Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:31:47.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2024

Joshua Paine
Joshua Paine
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Functions of International Adjudication and International Environmental Litigation , pp. 294 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Saab, G, ‘The Normalization of International Adjudication: Convergence and Divergencies’ (2010) 43 NYUJILP 1.Google Scholar
Adede, AO, The System for Settlement of Disputes under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff 1987).Google Scholar
Akhtarkhavari, A, Global Governance of the Environment: Environmental Principles and Change in International Law and Politics (Edward Elgar 2011).Google Scholar
Aljaghoub, MM, The Advisory Function of the International Court of Justice 1946–2005 (Springer 2006).Google Scholar
Allen, BE, ‘The Use of Non-Pecuniary Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement: Lessons for Arbitral Practitioners’ in Schneider, Michael E and Knoll, Joachim (eds), Performance as a Remedy: Non-monetary Relief in International Arbitration (Juris 2011).Google Scholar
Allott, P, ‘Mare Nostrum: A New International Law of the Sea’ (1992) 86 AJIL 764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, KJ, The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (Princeton University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, ‘The High Water Mark of International Judicialization?’, iCourts Working Paper Series no 250, 2021.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, ‘The International Court of Justice in Comparison: Understanding the Court’s Limited Influence’ (2021) 21 MJIL 676.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Gathii, JT and Helfer, LR, ‘Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences’ (2016) 27 EJIL 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JE, International Organizations as Law-Makers (OUP 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JE, The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Martinus Nijhoff 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, JE, ‘Is Investor-State Arbitration “Public”?’ (2016) 7 JIDS 534.Google Scholar
Alvarez, JE, The Impact of International Organizations on International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, RP, Studies in International Adjudication (Vikas Publications 1969).Google Scholar
Andenas, M, ‘Reassertion and Transformation: From Fragmentation to Convergence in International Law’ (2015) 36 Georgetown JIL 685.Google Scholar
Andenas, M and Bjorge, E, ‘Introduction: From Fragmentation to Convergence in International Law’ in Andenas, Mads and Bjorge, Eirik (eds), A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (CUP 2015).Google Scholar
Andenas, M and Zleptnig, S, ‘Proportionality: WTO Law in Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 42 Texas ILJ 371.Google Scholar
Anderson, D, ‘Negotiation and Dispute Settlement’ in Evans, Malcolm D (ed), Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma (Hart 1998).Google Scholar
Anderson, DH, ‘Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (OUP 2008).Google Scholar
Asmelash, H, ‘The First Ten Years of WTO Jurisprudence on Renewable Energy Support Measures: Has the Dust Settled Yet?’ (2022) 21 WTR 455.Google Scholar
Baetens, F (ed), Legitimacy of Unseen Actors in International Adjudication (CUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetens, F Identity and Diversity on the International Bench: Who Is the Judge? (OUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, A, Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (CUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranyai, G and Bartus, G, ‘Anatomy of a Deadlock: A Systemic Analysis of Why the Gabčíkovo–Nagymaros Dam Dispute Is Still Unresolved’ (2016) 18 Water Policy 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R, ‘The Continuing Vitality of UNCLOS’ in Barrett, Jill and Barnes, Richard (eds), Law of the Sea: UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (BIICL 2016).Google Scholar
Barrett, J, ‘The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: A “Living” Treaty?’ in Barrett, Jill and Barnes, Richard (eds), Law of the Sea: UNCLOS as a Living Treaty (BIICL 2016).Google Scholar
Bartels, L, ‘The Chapeau of the General Exceptions in the WTO GATT and GATS Agreements: A Reconstruction’ (2015) 109 AJIL 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batifort, S and Heath, JB, ‘The New Debate on the Interpretation of MFN Clauses in Investment Treaties: Putting the Brakes on Multilateralization’ (2017) 111 AJIL 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behn, D, ‘Performance of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ in Squatrito, Theresa and others (eds), The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals (CUP 2018).Google Scholar
Behn, D and Fauchald, OK, ‘Governments under Cross-Fire? Renewable Energy and International Economic Tribunals’ (2015) 12 Manchester JIEL 117.Google Scholar
Behn, D, Fauchald, OK and Langford, M, ‘The International Investment Regime and Its Discontents’ in Behn, Daniel, Fauchald, Ole Kristian and Langford, Malcolm (eds), The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives (CUP 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behn, D and Langford, M, ‘Trumping the Environment? An Empirical Perspective on the Legitimacy of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2017) 18 JWIT 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekker, PH, ‘Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgement’ (1998) 92 AJIL 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendel, J, Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure before International Courts and Tribunals (Edward Elgar 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, E, The Law of Global Governance (Martinus Nijhoff 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, KP and Jensen, JO, ‘The Arbitrator’s Mandate to Facilitate Settlement’ (2017) 40 Fordham ILJ 887.Google Scholar
Berman, F, ‘The International Court of Justice as an “Agent” of Legal Development’ in Tams, Christian J and Sloan, James (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Bethlehem, D, ‘The Greening of International Dispute Settlement? Stepping Back a Little’ (2020) 114 ASIL Proceedings 225.Google Scholar
Beviglia, Zampetti A, Low, P and Mavroidis, PC, ‘Consensus Decision-Making and Legislative Inertia at the WTO: Can International Law Help?’ (2022) 56 JWT 1.Google Scholar
Biermann, F, Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene (MIT Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilder, R, ‘The Settlement of Disputes in the Field of the International Law of the Environment’ (1975) 144 RdC 140.Google Scholar
Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (OUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (Harvard University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, L, ‘Subsequent Practice, Practices, and “Family-Resemblance”: Towards Embedding Subsequent Practice in Its Operative Milieu’ in Nolte, Georg (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, L and Angelini, A, ‘After “The Court Rose”: The Rise of Diplomatic Means to Implement the Pronouncements of the International Court of Justice’ (2012) 11 LPICT 1.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, J, ‘Investment Treaties and Transition from Authoritarian Rule’ (2014) 15 JWIT 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnitcha, J, Poulsen, LNS and Waibel, M, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (OUP 2017).Google Scholar
Born, G, ‘A New Generation of International Adjudication’ (2012) 61 Duke LJ 775.Google Scholar
Born, G, Morris, D and Forrest, S, ‘“A Margin of Appreciation”: Appreciating Its Irrelevance in International Law’ (2020) 61 HILJ 65.Google Scholar
Botkin, DB, The Moon in the Nautilus Shell: Discordant Harmonies Reconsidered from Climate Change to Species Extinction, How Life Persists in an Ever-Changing World (OUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, CP and Trachtman, JP, ‘Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres: A Balancing Act’ (2009) 8 WTR 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Further Development of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea: Mechanisms for Change’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (OUP 2006).Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘The Environmental Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (2007) 22 IJMCL 369.Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Developments in the International Law of Environmental Impact Assessments and Their Relation to the Espoo Convention’ (2011) 20 RECIEL 227.Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Human Rights and the Environment: Where Next?’ (2012) 23 EJIL 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘UNCLOS Dispute Settlement and the Uses and Abuses of Part XV’ (2014) 47 Revue Belge de Droit International 182.Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘The Tribunal and the Rule of Law’ in ITLOS (ed), The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Rule of Law: 1996–2016 (Brill Nijhoff 2018).Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Progressive Development of International Environmental Law: Legislate or Litigate?’ (2019) 62 German Ybk. Int’l L. 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A and Harrison, J, ‘Judicial Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: Current Problems’ (2013) 4 JIDS 245.Google Scholar
Boyle, A and Redgwell, C, Birnie, Boyle, and Redgwell’s International Law and the Environment (4th ed., CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, AE, ‘Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction’ (1997) 46 ICLQ 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C, A Common Law of International Adjudication (OUP 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C, ‘Introduction: The Development and Importance of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’ in Brown, Chester (ed), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘COPing with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2002) 15 LJIL 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘Procedure and Substance in International Environmental Law’ (2020) 405 RdC 81.Google Scholar
Buga, I, ‘Between Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea Convention: Subsequent Practice, Treaty Modification, and Regime Interaction’ in Rothwell, Donald R and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).Google Scholar
Buga, I, Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice (OUP 2018).Google Scholar
Buggenhoudt, C, Common Interests in International Litigation: A Case Study on Natural Resource Exploitation Disputes (Intersentia 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchardt, D, ‘The Functions of Law and Their Challenges: The Differentiated Functionality of International Law’ (2019) 20 German LJ 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, C, The Power to Protect: Trade, Health and Uncertainty in the WTO (Hart 2004).Google Scholar
