doron, P. 1998 “The ‘Porcupine’: a novel high-flux absorber for volumetric solar receivers,”J. Solar Energy Eng 120 85CrossRef Google Scholar

Stine, W. B.Geyer, M. 2001 http://www.powerfromthesun.net/book.htm

Fricker, H. W. 2004 “Regenerative thermal storage in atmospheric air system solar power plants,”Energy 29 871CrossRef Google Scholar

Pacheco, J. E.Showalter, S. K.Kolb, W. J. 2002 “Development of a molten-salt thermocline thermal storage system for parabolic trough plants,”J. Solar Energy Eng 124 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Steinmann, W. D.Tamme, R. 2008 “Latent heat storage for solar steam systems,”J. Solar Energy Eng 130 011004CrossRef Google Scholar

Schnatbaum, L. 2009 “Solar thermal power plants,”Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 176 127CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwarzboezl, P.Buck, R.Sugarmen, C.Ring, A.Crespo, M. J.Altwegg, P.Enrile, J. 2006 “Solar gas turbine systems: design, cost and perspectives,”Solar Energy 80 1231CrossRef Google Scholar

Breyer, C.Knies, G. 2009 “Global energy supply potential of concentrating solar power,”SolarPACES 2009BerlinGoogle Scholar

Philibert, C. 2010 http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/csp_roadmap.pdf

Wagner, M. J.Kutscher, C. F. 2010 “Assessing the impact of heat rejection technology on CSP plant revenue,”SolarPACES 2010PerpignanFrancehttp://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49369.pdfGoogle Scholar PubMed

Stoddard, L.Abiecunas, J.O'Connell, R. 2006 Economic, Energy, and Environmental Benefits of Concentrating Solar Power in CaliforniaNRELCrossRef Google Scholar

Kennedy, C. E.Terwilliger, K. 2005 “Optical durability of candidate solar reflectors,”J. Solar Energy Eng 127 262CrossRef Google Scholar

Karni, J.Kribus, A.Ostraich, B.Kochavi, E. 1998 “A high-pressure window for volumetric solar receivers,”J. Solar Energy Eng 120 101CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiss, W.Mauthner, F. 2010 Solar Heat Worldwide: Markets and Contribution to the Energy Supply 2008IEA Solar Heating & Cooling ProgrammeGoogle Scholar