Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Things Fall Apart: Mukhamukham and the Failure of the Collective
- 2 The Domain of Inertia: Elippathayam and the Crisis of Masculinity
- 3 Master and Slave: Vidheyan and the Debasement of Power
- 4 The Server and the Served: Kodiyettam and the Politics of Consumption
- 5 The Search for Home: Swayamvaram and the Struggle with Conscience
- 6 Woman in the Doorway: Naalu Pennungal and Oru Pennum Randaanum
- 7 Making the Imaginary Real: Anantaram, Mathilukal and Nizhalkkuthu
- 8 The Dream of Emancipation: Kathapurushan and the Triumph of the Individual
- Filmography
- Notes
- Bibliography
- About the Author
- Index
4 - The Server and the Served: Kodiyettam and the Politics of Consumption
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Things Fall Apart: Mukhamukham and the Failure of the Collective
- 2 The Domain of Inertia: Elippathayam and the Crisis of Masculinity
- 3 Master and Slave: Vidheyan and the Debasement of Power
- 4 The Server and the Served: Kodiyettam and the Politics of Consumption
- 5 The Search for Home: Swayamvaram and the Struggle with Conscience
- 6 Woman in the Doorway: Naalu Pennungal and Oru Pennum Randaanum
- 7 Making the Imaginary Real: Anantaram, Mathilukal and Nizhalkkuthu
- 8 The Dream of Emancipation: Kathapurushan and the Triumph of the Individual
- Filmography
- Notes
- Bibliography
- About the Author
- Index
Summary
Kodiyettam (Ascent, 1977) is set in the 1970s, at a time when the Nehruvian dream had floundered in India and there was widespread discontent in the country. The 1964 split in the Communist Party along with the failure of political reforms in Kerala had led to a loss of faith in all governmental institutions and state-sponsored initiatives. But other than a few cursory references to political rallies and the expulsion of a Party member, the film makes no allusion to the events that were being hotly discussed and debated. Instead, Gopalakrishnan focuses on a village in Kerala where an unrepentant, regressive patriarchal culture has turned its back on modernity and all forms of progressive reform. Shaped by the legacy of feudalism, it is a culture of wasteful self-indulgence and degrading machismo. The men live suspended in a time-warp, outside all norms of productive social living—a community of outsiders. They are repeatedly associated with mindless consumption and a demeaning corporeality that symbolizes their depraved form of otherness. Some are callous fathers and husbands; others cheat on their wives. A few have short fuses that ignite suddenly and unpredictably. Most of their pathetic displays of power are directed at women. Emotionally and morally stunted, these men blindly subscribe to an oppressive ideology of self-serving excess.
Gopalakrishnan's critique of masculinity, then, is directed at an entire culture, a whole way of life. Since the people in the film are incapable of any collective form of redress, he invests in the individual's potential for emancipation and makes him a symbol of hope for the community at large. His protagonist, Sankarankutty, is an orphan in his early thirties who clings to an infantile state, refusing to grow up and become a man (as his mother-in-law subsequently laments). In relation to the other males, his symptoms are relatively minor, but they can be traced to the same malaise that has infected them all. Compared to these men, he is merely simple, foolish and naïve.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Films of Adoor GopalakrishnanA Cinema of Emancipation, pp. 63 - 78Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2015