Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:06:56.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Conscience Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Frank S. Ravitch
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Conscience claims can arise in many contexts. Perhaps the most famous is conscientious objection to military service, which has a history going back to the beginning of the nation when Quakers objected to military service on religious grounds. Of course the most famous conscientious objection cases occurred during the Vietnam War, when the issue came to the fore in public discourse. Several court cases arose from conscientious objector claims during that era.

Yet it is in the healthcare context that conscience claims have been most prevalent in recent years. In this context, even the term “conscience claim” is controversial. This is the language often used by those advocating for conscience based exemptions to healthcare requirements. Opponents refer to them as “refusal claims”, because they allow healthcare providers to refuse to provide services that they would otherwise be legally required to provide.

I understand that the terminology one chooses to use is not just a matter of semantics, but I decided to use the term “conscience” rather than “refusal.” Although I agree with those who focus on the significant concerns that arise for women's healthcare when certain forms of conscience claims are protected without consideration of the impact on third parties, the simple fact is that these “refusals” are indeed based on religious or moral “conscience.” Therefore the term “conscience” is the better representation of the reasons why we have these exemptions, even if it is not the better representation of the effects that these exemptions may have when they are written in a way that does not consider patients’ rights. By choosing to use the term “conscience,” I am not picking sides on the broader issues relating to reproductive rights – as will be seen clearly in this chapter; rather, I am acknowledging that despite the power of words to define the nature of a phenomenon such as conscience or refusal, there are ways to protect interests on both sides regardless of which term one uses. So, to those of you who prefer the term “refusal,” please do not assume that your position will be ignored or undervalued because I have chosen to use the term “conscience.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Freedom's Edge
Religious Freedom, Sexual Freedom, and the Future of America
, pp. 134 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conscience Claims
  • Frank S. Ravitch, Michigan State University
  • Book: Freedom's Edge
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316670057.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conscience Claims
  • Frank S. Ravitch, Michigan State University
  • Book: Freedom's Edge
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316670057.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conscience Claims
  • Frank S. Ravitch, Michigan State University
  • Book: Freedom's Edge
  • Online publication: 05 September 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316670057.007
Available formats
×