Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:12:40.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration

from Part 1 - Energy and the environment: the global landscape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Sally M. Benson
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
David S. Ginley
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado
David Cahen
Affiliation:
Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
Get access

Summary

Focus

A transition to a low-carbon economy can be facilitated by CO2 capture and sequestration. This chapter focuses on capture of carbon dioxide from industrial emission sources such as electricity generation and sequestration in deep geological formations. A detailed description of the technology is provided, including the potential scale of application, estimated costs, assessment of risks, and emerging research issues.

Synopsis

Today, 60% of global CO2 emissions come from large point sources such as power plants, refineries, cement plants, and steel mills. Reducing emissions from these sources will require reducing demand for the services or materials they provide, finding alternative ways to provide similar services with lower carbon dioxide emissions, or directly reducing emissions by capturing and sequestering emissions. Technology to capture carbon dioxide is available today, but capturing and sequestering CO2 will increase the cost of electricity production by an estimated 50%–100% compared with today's generating costs. Moreover, an estimated increase of 15%–30% of the primary energy supply needed to deliver these services or goods would be required. Captured carbon dioxide can be sequestered in deep geological formations, either onshore or offshore. Sedimentary basins are the preferred location for carbon dioxide sequestration, since they are known to contain both the porous and permeable sandstone formations needed to sequester CO2 and low-permeability rocks such as shale that can trap CO2 for geological time periods of millions of years. The estimated capacity for sequestering CO2 is large and expected to be sufficient for at least 100 years of needed demand. However, the actual capacity for safe and environmentally benign sequestration remains uncertain, since CO2 sequestration has been employed for little more than a decade and only on a small scale. Nevertheless, the basic technologies for sequestration and performance prediction are mature, building on nearly a century of oil and gas production, natural-gas storage, CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR), and acid gas disposal. Enhancements of these technologies will arise as geological sequestration itself matures – but they are sufficiently developed to initiate sequestration today. Regulatory and legal issues remain to be resolved, including issues such as permits for sequestration-project siting, well drilling, and completion, operational parameters such as maximum injection pressures, ownership of underground power space, supremacy of mineral or groundwater rights, and liability for long-term stewardship. Resolving these issues and gaining support for this approach from the public are likely to be the greatest challenges for implementing CO2 capture and sequestration on a meaningful scale.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

