Book contents
- Framing the European Union
- Framing the European Union
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Book part
- Glossary
- 1 The referendum conundrum
- 2 Diffusion channels
- 3 Spain: the quiet referendum
- 4 France: the momentum referendum
- 5 The Netherlands: the reversal referendum
- 6 Luxembourg: the diffusion referendum
- 7 Ireland: the double referendum
- 8 Through the eyes of the European Union
- 9 From champions to campaigners
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Book contents
- Framing the European Union
- Framing the European Union
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Book part
- Glossary
- 1 The referendum conundrum
- 2 Diffusion channels
- 3 Spain: the quiet referendum
- 4 France: the momentum referendum
- 5 The Netherlands: the reversal referendum
- 6 Luxembourg: the diffusion referendum
- 7 Ireland: the double referendum
- 8 Through the eyes of the European Union
- 9 From champions to campaigners
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Framing the European UnionThe Power of Political Arguments in Shaping European Integration, pp. 292 - 308Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Aarts, Kees, and van der Kolk, Henk, eds. Nederlanders en Europa: Het Referendum over de Europese Grondwet. Amsterdam: Utigeverij Bert Bakker, 2005.Google Scholar
Aarts, Kees, and van derKolk, Henk “Understanding the Dutch ‘No’: The Euro, the East, and the Elite.” Political Science and Politics 39, no. 2 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aday, Sean, Farrell, Henry, Lynch, Marc, Sides, John, and Freelon, Deen. “Blogs and Bullets II: New Media and Conflict after the Arab Spring.” Report, United States Institute of Peace. Washington, DC, 2012.Google Scholar
Anderson, Peter, and McLeod, Aileen. “The Great Non-Communicator? The Mass Communication Deficit of the European Parliament and Its Press Directorate.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 5 (2004): 897–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anker, Hans. “The Netherlands, Referendum on the European Constitution, June 1: A Referendum on the Gap between the Citizens and the Political Establishment ” In Election Time 2005: The European Yearbook of Political Campaigning 2005, edited by Hartinger, Sepp. European Association of Political Consultants and Hartinger Consulting Communications, 2006.Google Scholar
Arriba, Ana, and Moreno, Luis. “Spain – Poverty, Social Exclusion and ‘Safety Nets’.” In Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, edited by Ferrera, Maurizio. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Baisnée, Olivier. “The Politics of the Commission as an Information Source.” In Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence, Legitimacy, edited by Smith, Andy, 134–155. London: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Gavin. “A Road Less Travelled: Reflections on the Supreme Court Rulings in Crotty, Coughlan and McKenna (No. 2).” The Institute of International and European Affairs Papers (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basler, Roy. Abraham Lincoln: His Speeches and Writings. 2nd edn. Cleveland: Da Capo Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Becker, Frans, and Cuperus, Rene. “Welfare State Blues: Thirty Years of Reform Policy in the Netherlands.” In Public Discourse and Welfare State Reform: The Social Democratic Experience, edited by Schmidt, Vivien. Amsterdam: Mets & Schilt, 2005.Google Scholar
Bee, Cristiano. “Understanding the EU's Institutional Communication: Principles and Structure of a Contested Policy.” In Mapping the European Public Sphere: Institutions, Media and Civil Society, edited by Bee, Cristiano and Bozzini, Emanuela. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Perspectives on Politics 5, no. 2 (2007): 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, Eric, and Aarts, Kees. “Explaining the Rise of the LPF: Issues, Discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election.” Acta Politica 41 (2006): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, Robert, and Snow, David. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26, no. 1 (2000): 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berganza, Rosa. “Media Framing of the Spanish Referendum on EU Constitution.” In International Communication Association. Dresden, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar
Beus, Jos de. “The European Union and the Public Sphere: Conceptual Issues, Political Tensions, Moral Concerns, and Empirical Questions ” In The Making of a European Public Sphere, edited by Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Bijsmans, Patrick, and Altides, Christina. “‘Bridging the Gap’ between EU Politics and Citizens? The European Commission, National Media and EU Affairs in the Public Sphere.” Journal of European Integration 29, no. 3 (2007): 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnema, Harmen, and Crum, Ben. “Resistance to Europe as a Carrier of Mass-Elite Incongruence: The Case of The Netherlands.” In Les Résistances à l'Europe: Cultures Nationals, Ideologies et Strategies d'Acteurs, edited by Lacroix, Justine and Coman, Ramona. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles, 2007.Google Scholar
Blanco, Víctor Sampedro, Ruiz Jiménez, Antonia María, and Reis, Bruno Carriço. “El Referendo del Tratado de la UE en la Prensa Española de Referencia: A Favor de la Constitución o en Contra de la Unión Europea.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 20 (2005).Google Scholar
Brady, Henry, Johnston, Richard, and Sides, John. “The Study of Political Campaigns.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, edited by Brady, Henry and Johnston, Richard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Braun, Dietmar, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. “Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18, no. 3 (2006): 298–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, Robert. “The Diffusion of Racist Violence in the Netherlands: Discourse and Distance.” Journal of Peace Research 48, no. 6 (2011): 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, Daniel, and Coppedge, Michael. “Diffusion Is No Illusion: Neighbor Emulation in the Third Wave of Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 4 (2006): 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouard, Sylvain, and Sauger, Nicolas. “Comprendre la victoire du “Non”: proximité partisane, conjoncture et attitude à l’égard de l'Europe.” In Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen du 29 mai 2005: comprendre le “Non” français, edited by Laurent, Annie and Sauger, Nicolas. Paris: CEVIPOF, 2005.Google Scholar
Brouard, Sylvain, and Tiberj, Vincent. “The French Referendum: The Not So Simple Act of Saying Nay.” Political Science and Politics 39, no. 2 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, and Wolchik, Sharon. “International Diffusion and Postcommunist Electoral Revolutions.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39, no. 3 (2006): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buruma, Ian. Murder in Amsterdam: The Death of Theo van Gogh and the Limits of Tolerance. New York: The Penguin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Cabrero, Gregorio Rodríguez. “The Consolidation of the Spanish Welfare State (1975–2010).” In The Spanish Welfare State in European Context, edited by Guillén, Ana Marta and León, Margarita. Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. The American Voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Capdevila, Arantxa, Gómez, Lorena, and Aubia, Laia. “Partisan Strategies in Light of the European Constitution in Spain.” EpsNet Electronic Journal 5 (2006).Google Scholar
Chabot, Sean. “Framing, Transnational Diffusion, and African-American Intellectuals in the Land of Gandhi.” International Review of Social History 49 (2004): 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, Raj. “The 2008 Spanish Election: A Balancing Game.” West European Politics 31, no. 5 (2008): 1069–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies.” American Political Science Review 101, no. 4 (2007): 637–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10 (2007): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James “A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments.” Journal of Communication 57, no. 1 (2007): 99–118.Google Scholar
Chryssochoou, Dimitris. “Europe's Contested Democracy.” In European Union Politics, edited by Cini, Michelle and Borragán, Nieves Pérez-Solórzano. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
CIA. “The World Factbook” (2010), https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/lu.html.Google Scholar
Clement, Franz. “Le travail intérimaire au Luxembourg: Un régulateur du marché du travail dans la Grande Région?” European Employment Services (EURES) (2006).Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos. “Business as Usual: EU Policy Under Zapatero – The EU Policy of the Socialist Government 2004–2008.” In American Political Science Association. Toronto, Canada 2009.Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos “Why Convene Referendums? Explaining Choices in EU Constitutional Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 8 (2007): 1311–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closa, Carlos, and Heywood, Paul. Spain and the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, John. “Irish Public Opinion and the New Europe.” In Ireland and the European Union: Nice, Enlargement and the Future of Europe, edited by Holmes, Michael. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Cobb, Michael, and Kuklinski, James. “Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion.” American Journal of Political Science 41, no. 1 (1997): 88–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David. New York: The Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne. “Spain: The Uneasy Transition.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, edited by Cornelius, Wayne, Tsuda, Takeyuki, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Tsuda, Takeyuki, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James, eds. Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Criddle, Byron. “The French Referendum on the Maastricht Treaty September 1992.” Parliamentary Affairs 46, no. 2 (1993): 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crum, Ben. “The EU Constitutional Treaty in the Netherlands: Could a Better Embedding Have Made a Difference?” WRR Scientific Council for Government Policy Web Publications no. 25 (2007).Google Scholar
Crum, Ben “Party Stances in the Referendums on the EU Constitution: Causes and Consequences of Competition and Collusion.” European Union Politics 8, no. 1 (2007): 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, R, and Laver, Michael. “Referendum Dynamics and the Irish Divorce Amendment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54, no. 1 (1990): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Peter. The Extreme Right in France, 1789 to the Present: From de Maistre to Le Pen. New York: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kathryn Anne. Language Planning in Multilingual Contexts: Political Communities and Schools in Luxembourg. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, Claes. “No News Is Bad News! The Role of the Media and News Framing in Embedding Europe ” WRR Scientific Council for Government Policy Web Publications 20 (2007).Google Scholar
de Vreese, Claes “Political Parties in Dire Straits? Consequences of National Referendums for Political Parties.” Party Politics 12, no. 5 (2006): 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, Claes “Why European Citizens Will Reject the European Constitution.” Harvard University Minda de Gunzburg Centre for European Studies Working Paper 116 (2004).Google Scholar
de Vreese, Claes, and Boomgaarden, Hajo. “Immigration, Identity, Economy and the Government: Understanding Variation in Explanations for Outcomes of EU-related Referendums.” In The Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns: An International Perspective, edited by De Vreese, Claes. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vreese, Claes, and Semetko, Holli. Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine. “Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects National Elections.” European Union Politics 8, no. 3 (2007): 363–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeClercq, Willy. “Reflection on Information and Communication Policy of the European Community.” Brussels 1993.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul, and Ederveen, Sjef, eds. European Times: Public Opinion on Europe & Working Hours, Compared and Explained. The Hague: SCP The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis 2005.Google Scholar
Dekker, Paul, and Wennekers, Charlotte. “Publieke Opinies over Europa: Tussen Abstracte Steun en Concrete Ergernissen.” Internationale Spectator 59, no. 12 (2005): 627–630.Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne. “29th May 2005: A Devastated Landscape.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “The Dutch Reject the European Constitution.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “Luxembourg Says ‘Yes’ to the European Constitution.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “Referendum on the European Constitution in Luxembourg 10th July 2005.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “Referendum on the European Constitution in Luxembourg: A Roundup a Week before the Election.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “Referendum on the European Constitution in Spain on 20th February: An Assessment Just a Few Days before the Election.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “Referendum on the Ratification of the European Constitution in Spain.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Deloy, Corinne “The Spanish Approve the European Constitution by a Wide Majority.” Robert Schuman Foundation Report (2005).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc. Liberation Technology: Social Media and the Struggle for Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey. “The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition, or Learning?” Annual Review of Sociology 33 (2007): 449–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Róisín. Ireland, Neutrality and European Security Integration. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, David. “British Employment Policy in the 1980s: Learning from the American Experience.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 10, no. 1 (1997): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, David, Greenwold, Stephen, and Marsh, David. “Policy Transfer: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed, But Why Red, White and Blue?” Parliamentary Affairs 52, no. 4 (1999): 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, David, and Marsh, David. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13, no. 1 (2000): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” Journal of Politics 63, no. 4 (2001): 1041–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James, Jacobs, Lawrence, and Ostermeier, Eric. “Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image.” Journal of Politics 66, no. 4 (2004): 1180–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James, and Nelson, Kjersten. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 4 (2003): 729–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Patrick, Fehlen, Fernand, Kies, Raphaël, and Poirier, Philippe. Le Référendum sur le Traité établissant une Constitution pour l'Europe: Rapport élaboré pour la Chambre des Députés. Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg, 2007.Google Scholar
Duseigneur, Guillaume. “Lorsque l'Union Européenne questionne l'identité partisane: Le référendum interne du PS sur le TCE.” In Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen du 29 mai 2005: comprendre le “Non” français, edited by Laurent, Annie and Sauger, Nicolas. Paris: CEVIPOF, 2005.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard, and Dalton, Russell. “Europeans and the European Community: The Dynamics of Public Support for European Integration.” International Organization 47, no. 4 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Matthijs, De Vreese, Claes, Boomgaarden, Hajo, and Schuck, Andreas. “The Impact of Information Acquisition on EU Performance Judgments.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (2012): 728–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, and Simmons, Beth. “On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598, no. 1 (2005): 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, E. “How to Solve the Riddle of Belated Euro Contestation in the Netherlands?” WRR Scientific Council for Government Policy Web Publications no. 26 (2007).Google Scholar
Escribano, Antonio. “The EC and Spanish Immigration Policy.” In Spain and EC Membership Evaluated, edited by Barbado, Amparo. London: Pinter Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
EurActiv. “Interview with Christophe Leclercq, EurActiv Founder & Publisher, on EU Communication.” Euractiv, 2005.Google Scholar
EurActiv “Interview: Commissioner Wallström on the EU's Communication Strategy.” EurActiv, 2005.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer. “The European Constitution: Post-referendum Survey in Luxembourg.” European Commission: Brussels, 2005.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “The European Constitution: Post-referendum Survey in the Netherlands.” European Commission: Brussels (2005).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Lisbon Treaty Post-referendum Survey Ireland 2009.” European Commission: Brussels (2009).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Post-referendum Survey in Ireland.” European Commission: Brussels (2008).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Qualitative Study on EU Citizens and the Euro in the Months Following its Introduction.” European Commission: Brussels (2002).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Special Eurobarometer: Face-to-face Interviews with EU 25 on the Draft European Constitution.” European Commission: Brussels, November, 2004.Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Standard Eurobarometer 61: Public Opinion in the EU, Spring 2004.” European Commission: Brussels (2004).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Standard Eurobarometer 62: Public Opinion in the EU, Autumn 2004.” European Commission: Brussels (2004).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Standard Eurobarometer 64: Public Opinion in the EU, Autumn 2005.” European Commission: Brussels (2005).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Standard Eurobarometer 68: Public Opinion in the EU, Autumn 2007.” European Commission: Brussels (2007).Google Scholar
Eurobarometer “Standard Eurobarometer 71: Public Opinion in the EU, Spring 2009.” European Commission: Brussels (2009).Google Scholar
