Ethics of fetal therapy

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511997778.006

Chapter 4 - Ethics of fetal therapy

from Section 1 - General principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2013

Frank A. Chervenak and

Laurence B. McCullough

Edited by

Mark D. Kilby ,

Anthony Johnson and

Dick Oepkes

Show author details

Mark D. Kilby: Affiliation:
Department of Fetal Medicine, University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson: Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas
Dick Oepkes: Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This volume addresses the rapidly evolving discipline of fetal therapy, including both non-invasive and invasive methods. It is obvious that ethics is an essential dimension of this enterprise [1–3]. Less than optimal consideration of the ethical dimensions and processes of fetal therapy can have serious clinical sequelae for pregnant women, fetal patients, and future children. Ongoing research is crucial in any evolving area of clinical practice and this is especially true in fetal therapy. In this chapter we therefore provide an ethical framework to guide clinical investigation and the translation of its results into clinical practice. In the first section of this chapter we provide an ethical framework for fetal therapy in both clinical research and practice. On the basis of this ethical framework, we then provide ethically justified criteria for innovation, clinical investigation, and the responsible transition from clinical investigation to clinical practice.

An ethical framework for fetal therapy

Medical ethics

Ethics can be defined as the disciplined study of morality. Medical ethics is the disciplined study of morality in medicine and has been part of the history of medicine globally since ancient times [4]. Medical ethics identifies the ethical obligations of physicians and healthcare organizations to patients as well as the obligations of patients [5]. There are multiple sources of morality in pluralistic societies and across societies. These include law, local and regional history, the world’s religions, ethnic and cultural traditions, families, personal experience, and the traditions and practices of medicine, including medical education and training.

Keywords

pregnant woman healthcare organizations medical ethics physician fetal therapy beneficence principle clinical research

Type: Chapter
Information: Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
, pp. 39 - 44

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511997778.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:10–14.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioethics 2011;11:39–49.Google Scholar

Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th edn. New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.

McCullough, LB. The discourses of practitioners in eighteenth-century Britain. In: Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2009; 403–13.

Hippocrates. Oath of Hippocrates. In: Temkin, O, Temkin, CL, eds. Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press. 1976; 6.

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Birnbach, DJ. Ethics: an essential dimension of clinical obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1480–5.Google Scholar

Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1986.

Department of Health and Human Services. Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects. 45 CFR 46. Available at , accessed May 14, 2011.

McCullough, LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS, Grisso, T, Renaud, M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1689–97.Google Scholar

Brody, BA. The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998.

Brody, BA, McCullough, LB, Sharp, R. Consensus and controversy in research ethics. JAMA 2005;294:1411–14.Google Scholar

Lilford, RJ. The substantive ethics of clinical trials. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992;35:837–45.Google Scholar

Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, et al. A randomized trial prenatal versus postnatal repair of meningomyeocele. N Engl J Med 2011;364:993–1004.Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 4 - Ethics of fetal therapy

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive