Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:58:08.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Tuning fine-tuning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

By
Ernan McMullin
Edited by
John D. Barrow ,
Simon Conway Morris ,
Stephen J. Freeland  and
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Ernan McMullin
Affiliation:
Program in History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame
John D. Barrow
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Simon Conway Morris
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen J. Freeland
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Charles L. Harper, Jr
Affiliation:
John Templeton Foundation
Get access

Summary

The chapters in this volume, written from a wide variety of perspectives, explore the possibility of extending the theme of “fine-tuning” beyond the domain of cosmology, where it first entered into serious discussion in the mid-1970s, to other sciences such as biochemistry and biology. As a prelude to this investigation, it seems worthwhile to explore the theme of fine-tuning itself in some detail, given the ambiguities that still surround it and the vigor of the continuing disagreement as to what its implications are. How did fine-tuning make its way into the cosmological discussion? What precisely did – and does – it amount to? What were – and still are – the responses to it? How is one to evaluate those responses? Achieving a measure of clarity on these issues should make it easier to appreciate the search for fine-tuning or its analogs elsewhere in the sciences.

The infinities of space and time in Newtonian mechanics were not propitious to the formulation of a cosmology, a theory of the cosmic whole, although the notion of gravity gave a hint, at least, as to how material complexity could form. The unification of space and time by Einstein's general theory in a non-Euclidean geometrical framework offered new possibilities, and Hubble's subsequent confirmation of galactic expansion pointed Lemaître to a universe model that would, from a “primeval atom,” expand into the universe we know.

Type
Chapter
Information
Fitness of the Cosmos for Life
Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning
 , pp. 70 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrow, J. D. (2002). Constants of Nature: From Alpha to Omega. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Barrow, J. D. and Tipler, F. J. (1986). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Behe, M. (1996). Darwin's Black Box. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N. (2002). Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, B. (1974). Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology. In The Confrontation of Cosmological Theory with Astronomical Data, ed. Longair, M. S.. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. B. and Hawking, S. W. (1973). Why is the universe isotropic?Astrophysical Journal, 180, 317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway Morris, S. (2003). Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, M. A. (1993). God and the New Cosmology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Corey, M. A. (2001). The God Hypothesis: Discovering Design in Our “Just Right” Goldilocks Universe. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1981). Life Itself. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Davies, P. (1999). The Fifth Miracle. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1983). Universal Darwinism. In Evolution from Molecules to Man, ed. Bendal, D. S.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–25. [I owe this reference to Iris Fry.]Google Scholar
Duve, C. (1995). Vital Dust: Life as a Cosmic Imperative. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. (1961). Dirac's cosmology and Mach's principle, Nature, 192, 440–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1937). The cosmological constants. Nature, 139, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, D. W. F., Pixley, R. E., Wenzel, W. A.et al. (1953a). The 7.68 MeV state in C12. Physical Review, 92, 649–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, D. N. F., Wenzel, W. A. and Whaling, W. (1953b). A state in C12 predicted from astrophysical evidence. Physical Review, 92, 1095.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. F. R., Kirchner, U. and Stoeger, W. R. (2003). Multiverses and physical cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 347, 921–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G. F. R., Kirchner, U. and Stoeger, W. R. (2006). Multiverses and cosmology: philosophical issues. http://arXiv/org/abs/astro~ph/0407329.
Feinberg, G. and Shapiro, R. (1980). Life beyond Earth. New York, NY: Morrow.Google Scholar
Fry, I. (1996). On the biological significance of the properties of matter: L. J. Henderson's theory of the fitness of the environment. Journal of the History of Biology, 29, 155–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of Ages. New York, NY: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Grunbaum, A. (1998). Theological misinterpretations of current physical cosmology. Philo, 1, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, A. (1981). Inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Physical Reviews, D23, 347–56.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. (1995). The natural selection of universes capable of containing intelligent life. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 36, 193–203.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. J. (1913). The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter. New York: Macmillan. Repr. (1958), Boston, MA: Beacon Press; (1970), Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. J. (1916). Teleology in cosmic evolution: a reply to Professor Warren. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Method, 13, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, F. (1954). The nuclear reactions occurring in very hot stars. Astrophysical Journal, 1 (suppl.), 121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, F. (1965). Galaxies, Nuclei, and Quasars. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Leslie, J. (1996). Universes. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Linde, A. D. (1990a). Inflation and Quantum Cosmology. Boston, MA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linde, A. D. (1990b). Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology. New York, NY: Harwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, N., ed. (2003). God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, N. and Thrush, M. J. (2003). Fine-tuning, multiple universes, and the “this universe” objection. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 84, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, E. (1981). How should cosmology relate to theology? In The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century, ed. Peacocke, A.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 17–57.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (1988). Natural science and belief in a Creator. In Physics, Philosophy, and Theology, ed. Russell, R. J., Stoeger, W. R. and Coyne, G. V.. Rome: Vatican Observatory Press, pp. 49–79.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (1992). The Inference That Makes Science, Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (1993). Indifference Principle and Anthropic Principle in the history of cosmology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 359–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, E. (2007). The virtues of a good theory. In The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science, ed. Psillos, S. and Curd, M.. London: Routledge, in press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. J. and Terrero-Escalante, C. A. (2004). Primordial fluctuations and cosmological inflation after WMAP 1.0: http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0403129 and Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 0408, 003–22.CrossRef
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V.et al. (2003). First year WMAP observations: determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 148, 175–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilenkin, A. (1995). Predictions from quantum cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 74, 846–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, S. (2000). A priori probability distribution of the cosmological constant. Physical Review, D61, 103905, 1–4.Google Scholar
White, R. (2000). Fine tuning and multiple universes. Nous, 34, 260–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×