European Commission. “Action Plan to Improve Communicating Europe by the Commission.” Brussels 2005.Google Scholar
European Commission “The Commission's Contribution to the Period of Reflection and Beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate.” Brussels 2005.Google Scholar
European Commission “Evaluation of the Plan D / Debate Europe Citizen Consultation Projects: Final Report.” Brussels 2009.Google Scholar
European Parliament. “Report on the White Paper on a European Communication Policy.” Brussels 2006.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 (1980): 889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGibbon, John. “Ireland's No to Lisbon: Learning the Lessons from the Failure of the Yes and the Success of the No Side.” Sussex European Institute, SEI Working Paper 110 (2009).Google Scholar
FitzGibbon, John “The Second Referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon in the Republic of Ireland, 2nd October 2009.” European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing Paper 17 (2009).Google Scholar
Flood, Chris. “French Euroscepticism and the Politics of Indifference.” In French Relations with the European Union, edited by Drake, Helen. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 3 (2006): 533–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Font, Joan. “El Voto de los Españoles en el Referendum sobre el Tratado Constitucional.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 22 (2005).Google Scholar
Font, Joan, and Rodriguez, Elisa. “The Spanish Referendum on the EU Constitution: Issues, Party Cues and Second-Order Effects.” In The Midwest Political Science Association Annual National Conference. Chicago, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
Fortuyn, Pim. Zielloos Europa: Tegen een Europa van Technocraten, Bureaucratie, Subsidies en Overmijdelijke Fraude. Utrecht: A. W. Bruna, 1997.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, van derEijk, Cees, and Marsh, Michael. “Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht.” West European Politics 18, no. 3 (1995): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew. “Economic Integration and Mass Politics: Market Liberalization and Public Attitudes in the European Union.” American Journal of Political Science 42, no. 3 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew, and Palmer, Harvey. “Understanding Variation in Public Support for European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 27, no. 1 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, Matthew, and Scheve, Kenneth. “Mixed Messages: Party Dissent and Mass Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 8, no. 1 (2007): 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William. “Political Discourse and Collective Action.” In International Social Movement Research, edited by Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Tarrow, Sidney. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Garry, John, Marsh, Michael, and Sinnott, Richard. “‘Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ Effects in EU Referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums.” European Union Politics 6, no. 2 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzo, Emanuele. “Témoignage.” In Témoignages à la mémoire de Jean Monnet, edited by Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe. Lausanne: Fondation Jean Monnet pour l'Europe, 1989.Google Scholar
Gerstlé, Jacques. “The Impact of Television on French Referendum Campaign in 2005.” Notre Europe (2006).Google Scholar
Gilland, Karin “Referenda in the Republic of Ireland.” Electoral Studies 18 (1999): 411–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleissner, Martin, and De Vreese, Claes. “News about the EU Constitution. Journalistic Challenges and Media Portrayal of the European Union Constitution.” Journalism 6, no. 2 (2005): 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glencross, Andrew, and Trechsel, Alexander. “First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four Member States.” West European Politics 34, no. 4 (2011): 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
Gomez-Reino, Marga, Llamazares, Ivan, and Ramiro, Luis. “Euroscepticism and Political Parties in Spain.” In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism: Volume I, edited by Szczerbiak, Aleks and Taggart, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gora, Anna. “The Irish Lisbon Treaty Referendum: Does Direct Democracy Work for the EU?” Paper presented at the 8th ECSA-C Biennial Conference, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (2010).Google Scholar
Graber, Doris. Processing Politics: Learning from Television in the Internet Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramberger, Marc. Die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der Europäischen Kommission 1952–1996: PR zur Legitimation von Integration?. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997.Google Scholar
Grunberg, Gerard. “Euroscepticism in France, 1992–2002.” In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism: Volume I, edited by Szczerbiak, Aleks and Taggart, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Guibernau, Montserrat. “Nations without States in the EU: The Catalan Case.” In European Integration and the Nationalities Question, edited by McGarry, John and Keating, Michael. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Guillen, Ana, Alvarez, Santiago, and E Silva, Pedro Adao. “Redesigning the Spanish and Portuguese Welfare States: The Impact of Accession into the European Union.” In In Spain and Portugal in the European Union: The First Fifteen Years, edited by Royo, Sebastian and Manuel, Paul. London: Frank Cass, 2003.Google Scholar
Guiraudon, Virginie. “The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain: A Political Sociology Approach.” Journal of European Public Policy 10, no. 2 (2003): 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyomarch, Alain, Machin, Howard, and Ritchie, Ella. France in the European Union. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Kerstin. “European Integration and Civil Society in Spain.” In Spain and Portugal in the European Union: The First Fifteen Years, edited by Royo, Sebastian and Manuel, Paul. London: Frank Cass, 2003.Google Scholar
Hamilton, David, and Zanna, Mark. “Differential Weighting of Favorable and Unfavorable Attributes in Impressions of Personality.” Journal of Experimental Results in Personality 6 (1972): 204–212.Google Scholar
Harmsen, Robert. “The Dutch Referendum on the Ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty.” European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing Paper 13 (2005).Google Scholar
Harmsen, Robert “Euroscepticism in the Netherlands: Stirrings of Dissent.” In Euroscepticism: Party Politics, National Identity and European Integration, edited by Harmsen, Robert and Spiering, Menno. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Joseph, and Corkill, David. Spain: A Modern European Economy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Hausemer, Piere. “Luxembourg's Referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty.” European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing Paper 14 (2005).Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter, Sandell, Rickard, and Stern, Charlotta. “Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party.” American Journal of Sociology 106, no. 1 (2000): 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara. Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara “How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums.” Party Politics 12, no. 5 (2006): 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, Sara “When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15, no. 1 (2005): 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Jean-Paul. “Lëtzebuergesch in Luxembourg Today.” In Luxembourg and Lëtzebuergesch: Language and Communication at the Crossroads of Europe, edited by Newton, Gerald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hollifield, James. “France: Republicanism and the Limits of Immigration Control.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, edited by Cornelius, Wayne, Tsuda, Takeyuki, Martin, Philip, and Hollifield, James. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Holman, Otto. Integrating Southern Europe: EC Expansion and the Transnationalization of Spain. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Holmes, Michael. “The Development of Opposition to European Integration in Ireland.” In Ireland and the European Union: Nice, Enlargement and the Future of Europe, edited by Holmes, Michael. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Holmes, Michael “The Referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon in the Republic of Ireland, 12 June 2008.” European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing Paper 16 (2008): 1–9.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 8 (2002): 965–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David. The French Road to European Monetary Union. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. “Public Opinion and European Integration.” In European Integration, edited by Lindberg, Leon and Scheingold, Stuart. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Examiner, Irish. “EU Fund to Help Former Dell Staff Creates 250 Jobs.” Irish Examiner, 27 September 2011.Google Scholar
Times, Irish. “Lisbon Rejection Would Hurt Ireland, Says Barroso.” Irish Times, 19 September 2009.Google Scholar
Ivaldi, Gilles. “Beyond France's 2005 Referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty: Second-order Model, Anti-establishment Attitudes and the End of the Alternative European Utopia.” West European Politics 29, no. 1 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. “Agenda Setting and Beyond: Television News and the Strength of Political Issues.” In Agenda Formation, edited by Riker, Wiliam. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef, and Storsved, Ann. “Legitimacy through Referendum? The Nearly Successful Domino-Strategy of the EU-Referendums in Austria, Finland, Sweden and Norway.” West European Politics 18, no. 4 (1995): 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Oliver, and Lodge, Martin. “The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research.” Political Studies Review 1 (2003): 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauregui, Gurutz. “Basque Nationalism: Sovereignty, Independence and European Integration.” In European Integration and the Nationalities Question, edited by McGarry, John and Keating, Michael. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer. “Survival of the Fittest: Rhetoric during the Course of an Election Campaign.” Political Psychology 25, no. 4 (2004): 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Barabas, Jason. “Bankrupt Rhetoric: How Misleading Information Affects Knowledge about Social Security.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70, no. 3 (2006): 278–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. The Challenge of Direct Democracy: The 1992 Canadian Referendum. Montreal: McGill – Queen's University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Richard, Hagen, Michael, and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard. “Euroscepticism in Parliament: A Comparative Analysis of the European and National Parliaments.” In Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism Volume 2, edited by Szczerbiak, Aleks and Taggart, Paul. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kerschen, Nicole. “The Welfare System of Luxembourg: From Past Dependency to the European Approach.” In The Handbook of European Welfare Systems, edited by Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Kevin, Deirdre. Europe in the Media. A Comparison of Reporting, Representation, and Rhetoric in National Media Systems in Europe. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinnijenhuis, Jan, Takens, Janet, and van Atteveldt, Wouter. “Toen Europa de Dagbladen Ging Vullen.” In Nederlanders en Europa: Het Referendum over de Europese Grondwet, edited by Aarts, Kees and van der Kolk, Henk. Amsterdam: Utigeverij Bert Bakker, 2005.Google Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey, and Reilly, David. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 53, no. 1 (2000): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, Brigid, and O'Mahony, Jane. Ireland and the European Union. New York: Palgrave, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasserre Capdeville, Jérôme. Le secret bancaire: Étude de droit comparé: France, Suisse, Luxembourg. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires d'Aix-Marseille, 2006.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (1985): 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Lechner, Frank. The Netherlands: Globalization and National Identity. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence. “Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums.” European Journal of Political Research 41, no. 6 (2002): 711–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. New York: Broadview Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDuc, Lawrence “Saving the Pound or Voting for Europe? Expectations for Referendums on the Constitution and the Euro.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 15, no. 2 (2005): 169–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Wilhelm. “The Treaty of Nice and the Convention on the Future of Europe.” European Parliament, 2011.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Leon, and Scheingold, Stuart. Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in European Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Linos, Katerina. “Diffusion through Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 3 (2011): 678–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” The American Political Science Review 86, no. 2 (1992): 390–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, Pat. Public Opinion, Politics and Society in Contemporary Ireland. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Madroñal, Juan Carlos. “Spanish Referendum on the EU Constitution: Monitoring Report.” Mas Democracia and Democracy International Monitoring Reports (2005).Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. “The Limited Impact of Europe on National Party System.” West European Politics 23, no. 4 (2000): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter “Political Opposition and the European Union.” Government and Opposition 42 (2007): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, George, Sullivan, John, Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and Stevens, Daniel. “The Emotional Foundation of Political Cognition: The Impact of Extrinsic Anxiety on the Formation of Political Tolerance Judgments.” Political Psychology 26, no. 6 (2005): 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Gary, Hooghe, Liesbet, Nelson, Moira, and Edwards, Erica. “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality.” Comparative Political Studies 39, no. 2 (2006): 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marthaler, Sally. “The French Referendum on Ratification of the Constitutional Treaty.” European Parties Elections and Referendums Network, Referendum Briefing Paper 12 (2005).Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Isabel, Lecheler, Sophie, and De Vreese, Claes. “Information Flow and Communication Deficit: Perceptions of Brussels-Based Correspondents and EU Officials.” Journal of European Integration 34, no. 4 (2012): 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. “‘Initiator’ and ‘Spin-off’ Movements: Diffusion Processes in Protest Cycles.” In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, edited by Traugott, Mark. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian. “Elections without Cues: The 1999 Australian Republic Referendum.” Australian Journal of Political Science 36, no. 2 (2001): 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, Lauren. “Public Support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat?” The Journal of Politics 64, no. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrano, Juan Díez. Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrano, Juan Díez, and Gray, Emily. “Framing the European Union in National Public Spheres.” In The Making of a European Public Sphere, edited by Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Menendez-Alarcon, Antonio. The Cultural Realm of European Integration: Social Representations in France, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2004.Google Scholar
Mény, Yves. “De la démocratie en Europe: Old Concepts and New Challenges.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41, no. 1 (2002): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christoph. “Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union's Communication Deficit.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37, no. 4 (1999): 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. “In Defense of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 4 (2002): 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Daniel. “The Diffusion of Collective Violence: Infectiousness, Susceptibility, and Mass Media Networks.” American Journal of Sociology 106, no. 1 (2000): 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, and Niemi, Richard. “Educated Guesses: The Process of Answering Factual Knowledge Questions in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59, no. 3 (1995): 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Petry, Francois, and Belanger, Eric. “Issue-Based Strategies in Election Campaigns: The Case of Healthcare in the 2000 Canadian Federal Election.” Political Communication (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, Catherine. “Fighting the Last War: Applying the Policy Transfer Approach to Election Campaigns.” Party Politics 16, no. 5 (2010): 608–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Gerald, ed. Luxembourg and Lëtzebuergesch: Language and Communication at the Crossroads of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijeboer, Arjen. “The First Dutch Referendum: A Pre-Ballot Assessment.” Notre Europe no. 18 (2005).Google Scholar
Nijeboer, Arjen “Peoples’ Vengeances: The Dutch Referendum.” European Constitutional Law Review 1 (2005): 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. “Representation and the Democratic Deficit.” European Journal of Political Research 32, no. 2 (1997): 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Curtice, John, Sanders, David, Scammell, Margaret, and Semetko, Holli. On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brennan, John. “Ireland's European Discourse and the National Forum on Europe.” In Ireland and the European Union: Nice, Enlargement and the Future of Europe, edited by Holmes, Michael. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
O'Drisceoil, Donal. Censorship In Ireland 1939–1945 Neutrality, Politics and Society. Cork: Cork University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Oostlander, Arie. “Report of the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education and the Media on the Information Policy of the European Community.” Brussels: European Parliament, 1993.Google Scholar
Ovodenko, Alexander, and Keohane, Robert. “Institutional Diffusion in International Environmental Affairs.” International Affairs 88, no. 3 (2012): 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelkmans, J., and Kessel, S. van. “Encapsulating Services in the ‘Polder’: The Bolkestein Directive in Dutch Politics.” WRR Scientific Council for Government Policy Web Publications no. 31 (2007).Google Scholar
Perea, Eva Anduiza. “Who Abstained and Why? Voter Turnout for the Referendum on the Treaty to Establish a European Constitution.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 34 (2005).Google Scholar
Perni, Orietta. “Migration in Spain from Aznar to Zapatero: A Real Change of Direction?” In International Studies Association 47th Annual Convention. San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Perrineau, Pascal. “The Conditions for the Re-emergence of an Extreme Right Wing in France: The National Front, 1984–1998.” In The Development of the Radical Right in France: From Boulanger to Le Pen, edited by Arnold, Edward. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Pfau, Michael, and Kenski, Henry. Attack Politics: Strategy and Defense. New York: Praeger, 1990.Google Scholar
Phádraig, Máire Nic Ghiolla, and Hilliard, Betty. “Socioeconomic Change in Ireland since the 1980s: The Tiger, the Transnational Corporations and the Peace Dividend.” In Changing Ireland in International Comparison, edited by Hilliard, Betty and Ghiolla Phádraig, Máire Nic. Dublin: The Liffey Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Piar, Christophe, and Gerstlé, Jacques. “Le cadrage du référendum sur la Constitution européenne: La dynamique d'une campagne à rebondissements.” In Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen du 29 mai 2005: comprendre le “Non” français, edited by Laurent, Annie and Sauger, Nicolas. Paris: CEVIPOF, 2005.Google Scholar
Pierskalla, Jan, and Hollenbach, Florian. “Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Cell Phone Coverage on Political Violence in Africa.” American Political Science Review 107, no. 2 (2013): 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polletta, Francesca, and Kai Ho, M.. “Frames and their Consequences.” In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, edited by Goodin, Robert and Tilly, Charles. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Pondelinger, Germain. “Country Report: ELA – Luxembourg.” European Journal for Education Law and Policy 3 (1999): 151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, Felicia, and John, Oliver. “Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, no. 3 (1991): 380–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qvortrup, Matt. “Rebels without a Cause? The Irish Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.” The Political Quarterly 80 (2009): 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, Howard, Ron, James, and Thoms, Oskar. “Shaping the Northern Media's Human Rights Coverage: 1986–2000.” Journal of Peace Research 44, no. 4 (2007): 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasinski, Kenneth. “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53, no. 3 (1989): 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Nicholas. “Europe and Ireland's Changing Security Policy.” In Ireland and the European Union: Nice, Enlargement and the Future of Europe, edited by Holmes, Michael. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8, no. 1 (1980): 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricard-Nihoul, Gaëtane. “The French ‘No’ Vote on 29 May 2005: Understanding and Action.” Notre Europe 44 (2005).Google Scholar
Ricard-Nihoul, Gaëtane, and Larhant, Morgan. “How to Explain the Unexpected: An Assessment of the French Constitutional Referendum.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 57 (2005).Google Scholar
Richard, Arsène, and Pabst, Ronald. “Evaluation of the French Referendum on the EU Constitution, May 2005.” Democracy International Monitoring Reports (2005).Google Scholar
Riker, William, ed. Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Roes, Theo, ed. Facts and Figures of the Netherlands: Social and Cultural Trends 1995–2006. The Hague: SCP – The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, 2008.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, George. Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Royo, Sebastian. Varieties of Capitalism in Spain: Remaking the Spanish Economy for the New Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Rudé, George. The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England 1730–1848. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuck, Andreas. “Referendum Campaign Dynamics: News Media, Campaign Effects and Direct Democracy.” University of Amsterdam, 2005.Google Scholar
Schuck, Andreas, and de Vreese, Claes. “The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the Role of EU Skepticism and the Campaign.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 18, no. 1 (2008): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scuto, Denis. “EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Report: Luxembourg.” European University Institute Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, 2009.Google Scholar
Seidendorf, Stefan. “Contesting Europe: The Constitutive Impact of Discursive Dynamics on National Referendum Campaigns.” European Political Science Review 2 (2010): 423–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, J. G. The Extreme Right in France: From Pétain to Le Pen. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott, Richard. “Cleavages, Parties and Referendums: Relationships between Representative and Direct Democracy in the Republic of Ireland.” European Journal of Political Research 41, no. 6 (2002): 811–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott, Richard, and Elkink, Johan. “Attitudes and Behaviour in the Second Referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon.” Report for the Department of Foreign Affairs (2010).Google Scholar
Sinnott, Richard, Elkink, Johan, O'Rourke, Kevin, and McBride, James. “Attitudes and Behaviour in the Referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon.” Report for the Department of Foreign Affairs (2009).Google Scholar
Siune, Karen, Svensson, Palle, and Tonsgaard, Ole. “The European Union: The Danes Said ‘No’ in 1992, But ‘Yes’ in 1993: How and Why?” Electoral Studies 13, no. 2 (1994): 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Timothy B. France in Crisis: Welfare, Inequality and Globalization since 1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul, and Theriault, Sean. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, edited by Saris, Willem and Sniderman, Paul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Snow, David, and Benford, Robert. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, edited by Morris, Aldon and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Snow, David, Rochford Jr, E. Burke, Worden, Steven, and Benford, Robert. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (1986): 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, Sarah. “Diffusion Processes within and across Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Malden, UK: Blackwell, 2003.Google Scholar
Spanier, Bernd. Europe, Anyone?: The “Communication Deficit” of the European Union Revisited. Germany: Nomos, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spilerman, Seymour. “Structural Characteristics of Cities and the Severity of Racial Disorders.” American Sociological Review 41 (1976): 771–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
STATEC. “Economic and Social Portrait of Luxembourg.” National Statistical Institute of Luxembourg, 2003.Google Scholar
Statham, Paul. “Introduction.” In The Making of a European Public Sphere, edited by Koopmans, Ruud and Statham, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Statham, Paul “Making Europe News: How Journalists View Their Role and Media Performance.” Journalism 9, no. 4 (2008): 398–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statham, Paul “Media Performance and Europe's ‘Communication Deficit’: A Study of Journalists' Perceptions.” In Mapping the European Public Sphere: Institutions, Media and Civil Society, edited by Bee, Cristiano and Bozzini, Emanuela. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Stell, Gerald. Luxembourgish Standardization: Context, Ideology and Comparability with the Case of West Frisian. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters Louvain-La-Neuve, 2006.Google Scholar
Svensson, Palle. “Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis.” European Journal of Political Research 41, no. 6 (2002): 733–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, Aleks, and Taggart, Paul. EU Enlargement and Referendums. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. “Keynote Article: Questions of Europe –3. The Domestic Politics of the 2005 French and Dutch Referendums and their Challenge for the Study of European Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44, no. 1 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Paul “A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 33, no. 3 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Paul, and Szczerbiak, Aleks. “Contemporary Euroscepticism in the Party Systems of the European Union Candidate States of Central and Eastern Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 43, no. 1 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Paul, and Szczerbiak, Aleks “The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in EU Member and Candidate States.” Opposing Europe Research Network Working Paper 6 (2002).Google Scholar
Takens, Janet. “A Negative Campaign? A Study of the News Coverage of the European Constitution and its Effects.” Free University of Amsterdam, 2006.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, Markus. “European Public Spheres and the EU's Communication Strategy: From Deficits to Policy Fit?” Perspectives on European Politics & Society 9, no. 3 (2008): 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Torreblanca, José. “Farewell to Funds? Keys to Understanding Spain's Position When Negotiating the 2007–13 EU Budget.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 21 (2005).Google Scholar
Torreblanca, José “Spain's Referendum on the European Constitution: A Double Disappointment.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 27 (2005): 1–6.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. “Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions.” In The Limits of Rationality, edited by Cook, Karen and Levi, Margaret, ix, 426 p. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
United States Department of State. “Country Reports.” (2010), http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/lu/.Google Scholar
Vallvé, José Luis González. “España y Francia Frente al Referéndum Constitucional: Entre la Inquietud y la Esperanza.” Elcano Royal Institute Working Paper 55 (2005).Google Scholar
van Oorschot, Wim. “The Dutch Welfare System: From Collective Solidarity towards Individual Responsibility.” In The Handbook of European Welfare Systems, edited by Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
Wallace, William, and Smith, Julie. “Democracy or Technocracy? European Integration and the Problem of Popular Consent.” West European Politics 18, no. 3 (1995): 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallström, Margot. “Houses of the Oireachtas: Presentation of European Commissioner for Institutional Relations and Communications Strategy.” Dublin 2005.Google Scholar
Wallström, Margot “Ireland and Lisbon: Giving People the Facts: Speech at the Irish Institute of European Affairs.” Brussels 2008.Google Scholar
Wallström, Margot “Opening Speech at the Stakeholders Conference on Understanding Public Opinion.” Madrid 2006.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. “European Neo-Constitutionalism. In Search of Foundations for the European Constitutional Order.” Political Studies 44, no. 3 (1996): 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. “Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57, no. 2 (2005): 262–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRR Scientific Council for Government Policy. Rediscovering Europe in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar