Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- PART I TERRITORIAL STUDIES
- PART II HISTORICAL STUDIES
- NORMANS UNDER EDWARD THE CONFESSOR
- MR. FREEMAN AND THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS
- MASTER WACE
- NOTE ON THE PSEUDO-INGULF
- REGENBALD, PRIEST AND CHANCELLOR
- THE CONQUEROR AT EXETER
- THE ALLEGED DESTRUCTION OF LEICESTER (1068)
- ELY AND HER DESPOILERS (1072–75)
- THE LORDS OF ARDRES
- EARLY IRISH TRADE WITH CHESTER AND ROUEN
- WALTER TIREL AND HIS WIFE
- WALDRIC, WARRIOR AND CHANCELLOR
- A CHARTER OF HENRY I. (1123)
- THE ORIGIN OF THE NEVILLES
- THE ALLEGED INVASION OF ENGLAND IN 1147
- THE ALLEGED DEBATE ON DANEGELD (1163)
- A GLIMPSE OF THE YOUNG KING'S COURT (1170)
- THE FIRST KNOWN FINE (1175)
- THE MONTMORENCY IMPOSTURE
- THE OXFORD DEBATE ON FOREIGN SERVICE (1197)
- RICHARD THE FIRSTS CHANGE OF SEAL (1198)
- COMMUNAL HOUSE DEMOLITION
- THE CINQUE PORT CHARTERS
- ADDENDA
- INDEX
THE CONQUEROR AT EXETER
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2010
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Contents
- PART I TERRITORIAL STUDIES
- PART II HISTORICAL STUDIES
- NORMANS UNDER EDWARD THE CONFESSOR
- MR. FREEMAN AND THE BATTLE OF HASTINGS
- MASTER WACE
- NOTE ON THE PSEUDO-INGULF
- REGENBALD, PRIEST AND CHANCELLOR
- THE CONQUEROR AT EXETER
- THE ALLEGED DESTRUCTION OF LEICESTER (1068)
- ELY AND HER DESPOILERS (1072–75)
- THE LORDS OF ARDRES
- EARLY IRISH TRADE WITH CHESTER AND ROUEN
- WALTER TIREL AND HIS WIFE
- WALDRIC, WARRIOR AND CHANCELLOR
- A CHARTER OF HENRY I. (1123)
- THE ORIGIN OF THE NEVILLES
- THE ALLEGED INVASION OF ENGLAND IN 1147
- THE ALLEGED DEBATE ON DANEGELD (1163)
- A GLIMPSE OF THE YOUNG KING'S COURT (1170)
- THE FIRST KNOWN FINE (1175)
- THE MONTMORENCY IMPOSTURE
- THE OXFORD DEBATE ON FOREIGN SERVICE (1197)
- RICHARD THE FIRSTS CHANGE OF SEAL (1198)
- COMMUNAL HOUSE DEMOLITION
- THE CINQUE PORT CHARTERS
- ADDENDA
- INDEX
Summary
“And y seide nay, and proved hit by Domesday.”
FOR a companion study to the Battle of Hastings, one could not select a better subject than the Siege of Exeter by William in 1068. It is so, because, in the tale of the Conquest, “No city of England,” in Mr. Freeman's words, “comes so distinctly to the front as Exeter”; and because, as editor of “Historic Towns,” he chose Exeter, out of all others, as the town to be reserved for himself. “Its siege by William,” we are told, “is one of the most important events of his reign”; but it was doubtless the alleged “federal” character of Exeter's attitude at this crisis that gave its story for him an interest so unique. This episode, moreover, has many advantages: it is complete in itself; it is rich in suggestion; it is taken from the period in which the Professor described himself as “most at home”; and its scene is laid within his own borders, his own West Saxon land. It presents an admirable test of Mr. Freeman's work at the point where he was admittedly strongest, and his thoroughly typical treatment of it affords a perfect illustration of the method he employed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feudal EnglandHistorical Studies on the XIth and XIIth Centuries, pp. 431 - 455Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1895