Çalı, B, ‘International Judicial Review’ in Lang, Anthony and Wiener, Antje (eds), Handbook on Global Constitutionalism (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Çalı, B and Koch, A, ‘Foxes Guarding the Foxes? The Peer Review of Human Rights Judgments by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe’ (2014) 14 Human Rights Law Review 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannizzaro, E, ‘Proportionality and Margin of Appreciation in the Whaling Case: Reconciling Antithetical Doctrines?’ (2016) 27 EJIL 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD, ‘The Nature of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Evolving Structure of International Dispute Resolution’ (1990) 84 AJIL 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, DD, ‘Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals’ (2006) 24 Berkeley JIL 401.Google Scholar
Caron, DD, ‘The Multiple Functions of International Courts and the Singular Task of the Adjudicator’ (2017) 111 ASIL Proceedings 231.Google Scholar
Caserta, S and Madsen, MR, ‘The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices’ (2022) 35 LJIL 931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, JI, ‘Entry Into Force of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea’ (1995) 35 Va. J. Int’l L 381.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S, ‘The WTO’s Environmental Progress’ (2007) 10 JIEL 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S, ‘Of the World Trade Court’s Burden’ (2009) 20 EJIL 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S, The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community and Constitution (CUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, R, ‘Some Reflections on the Operation of the Dispute Settlement System of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea During Its First Decade’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (OUP 2006).Google Scholar
Churchill, R, ‘The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ in Rothwell, Donald R and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).Google Scholar
Churchill, RR and Ulfstein, G, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94 AJIL 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, BJ, Environmental Sovereignty and the WTO: Trade Sanctions and International Law (Transnational Publishers 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, BJ, ‘Does International Economic Law Impose a Duty to Negotiate?’ (2018) 17 Chinese JIL 73.Google Scholar
Constain, S, ‘Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Government Policy and the Changing Landscape’ (2014) 29 ICSID Review 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G, ‘The Illusion of “Evolutionary Interpretation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Abi-Saab, Georges and others (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Cooper, CA, ‘The Management of International Environmental Disputes in the Context of Canada-United States Relations: A Survey and Evaluation of Techniques and Mechanisms’ (1986) 24 Can YB Int’l L 247.Google Scholar
Corten, O, ‘The Notion of “Reasonable” in International Law: Legal Discourse, Reason and Contradictions’ (1999) 48 ICLQ 613.Google Scholar
Craig, P, EU Administrative Law (3rd ed., OUP 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, AN, ‘Recalcitrant Reality and Chosen Ideals: The Public Function of Dispute Settlement in International Environmental Law’ (1997) 10 Georgetown Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 551.Google Scholar
Craik, N, ‘The Duty to Cooperate in International Environmental Law: Constraining State Discretion through Due Respect’ (2019) 30 Ybk IEL 22.Google Scholar
Craik, N, ‘The Duty to Cooperate in the Customary Law of Environmental Impact Assessment’ (2020) 69 ICLQ 239.Google Scholar
Crawford, J, International Law as an Open System: Selected Essays (Cameron May 2002).Google Scholar
Crawford, J, State Responsibility: The General Part (CUP 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Flexibility in the Award of Reparation: The Role of the Parties and the Tribunal’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Sersic, Maja and Šošić, Trpimir M (eds), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Brill Nijhoff 2016).Google Scholar
Crawford, J, Baetens, F and Cameron, R, ‘Functions of the International Court of Justice’ in Espósito, Carlos and Parlett, Kate (eds), The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice (CUP 2023).Google Scholar
Crow, K, ‘The Opacity of Proportionality in International Courts: Could Categories Clarify?’ (2019) 51 GWILR 289.Google Scholar
Czybulka, D, ‘Article 194’ in Proelss, Alexander (ed), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Commentary (CH Beck 2017).Google Scholar
Davey, WJ, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: Crown Jewel or Costume Jewelry?’ (2022) 21 WTR 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Baere, G, Chane, A-L and Wouters, J, ‘International Courts as Keepers of the Rule of Law: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities’ (2016) 48 NYUJILP 715.Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E (ed), International Procedure in Interstate Litigation and Arbitration: A Comparative Approach (CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sena, P and Acconciamessa, L, ‘Balancing Test’ in Ruiz-Fabri, Hélène (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (OUP 2021).Google Scholar
De Visscher, C, Theory and Reality in Public International Law (PE Corbett tr, Revised ed, Princeton University Press 1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, J, ‘The International Obligation to Cooperate–An Empty Shell or a Hard Law Principle of International Law?–A Critical Look at a Much Debated Paradigm of Modern International Law’ in Hestermeyer, Holger P et al (ed), Coexistence, Cooperation and Solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum, vol 1 (Martinus Nijhoff 2012).Google Scholar
Demirkol, B, ‘Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2015) 6 JIDS 403.Google Scholar
Demirkol, B, ‘Reconsideration of Proper Remedies in Investment Arbitration in Light of Recent Cases: Should the Remedy Follow the Primary Obligation?’ (2021) 22 JWIT 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmedt, A, ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’ (2001) 4 JIEL 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Benedetto, S, International Investment Law and the Environment (Edward Elgar 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, PF and Ku, C, The Dynamics of International Law (CUP 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djeffal, C, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (CUP 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doelle, M, ‘Non-compliance Procedures’ in Rajamani, Lavanya and Peel, Jacqueline (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (2nd ed., OUP 2021).Google Scholar
Dolzer, R, Kriebaum, U and Schreuer, C, Principles of International Investment Law (3rd ed., OUP 2022).Google Scholar
Donoghue, JE, ‘The Role of the World Court Today’ (2012) 47 Georgia Law Review 181.Google Scholar
Dothan, S, International Judicial Review: When Should International Courts Intervene? (CUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, C, ‘Worth Shopping Around? Defending Regulatory Autonomy under the SPS and TBT Agreements’ (2015) 14 WTR 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, M, ‘The Necessity Test in World Trade Law: What Now?’ (2016) 15 Chinese JIL 817.Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Its Interaction with the Minimum Standard and Its Customary Status’ (2017) 1 Brill Research Perspectives in International Investment Law and Arbitration 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA, ‘The Judicial Trilemma’ (2017) 111 AJIL 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA, ‘International Judicial Practices: Opening the “Black Box” of International Courts’ (2018) 40 Mich. J. Int’l L. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, P-M, ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’ (2007) 1 EJLS 25.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P-M and Viñuales, JE, International Environmental Law (2nd ed., CUP 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C-D and Ehring, L, ‘The Authoritative Interpretation under Article IX:2 of the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization: Current Law, Practice and Possible Improvements’ (2005) 8 JIEL 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C-D and Lockhart, N, ‘Standard of Review in WTO Law’ (2004) 7 JIEL 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsig, M and Pollack, MA, ‘Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at The World Trade Organization’ (2014) 20 European Journal of International Relations 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, T, ‘Recent Developments in WTO Jurisprudence: Has the Appellate Body Resolved the Issue of an Appropriate Standard of Review in SPS Cases?’ (2012) 62 Univ. Toronto LJ 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahner, JH, Judicial Deference in International Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis (Hart 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahner, JH, ‘The Limited Utility of Deference in International Dispute Settlement’ (2022) 21 LPICT 467.Google Scholar
Fahner, JH, ‘Maximising Investment Protection under the Minimum Standard: A Case Study of the Evolutive Interpretation and Application of Customary International Law in Investment Arbitration’ (2023) 12(1) ESIL Reflections.Google Scholar
Fassbender, B, ‘Article 9’ in Zimmermann, Andreas and others (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Feria-Tinta, M and Milnes, SC, ‘The Rise of Environmental Law in International Dispute Resolution: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Issues a Landmark Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights’ (2016) 27 Ybk IEL 64.Google Scholar
Fikfak, V, ‘Structural Remedies: Human Rights Law’ in Ruiz-Fabri, Hélène (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (OUP 2022).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The International Court of Justice and International Environmental Law’ in Tams, Christian J and Sloan, James (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘International Protection of the Environment’ (2001) 293 RdC 9.Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F, ‘Necessity Killed the GATT: Art XX GATT and the Misleading Rhetoric about “Weighing and Balancing”’ (2012) 4 EJLS 39.Google Scholar
Foster, CE, ‘Adjudication, Arbitration and the Turn to Public Law “Standards of Review”: Putting the Precautionary Principle in the Crucible’ (2012) 3 JIDS 525.Google Scholar
Foster, CE, ‘International Adjudication–Standard of Review and Burden of Proof: Australia-Apples and Whaling in the Antarctic’ (2012) 21 RECIEL 80.Google Scholar
Foster, CE, ‘Diminished Ambitions? Public International Legal Authority in the Transnational Economic Era’ (2014) 17 JIEL 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, CE, Global Regulatory Standards in Environmental and Health Disputes: Regulatory Coherence, Due Regard, and Due Diligence (OUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, CE, ‘Why Due Regard Is More Appropriate than Proportionality Testing in International Investment Law’ (2022) 23 JWIT 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, TM, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (OUP 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franckx, E, ‘“Reasonable Bond” in the Practice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ (2002) 32 Calif WILJ 303.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, G, ‘Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking Comparative Law’ (1985) 26 HILJ 411.Google Scholar
Freestone, D, ‘Caution or Precaution: “A Rose By Any Other Name…”?’ (1999) 10 Ybk IEL 25.Google Scholar
Fukunaga, Y, ‘Standard of Review and “Scientific Truths” in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Investment Arbitration’ (2012) 3 JIDS 559.Google Scholar
Gao, J, ‘The ITLOS Advisory Opinion for the SRFC’ (2015) 14 Chinese JIL 735.Google Scholar
Gardiner, RK, Treaty Interpretation (2nd ed., OUP 2015).Google Scholar
Garrido-Muñoz, A, ‘Managing Uncertainty: The International Court of Justice, “Objective Reasonableness” and the Judicial Function’ (2017) 30 LJIL 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, P, ‘The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Activities in 2003’ (2004) 3 Chinese JIL 241.Google Scholar
Gavouneli, M, ‘Protection Standards for the Marine Environment: Updating Part XII of the Law of the Sea Convention?’ in Minas, Stephen and Diamond, H Jordan (eds), Stress Testing the Law of the Sea: Dispute Resolution, Disasters & Emerging Challenges (Brill Nijhoff 2018).Google Scholar
Gertz, G, Jandhyala, S and Poulsen, LNS, ‘Legalization, Diplomacy, and Development: Do Investment Treaties De-politicize Investment Disputes?’ (2018) 107 World Development 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacco, LL, Judicial Decisions in International Law Argumentation: Between Entrapment and Creativity (Hart 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakopoulos, C and Monga, M, ‘History as Interpretative Context in the Evolutionary Interpretation of FET in International Investment Law’ in Abi-Saab, Georges and others (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Giladi, R and Shany, Y, ‘The International Court of Justice’ in Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
Giladi, R and Shany, Y, ‘Assessing the Effectiveness of the International Court of Justice’ in Espósito, Carlos and Parlett, Kate (eds), The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice (CUP 2023).Google Scholar
Gillett, M, Prosecuting Environmental Harm before the International Criminal Court (CUP 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, T, ‘Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking’ (2005) 45 Va. J. Int’l L. 631.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T, ‘The Institutional Context of the International Court of Justice’ in Espósito, Carlos and Parlett, Kate (eds), The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice (CUP 2023).Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T and McAdams, RH, ‘Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution’ (2004) 45 W&MLR 1229.Google Scholar
Godden, L and Peel, J, Environmental Law: Scientific, Policy and Regulatory Dimensions (OUP 2010).Google Scholar
Goodman, C, ‘Rights, Obligations, Prohibitions: A Practical Guide to Understanding Judicial Decisions on Coastal State Jurisdiction over Living Resources in the Exclusive Economic Zone’ (2018) 33 IJMCL 558.Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2 JIDS 31.Google Scholar
Gray, C, ‘Remedies’ in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Gros, G, ‘The ICJ’s Handling of Science in the Whaling in the Antarctic Case: A Whale of a Case?’ (2015) 6 JIDS 578.Google Scholar
Grossman, N, ‘The Normative Legitimacy of International Courts’ (2013) 86 Temple Law Review 61.Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L, Regulating Health and Environmental Risks under WTO Law: A Critical Analysis of the SPS Agreement (OUP 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruszczynski, L, ‘Standard of Review of Health and Environmental Regulations by WTO Panels’ in Van Calster, Geert and Prévost, Denise (eds), Research Handbook on Environment, Health and the WTO (Edward Elgar 2013).Google Scholar
Gruszczynski, L and Vadi, V, ‘Standard of Review and Scientific Evidence in WTO Law and International Investment Arbitration: Converging Parallels?’ in Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter (eds), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (OUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, AT, ‘International Tribunals: A Rational Choice Analysis’ (2008) 157 Univ. of Pennsylvania LR 171.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, EM, Puig, S and Victor, DG, ‘Against Secrecy: The Social Cost of International Dispute Settlement’ (2017) 42 Yale J. Int’l L. 279.Google Scholar
Hamamoto, S, ‘From the Requirement of Reasonableness to a “Comply and Explain” Rule: The Standard of Review in the Whaling Judgment’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia and Tamada, Dai (eds), Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Brill Nijhoff 2016).Google Scholar
Harbo, T-I, The Function of Proportionality Analysis in European Law (Brill Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J, ‘Judicial Law-Making and the Developing Order of the Oceans’ (2007) 22 IJMCL 283.Google Scholar
Harrison, J, Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International Law (CUP 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J, ‘Reflections on the Role of International Courts and Tribunals in the Settlement of Environmental Disputes and the Development of International Environmental Law’ (2013) 25 Journal of Environmental Law 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J, ‘Safeguards against Excessive Enforcement Measures in the Exclusive Economic Zone – Law and Practice’ in Ringbom, Henrik (ed), Jurisdiction Over Ships: Post-UNCLOS Developments in the Law of the Sea (Brill Nijhoff 2015).Google Scholar
Harrison, J, ‘Patrolling the Boundaries of Coastal State Enforcement Powers: The Interpretation and Application of UNCLOS Safeguards Relating to the Arrest of Foreign-Flagged Ships’ (2017) 42 L’Observateur des Nations Unies 117.Google Scholar
Harrison, J, Saving the Oceans through Law: The International Legal Framework for the Protection of the Marine Environment (OUP 2017).Google Scholar
Heidar, T, ‘Introduction: How Does the Law of the Sea Adapt to New Knowledge and Changing Circumstances?’ in Heidar, Tomas (ed), New Knowledge and Changing Circumstances in the Law of the Sea (Brill Nijhoff 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, LR and Slaughter, A-M, ‘Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo’ (2005) 93 Calif LR 899.Google Scholar
Helmersen, ST, ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: Legality, Semantics and Distinctions’ (2013) 6 EJLS 161.Google Scholar
Helmersen, ST, ‘The Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body’ in Abi-Saab, Georges and others (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Henckels, C, ‘Balancing Investment Protection and the Public Interest: The Role of the Standard of Review and the Importance of Deference in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2013) 4 JIDS 197.Google Scholar
Henckels, C, Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration: Balancing Investment Protection and Regulatory Autonomy (CUP 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, GI, The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (OUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, GI, ‘International Judicial Lawmaking’ in Brölmann, Catherine and Radi, Yannick (eds), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar
Hey, E, Teaching International Law: State-Consent as Consent to a Process of Normative Development and Ensuing Problems (Kluwer Law International 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hey, E, Reflections on an International Environmental Court (Kluwer Law International 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindelang, S and Krajewski, M (eds), Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified (OUP 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, M, ‘Between Fair and Equitable Treatment and Stabilization Clause: Stable Legal Environment and Regulatory Change in International Investment Law’ (2011) 12 JWIT 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, R and Karl, L, ‘Article 57’ in Zimmermann, Andreas and others (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Horn, H and Mavroidis, PC, ‘Multilateral Environmental Agreements in the WTO: Silence Speaks Volumes’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Economic Theory 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R, ‘The Appellate Body Rulings in the Shrimp/Turtle Case: A New Legal Baseline for the Trade and Environment Debate’ (2002) 27 Columbia JEL 491.Google Scholar
Howse, R, ‘Moving the WTO Forward-One Case at a Time’ (2009) 42 Cornell ILJ 223.Google Scholar
Howse, R, ‘The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary’ (2016) 27 EJIL 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R and Langille, J, ‘Continuity and Change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism Past, Present, and Future’ (2023) 117 AJIL 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R, Langille, J and Sykes, K, ‘Pluralism in Practice: Moral Legislation and the Law of the WTO after Seal Products’ (2015) 48 GWILR 81.Google Scholar
Howse, R and Türk, E, ‘The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations: A Case Study of the Canada–EC Asbestos Dispute’ in Bermann, George A and Mavroidis, Petros C (eds), Trade and Human Health and Safety (CUP 2006).Google Scholar
Hudec, RE, ‘Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Weiss, Friedl (ed), Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice of Other International Courts and Tribunals (Cameron May 2000).Google Scholar
Hudson, MO, International Tribunals: Past and Future (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1944).Google Scholar
Husa, J, ‘Methodology of Comparative Law Today: From Paradoxes to Flexibility?’ (2006) 58 Revue internationale de droit comparé 1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husa, J, ‘Research Designs of Comparative Law – Methodology or Heuristics?’ in Adams, Maurice and Heirbaut, Dirk (eds), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke (Hart 2014).Google Scholar
Husa, J, Introduction to Comparative Law (2nd ed., Hart 2023).Google Scholar
Ioannidis, M, ‘A Procedural Approach to the Legitimacy of International Adjudication: Developing Standards of Participation in WTO Law’ (2011) 12 German LJ 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, M, ‘Beyond the Standard of Review: Deference Criteria in WTO Law and the Case for a Procedural Approach’ in Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter (eds), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
Jackson, JH, Sovereignty, the WTO, and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (CUP 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, VC, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (OUP 2012).Google Scholar
Jenks, CW, The Prospects of International Adjudication (Stevens & Sons 1964).Google Scholar
Jenks, CW, ‘Orthodoxy and Innovation in the Law of Nations’ (1971) 57 Proceedings of the British Academy 215.Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘The Judicial Function and the Rule of Law in International Relations’ in Jennings, Robert Y (ed), Collected Writings of Sir Robert Jennings, vol 1 (Kluwer Law International 1998).Google Scholar
