Technical knowledge and making cotton king

Margaret C. Jacob

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107358355.004

3 - Technical knowledge and making cotton king

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Margaret C. Jacob

Show author details

Margaret C. Jacob: Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The story about the need for technical knowledge to access coal in Northumberland’s deep mines has an analogue in the manufacturing of cotton. For decades, in both industries, we have been told that learned knowledge – as distinct from practice – had nothing to do with the First Industrial Revolution, that skilled artisans who seldom cracked a book held the key to British industrial prowess in cotton. In the production of cotton cloth, emphasis has been laid upon water power as distinct from steam, and thus the knowledge of mechanics – the science of local motion – needed to employ power technology has been neglected.

As with Boulton and Watt, two leaders in mechanized cotton production will have to stand in for the first generation of cotton manufacturers. As a leading cotton baron and one of the subjects of this chapter, John Kennedy (b. 1769) eventually became a wealthy man. In order to assemble his factory Kennedy had to understand different rates of velocity and the impact that a steam engine would have on spinning. Just as important, he had to understand and approve – or alter – plans for the mechanization of his cotton factory drawn up by civil engineers, in this case Boulton and Watt. Eventually Kennedy, in partnership with James M’Connel (b. 1762), figured out how to use the Watt engine effectively, and together they became among the leading cotton industrialists of Manchester.

Type: Chapter
Information: The First Knowledge Economy
Human Capital and the European Economy, 1750–1850
, pp. 85 - 109

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107358355.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chapman, S. D., The Cotton Industry in the Industrial Revolution (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Tann, J., “Fixed Capital Formation in Steam Power 1775–1825: A Case Study of the Boulton and Watt Engine,” in Studies in Capital Formation in the United Kingdom 1750–1920, ed. Feinstein, Charles H. and Pollard, Sidney (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), p. 179.Google Scholar

Kennedy, John, A Brief Memoir of Samuel Crompton; With a Description of His Machine Called the Mule, and of the Subsequent Improvement of the Machine by Others (Manchester: printed by Henry Smith, 1830), pp. 24–9Google Scholar

Kennedy, J., Miscellaneous Papers on Subjects Connected with the Manufactures of Lancashire reprinted from the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. Privately printed, 1849, pp. 1–18.

Huberman, M., “Industrial Relations and the Industrial Revolution: Evidence from M’Connel and Kennedy, 1810–1840,” The Business History Review, 65, Summer 1991, pp. 345–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, C. H., A Cotton Enterprise: 1795–1840: A History of M’Connel & Kennedy, Fine Cotton Spinners (Manchester University Press, 1972), p. 10.Google Scholar

Baines, Jr. E., History of the Cotton Manufacture in Great Britain (London: Fisher, Fisher & Jackson, 1835), p. 148.Google Scholar

Timmins, G., “Technological Change,” in The Lancashire Cotton Industry: A History since 1700, ed. Rose, Mary B. (Preston: Lancashire County Books, 1996), pp. 29–62.Google Scholar

Fairbairn, W., A Brief Memoir of the Late John Kennedy, Esq. (Manchester: Charles Simms & Co., 1861), pp. 4–8Google Scholar

Henry, W. C., “A Biographical Notice of the Late Peter Ewart, Esq.,” Memoirs of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, Second Series, No. 7 (1846), pp. 113–36Google Scholar

Rose, M. B., The Gregs of Quarry Bank Mill: The Rise and Decline of a Family Firm, 1750–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar

Guest, R., A Compendious History of the Cotton Manufacture (1823; reprint, London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd., 1968).Google Scholar

Kennedy, J., On the Exportation of Machinery: A Letter Addressed to the Hon. E.G. Stanley, M.P. (London: Hurst & Co., 1824), p. 16Google Scholar

Bertuglia, et al., Innovative Behavior in Space and Time (Berlin: Springer, 2000), pp. 4 and 18–19.Google Scholar

Jacob, M. C., “Commerce, Industry and the Laws of Newtonian Science: Weber Revisited and Revised,” Canadian Journal of History, 35, August 2000, pp. 275–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allen, Z., The Science of Mechanics, (Providence: 1829)Google Scholar

Drake, D., An Anniversary Discourse on the State and Prospects of the Western Museum Society (Cincinnati, OH: 1820), pp. 32–3Google Scholar

Stapleton, D. H., The Transfer of Early Industrial Technologies to America (Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society, 1987), p. 126.Google Scholar

Edgeworth, M. and Edgeworth, R. L., Practical Education, 3 vols. (London, 1801: reprint, Poole: Woodstock Books, 1996)Google Scholar

Report of the Committee of the Birmingham Mechanics’ Institution, Read at the Ninth Anniversary Meeting, Held Friday, January 2, 1835, in the Lecture Room, Cannon-Street (Birmingham: printed by J. W. Showell, 1835).

