Fetal urinary tract obstruction

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511997778.027

Chapter 14.2 - Fetal urinary tract obstruction

Prenatal assessment and prognosis

from Section 2 - Fetal disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013

Nahla Khalek and

Edited by

Anthony Johnson and

Mark D. Kilby: Affiliation:
Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson: Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Dick Oepkes: Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The natural history of congenital lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) is highly variable and dependent on the gender, severity, duration, and age of onset of the obstruction. Complete obstruction of the urethra early in gestation can lead to massive distention of the bladder, hydroureteronephrosis, and renal fibrocystic dysplasia. Inability of the urine to enter the amniotic space results in oligohydramnios, leading to pulmonary hypoplasia and secondary deformations of the face and extremities. Outcome is measured in terms of postnatal survival and is dependent on two factors: pulmonary development and renal function. Of these, pulmonary development may be the most critical for neonatal survival.

Experimental studies for evaluating fetal renal function

Prenatal clinical determination of renal injury in obstructive uropathy has been problematic [1–4]. Several studies have assessed the predictive value of the ultrasonographic appearance of the fetal kidneys as an indicator of damage. However, such observational impressions lack the sensitivity/specificity for accurate correlation with renal function [5–7]. As renal function deteriorates, urine production diminishes and is reflected by a decline in amniotic fluid volume. However, quantitative assessment of amniotic fluid volume alone is a poor measure of renal function, because renal dysplasia may already be irreversibly established by the time oligohydramnios is ultrasonographically detected [2, 8].

Keywords

urinary tract obstruction pulmonary development renal function smooth muscle hypertrophy prenatal therapy fetal urine fetal bladder

Type: Chapter
Information: Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 246 - 252

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997778.027 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kramer, SA. Current status of fetal intervention for congenital hydronephrosis. J Urol 1983;130(4):641–6.Google Scholar

Bellinger, MF, Comstock, CH, Grosso, D, et al. Fetal posterior urethral valves and renal dysplasia at 15 weeks gestational age. J Urol 1983;129(6):1238–9.Google Scholar

Wladimiroff, JW. Effect of furosemide on fetal urine production. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1975;82(3):221–4.Google Scholar

Chinn, DH, Filly, RA. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal genitourinary tract anomalies. Urol Radiol 1982;4(2–3):115–23.Google Scholar

Mahony, BS, Fill, RA, Callen, PW, et al. Fetal renal dysplasia: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 1984;152(1):143–6.Google Scholar

Glazer, GM, Filly, RA, Callen, PW. The varied sonographic appearance of urinary tract in the fetus and newborn with urethral obstruction. Radiology 1982;144(3):563–8.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Harrison, MR, Longaker, MT, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and management of bilateral hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 1988;2(3):334–42.Google Scholar

Lumbers, ER, Hill, KJ, Bennett, VJ. Proximal and distal tubular activity in chronically catheterized fetal sheep compared with the adult. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1988;66(6):697–702.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR, Flake, AW, et al. Development of a fetal renal function test using endogenous creatinine clearance. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20(6):602–7.Google Scholar

Glick, PL, Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, et al. Management of the fetus with congenital hydronephrosis II. Prognostic criteria and selection for treatment. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20(6):376–87.Google Scholar

Morris, RK, Quinlan-Jones, E, Kilby, MD, Khan, KS. Systematic review of accuracy of fetal urine analysis to predict poor postnatal renal function in cases of congenital urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:900–91.Google Scholar

Johnson, MP, Corsi, P, Badfield, W, et al. Sequential urinalysis improves evaluation of fetal renal function in obstructive uropathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173(1):59–65.Google Scholar

Mussap, M, Fanos, V, Pizzini, C, et al. Predictive value of amniotic fluid cystatin C levels for the early identification of fetuses with obstructive uropathies. BJOG 2002;109(7)9:778–83.Google Scholar

Reed, C. Diagnostic applications of cystatin C. Br J Biomed Sci 2000;57(4):323–9.Google Scholar

Nicksa, GA, Yu, DC, Curatolo, A, et al. Prenatal urinary matrix metalloproteinase profiling as a potential diagnostic tool in fetal obstructive uropathy. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:70–3.Google Scholar

Freedman, AL, Bukowski, TP, Smith, CA, et al. Fetal therapy for obstructive uropathy: diagnosis-specific outcomes. J Urol 1996;156(2 Pt 2):720–3.Google Scholar

Nicksa, GA, O’Neill, E, Yu, DC, et al. Correlation between prenatal urinary matrix metalloproteinase activity and the degree of kidney damage in a large animal model of congenital obstructive uropathy. J Ped Surg 2010;45:1120–5.Google Scholar

Johnson, MP, Bukowski, TP, Reitleman, C, et al. In-utero surgical treatment of fetal obstructive uropathy: a new comprehensive approach to identify appropriate candidates for vesicoamniotic shunt therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170(6):1770–6.Google Scholar

Freedman, AL, Qureshi, F, Shapiro, E, et al. Smooth muscle development in the obstructed fetal bladder. Urology 1997;49(1):104–7.Google Scholar

Feldman, B, Hassan, S, Kramer, RL, et al. Amnioinfusion in the evaluation of fetal obstructive uropathy: the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on complication rates. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999;14(3):172–5.Google Scholar

Qureshi, F, Jacques, SM, Seifman, B, et al. In-utero fetal urine analysis and renal histology do correlate with the outcome in fetal obstructive uropathies. Fetal Diag Ther 1996;11(5):306–12.Google Scholar

Manning, FA, Harrison, MR, Rodeck, C. Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus: report of the international Fetal Surgery Registry. N Engl J Med 1986;315(5):336–40.Google Scholar

Crombleholme, TM, Harrison, MR, Golbus, MS, et al. Fetal intervention in obstructive uropathy: prognostic indicators and efficacy of intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162(5):1239–44.Google Scholar

Sholder, AJ, Maizels, M, Depp, B, et al. Caution in antenatal intervention. J Urol 1988;139(5):1026–9.Google Scholar

Coplen, DE, Hare, JY, Zderic, SA, et al. 10-year experience with prenatal intervention for hydronephrosis. J Urol 1996;156(3):1142–5.Google Scholar

Freedman, AL, Johnson, MP, Smith, CA, et al. Long-term outcome in children after antenatal intervention for obstructive uropathies. Lancet 1999;345(9176):374–7.Google Scholar

McLorie, G, Farhat, W, Khoury, A, Geary, D, Ryan, G. Outcome analysis of vesicoamniotic shunting in a comprehensive population. J Urol 2001;166(3):1036–40.Google Scholar

Biard, J, Johnson, MP, Carr, MC, et al. Long-term outcomes in children treated by prenatal shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106(3):503.Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 14.2 - Fetal urinary tract obstruction

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive