Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:05:17.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Conclusion: Shahsevan identity and history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Richard Tapper
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London
Get access

Summary

On ethnicity and identity

In the opening chapter I showed how anthropologists have failed to agree on a substantive definition of ‘tribe’, arguing that as an analytical concept it is best used – and best matches indigenous concepts – for a ‘state of mind’, a mode of social organization essentially opposed to that of a centralized state. Some of the problems anthropologists have had with the concept of ‘tribe’ are echoed in debates over concepts of ‘ethnicity’ and ‘identity’. I do not intend to review those debates here, but only to make clear my own perspective, which is the same as that employed in the discussion of ‘tribe’.

One dominant approach to ‘ethnic groups’ in history and anthropology has conceived them to be, or to approximate, bio-genetically self-perpetuating populations, whose members share elements of a common culture, identify themselves and are identified by others as a separate category. This ‘primordialist’ approach, fundamentally positivist and objectivist, is a refinement of an older anthropological tradition in which ‘cultures’ were treated as co-terminous with ‘tribes’, ‘societies’, ‘peoples’. Even if adherents of this approach do not all take the genetic assumptions too literally, they still present populations as divided into formally bounded, clear-cut, ethnic groups, with every person belonging to one: a conception that facilitates tidy maps, neat lists of the traits associated with each group, a rigorous classification of types, and cross-cultural comparison.

The flaws in such a conception have become increasingly clear, not least its disregard for the identity claims of the populations concerned and for other cleavages such as those of class that might divide those populations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Frontier Nomads of Iran
A Political and Social History of the Shahsevan
, pp. 315 - 348
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×