Chamber of Commerce, Enquête faite par ordre du Parlement d’Angleterre pour constater les progrès de l’industrie en France (Paris: Boudouin, 1825), pp. 137–61

Watts, M. R., The Dissenters, Vol. II, The Expansion of Evangelical Nonconformity (Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 332.Google Scholar

Morus, I. R., Frankenstein’s Children: Electricity, Exhibition, and Experiment in Early-Nineteenth-Century London (Princeton University Press, 1998), p. 189Google Scholar

Fraser, D., ed., Municipal Reform and the Industrial City (Leicester University Press, 1982), p. 23.

Seed, J., “Unitarianism, Political Economy, and the Antinomies of Liberal Culture in Manchester, 1830–50,” Social History, 7, 1982, pp. 1–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Eckersley, R.’s “The Drum Major of Sedition: The Life and Political Career of John Cartwright, 1740–1824” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester, 1999)Google Scholar

Wade, R., The Rise of Nonconformity in Manchester with a Brief Sketch of the History of Cross Street Chapel (Manchester: Johnson and Rawson, 1880); p. 26Google Scholar

Carlson, R. E., The Liverpool and Manchester Railway Project, 1821–1831 (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1969), p. 50.Google Scholar

Watts, M. R., The Dissenters, Vol. I, From the Reformation to the French Revolution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 464–71Google Scholar

Goring, J., “The Breakup of Old Dissent,” in The English Presbyterians: From Elizabethan Puritanism to Modern Unitarianism, ed. Bolam, et al. (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1968), pp. 175–218Google Scholar

Webb, R. K., “The Emergence of Rational Dissent,” in Enlightenment and Religion: Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-Century Britain, ed. Haakonssen, Knud (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 12–41.Google Scholar

Thackray, A., “Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model,” American Historical Review, 79, 1974, pp. 672–709.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrar, W. V., Chemistry and the Chemical Industry in the 19th Century: The Henrys of Manchester and Other Studies, ed. Hills, R. L. and Brock, W. H. (Aldershot: Variorum, 1997), Vol. I, pp. 187–91.Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, E., “Some Account of the Late Mr. Ewart’s Paper on the Measure of Moving Forces; and on the Recent Applications of the Principles of Living Forces to Estimate the Effects of Machines and Movers,” Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, Second Series, 7, 1846, pp. 137–56.Google Scholar

Raymond, J. and Pickstone, J. V., “The Natural Sciences and the Learning of the English Unitarians,” in Truth, Liberty, Religion: Essays Celebrating Two Hundred Years of Manchester College, ed. Smith, Barbara (Oxford: Manchester College Oxford, 1986), pp. 127–64, 134–5.Google Scholar

Kennedy, J., On the Exportation of Machinery: A Letter Addressed to the Hon. E.G. Stanley, M.P. (London: Longman, Hurst & Co. et al., 1824).Google Scholar

Kennedy, J., Observations on the Rise and Progress of the Cotton Trade in Great Britain, Particularly in Lancashire and the Adjoining Counties (Manchester: The Executors of the Late S. Russell, 1818), p. 20Google Scholar

Inkster, I., “The Social Context of an Educational Movement: A Revisionist Approach to the English Mechanics’ Institutes, 1820–1850,” in Scientific Culture and Urbanisation in Industrialising Britain (Aldershot: Ashgate, Variorum, 1997).Google Scholar

Mokyr, J., “Entrepreneurship and the Industrial Revolution in Britain,” in The Invention of Enterprise: Entrepreneurship from Ancient Mesopotamia to Modern Times, ed. Landes, D. S., Mokyr, J., and Baumol, W. J. (Princeton University Press, 2010), p. 203n.Google Scholar

Munford, A. A., The Manchester Grammar School, 1515–1915: A Regional Study of the Advancement of Learning in Manchester since the Reformation (London: Longmans and Green, 1919), p. 246.Google Scholar

Dalton, J., Experimental Essays. On the Constitution of mixed Gases; and the Force of Steam or Vapour from Water and other Liquids in different temperatures … read to Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, October 2, 16, 20, 1801 (Memoirs, 1802).