Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:04:48.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Novel Evidence for Ancient Freed People

Xenophon of Ephesus’ Ephesiaca and the Cena Trimalchionis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

By
William M. Owens
Edited by
Sinclair W. Bell ,
Dorian Borbonus  and
Rose MacLean
Sinclair W. Bell
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Dorian Borbonus
Affiliation:
University of Dayton, Ohio
Rose MacLean
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

This chapter compares two fictional texts of the imperial period that represent freed persons, Xenophon of Ephesus’ Ephesiaca and Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis. The comparison advances our understanding of how Roman freed persons may have come to terms with the experience of slavery. Ephesiaca expresses sympathy for the enslaved elite protagonists Habrocomes and Anthia not only as enslaved elites, but as enslaved persons per se. The novel continues its sympathy for the protagonists after they have been restored to freedom. In particular, the conclusion of Ephesiaca offers a sympathetic depiction of the protagonists’ response to what they had endured in slavery: Habrocomes and Anthia dedicate memorials to their parents, who had died while the protagonists were still enslaved; they withdraw from the wider community and reconstitute a family that includes their fellow freed persons; they spend the rest of their lives in celebration that is shadowed by their recollection of the past and the anticipation of their own mortality. The same motifs, viz., memorialization, recollection of a painful past, seclusion from the wider community, family constituted on the basis of shared experience rather than biology, and melancholic celebration, mark the representation of Trimalchio and his fellow freed persons in the Cena. The parallels suggest the possibility that these motifs typified the representation of the experience of freed persons, sympathetically in Ephesiaca and derisively in the Cena.

Keywords

Xenophon of EphesusEphesiacaPetroniusCena Trimalchionisrepresentation of enslaved persons in ancient literaturerepresentation of freed persons in ancient literatureGreek novelRoman novel
Type
Chapter
Information
Freed Persons in the Roman World
Status, Diversity, and Representation
 , pp. 217 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. 2000. Fairytale in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-J. 1994. Business Managers in Ancient Rome: A Social and Economic Study of Institores, 200 B.C.–A.D. 250. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2005. “Mourning the Puer Delicatus: Status Inconsistency and the Ethical Value of Fostering in Statius, Silvae 2.1.” AJP 126.2: 257–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2012. “‘Torture her until she lies’: Torture, Testimony, and Social Status in Roman Rhetorical Education.” G&R 59.2: 165–77.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 1984. “Freedmen in the Satyricon of Petronius.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. 1994. “Trimalchio’s Underworld.” In The Search for the Ancient Novel, ed. Tatum, J., 237–59. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
Busch, A. 2013. “Pederasty and Flavian Family Values in Statius, Siluae 2.1.” CW 107.1: 63–97.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1939. “Θρεπτός and Related Terms in the Inscriptions of Asia Minor.” In Anatolian Studies Presented to W. H. Buckler, ed. Calder, W. M. and Keil, J., 27–62. Manchester.Google Scholar
Cheng, A. A. 2001. The Melancholy of Race: Psychoanalysis, Assimilation and Hidden Grief. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. H. 1981. Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2014. Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faverty, F. E. 1931. “The Story of Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife in Mediaeval Literature.” Harvard Studies and Notes in Philology and Literature 13: 81–127.Google Scholar
Forsdyke, S. 2012. Slaves Tell Tales: And Other Episodes in the Politics of Popular Culture in Ancient Greece. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamauf, R. 2007. “Cum aliter nulla domus tuta esse possit … D. 29, 5, 1: Fear of Slaves and Roman Law.” In Fear of Slaves, Fear of Enslavement in the Ancient Mediterranean = Peur de l’esclave, peur de l’esclavage en Méditerranée ancienne, ed. Serghidou, A., 145–64. Besançon.Google Scholar
Garlan, Y. 1982. Slavery in Ancient Greece, trans. J. Lloyd. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
George, M. 2013. “Cupid Punished: Reflections on a Roman Genre Scene.” In Roman Slavery and Roman Material Culture, ed. George, M., 158–79. Toronto.Google Scholar
Henderson, J, ed. and trans. 2009. Longus: Daphnis and Chloe. Xenophon of Ephesus: Anthia and Habrocomes, Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hopkins, K. 1993. “Novel Evidence for Roman Slavery.” P&P 138: 3–27.Google Scholar
König, J. 2007. “Orality and Authority in Xenophon of Ephesus.” In Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts: Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel, ed. Rimell, V., 1–22. Eelde.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2007. “Love and Murder: Two Textual Problems in Xenophon’s Ephesiaca.” AN 5: 31–40.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 2007. “The True Nature of the Satyricon?” In The Greek and Roman Novel: Parallel Readings, ed. Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J. and Zimmerman, M., 151–68. Eelde and Groningen.Google Scholar
Levine, L. W. 2007. Black Culture and Black Consciousness: Afro-American Folk Thought from Slavery to Freedom. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2013. Love and Providence: Recognition in the Ancient Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. 2011. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, J. N. 1995. Xenophon of Ephesus: His Compositional Technique and the Birth of the Novel. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Sullivan, J. N. 2014. “Xenophon, The Ephesian Tales.” In A Companion to the Ancient Novel, ed. Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N., 43–61. Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, W. M. 2020. The Representation of Slavery in the Greek Novel: Resistance and Appropriation. London.Google Scholar
Petersen, L. H. 2003. “The Baker, His Tomb, His Wife, and Her Breadbasket: The Monument of Eurysaces in Rome.” ArtB 85.2: 230–57.Google Scholar
Petersen, L. H. 2006. The Freedman in Roman Art and Art History. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2017. Slave Theater in the Roman Republic: Plautus and Popular Comedy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rife, J. L. 2002. “Officials of the Roman Provinces in Xenophon’s Ephesiaca.” ZPE 138: 93–108.Google Scholar
Roth, U. 2016. “Liberating the Cena.” CQ 66.2: 614–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, U. 2021. “Speaking Out? Child Sexual Abuse and the Enslaved Voice in the Cena Trimalchionis.” In Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity, ed. Kamen, D. and Marshall, C. W., 211–38. Madison.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. 2003. “Xenophon of Ephesus and Orality in the Roman Empire.” AN 3: 43–62.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. L. 2011. A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Tagliabue, A. 2017. Xenophon’s Ephesiaca: A Paraliterary Love-Story from the Ancient World. Groningen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. 1966. Motif-Index of Folk-Literature. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Uther, H.-J. 2011. The Types of International Folktales. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2011. Narrative and Identity in the Ancient Greek Novel. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youni, M. S. 2008. “Sur le statut juridique de l’affranchi grec dans le monde gréco-romain.” In La fin du statut servile? (affranchissement, libération, abolition …), ed. Gonzalès, A., 161–74. Besançon.Google Scholar
Zelnick-Abramovitz, R. 2005. Not Wholly Free: The Concept of Manumission and the Status of Manumitted Slaves in the Ancient Greek World. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipes, J. 1979. Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theories of Folk and Fairy Tales. London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×