Johns, L, Strengthening International Courts: The Hidden Costs of Legalization (University of Michigan Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, DM, ‘Fishery Diplomacy and Science and the Judicial Function’ (2000) 10 Ybk IEL 33.Google Scholar
Jones, HL, ‘Why Comply? An Analysis of Trends in Compliance with Judgments of the International Court of Justice since Nicaragua’ (2012) 12 Chi.-Kent J. Int’l & Comp. L. 57.Google Scholar
Kalicki, JE and Joubin-Bret, A (eds), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century (Brill Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapterian, G, ‘A Critique of the WTO Jurisprudence on “Necessity”’ (2010) 59 ICLQ 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaman, IV, Dispute Resolution in the Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Cogan J, ‘Competition and Control in International Adjudication’ (2008) 48 Va. J. Int’l L 411.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A, Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (CUP 2009).Google Scholar
Keith, K, ‘The Role of an ICJ Judge’ in Espósito, Carlos and Parlett, Kate (eds), The Cambridge Companion to the International Court of Justice (CUP 2023).Google Scholar
Kessedjian, C and others, ‘Mediation in Future Investor–State Dispute Settlement’ (2023) 14 JIDS 192.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B, ‘International Courts: Uneven Judicialisation in Global Order’ in Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti (eds), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (CUP 2012).Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B and Schill, S, ‘Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’ in van den Berg, Albert Jan (ed), Fifty Years of the New York Convention (Kluwer Law International 2009).Google Scholar
Kittichaisaree, K, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (OUP 2021).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘On Rationalism in Politics: Interpretation of Treaties and the World Trade Organization’ (2005) 74 Nordic JIL 405.Google Scholar
Kläger, R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’ (2010) 11 JWIT 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kläger, R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (CUP 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (CUP 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, N and Kroon, D, ‘Settlement of International Environmental Law Disputes’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Brus, Marcel and Merkouris, Panos (eds), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (2nd ed., Edward Elgar 2021).Google Scholar
Klein, N and Parlett, K, Judging the Law of the Sea: Judicial Contributions to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (OUP 2022).Google Scholar
Kleinheisterkamp, J, ‘Investment Treaty Law and the Fear for Sovereignty: Transnational Challenges and Solutions’ (2015) 78 MLR 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinlein, T, ‘Matters of Interpretation: How to Conceptualize and Evaluate Change of Norms and Values in the International Legal Order’ in Krieger, Heike and Liese, Andrea (eds), Tracing Value Change in the International Legal Order: Perspectives from Legal and Political Science (OUP 2023).Google Scholar
Koh, T and Lin, J, ‘The Land Reclamation Case: Thoughts and Reflections’ (2006) 10 Singapore YBIL 1.Google Scholar
Kojima, C, ‘South China Sea Arbitration and the Protection of the Marine Environment: Evolution of UNCLOS Part XII through Interpretation and the Duty to Cooperate’ (2015) 21 Asian Yearbook of International Law 166.Google Scholar
Kolb, R, The International Court of Justice (Alan Perry tr, Hart 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘Short Reflections on the ICJ’s Whaling Case and the Review by International Courts and Tribunals of “Discretionary Powers”’ (2014) 32 AYBIL 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘Evolutionary Interpretation in International Law: Some Short and Less than Trail-Blazing Reflections’ in Abi-Saab, Georges and others (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Kooijmans, P, ‘The ICJ in the 21st Century: Judicial Restraint, Judicial Activism, or Proactive Judicial Policy’ (2007) 56 ICLQ 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koon Hean, C, Koh, T and Yee, L, Malaysia & Singapore The Land Reclamation Case: From Dispute to Settlement (Straits Times Press 2013).Google Scholar
Kopar, R, Stability and Legitimate Expectations in International Energy Investments (Hart 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, B, Lipson, C and Snidal, D, ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’ (2001) 55 International Organization 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Peaceful Settlement of Environmental Disputes’ (1991) 60 Nordic JIL 73.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (reissue, CUP 2005).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘The Case for Comparative International Law’ (2011) 20 Finnish YBIL 1.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’ (2011) 26 International Relations 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzé, LJ, Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene (Hart 2016).Google Scholar
Kotzé, LJ and others, ‘Earth System Law: Exploring New Frontiers in Legal Science’ (2022) 11 Earth System Governance 100126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, L, ‘The Environment before the European Court of Justice’ in Voigt, Christina (ed), International Judicial Practice on the Environment (CUP 2019).Google Scholar
Kriebaum, U, ‘FET and Expropriation in the (Invisible) EU Model BIT’ (2014) 15 JWIT 454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriebaum, U, ‘Evaluating Social Benefits and Costs of Investment Treaties: Depoliticization of Investment Disputes’ (2018) 33 ICSID Review 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, H and Peters, A, ‘Due Diligence and Structural Change in the International Legal Order’ in Krieger, Heike and Peters, Anne (eds), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (OUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N, ‘The Dynamics of International Law Redux’ (2021) 74 Current Legal Problems 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulick, A (ed), Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime (CUP 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulovesi, K, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Challenges of the Environment, Legitimacy and Fragmentation (Kluwer Law International 2011).Google Scholar
Kuokkanen, T, International Law and the Environment: Variations on a Theme (Brill 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, J, ‘Adjudging the Exceptional at International Investment Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis’ (2010) 59 ICLQ 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, J, ‘The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO’ in Schill, Stephan W (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (OUP 2010).Google Scholar
Lambert, E, ‘Execution of Judgment: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)’ in Ruiz-Fabri, Hélène (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (OUP 2018).Google Scholar
Lang, A, World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic Order (OUP 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A, ‘The Role of the International Court of Justice in a Context of Fragmentation’ (2013) 62 ICLQ 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A, ‘Twenty Years of the WTO Appellate Body’s “Fragmentation Jurisprudence”’ (2015) 14 Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, M, Behn, D and Lie, RH, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 20 JIEL 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanovoy, V, ‘Standards of Review in the Practice of International Courts and Tribunals’ in Kajtár, Gábor, Çali, Basak and Milanovic, Marko (eds), Secondary Rules of Primary Importance in International Law (OUP 2022).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Function of Law in the International Community (OUP 1933).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (rev. ed., Stevens & Sons 1958).Google Scholar
Legrand, P, ‘The Impossibility of Legal Transplants’ (1997) 4 Maastricht J. Eur. & Comp. L. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonelli, GC, Transnational Narratives and Regulation of GMO Risks (Hart 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonhardsen, EM, ‘Designing Deference: Towards a Thin Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Investment Law?’ in Bäumler, Jelena and others (eds), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2021 (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Lim, CL, Ho, J and Paparinskis, M, International Investment Law and Arbitration: Commentary, Awards and Other Materials (2nd ed., CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, S and Kebede, Tiba F, ‘The International Judge in an Age of Multiple International Courts and Tribunals’ (2008) 9 Chicago JIL 407.Google Scholar
Lissitzyn, OJ, The International Court of Justice: Its Role in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1951).Google Scholar
Lo, C, Nakagawa, J and Lin, T (eds), The Appellate Body of the WTO and Its Reform (Springer 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loft, P, ‘British Indian Ocean Territory: UK to Negotiate Sovereignty 2022/23’, House of Commons Library Research Briefing, 22 November 2022.Google Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘The Interplay between Negotiation and Litigation in International Dispute Settlement’ in Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law, and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff 2007).Google Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘The Function of Litigation in International Society’ (2012) 61 ICLQ 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘The “Complementary Role” of ITLOS in the Development of Ocean Law’ in Scheiber, Harry N and Paik, Jin-Hyun (eds), Regions, Institutions, and Law of the Sea: Studies in Ocean Governance (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘The Law of Treaties; or, Should This Book Exist?’ in Tams, Christian J, Tzanakopoulos, Antonios and Zimmermann, Andreas (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar 2014).Google Scholar
Lowe, V and Churchill, R, ‘The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2001’ (2002) 17 IJMCL 463.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R and others, Selecting International Judges: Principle, Process, and Politics (OUP 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, MR, Cebulak, P and Wiebusch, M, ‘Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts’ (2018) 14 International Journal of Law in Context 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malacrida, R, ‘WTO Panel Composition: Searching Far and Wide for Administrators of World Trade Justice’ in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System (CUP 2015).Google Scholar
Mansfield, B, ‘Compulsory Dispute Settlement after the Southern Bluefin Tuna Award’ in Elferink, Alex G Oude and Rothwell, Donald R (eds), Oceans Management in the 21st Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses (Martinus Nijhoff 2004).Google Scholar
Marceau, G, ‘Evolutive Interpretation by the WTO Adjudicator’ (2018) 21 JIEL 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G and Trachtman, JP, ‘A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods: The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’ (2014) 48 JWT 351.Google Scholar
Marisi, F, Environmental Interests in Investment Arbitration: Challenges and Directions (Kluwer Law International 2020).Google Scholar
Marotti, L, ‘Remedies against Non-compliance with International Judgments’ in Ruiz-Fabri, Hélène (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (OUP 2021).Google Scholar
Marotti, L and Palchetti, P, ‘Of Restoring Compliance, Lex Specialis and Intersecting Wrongs: The Question of “Remedies” in Gabčikovo-Nagymaros’ in Forlati, Serena, Mbengue, Makane Moïse and McGarry, Brian (eds), The Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Judgment and Its Contribution to the Development of International Law (Brill Nijhoff 2020).Google Scholar
Marr, S, ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: The Precautionary Approach and Conservation and Management of Fish Resources’ (2000) 11 EJIL 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matz-Lück, N and Van Doorn, E, ‘Due Diligence Obligations and the Protection of the Marine Environment’ (2017) 42 L’Observateur des Nations Unies 177.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, ‘Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Mind over Matter’ in Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W (eds), Handbook of Commercial Policy, vol 1A (North-Holland 2016).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, The Regulation of International Trade, vol 1 (MIT Press 2016).Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: How, Why and Where? (Edward Elgar 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, B, ‘The Pitfalls of Ineffective Conceptualization: The Case of the Distinction between Procedure and Substance’ (2022) 33 EJIL 1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbengue, MM, ‘The South China Sea Arbitration: Innovations in Marine Environmental Fact-Finding and Due Diligence Obligations’ (2016) 110 AJIL Unbound 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbengue, MM and Das, R, ‘The ICJ’s Engagement with Science: To Interpret or Not to Interpret?’ (2015) 6 JIDS 568.Google Scholar
McDougall, R, ‘The Crisis in WTO Dispute Settlement: Fixing Birth Defects to Restore Balance’ (2018) 52 JWT 867.Google Scholar
McGrady, B, ‘Necessity Exceptions in WTO Law: Retreaded Tyres, Regulatory Purpose and Cumulative Regulatory Measures’ (2009) 12 JIEL 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘The Evolution of Treaty Obligations in International Law’ in Nolte, Georg (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
McLachlan, C, Shore, L and Weiniger, M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (2nd ed, OUP 2017).Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘(Inter)Temporal Considerations in the Interpretative Process of the VCLT: Do Treaties Endure, Perdure or Exdure?’ (2014) 45 Netherlands YBIL 121.Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshel, T, ‘Unmasking the Substance behind the Process: Why the Duty to Cooperate in International Water Law Is Really a Substantive Principle’ (2019) 47 Denver JILP 29.Google Scholar
Messenger, G, The Development of World Trade Organization Law: Examining Change in International Law (OUP 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messenger, G, ‘The Development of International Law, Perception, and the Problem of Time’ in Pasquet, Luca, Castellanos-Jankiewicz, León and Van der Ploeg, Klara Polackova (eds), International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Messineo, F, ‘The Functions of The International Court of Justice: Tending to the Law While Settling Disputes?’ in Kent, Avidan, Skoutaris, Nikos and Trinidad, Jamie (eds), The Future of International Courts: Regional, Institutional and Procedural Challenges (Routledge 2019).Google Scholar
Michaels, R, ‘The Functional Method of Comparative Law’ in Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd ed., OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Miles, K, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (CUP 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, K, (ed), Research Handbook on Environment and Investment Law (Edward Elgar 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, AD and Henckels, C, ‘Variations on a Theme: Comparing the Concept of “Necessity” in International Investment Law and WTO Law’ (2013) 14 Chicago Journal of International Law 93.Google Scholar
Mitchell, AD and Munro, J, ‘Someone Else’s Deal: Interpreting International Investment Agreements in the Light of Third-Party Agreements’ (2017) 28 EJIL 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, AD and Sheargold, E, Principles of International Trade and Investment Law (Edward Elgar 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, SM and Owsiak, AP, ‘The International Court of Justice’ in Howard, Robert M and Randazzo, Kirk A (eds), Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior (Routledge 2018).Google Scholar
Mitchell, SM and Owsiak, AP, ‘Judicialization of the Sea: Bargaining in the Shadow of UNCLOS’ (2021) 115 AJIL 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, A, Promoting Renewable Energy: The Mutual Supportiveness of Climate and Trade Law (Edward Elgar 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montt, S, State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation (Hart 2009).Google Scholar
Motzfeldt, Kravik A, ‘An Analysis of Stagnation in Multilateral Law-Making – and Why the Law of the Sea Has Transcended the Stagnation Trend’ (2021) 34 LJIL 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, SD, ‘International Judicial Bodies for Resolving Disputes between States’ in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Nagy, B, ‘The ICJ Judgment in the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case and Its Aftermath: Success or Failure?’ in Fabri, Hélène Ruiz and others (eds), A Bridge over Troubled Waters: Dispute Resolution in the Law of International Watercourses and the Law of the Sea (Brill Nijhoff 2021).Google Scholar
Nagy, CI, ‘Clash of Trade and National Public Interest in WTO Law: The Illusion of “Weighing and Balancing” and the Theory of Reservation’ (2020) 23 JIEL 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J and Türk, E, ‘Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea – Beef, EC – Asbestos and EC – Sardines (2003) 37 JWT 199.Google Scholar
Nguyen, LN, ‘Expanding the Environmental Regulatory Scope of UNCLOS through the Rule of Reference: Potentials and Limits’ (2021) 52 ODIL 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, LN, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the Settlement of Marine Environmental Disputes under UNCLOS’ (2021) 9 Korean J. Int. Comp. Law 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, LN, The Development of the Law of the Sea by UNCLOS Dispute Settlement Bodies (CUP 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottage, H and Sebastian, T, ‘Giving Legal Effect to the Results of WTO Trade Negotiations: An Analysis of the Methods of Changing WTO Law’ (2006) 9 JIEL 989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noyes, JE, ‘Compulsory Third-Party Adjudication and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law the Sea’ (1989) 4 Connecticut JIL 675.Google Scholar
Nussberger, A, The European Court of Human Rights (OUP 2020).Google Scholar
O’Connell, DP, International Law (2nd ed., Stevens & Sons 1970).Google Scholar
O’Hara, C, ‘Consensus Decision-Making and Democratic Discourse in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1947 and World Trade Organisation’ (2021) 9 London Review of International Law 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obadia, E and Nitschke, F, ‘Institutional Arbitration and the Role of the Secretariat’ in Giorgetti, Chiara (ed), Litigating International Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s Guide (Brill Nijhoff 2014).Google Scholar
Oda, S, ‘Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea’ (1995) 44 ICLQ 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, HP, ‘International Courts and the Doctrinal Channels of Legal Diplomacy’ (2015) 6 Transnational Legal Theory 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F, ‘The Investment Treaty System as Judicial Review’ (2013) 24 Am. Rev. Int. Arb. 437.Google Scholar
Ortino, F, ‘Investment Treaties, Sustainable Development and Reasonableness Review: A Case against Strict Proportionality Balancing’ (2017) 30 LJIL 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F, The Origin and Evolution of Investment Treaty Standards: Stability, Value, and Reasonableness (OUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortino, F and Tabari, NM, ‘International Dispute Settlement: The Settlement of Investment Disputes Concerning Natural Resources – Applicable Law and Standards of Review’ in Morgera, Elisa and Kulovesi, Kati (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Natural Resources (Edward Elgar 2016).Google Scholar
Örücü, AE, ‘Methodology of Comparative Law’ in Smits, Jan M (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2nd ed., Edward Elgar 2012).Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, AG and others, ‘Compulsory Jurisdiction as the DNA of LOSC Dispute Settlement: An Evolutionary Path’ (2023) 38 IJMCL 185.Google Scholar
Oxman, BH, ‘The Duty to Respect Generally Accepted International Standards’ (1991) 24 NYUJILP 109.Google Scholar
Oxman, BH, ‘Complementary Agreements and Compulsory Jurisdiction’ (2001) 95 AJIL 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxman, BH, ‘Courts and Tribunals: The ICJ, ITLOS, and Arbitral Tribunals’ in Rothwell, Donald R and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015).Google Scholar
Paine, J, ‘The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body as a Voice Mechanism’ (2019) 20 JWIT 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, J, ‘Autonomy to Set the Level of Regulatory Protection in International Investment Law’ (2021) 70 ICLQ 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, D and Alexandrov, SA, ‘“Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Kennedy, Daniel LM and Southwick, James D (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (CUP 2002).Google Scholar
Palmeter, D, Mavroidis, PC and Meagher, N, Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure (3rd ed., CUP 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (OUP 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Substantive Standards of Investment Protection under EU Law and International Investment Law’ in Gaillard, Emmanuel and Ruiz-Fabri, Hélène (eds), EU Law and International Investment Arbitration (Juris 2018).Google Scholar
