Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- INTRODUCTION
- PART I INTRODUCTION TO THE CONVENTION SYSTEM
- PART II VERTICALISED CASES UNRAVELLED
- PART III PROBLEMS IN VERTICALISED CASES
- PART IV TOWARDS A NEW APPROACH TO VERTICALISED CASES
- CONCLUSION
- Summary in Dutch
- Bibliography
- Appendix 1 Overview case law sample
- Curriculum Vitae
- Human Rights Research Series
Chapter 9 - Current Third-party Intervention Procedure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Acknowledgments
- Contents
- INTRODUCTION
- PART I INTRODUCTION TO THE CONVENTION SYSTEM
- PART II VERTICALISED CASES UNRAVELLED
- PART III PROBLEMS IN VERTICALISED CASES
- PART IV TOWARDS A NEW APPROACH TO VERTICALISED CASES
- CONCLUSION
- Summary in Dutch
- Bibliography
- Appendix 1 Overview case law sample
- Curriculum Vitae
- Human Rights Research Series
Summary
INTRODUCTION
As explained above, the proposal for a new approach to verticalised cases presented here is directed at the third-party intervention procedure. However, a proposal to redesign this procedure cannot be made without taking full account of the features of the current procedure. Hence, this chapter introduces the rules governing the procedure, the various forms of third-party intervention allowed under the Convention, and the current third-party intervention practice before the Court. An overview of the current procedural requirements is presented in Section 2, followed by a discussion of the various forms of third-party intervention allowed under the Convention (Section 3), and, finally, a discussion of how third-party interventions influence the Court's case law (Section 4).
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
Before Protocol No. 11 to the Convention entered into force in 1998, the Convention did not contain a provision on third-party intervention, even though the Court had allowed a third party to intervene as early as 1979. This was in the case of Winterwerp, which concerned the compulsory confinement of a psychiatric patient. In this case against the Netherlands, the Court granted the United Kingdom leave to intervene on the basis of the Court's competence to ‘hear as a witness or expert in any other capacity any person whose evidence or statements seem likely to assist in the carrying out of its task’. In 1983, the Court provided a separate legal basis for third-party interventions in its Rules of Court. This was followed by the entering into force of Protocol No. 11 in 1998, which ensured that the third-party intervention procedure was codified in the Convention. The procedure is now laid down in Article 36 ECHR, which reads as follows:
1. In all cases before a Chamber or the Grand Chamber, a High Contracting Party one of whose nationals is an applicant shall have the right to submit written comments and to take part in hearings.
2. The President of the Court may, in the interest of the proper administration of justice, invite any High Contracting Party which is not a party to the proceedings or any person concerned who is not the applicant to submit written comments or take part in hearings.
3. In all cases before a Chamber or the Grand Chamber, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights may submit written comments and take part in hearings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fundamental Rights Violations by Private Actors and the Procedure before the European Court of Human RightsA Study of Verticalised Cases, pp. 169 - 186Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2022