IPCC 2006 Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and StorageCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Benson, S. M. 2005 Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geological Formations – Results from the CO2Capture Project. Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationOxfordElsevierGoogle Scholar
Buesseler, K. O.Andrews, J. E.Pike, S. M.Charette, M. A. 2004 “The effects of iron fertilization on carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean,”Science 304 414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppi, P.Sedjo, R. 2001 “Technological and economic potential of options to enhance, maintain, and manage biological carbon reserves and geo-engineering,”Climate Change 2001: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeMetz, B.Davidson, O.Swart, R.Pan, J.CambridgeCambridge University Press301Google Scholar
IEA 2010
Smil, V. 2010 Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, ProspectsSanta Barbara, CAPraeger PressGoogle Scholar
Riahi, K.Dentener, F.Gielen, D. 2011 “Energy transition pathways for sustainable development,”Global Energy AssessmentCambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
IEA 2004 A Review of Global Capacity Estimates for the Geological Storage of Carbon DioxideIEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Technical Review (TR4)Google Scholar
Torp, T. A.Gale, J. 2003 “Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: the Sleipner and SACS projects,”Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6)Gale, J.Kaya, Y.Amsterdam, Pergamon311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddiford, F. A.Tourqui, A.Bishop, C. D.Taylor, B.Smith, M. 2003 “A cleaner development: the In Salah Gas Project, Algeria,”Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6)Gale, J.Kaya, Y.Amsterdam, Pergamon601Google Scholar
Moberg, R.Stewart, D. B.Stachniak, D. 2003 “The IEA Weyburn CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project,”Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6)Gale, J.Kaya, Y.Amsterdam, Pergamon219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. C.Kerr, H. R. 2005 “The CO2 Capture Project Introduction,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 1: Capture and Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Combustion SourcesThomas, D. C.LondonElsevier Science1Google Scholar
Chiesa, P.Consonni, S.Kreutz, T.Williams, R. 2005 “Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions,”Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 30 747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotzak, G.Shilling, N. Z.Simons, G.Yackly, K. 2005 “An evaluation of conversion of gas turbines to hydrogen fuel,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 1: Capture and Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Combustion SourcesThomas, D. C.LondonElsevier Science427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, G.Chu, R.Degen, B. 2005 “CO2 Removal from power plant flue gas – cost efficient design and integration study,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 1: Capture and Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Combustion SourcesThomas, D. C.LondonElsevier Science99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miracca, I.Aasen, K. I.Brownsecombe, T.Gerdes, K.Simmonds, M. 2005 “Oxygen combustion for CO2 capture technology,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 1: Capture and Separation of Carbon Dioxide from Combustion SourcesThomas, D. C.LondonElsevier Science99Google Scholar
Holloway, S. 1996 The Underground Disposal of Carbon DioxideBritish Geological Survey, KeyworthNottinghamGoogle Scholar
Gunter, W. D.Bachu, S.Benson, S. 2004 “The role of hydrogeological and geochemical trapping in sedimentary basins for secure geological storage for carbon dioxide,”Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide: TechnologyBaines, S.Worden, R. H.LondonGeological Society129Google Scholar
Hepple, R.Benson, S. M. 2005 “Geologic storage of carbon dioxide as a climate change mitigation strategy: performance requirements for surface seepage,”Environmental Geol. 47 576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oen, P. M. 2003 “The development of the Greater Gorgon Gas Fields,”APPEA J. 43 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, B.Silver, E. 2002 “The evolution and present state of tree-kills on Mammoth Mountain, California: tracking volcanogenic CO2 and its lethal effects,”Proceedings of the 2002 AVIRIS Airborne Geoscience WorkshopJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyPasadena, CAGoogle Scholar
Perry, K. F. 2005 “Natural gas storage industry experience and technology: potential application to CO2 geological storage,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationBenson, S. M.LondonElsevier Science815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apps, J. 2005 “The regulatory climate governing the disposal of liquid wastes in deep geologic formations: a paradigm for regulations for the subsurface disposal of CO2,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationBenson, S. M.LondonElsevier Science1163Google Scholar
Bachu, S.Haug, K. 2005 “In-situ characteristics of acid-gas injection operations in the Alberta basin, western Canada: demonstration of CO2 geological storage,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationBenson, S. M.LondonElsevier Science867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, S. M. 2005 “Lessons learned from industrial and natural analogs for health, safety and environmental risk assessment for geologic storage of carbon dioxide,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationBenson, S. M.LondonElsevier Science1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasda, S. E.Bachu, S.Celia, M. A. 2004 “The potential for CO2 leakage from storage sites in geological media: analysis of well distribution in mature sedimentary basins,”Environmental Geol. 46 707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burruss, R. 2004 Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide in the Next 50 Years: An Energy Resource PerspectiveWashington, DCPew CenterGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, R. A.Arts, R.Eiken, O. 2005 “4D Seismic quantification of a growing CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea,”Petroleum Geology: North West Europe and Global Perspectives – Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology ConferenceDore, A. G.Vining, B.LondonGeological Society15Google Scholar
Hovorka, S. D.Benson, S. M.Doughty, C. 2005
White, D. 2005 “Theme 2: prediction, monitoring and verification of CO2 movements,”Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7)Wilson, M.Monea, M.Amsterdam, Pergamon73
Miles, N.Davis, K.Wyngaard, J. 2005 “Detecting leaks from CO2 reservoirs using micrometeorological methods,”Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations – Results from the CO2 Capture Project, Volume 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and VerificationBenson, S. M.LondonElsevier Science1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krevor, S. C.Perrin, J. -C.Esposito, A.Rella, C.Benson, S. 2010 2132
Rubin, E.Rao, A. 2004 “Uncertainties in CO2 capture and sequestration costs,”Proceedings of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 6th International Conference (GHGT-6)Gale, J.Kaya, Y.LondonElsevier Science1119Google Scholar
Herzog, H. 1999 “The economics of CO2 capture,”Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control technologiesEliason, B.Reimer, P.Wokaun, A.Oxford, PergamonGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration
    • By Sally M. Benson, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Edited by David S. Ginley, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, David Cahen, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  • Book: Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511718786.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration
    • By Sally M. Benson, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Edited by David S. Ginley, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, David Cahen, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  • Book: Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511718786.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Carbon dioxide capture and sequestration
    • By Sally M. Benson, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Edited by David S. Ginley, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado, David Cahen, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel
  • Book: Fundamentals of Materials for Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511718786.010
Available formats
×