Park, WW and Walsh, TW, ‘Review Essay: The Uses of Comparative Arbitration Law’ (2008) 24 Arb. Int’l 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, J and Petrochilos, G, ‘Neer-Ly Misled?’ (2007) 22 ICSID Review 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, A, ‘International Adjudication’ in Besson, Samantha and Tasioulas, John (eds), The Philosophy of International Law (OUP 2010).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules Are Rules-toward a More Collective Approach’ (2000) 94 AJIL 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘The Calculation and Design of Trade Retaliation in Context: What Is the Goal of Suspending WTO Obligations?’ in Bown, Chad P and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (CUP 2010).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘At the Edge of Chaos?: Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed’ (2014) 29 ICSID Review 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘The Rule of Law without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus’ (2015) 109 AJIL 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Elsig, M, ‘The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals’ in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Pollack, Mark (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (CUP 2012).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Hamilton, RJ, ‘Exit from International Tribunals’ (2018) 9 JIDS 679.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Pelc, K, ‘Who Guards the “Guardians of the System”? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2022) 116 AJIL 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Wessel, RA and Wouters, J, ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’ (2014) 25 EJIL 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J, Science and Risk Regulation in International Law (CUP 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J, ‘Of Apples and Oranges (and Hormones in Beef): Science and the Standard of Review in WTO Disputes under the SPS Agreement’ (2012) 61 ICLQ 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peel, J, ‘The Use of Science in Environment-Related Investor-State Arbitration’ in Miles, Kate (ed), Research Handbook on Environment and Investment Law (Edward Elgar 2019).Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization’ (2017) 15 ICON 671.Google Scholar
Petersmann, M-C, ‘When Environmental Protection and Human Rights Collide: Four Heuristics of Conflict Resolution’ in Voigt, Christina (ed), International Judicial Practice on the Environment (CUP 2019).Google Scholar
Petersmann, M-C, When Environmental Protection and Human Rights Collide: The Politics of Conflict Management by Regional Courts (CUP 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, HD, ‘International Courts and State Compliance: An Investigation of the Law of the Sea Cases’ (2019) 50 ODIL 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirker, B, Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study (Europa Law Publishing 2013).Google Scholar
Pitea, C and Tanzi, A, ‘Non-compliance Mechanisms: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward’ in Treves, Tullio and others (eds), Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (TMC Asser Press 2008).Google Scholar
Polonskaya, K, ‘Selecting Candidates to the Bench of the World Court: (Inevitable) Politicization and Its Consequences’ (2020) 33 LJIL 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proelss, A, ‘The Contribution of the ITLOS to Strengthening the Regime for the Protection of the Marine Environment’ in Del Vecchio, Angela and Virzo, Roberto (eds), Interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals (Springer 2019).Google Scholar
Prost, M, The Concept of Unity in Public International Law (Hart 2012).Google Scholar
Puig, S, ‘Recasting ICSID’s Legitimacy Debate: Towards a Goal-Based Empirical Agenda’ (2013) 36 Fordham ILJ 465.Google Scholar
Puig, S, ‘No Right without a Remedy: Foundations of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2014) 35 Univ. of Pennsylvania JIL 829.Google Scholar
Puig, S, ‘Social Capital in the Arbitration Market’ (2014) 25 EJIL 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkowski, D, The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (OUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radi, Y, Rules and Practices of International Investment Law and Arbitration (CUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajesh, Babu R, ‘State Responsibility for Illegal, Unreported and Unrelated Fishing and Sustainable Fisheries in the EEZ: Some Reflections on the ITLOS Advisory Opinion of 2015’ (2015) 55 Indian JIL 239.Google Scholar
Ranjan, P, ‘Using the Public Law Concept of Proportionality to Balance Investment Protection with Regulation in International Investment Law: A Critical Reappraisal’ (2014) 3 CJICL 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, PC and Gautier, P, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Law, Practice and Procedure (Edward Elgar 2018).Google Scholar
Rasilla, I de la, ‘“The Greatest Victory”? Challenges and Opportunities for Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ (2023) 38 ICSID Review 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, SR, ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’ (2008) 102 AJIL 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfuse, R, ‘The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention’ (2005) 36 VUWLR 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfuse, R, ‘Standard of Review in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’ in Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter (eds), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
Redgwell, C, ‘Treaty Evolution, Adaptation and Change: Is the LOSC “Enough” to Address Climate Change Impacts on the Marine Environment?’ (2019) 34 IJMCL 440.Google Scholar
Regan, DH, ‘The Meaning of “Necessary” in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XIV: The Myth of Cost–Benefit Balancing’ (2007) 6 WTR 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimann, M, ‘Beyond National Systems: A Comparative Law for the International Age’ (2001) 75 Tulane LR 1103.Google Scholar
Reimann, M, ‘The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century’ (2002) 50 American Journal of Comparative Law 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, A and Schreuer, C, International Protection of Investments: The Substantive Standards (CUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, WM, ‘International Investment Arbitration and ADR: Married but Best Living Apart’ (2009) 24 ICSID Review 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, WM, ‘Canute Confronts the Tide: States versus Tribunals and the Evolution of the Minimum Standard in Customary International Law’ (2015) 30 ICSID Review 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riles, A, ‘Wigmore’s Treasure Box: Comparative Law in the Era of Information’ (1999) 40 HILJ 221.Google Scholar
Rioseco, S, ‘Conferences of the Parties beyond International Environmental Law: How COPs Influence the Content and Implementation of Their Parent Treaties’ (2023) 36 LJIL 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, J, ‘Proportionality and Discretion in International and European Law’ in Tsagourias, Nicholas (ed), Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives (CUP 2007).Google Scholar
Rivers, J, ‘The Presumption of Proportionality’ (2014) 77 MLR 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’ (2013) 107 AJIL 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A and others, ‘Comparative International Law: Framing the Field’ (2015) 109 AJIL 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A and St John, T, ‘Complex Designers and Emergent Design: Reforming the Investment Treaty System’ (2022) 116 AJIL 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, CA, ‘The Politics of International Investment Arbitrators’ (2013) 12 Santa Clara JIL 223.Google Scholar
Roland Holst, RJ, Change in the Law of the Sea: Context, Mechanisms and Practice (Brill Nijhoff 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland Holst, RJ, ‘Reflections on the Governance Function of Compulsory Dispute Settlement in the Legal Order for the Ocean’ (2023) 38 IJMCL 283.Google Scholar
Romano, CPR, The Peaceful Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: A Pragmatic Approach (Kluwer Law International 2000).Google Scholar
Romano, CPR, ‘A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions’ (2011) 2 JIDS 241.Google Scholar
Romano, CPR, Alter, KJ and Shany, Y, ‘Mapping International Adjudicative Bodies, the Issues, and Players’ in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronen, Y, ‘Functions and Access’ in Schabas, William A and Murphy, Shannonbrooke (eds), Research Handbook on International Courts and Tribunals (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Rosenne, S and Sohn, LB (eds), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol 5 (Martinus Nijhoff 1989).Google Scholar
Rovnov, Y, ‘Appropriate Level of Protection: The Most Misconceived Notion of WTO Law’ (2020) 31 EJIL 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabahi, B, Rubins, ND and Wallace, D Jr, Investor–State Arbitration (2nd ed., OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Sacerdoti, G, ‘Appeal and Judicial Review in International Arbitration and Adjudication: The Case of the WTO Appellate Review’ in Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (ed), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar
Salacuse, JW, ‘Is There a Better Way? Alternative Methods of Treaty-Based, Investor-State Dispute Resolution’ (2007) 31 Fordham Int’l LJ 138.Google Scholar
Salacuse, JW, ‘The Emerging Global Regime for Investment’ (2010) 51 HILJ 427.Google Scholar
Salacuse, JW, The Law of Investment Treaties (3rd ed., OUP 2021).Google Scholar
Salacuse, JW and Sullivan, NP, ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’ (2005) 46 HILJ 67.Google Scholar
Sands, P, ‘Litigating Environmental Disputes: Courts, Tribunals and the Progressive Development of International Environmental Law’ in Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick, Wolfrum, Rüdiger and Kojima, Chie (eds), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law, and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff 2007).Google Scholar
Sands, P and Peel, J, Principles of International Environmental Law (4th ed., CUP 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandonato, de León P, ‘Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement and How They Got Along in the Pulp Mills Case’ in de Chazournes, Laurence Boisson, Kohen, Marcelo G and Viñuales, Jorge E (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar
Scalieri, E, ‘Discretionary Power of Coastal States and the Control of Its Compliance with International Law by International Tribunals’ in Del Vecchio, Angela and Virzo, Roberto (eds), Interpretations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by International Courts and Tribunals (Springer 2019).Google Scholar
Scanlon, Z, ‘Upsetting the Balance? The Legality of Vessel Confiscation under the LOSC after the M/V Virginia G Case’ (2018) 33 IJMCL 166.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Z and Beckman, R, ‘Assessing Environmental Impact and the Duty to Cooperate: Environmental Aspects of the Philippines v China Award’ (2018) 3 Asia-Pacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, V, ‘Fishing for Interpretation: The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Flag State Responsibility for Illegal Fishing in the EEZ’ (2016) 47 ODIL 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schebesta, H and Sinopoli, D, ‘The Potency of the SPS Agreement’s Excessivity Test: The Impact of Article 5.6 on Trade Liberalization and the Regulatory Power of WTO Members to Take Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’ (2018) 21 JIEL 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, SW, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law (CUP 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, SW, ‘System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking’ (2011) 12 German LJ 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, SW, ‘W(h)ither Fragmentation? On the Literature and Sociology of International Investment Law’ (2011) 22 EJIL 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, SW, ‘Deference in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Re-conceptualizing the Standard of Review’ (2012) 3 JIDS 577.Google Scholar
Schill, SW, ‘Sources of International Investment Law: Multilateralization, Arbitral Precedent, Comparativism, Soft Law’ in Besson, Samantha and d’Aspremont, Jean (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Sources of International Law (OUP 2018).Google Scholar
Schill, SW and Vidigal, G, ‘Investment Dispute Settlement à La Carte: A Proposal for the Reform of Investor–State Dispute Settlement’ in Elsig, Manfred, Polanco, Rodrigo and Van Den Bossche, Peter (eds), International Economic Dispute Settlement: Demise or Transformation? (CUP 2021).Google Scholar
Schneider, AK, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of (International) Law: What the Normalization of Adjudication in International Governance Regimes Means for Dispute Resolution’ (2008) 41 NYUJILP 789.Google Scholar
Schneider, AK and Welsh, NA, ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of Investor-State Mediation: How the Threat of Mediation Will Improve Parties’ Conflict Management’ (2021) 17 Univ. St. Thomas LJ 373.Google Scholar
Schneider, ME, ‘Investment Disputes – Moving beyond Arbitration’ in Laurence Boisson de Chazournes’ in Kohen, Marcelo G and Viñuales, Jorge E (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Nijhoff 2013).Google Scholar
Schneiderman, D, Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise (CUP 2008).Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Non-Pecuniary Remedies in ICSID Arbitration’ (2004) 20 Arb. Int’l 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Investment Arbitration’ in Romano, Cesare PR, Alter, Karen J and Shany, Yuval (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Schreuer, C, ‘Alternative Remedies in Investment Arbitration’ (2016) 3 The Journal of Damages in International Arbitration 1.Google Scholar
Schulte, C, Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice (OUP 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J, The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: A Commentary (OUP 2009).Google Scholar
Scott, S, ‘The Contribution of the LOS Convention Organizations to Its Harmonious Implementation’ in Elferink, Alex G Oude and Rothwell, Donald R (eds), Oceans Management in the Twenty-first Century: Institutional Frameworks and Responses (Martinus Nijhoff 2004).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G, ‘Developing Country Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Why It Matters, the Barriers Posed’ in Hartigan, James C (ed), Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment (Emerald Group Publishing 2009).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G, Elsig, M and Puig, S, ‘The Law and Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement’ in Sandholtz, Wayne and Whytock, Christopher A (eds), Handbook on the Politics of International Law (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Shaffer, G and Trachtman, JP, ‘Interpretation and Institutional Choice at the WTO’ (2011) 52 Va. J. Int’l L 103.Google Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?’ (2005) 16 EJIL 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary’ (2009) 20 EJIL 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘One Law to Rule Them All: Should International Courts Be Viewed as Guardians of Procedural Order and Legal Uniformity?’ in Fauchald, Ole Kristian and Nollkaemper, André (eds), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Hart 2012).Google Scholar
Shany, Y, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (OUP 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shany, Y, ‘Effectiveness of International Adjudication: Assessing Functions and Performance’ (2014) 108 ASIL Proceedings 113.Google Scholar
Shaw, MN, Rosenne’s Law and Practice of the International Court: 1920–2015 (5th ed., Brill Nijhoff 2016).Google Scholar
Shelton, D, ‘Form, Function, and the Powers of International Courts’ (2008) 9 Chicago JIL 537.Google Scholar
Shelton, D, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (3rd ed., OUP 2015).Google Scholar
Shigeta, Y, International Judicial Control of Environmental Protection: Standard Setting, Compliance Control, and the Development of International Environmental Law by the International Judiciary (Kluwer Law International 2010).Google Scholar
Shirlow, E, Judging at the Interface: Deference to State Decision-Making Authority in International Adjudication (CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirlow, E, ‘The Promises and Pitfalls of Investor-State Mediation’ in Sachs, Lisa, Johnson, Lise and Coleman, Jesse (eds), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2019 (OUP 2021).Google Scholar
Shlomo-Agon, S, ‘Clearing the Smoke: The Legitimation of Judicial Power at the WTO’ (2015) 49 JWT 539.Google Scholar
Shlomo-Agon, S and Shany, Y, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System’ in Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
Shlomo Agon, S, International Adjudication on Trial: The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System (OUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shlomo Agon, S and Benvenisti, E, ‘The Law of Strangers: The Form and Substance of Other-Regarding International Adjudication’ (2018) 68 Univ. Toronto LJ 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifonios, D, Environmental Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law (Springer 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soave, T, ‘Who Controls WTO Dispute Settlement? Socio-Professional Practices and the Crisis of the Appellate Body’ (2020) 29 Italian YBIL 13.Google Scholar
Soave, T, ‘The Social Field of International Adjudication: Structures and Practices of a Conflictive Professional Universe’ (2023) 36 LJIL 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourgens, FG, A Nascent Common Law: The Process of Decision-Making in International Legal Disputes between States and Foreign Investors (Brill Nijhoff 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, A, ‘Integration Matters: Rethinking the Architecture of International Dispute Resolution’ (2010) 32 Univ. of Pennsylvania JIL 1.Google Scholar
Spain, A, ‘Beyond Adjudication: Resolving International Resource Disputes in an Era of Climate Change’ (2011) 30 Stanford Environmental LJ 343.Google Scholar
Spain, A, ‘Examining the International Judicial Function: International Courts as Dispute Resolvers’ (2011) 34 Loy L.A. Int’l & Comp. LR 5.Google Scholar
Squatrito, T and others, ‘A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of International Courts and Tribunals’ in Squatrito, Theresa and others (eds), The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals (CUP 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St John, T, The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences (OUP 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stec, S, ‘Do Two Wrongs Make a Right? Adjudicating Sustainable Development in the Danube Dam Case’ (1999) 29 Golden Gate University Law Review 317.Google Scholar
Steger, DP, ‘The Founding of the Appellate Body’ in Marceau, Gabrielle (ed), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System (CUP 2015).Google Scholar
Stephens, T, ‘The Limits of International Adjudication in International Environmental Law: Another Perspective on the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case’ (2004) 19 IJMCL 177.Google Scholar
Stephens, T, International Courts and Environmental Protection (CUP 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, T, ‘What Is the Point of International Environmental Law Scholarship in the Anthropocene?’ in Pedersen, Ole W (ed), Perspectives on Environmental Law Scholarship: Essays on Purpose, Shape and Direction (CUP 2018).Google Scholar
Stoica, V, Remedies before the International Court of Justice: A Systemic Analysis (CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, A and Mathews, J, ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’ (2008) 47 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 72.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A and Mathews, J, Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance: A Comparative and Global Approach (OUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulyok, K, Science and Judicial Reasoning: The Legitimacy of International Environmental Adjudication (CUP 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, AS and Grisel, F, The Evolution of International Arbitration: Judicialization, Governance, Legitimacy (OUP 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, AO, ‘The Least Restrictive Means’ (2003) 70 The University of Chicago Law Review 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammelo, I, Treaty Interpretation and Practical Reason: Towards a General Theory of Legal Interpretation (Law Book Company 1967).Google Scholar
Tams, CJ, ‘The ICJ as a “Law-Formative Agency”: Summary and Synthesis’ in Tams, Christian J and Sloan, James (eds), The Development of International Law by the International Court of Justice (OUP 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, CJ and Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Barcelona Traction at 40: The ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development’ (2010) 23 LJIL 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Prompt Release in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Some Reflections on the ITLOS Jurisprudence’ (2004) 51 Netherlands ILR 237.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Unilateral Exploration and Exploitation of Natural Resources in Disputed Areas: A Note on the Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire Order of 25 April 2015 before the Special Chamber of ITLOS’ (2015) 46 ODIL 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on the Philippines/China Arbitration Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’ (2016) 15 LPICT 305.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y, The International Law of the Sea (3rd ed., CUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y, The South China Sea Arbitration: Toward an International Legal Order in the Oceans (Hart 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y, ‘Obligation to Conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in International Adjudication: Interaction between Law and Time’ (2021) 90 Nordic JIL 86.Google Scholar
Teitel, R and Howse, R, ‘Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order’ (2009) 41 NYUJILP 959.Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, The International Court of Justice (OUP 2016).Google Scholar
Titi, C, ‘Between Utopia and Realism: Mediation and the Settlement of Investment Disputes’ in Titi, Catharine and Gómez, Katia Fach (eds), Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Article 36’ in Zimmermann, Andreas and others (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., OUP 2019).Google Scholar
Trachtman, JP, ‘Trade and … Problems, Cost–Benefit Analysis and Subsidiarity’ (1998) 9 EJIL 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, JP, ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution’ (1999) 40 HILJ 333.Google Scholar
Trachtman, JP, ‘International Legal Control of Domestic Administrative Action’ (2014) 17 JIEL 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, JP, ‘WTO Trade and Environment Jurisprudence: Avoiding Environmental Catastrophe’ (2017) 58 HILJ 273.Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘A System for Law of the Sea Dispute Settlement’ in Freestone, David, Barnes, Richard and Ong, David (eds), The Law of the Sea: Progress and Prospects (OUP 2006).Google Scholar
Treves, T and others (eds), Non-compliance Procedures and Mechanisms and the Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (TMC Asser Press 2008).Google Scholar
Trevisanut, S, ‘The Exercise of Administrative Functions by ITLOS: A Comment on Prompt Release Cases’ in Boschiero, Nerina and others (eds), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (TMC Asser Press 2013).Google Scholar
Trevisanut, S, ‘Twenty Years of Prompt Release of Vessels: Admissibility, Jurisdiction, and Recent Trends’ (2017) 48 ODIL 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubilava, A, ‘Amicable Settlements in Investor-State Disputes: Empirical Analysis of Patterns and Perceived Problems’ (2020) 21 JWIT 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulfstein, G, ‘Treaty Bodies and Regimes’ in Hollis, Duncan B (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (2nd ed., OUP 2020).Google Scholar
UNCTAD, ‘Treaty-based Investor–State Dispute Settlement Cases and Climate Action’, IIA Issues Note No 4 (2022).Google Scholar
Vadi, V, Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration (CUP 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadi, V, Proportionality, Reasonableness and Standards of Review in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Edward Elgar 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vadi, V, ‘Crisis, Continuity, and Change in International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2021) 42 Mich. J. Int’l L. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valcke, C and Grellette, M, ‘Three Functions of Function in Comparative Legal Studies’ in Adams, Maurice and Heirbaut, Dirk (eds), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke (Hart 2014).Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, ‘International Investment Law between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis’ (2009) 12 JIEL 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bossche, P, ‘From Afterthought to Centerpiece: The WTO Appellate Body and Its Rise to Prominence in the World Trading System’ in Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan and Bohanes, Jan (eds), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System (CUP 2006).Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P, ‘Looking for Proportionality in WTO Law’ (2008) 35 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bossche, P, ‘Is There Evolution in the Evolutionary Interpretation of WTO Law?’ in Abi-Saab, Georges and others (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P, ‘The Demise of the WTO Appellate Body: Lessons for Governance of International Adjudication?’, WTI Working Paper No 02/2021.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P and Zdouc, W, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Texts, Cases and Materials (5th ed, CUP 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Ploeg, KP, ‘International Law through Time: On Change and Facticity of International Law’ in Pasquet, Luca, Castellanos-Jankiewicz, León and Van der Ploeg, Klara Polackova (eds), International Law and Time: Narratives and Techniques (Springer 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Harten, G, ‘Investment Rules and the Denial of Change’ (2010) 60 Univ. Toronto LJ 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Harten, G, ‘Foreign Investor Protection and Climate Action: A New Price Tag for Urgent Policies’ [2015] Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No 21/2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Harten, G and Loughlin, M, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’ (2006) 17 EJIL 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandevelde, KJ, Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation (OUP 2010).Google Scholar
Venzke, I, ‘The Role of International Courts as Interpreters and Developers of the Law: Working Out the Jurisgenerative Practice of Interpretation’ (2011) 34 Loy. L.A. Int’l & Comp. LR 99.Google Scholar
Venzke, I, How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (OUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, JE, ‘The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Environmental Law: A Contemporary Assessment’ (2008) 32 Fordham ILJ 232.Google Scholar
Viñuales, JE, Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (CUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, JE, ‘The Organisation of the Anthropocene’ (2018) 1 Brill Research Perspectives in International Legal Theory and Practice 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viñuales, JE, ‘Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: The Current State of Play’ in Miles, Kate (ed), Research Handbook on Environment and Investment Law (Edward Elgar 2019).Google Scholar
Voigt, C, ‘International Courts and the Environment: The Quest for Legitimacy’ in Voigt, Christina (ed), International Judicial Practice on the Environment (CUP 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A, ‘Law and Politics in the WTO – Strategies to Cope with a Deficient Relationship’ (2001) 5 Max Planck Ybk UN Law 609.Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A, ‘Legitimacy of International Economic Governance: Interpretative Approaches to WTO Law and the Prospects of Its Proceduralization’ in Griller, Stefan (ed), International Economic Governance and Non-economic Concerns: New Challenges for the International Legal Order (Springer 2003).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I, ‘On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority’ (2013) 26 LJIL 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Bogdandy, A and Venzke, I, In Whose Name? A Public Law Theory of International Adjudication (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
von Staden, A, ‘The Democratic Legitimacy of Judicial Review beyond the State: Normative Subsidiarity and Judicial Standards of Review’ (2012) 10 ICON 1023.Google Scholar
Vordermayer, M, ‘“Gardening the Great Transformation”: The Anthropocene Concept’s Impact on International Environmental Law Doctrine’ (2014) 25 Ybk IEL 79.Google Scholar
Vranes, E, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (OUP 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wälde, TW and Kolo, A, ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and “Regulatory Taking” in International Law’ (2001) 50 ICLQ 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P, International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation (OUP 2013).Google Scholar
Weeramantry, CG, ‘The Function of the International Court of Justice in the Development of International Law’ (1997) 10 LJIL 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeramantry, R, Chang, B and Sherard-Chow, J, ‘Conciliation and Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Provisions: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis’ (2023) 38 ICSID Review 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, JH, ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2001) 35 JWT 191.Google Scholar
Weimer, M, ‘Reconciling Regulatory Space with External Accountability through WTO Adjudication – Trade, Environment and Development’ (2017) 30 LJIL 901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K, Negotiations in the Case Law of the International Court of Justice: A Functional Analysis (Ashgate 2014).Google Scholar
Wellhausen, RL, ‘International Investment Law and Foreign Direct Reinvestment’ (2019) 73 International Organization 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, W and Gruszczynski, L, ‘Introduction’ in Gruszczynski, Lukasz and Werner, Wouter (eds), Deference in International Courts and Tribunals: Standard of Review and Margin of Appreciation (OUP 2014).Google Scholar
Whytock, CA, ‘Legal Origins, Functionalism, and the Future of Comparative Law’ [2009] Brigham Young ULR 1879.Google Scholar
Wiener, JB, ‘Law and the New Ecology: Evolution, Categories, and Consequences’ (1995) 22 Ecology LQ 325.Google Scholar
Wittich, S, ‘The Judicial Functions of the International Court of Justice’ in Buffard, Isabelle and others (eds), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff 2008).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R, ‘International Law of Cooperation’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2010).Google Scholar
Wyatt, J, Intertemporal Linguistics in International Law: Beyond Contemporaneous and Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation (Hart 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanovich, A, ‘The Evolving WTO Dispute Settlement System’ in Taniguchi, Yasuhei, Yanovich, Alan and Bohanes, Jan (eds), The WTO in the Twenty-First Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia (CUP 2007).Google Scholar
Young, MA, ‘Introduction: The Productive Friction between Regimes’ in Young, Margaret A (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (CUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, MA, ‘Regime Interaction in Creating, Implementing and Enforcing International Law’ in Young, Margaret A (ed), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (CUP 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, MA and Sullivan, SR, ‘Evolution through the Duty to Cooperate: Implications of the Whaling Case at the International Court of Justice’ (2015) 16 MJIL 311.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, ‘The Judicial Function of Investment Tribunals: Taking Foundational Assumptions Seriously’ (2022) 25 JIEL 129.Google Scholar
Zleptnig, S, Non-economic Objectives in WTO Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweigert, K and Kötz, H, Introduction to Comparative Law (Tony Weir tr, OUP 1998).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Joshua Paine, University of Bristol
  • Book: The Functions of International Adjudication and International Environmental Litigation
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108655651.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Joshua Paine, University of Bristol
  • Book: The Functions of International Adjudication and International Environmental Litigation
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108655651.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Joshua Paine, University of Bristol
  • Book: The Functions of International Adjudication and International Environmental Litigation
  • Online publication: 23 May 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108655651.008
Available formats
×